RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess swallowing and laryngeal function at long-term follow-up in patients treated for severe COVID-19 in the ICU. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with severe COVID-19 were prospectively examined with fiberendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) about 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge. Comparison with initial FEES examinations during the time in hospital was performed in 17 patients. Analysis of swallowing function and laryngeal features was performed from video recordings. Twenty-five participants responded to Eating Assessment Tool, Voice Handicap Index, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at follow-up. RESULTS: Penetration to the laryngeal vestibule (PAS ≥ 3) was seen in 22% and silent aspiration (PAS = 8) in 11% of patients on at least one swallow at follow-up. Fourteen percent had obvious residue in the vallecula and/or pyriform sinuses after swallowing thick liquid or biscuits. Self-reported eating and swallowing difficulties were found in 40% of patients. Abnormal findings in the larynx were present in 53% at follow-up. Thirty-three percent had reduced or impaired vocal fold movement, of whom 22% had bilateral impaired abduction of the vocal folds. Possible anxiety and depression were found in 36% and 24% of responders, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although a majority of patients appear to regain normal swallowing function by 1 year after treatment for severe COVID-19, our results indicate that dysphagia, abnormal laryngeal function, and anxiety/depression may remain in a substantial proportion of patients. This suggests that swallowing and laryngeal function, and emotional symptoms, should be followed up systematically over time in this patient group.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos de Deglución , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Masculino , Femenino , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Estudios de Seguimiento , Laringe/fisiopatología , Cuidados Críticos , Deglución/fisiología , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the experiences of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors with postradiation trismus, specifically how oncological treatment affected their lives, rehabilitation, use of coping strategies, and healthcare experiences. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive approach was used and semi-structured interviews of 10 HNC survivors with postradiation trismus were conducted 6-30 months after completing oncological treatment. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed by qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The analysis of interviews yielded four main categories: Bodily symptoms, Effects on life, Support from the healthcare system, and Strategies to handle life and symptoms. Participants reported ongoing problems with xerostomia, dysgeusia, eating, and limited physical fitness. Pain related to trismus was not a major issue in this cohort. Participants expressed limitations in their social lives due to their eating difficulties, yet a sense of thankfulness for life and overall satisfaction with the healthcare they received. Psychological and practical coping strategies developed by the participants were also revealed. CONCLUSION: The results highlight areas of unmet need among HNC survivors that healthcare providers can target by establishing multi-professional teams dedicated to individualizing post-cancer rehabilitation care.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida , Trismo , Humanos , Trismo/etiología , Trismo/psicología , Trismo/rehabilitación , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Anciano , Adulto , Apoyo Social , Traumatismos por Radiación/psicología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/rehabilitación , Habilidades de AfrontamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to adapt the Swedish version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) to the International Outcome Inventory for Alternative Interventions (IOI-AI) in the context of ear surgery (IOI-AIop) and to test the psychometric properties. DESIGN: The validated Swedish questionnaire IOI-HA was adapted to the IOI-AIop by omitting the question about hearing aid use and changing the term "hearing aid" to "surgery" in the remaining items. The validity, component structure and reliability of the IOI-AIop were assessed. STUDY SAMPLE: Subjects diagnosed with otosclerosis and undergoing stapedotomy were included in the study (n = 162). RESULTS: High mean scores were noted for all items. Ceiling effects were noted, most pronounced for the satisfaction item. Principal component analysis (PCA) yielded a two-component structure explaining 77.5% of the variance. The test-retest reliability measured by intra class correlation coefficient was >0.9, and the internal consistency coefficient measured by Cronbach's alfa was >0.8. CONCLUSION: The IOI-AIop showed good psychometric properties. However, ceiling effects were observed. The two-component solution was in line with previous factor analyses of the IOI-HA and the IOI-AI. The comprehensive IOI-AIop is recommended as a useful tool to evaluate patient perspectives after ear surgery.