Association of vitamin intake with health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: It is still uncertain whether vitamin intake is associated with better quality of life in hemodialysis patients. This study aims to assess the association between the quantity of supplemented vitamins and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included all patients on chronic hemodialysis from three units. Vitamins and micronutrients assessed were B1, B6, B12, C, D, folic acid, menaquinone, carnitine, zinc, and coenzyme Q10. Quality of life scores included the 8 domains of SF-36 and the 11 domains of the Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQOL). Bivariate analysis compared two groups of patients divided based on the median of vitamin intake. Spearman Rho test assessed the correlation between number of vitamins and different dimensions of HRQoL. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were included. Median number of vitamins supplemented was 2 (1,3); 112 patients had an intake of ≤ 2 vitamins, and 71 patients were taking > 2 vitamins. There was a significant association between higher vitamin intake and the burden of kidney disease that remained significant in the multivariable analysis (p = 0.03), but no correlation between the number of vitamins (0 - 13) and different HRQoL scores. Sub-analyses of each category of vitamins showed no significant difference in HRQoL scores except for Vitamin B and staff encouragement (p = 0.01) and for multivitamins and quality of social interaction (p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A higher number of vitamins in hemodialysis patients is associated with an increased perception of the burden of kidney disease. Interventional studies are needed to assess whether selective vitamin supplementation in case of deficiencies is associated with better quality of life.

Routine laboratory testing in hemodialysis: how frequently is it needed?

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients are followed by routine laboratory testing. There is uncertainty whether these tests always lead to a change in decision-making. This study aims to discover the number of yearly interventions/changes in prescription based on these tests and depict the group of patients who would benefit from reduced or increased laboratory blood tests. METHODS: This is a multi-center retrospective study that included patients on hemodialysis for more than one year. Laboratory data collected included yearly average of hemoglobin, urea reduction ratio (URR), serum phosphate, calcium, potassium, parathormone (PTH), ferritin and transferrin saturation (TSAT); changes in prescription of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs), intravenous (IV) iron, alfacalcidol, phosphate binders and dialysis parameters were retrieved from medical records. A multivariate regression analysis assessed factors associated with high number of interventions. RESULTS: A total of 210 hemodialysis patients were included: 62.4% males, 47.1% diabetics. Their median age was 72 (62,78.5) years. Their laboratory parameters were within KDIGO targets. The median number of yearly interventions was 5 (3,7) for ESAs, 4 (2,6) for IV iron, 1 (0,2.25) for phosphate binders, 0 (0,1) for alfacalcidol. Based on the multivariate analysis, patients with higher ferritin, frequent changes in ESA, more changes in alfacalcidol and higher PTH had higher number of prescription's changes in ESA, IV iron, phosphate binders and alfacalcidol respectively. CONCLUSION: While maintaining KDIGO targets, therapeutic interventions following routine laboratory testing did not exceed six times yearly for all parameters. This suggests that a reduced testing frequency in hemodialysis patients is possible without any impact on quality of care. A personalized approach remains safe for hemodialysis patients while reducing the cost. This is very relevant in low-resource settings and during economic crises and needs to be evaluated in prospective studies.

Evaluation of chronic kidney disease in cancer patients: is there a preferred estimation formula?

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in cancer patients seems to rely mostly on the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula or the creatinine levels to adjust treatment dosages which is a practice refuted by internists. AIMS: We evaluate the overall agreement of the CG, modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and CKD-epidemiology collaboration equations (CKD-EPI) equation with the newly devised Janowitz and Williams' (JW) equation. METHODS: The renal function was estimated in 235 cancer patients according to the CG, MDRD, body surface area (BSA)-adjusted MDRD, CKD-EPI, BSA-adjusted CKD-EPI and JW formulae. RESULTS: JW equation was more in agreement with CG and CKD-EPI estimations than the other equations. Taking JW equation as reference, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that CG eGFR had the higher area under the curve when compared with other equations. Hierarchical cluster analysis showed more proximity between CG and JW equations than the other equations. CONCLUSION: The newly proposed JW eGFR estimation was more in agreement with CG equation than the other equations.

Clinical and histological predictors of long-term kidney graft survival.