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Trismus, marked by restricted mouth opening, significantly affects patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD) and head and neck cancer (HNC). Despite its prevalence, specialized questionnaires for trismus assessment are scarce. This study aims to fill this gap by translating and validating the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire version 2 (GTQ-2) into Chinese (C-GTQ-2), enhancing the evaluation of trismus in HNC and TMD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 78 HNC patients, 75 TMD patients, and a control group of 150 individuals without trismus symptoms. Participants were asked to complete the C-GTQ-2 and other health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments. A subset of 30 individuals retook the questionnaire within two weeks to assess test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The C-GTQ-2 demonstrated remarkable reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values exceeding 0.70 in three of the four domains, indicating high internal consistency. The instrument also showcased high intra-class correlations in the test-retest, affirming its reliability. Furthermore, it exhibited strong convergent validity, aligning well with other HRQL instruments, and effectively discriminated between patients with and without trismus, establishing its discriminant validity. CONCLUSIONS: The C-GTQ-2 emerges as a valid and reliable tool for assessing trismus in HNC and TMD patients, promising to significantly enhance both clinical and research approaches to managing trismus-related complications in the Chinese-speaking demographic. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: C-GTQ-2 proves effective for trismus assessment in head and neck cancer and temporomandibular disorder patients, offering enhanced clinical and research utility.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Trismo/diagnóstico , Trismo/etiología , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/complicaciones , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , PsicometríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Limitation of mouth opening, widely known as trismus, is a major symptom altering quality of life in individuals presenting from temporomandibular joint disorder or head and neck cancer. A French-language instrument addressing jaw opening limitation following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) or temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD) is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire-2 (GTQ-2) into French. METHODS: A French translation of the GTQ-2 was performed according to established international guidelines, leading to the French-GTQ-2 (F-GTQ-2). The validation study included 154 participants with trismus (minimum interincisal opening of ≤35 mm) following treatment for TMD or HNC and 149 age-matched participants without trismus. All participants completed the F-GTQ-2 and participants with trismus completed additional health-related quality of life questionnaires to allow for analysis of convergent validity. RESULTS: The F-GTQ-2 demonstrated retained psychometric properties with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.70 for the domains, jaw-related problems, eating limitations, facial pain and somewhat lower for muscular tension (0.60). Mainly moderate correlations were found when comparing the F-GTQ-2 to other instruments, which was in line with the pre-specified hypotheses, indicating satisfactory convergent validity. Discriminant validity was found with statistically significant differences in all domains of the F-GTQ-2 between trismus and non-trismus participants. CONCLUSION: The F-GTQ-2 can be considered a reliable and valid instrument to assess jaw-related difficulties in individuals with trismus due to HNC or TMD.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Traducciones , Trismo , Humanos , Trismo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Adulto , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/psicología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/complicaciones , Anciano , Francia , Dolor Facial/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined health related Quality of Life (HR-QoL) during the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) with even fewer focusing on the impact of oral mucositis (OM) on HR-QoL. Studies performed during treatment of HNC makes it possible to follow fluctuations in HR-QoL, OM and other treatment related side effects. The aim was to prospectively analyze HR-QoL, changes in clinical variables and the impact of OM on HR-QoL during HNC treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited before commencing curative cancer treatment and were given professional oral care weekly during oncologic treatment. HR-QoL was reported before, during (week 2, 4 and 6) and three months after treatment using the EORTC Quality of Life questionnaires C30 and H&N35 and the stimulated whole salivary secretion rate was determined at the same time-points. OM (erythema and ulceration) was registered using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), at baseline, weekly during treatment and post treatment. Differences in HR-QoL between different timepoints were analyzed. To analyze the impact of OM on HR-QoL the patients were categorized into two groups: no/mild OM (OMAS ulceration score 0-1) or severe OM (OMAS ulceration score ≥ 2) and HR-QoL was compared between the two OM groups at three timepoints during treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (43 men, 14 women), with a mean age of 58 years were included. Patients reported progressively impaired HR-QoL, with peak issues noted at weeks 4 and 6, particularly in social eating, senses, appetite loss, sticky saliva, and decreasing salivary secretion rates were determined. Patients with severe OM reported worse HR-QoL compared to those with no/mild OM. Persistent problems 3 months post treatment were appetite loss, dry mouth, senses (smell and taste) and problems with social eating. CONCLUSION: Patients experienced exacerbated symptoms and problems weeks 4 and 6 of oncological treatment, especially among those with severe OM, stressing the importance of clinically monitoring the patients to reduce and alleviate their symptoms. Persistent problems three months post treatment are likely associated with the reduced salivary secretion rate indicating that patients should be monitored also after completed oncological treatment.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Salud Bucal , Calidad de Vida , Estomatitis , Humanos , Estomatitis/etiología , Estomatitis/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Anciano , Adulto , Xerostomía/psicología , Xerostomía/etiología , Estudios de Seguimiento , Saliva/metabolismo , Saliva/química , Salivación/efectos de los fármacos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Radiotherapy-induced trismus is present in up to 40% of patients treated radiotherapeutically for head and neck cancer (HNC) and impacts health-related quality of life (HRQL) negatively. This prospective study aimed to investigate the development of trismus and its influence on HRQL and trismus-related symptoms in HNC patients for up to 5 years post-radiotherapy completion as no such follow-up studies exist. METHODS: Patients (n = 211) were followed prospectively from pre-radiotherapy to 12 and 60 months post-radiotherapy. At each follow-up, maximum interincisal opening (MIO) was measured, and patients filled in the European Organization for Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), Head and Neck-35 (EORTC QLQ-HN35), and Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire (GTQ). Trismus was defined as an MIO ≤ 35 mm. RESULTS: At 1 year post-radiotherapy, a total of 27% met the trismus criterion, and at 5 years post-radiotherapy, the corresponding figure was 28%. Patients in the trismus group scored significantly worse compared to the patients without trismus on 8/15 domains at 1 year post-radiotherapy on EORTC QLQ-C30, further worsening in 11/15 domains at 5 years post-radiotherapy. Similar results were found for EORTC QLQ-HN35. Patients with trismus reported more trismus-related symptoms according to the GTQ at both timepoints compared to those without trismus. CONCLUSION: This study highlights that HNC patients suffering from radiotherapy-induced trismus report poorer HRQL and more trismus-specific symptoms compared to patients without trismus. These differences persist and increase up to at least 5 years following treatment completion. Hence, our results highlight that radiotherapy-induced trismus affects long-term HRQL, jaw symptoms, and pain, further stressing the need for early and structured intervention.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Trismo , Humanos , Trismo/epidemiología , Trismo/etiología , Trismo/diagnóstico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pain is a frequent symptom of head and neck cancer (HNC) but longitudinal studies investigating facial pain are scarce. We aimed to investigate prevalence of facial pain, its effect on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and trismus-related symptoms in a HNC cohort. METHODS: Patients (n = 194) were prospectively followed post completion of radiotherapy (RT). Outcome measures included facial pain, HRQL, trismus-specific symptoms, and maximal interincisal opening (MIO). RESULTS: Facial pain was reported by 50% at baseline. Corresponding figures for 3-, 12-, and 60 months post-RT were 70%, 54% and 41%. Moderate to severe pain was reported in 29-44% of patients reporting pain during the study period. Patients reporting pain scored significantly worse on more HRQL variables and trismus symptoms, as well as had significantly smaller MIO at all follow-up time points. CONCLUSIONS: Facial pain was common in HNC patients pre- and post-RT and remained prevalent up to 5 years after completion of RT. Reductions in MIO were associated with more facial pain. Pain was also associated with worse HRQL.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Oncología por Radiación , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Trismo/epidemiología , Trismo/etiología , Dolor Facial/epidemiología , Dolor Facial/etiología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapiaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to investigate hearing outcomes in stapes revision surgery with regard to the type of clinic (university clinic or county clinic). Furthermore, the aim was to investigate the risk of complications with a focus on tinnitus, hearing deterioration, and taste disturbance 1 year after surgery. METHODS: The study is based on data from the Swedish Quality Register for Otosclerosis Surgery (SQOS). Two study protocols were completed by the surgeon, and a questionnaire was distributed to the patients 1 year after surgery. A total of 156 revisions were available for analysis with both preoperative and postoperative audiometry data. RESULTS: Seventy-five percent of the patients reported better to much better hearing 1 year after revision surgery. An air bone gap ≤ 20 dB postoperatively was seen in 77% of the patients. Four percent had hearing deterioration ≥ 20 dB PTA4 AC. Eleven percent had worsened or newly developed tinnitus, 5% had taste disturbance, and 3% had dizziness 1 year after surgery. Preoperative and postoperative hearing did not differ between patients operated on in university vs. county clinics. CONCLUSIONS: Revision surgery in otosclerosis is a challenge for otologists, but no differences in hearing outcomes between university and county clinics were found in this nationwide study. The risk of hearing deterioration and deafness is higher than in primary stapes surgery, and revision surgery should be recommended primarily in cases with a large air-bone gap and moderate to severe preoperative hearing loss.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida Auditiva , Otosclerosis , Cirugía del Estribo , Acúfeno , Humanos , Otosclerosis/cirugía , Otosclerosis/complicaciones , Estribo , Suecia/epidemiología , Acúfeno/cirugía , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Universidades , Cirugía del Estribo/métodos , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Dysphagia is common after radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) and can affect health-related quality of life (HRQL). This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of the head-lift exercise (HLE) over 12 months in HNC patients with radiation-induced dysphagia. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with dysphagia were randomized to intervention group (n = 30) and control group (n = 31) at 6-36 months after completion of radiotherapy for HNC. Dysphagia-specific HRQL was measured with the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI); general and HNC-specific HRQL was measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and QLQ-H&N35. Measurements were made at baseline, and at 8 weeks and 12 months after start of intervention. RESULTS: Adherence to the intervention was good throughout the year. When comparing change from baseline reports to each follow-up no statistically significant differences between the groups were found in any of the HRQL instruments. There were some statistically significant changes within groups compared to baseline. The intervention group improved self-rated swallowing function on the MDADI at 8 weeks (emotional domain, p = 0.03; functional domain, p = 0.007; total score, p = 0.01) and the control at twelve months (emotional domain, p = 0.03; functional domain, p = 0.02; physical domain, p = 0.004; total score, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In this randomized control study, no effect was observed short term or at 12 months on HRQL after use of the HLE as rehabilitation for radiation-induced dysphagia.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Deglución , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Ejercicio Físico , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to report on the effectiveness of voice rehabilitation following radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer in a long-term perspective, i.e., up to three years after completion of radiotherapy. METHODS: The study included a total of 74 patients that were randomised into an intervention group (n = 37) or a control group (n = 37). Voice recordings with blinded assessment of voice quality with the GRBAS protocol (Grade, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, Strain) and acoustic analysis was performed at baseline, 12 and 36 months following radiotherapy. Voice rehabilitation was performed in 10 sessions immediately following completion of radiotherapy. Patients also filled out the Swedish Self-Evaluation of Communication Experiences after Laryngeal cancer. RESULTS: The S-SECEL demonstrated statistically significant improvements in the intervention group when comparing baseline and 36 months, and no changes in the control group. Acoustic measures did not reveal any significant changes. The perceptual analysis demonstrated that when comparing the changes within the groups between baseline and 36 months there were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control group regarding the voice qualities Roughness, Breathiness and Strain. In the control group, 50% demonstrated deterioration in roughness, while in the intervention group only 7% deteriorated during this time. In Breathiness and Strain, 57 and 50%, respectively, improved in the intervention group, while only 32% and 23% improved, respectively, in the control group. CONCLUSION: Voice rehabilitation following radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer demonstrate positive effects in patient reported outcomes and perceptual measures of voice quality, and the effects remain up to three years following radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Laríngeas , Trastornos de la Voz , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trastornos de la Voz/etiología , Trastornos de la Voz/rehabilitaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This randomized study aimed to evaluate the effects of the Shaker head-lift exercise (HLE) to improve dysphagia following oncologic treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS: Patients with dysphagia following oncologic treatment for HNC were randomly assigned to intervention (n = 23) or control (standard dysphagia management, n = 24) groups. Swallowing was evaluated at baseline and at 8-week follow-up using flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) and self-perceived swallowing with the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Analysis was performed regarding secretion, initiation of swallow, residue after swallowing, and penetration/aspiration. RESULTS: Few statistically significant differences were found in the FEES analysis. Some improvement of self-perceived swallowing function was found in both groups. Adherence to training was high. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized study regarding the effect of the HLE demonstrated that swallowing outcome measures used in assessment of FEES did not improve in patients treated with radiotherapy for patients with dysphagia following HNC.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Deglución , Trastornos de Deglución/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Ejercicio FísicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dizziness is a common complaint among older adults and may affect quality of life in a negative way. The aim of this study was to assess health-related quality of life (HRQL), sense of coherence (SOC), self-rated health (SRH) and comorbidity in relation to dizziness, among older persons from an urban population. METHODS: The study is part of the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies (H70). A cross-sectional population-based sample including 662 79-years-olds (404 women, 258 men, 62% response rate) were surveyed with questions regarding dizziness, imbalance, comorbidities and general health. HRQL was assessed using the 36-item Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and SOC with the 13-items questionnaire Sense of Coherence (SOC-13). RESULTS: Half of the participants reported problems with dizziness (54%). Dizziness was negatively associated with HRQL, including after adjusting for comorbidities, especially in the physical domains of SF-36. Having dizziness was also associated with poorer SRH, tiredness and comorbidity among both men and women. SOC (mean total score), however, did not differ between dizzy and non-dizzy participants. CONCLUSIONS: Dizziness was negatively associated with HRQL, also after adjusting for comorbidities. Identification and treatment of dizziness, when possible, are important because reduction of dizziness symptoms may potentially help to enhance overall well-being in this age group.