Renal transplantation is the best option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), but its half-life is limited to a decade. Clinical and histological markers measurable within the first year of transplantation can be used to predict its outcome. These markers are important for selecting kidneys for transplantation, for identifying the main causes of late allograft loss, for therapeutic decisions and as surrogate markers in therapeutic trials. 'Basal state' markers, such as age, glomerular filtration rate and fibrotic lesions, are highly predictive of allograft loss, showing that early and stable pathological mechanisms contribute considerably to this loss. On the other hand, some more dynamic predictors such as treatment, recurrence of the initial disease, inflammation and epithelial phenotypic changes offer clinicians and researchers opportunities to influence the fate of allografts.

Anemia biomarkers and mortality in hemodialysis patients with or without diabetes: A 10-year follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Many studies have assessed the association between anemia and mortality in hemodialysis but few compared patients with and without diabetes. Our study aims to investigate the impact of hemoglobin and iron parameters on mortality in hemodialysis patients with or without diabetes. METHODS: This is a two-center retrospective study that included all adult patients who started hemodialysis between February 2012 and February 2020, followed until January 2021. Averages of hemoglobin, ferritin and transferrin saturation of entire follow-up were recorded. Kaplan Meier survival, log rank test and cox regression analyses were performed to assess the association between anemia biomarkers and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were included. Mean age was 67.98 ±12.41 years, mean hemoglobin was 10.92 ±0.75 g/dL, mean ferritin was 504.43 ± 221.42 ng/mL and mean transferrin saturation was 26.23 ±7.77%. Log rank test showed an association between hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL and better survival in patients without diabetes (P = 0.028). Based on cox regression analysis, hemoglobin was associated with all-cause mortality in all patients (HR = 0.66; CI:0.49,0.89; P = 0.007). When comparing patients with and without diabetes, this association remained significant only in patients without diabetes (HR = 0.53; CI:0.37,0.77; P<0.001). Based on different multivariate models, hemoglobin, ferritin and age were independent factors associated with mortality in patients without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that hemoglobin ≥11 g/dL is associated with better survival in hemodialysis patients without diabetes but not in those with diabetes. These differences need to be further explored in other countries and settings. An individualization of the hemoglobin target level might be necessary to improve patients' outcomes.

Exploring the knowledge gap of immune checkpoint inhibitors in chronic renal failure: A systematic review of the literature.

Targeting the immune system with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) to treat cancer has been lately adopted with a significant improvement of patients' survival. In parallel, the incidence of malignancy in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is increasing, but solid evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of ICI in this population is lacking. Moreover, the use of these agents as immunity boosters in kidney graft recipients treated with immunosuppressors is still controversial. We present in this article a review of the pharmacological properties of these drugs and their behavior with kidney failure and dialysis, as well as evidence of their use in different populations of CKD. Most of the available data are limited to case reports and case series. These drugs appear to be safe without dose adjustment in CKD patients and patients on dialysis. A major concern with this therapy in transplanted patients remains the risk of graft rejection.

Effective treatment with Tocilizumab in a COVID-19 patient on maintenance hemodialysis: A case report.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly spreading infective disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2). The management of this disease remains a challenge particularly in certain subgroups of patients such in hemodialysis patients who have higher exposure rates due to the nature of their in-hospital care, and higher mortality due to their burden of comorbidities. We report a case of a 52-year-old patient with Von Hippel Lindau syndrome and end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis who contracted COVID-19 infection. Despite the patient's rapidly deteriorating clinical status he was successfully treated with Tocilizumab, after which he showed rapid improvement in his clinical, biological and radiological parameters. Although few studies were available regarding the use of Tocilizumab in the dialysis population, its use proved to be effective and well tolerated in our patient.

EMT-MET in renal disease: should we curb our enthusiasm?

Renal epithelial cells arise during embryogenesis by mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET). In the context of renal diseases, these cells can switch back to a mesenchymal phenotype, in a process thus reminiscent of an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in which we referred to as "Epithelial Phenotypic Changes" (EPC). The pathophysiological consequence of EPC is controversial: in particular, to what extent EPC contribute to the pool of disease-associated renal fibroblasts is very uncertain. However, there is strong evidence that EPC correlate with a poor renal outcome. EPC indeed reflect an exposure to a profibrotic environment, at an early and potentially reversible stage. Detecting EPC has potential therapeutic implications for patients prone to renal fibrosis, both as a marker of efficacy or more directly as a target. In opposition to the EMT occurring during embryogenesis, EMT in fibrosis as well as in cancer is an anarchic cellular process actually developing at the expense of the whole organ(ism).