Asunto(s)
Mareo , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Mareo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aims to examine effects of jaw exercise on trismus 3 years following completion of a post-radiotherapy jaw exercise intervention. METHODS: Prospective study including 50 patients with head-and-neck cancer receiving radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, plus a matched control group. The intervention group underwent 10 weeks of jaw exercise training. Patients were followed pre-and postintervention and 3 years postintervention completion. Outcome measures were maximal interincisal opening (MIO), trismus-related symptoms, and health-related quality-of-life as measured by Gothenburg Trismus Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, and EORTC QLQ-H&N35. RESULTS: The intervention group had a statistically significantly higher mean MIO compared with the control group (40.1 mm and 33.9 mm, respectively, p < 0.001), reported less trismus-related problems and had an improved health-related quality-of-life when compared with the control group at the 3-year follow-up. These differences were all statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Jaw exercise therapy resulted in increased MIO, less trismus-related symptoms, and improved health-related quality-of-life. Jaw exercise therapy should be initiated early, in a structured manner and continued long-term.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Trismo/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Dizziness may affect quality of life in a negative way and contribute to falls. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare 75 years old with dizziness caused by benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) to those with general dizziness/impaired balance (non-BPPV related) and to those reporting no dizziness, regarding health-related quality of life (HRQL), falls, tiredness, and walking speed in a population-based setting. METHOD: A cross-sectional population-based sample, including 671 75 years old (398 women, 273 men), was investigated for BPPV, dizziness symptoms, falls, and walking speed. HRQL was assessed using the 36-item Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). RESULT: A total of 67 persons (10%) had symptoms of BPPV with 11 (1.6%) having nystagmus when tested for BPPV. Having BPPV as well as general dizziness/impaired balance was associated with reduced HRQL, more tiredness, enhanced number of falls, and lower walking speed. Furthermore, the risk of having BPPV increased fourfold if symptoms of dizziness when turning in bed was reported. CONCLUSION: Having problems with dizziness is common among senior citizens where BPPV can be an unrecognized cause of dizziness that may impact HRQL and overall well-being. As BPPV is common among older adults, and is potentially curable through reposition maneuvers, it is important to liberally test for, and treat the condition. Information about dizziness when turning in bed can help to pinpoint persons with enhanced risk for BPPV also on a population-based level.
Asunto(s)
Nistagmo Patológico , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Vértigo Posicional Paroxístico Benigno/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Mareo/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to adapt the instrument and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Swallowing Quality of Care questionnaire (S-SWAL-CARE) in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. METHODS: Translation and adaptation of the original SWAL-CARE into Swedish was performed according to established international guidelines. Field testing was performed using 100 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to multiple reasons such as head and neck cancer and neurologic/neuromuscular disease, who had undergone swallowing evaluation within 6 months prior to the study. The patients answered the S-SWAL-CARE, the Quality from the Patient's Perspective (QPP) and the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL). Test-retest was performed in 20% of the participants. The reliability and validity of the S-SWAL-CARE were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha as well as convergent and discriminative validity, respectively. RESULTS: The field testing of the S-SWAL-CARE resulted in sufficient reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values exceeding 0.90 for all domains. All items correlated strongly to their own domain, with weaker correlations to the other domains, indicating proper scale structure. Results also indicate sufficient convergent and discriminant validity when tested for association to the QPP domains and the SWAL-QOL Total score. The test-retest reliability of the S-SWAL-CARE demonstrated sufficient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the General advice domain (0.73) and Clinical advice domain (0.82). The ICC for the Patient satisfaction domain was lower (0.44). CONCLUSION: The S-SWAL-CARE can be considered a reliable and valid tool to assess the dysphagia-related quality of care in a mixed Swedish dysphagia patient population.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Psicometría/instrumentación , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Suecia , TraduccionesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Voice problems are common following radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. Few studies exist covering the effect of voice rehabilitation, and no previous studies exist regarding the cost of said rehabilitation. This randomized controlled study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of voice rehabilitation after radiotherapy for patients with laryngeal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 66 patients with laryngeal cancer with follow-up data 12 months post-radiotherapy were included. Patients were randomized into receiving either voice rehabilitation (n = 32) or no voice rehabilitation (n = 34). The patient outcome was measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The index range between 0 and 1, where 0 equals death and 1 represents perfect health. The QALYs were assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30 mapped to EuroQoL 5 Dimension values. The cost of rehabilitation and other healthcare visits was derived from hospital systems. The patients reported the total amount of sick leave days during the first 12 months following radiotherapy. The cost-effectiveness of the voice rehabilitation was compared with no rehabilitation intervention based on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. RESULTS: The cost per gained QALY with voice rehabilitation compared to no rehabilitation from a societal perspective was - 27,594 (SEK - 250,852) which indicates that the voice rehabilitation is a cost-saving alternative compared to no rehabilitation due to lower costs and a slightly better health outcome. From a healthcare perspective, the voice rehabilitation indicates a cost 60,800 (SEK 552,725) per gained QALY. CONCLUSION: From a societal perspective, i.e., including the costs of production loss, voice rehabilitation compared to no voice rehabilitation following radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer seems to be cost-saving. When analyzing only the healthcare costs in relation to health outcomes, voice rehabilitation indicates an incremental cost of 60,800 per gained QALY, which is just above the threshold of the maximum willingness to pay level.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Laríngeas/rehabilitación , Traumatismos por Radiación/rehabilitación , Trastornos de la Voz/rehabilitación , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Laríngeas/economía , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Trastornos de la Voz/etiología , Trastornos de la Voz/patologíaRESUMEN
The amount of research being performed in children, in particular pharmacological research, is lower than in adults, which is in direct contrast to the aims of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. A Pediatric Clinical Research Center (PCRC) has been established at Sahlgrenska University Hospital with the aim of supporting clinical research in children and adolescents. The number of inquiries and initiated clinical studies at PCRC has increased since the start in 2016. In addition, there is a need for regional and national infrastructures for paediatric clinical research and a national network for paediatric clinical studies. CONCLUSION: Sahlgrenska University Hospital has established an infrastructure to support paediatric research and to work with national networks and infrastructures.
Asunto(s)
Defensa del Niño , Familia , Adolescente , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dizziness is common among older people and falling is a feared complication. AIM: The purpose of this study was to investigate the presence of dizziness and its association with falls, walking speed and fear of falling, including sex differences, among 79-year-olds. Secondary purposes were to describe the relationship between dizziness and falls to number of medications and diseases. METHOD: The study consisted of the fifth cohort of Gothenburg's H70 birth cohort studies. A sample of 662 79-year-olds (404 women, 258 men) were investigated with questions regarding dizziness, previous falls and falls efficacy [estimated according to the falls efficacy scale Swedish version (FES (S))]. Functional tests included self-selected and maximal walking speed over 20 m. RESULTS: Dizziness was reported among 51% of the women and by 58% of the men (p = 0.12). Approximately, 40% had fallen during the past 12 months (41% women, 38% of the men, p = 0.48). Dizziness was related to a higher risk of falls among women (OR 2.63 (95% CI 1.67-4.14, p < 0.0001), but not among men (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.63-1.82, p = 0.8). Dizzy individuals had lower scores on FES (S) (p < 0.01), more medications (p < 0.001) and diseases (p < 0.001) than those without dizziness. Participants who reported dizziness walked 10% slower than participants without dizziness (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Women with dizziness more often reported falls compared to women without dizziness-a trend that was not seen among men. Persons with dizziness walked slower. Many medications increased risk of falling; hence, number of medications alone might help pinpoint risk groups for falling.