RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Clinical gait analysis can be used to evaluate the recovery process of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). The postoperative walking patterns of these patients can be significantly influenced by the choice of surgical approach, as each procedure alters distinct anatomical structures. The aim of this study is twofold. The first objective is to develop a gait model to describe the change in ambulation one week after THA. The secondary goal is to describe the differences associated with the surgical approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing THA with lateral (n = 9), anterior (n = 15), and posterior (n = 12) approaches were included in the study. Walking before and 7 days after surgery was recorded using a markerless motion capture system. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), a data reduction technique, condensed 21 spatiotemporal gait parameters to a smaller set of dominant variables. The EFA-derived gait domains were utilized to study post-surgical gait variations and to compare the post-surgical gait among the three groups. RESULTS: Four distinct gait domains were identified. The most pronounced variation one week after surgery is in the Rhythm (gait cycle time: + 32.9 % ), followed by Postural control (step width: + 27.0 % ), Phases (stance time: + 11.0 % ), and Pace (stride length: - 9.3 % ). In postsurgical walking, Phases is statistically significantly different in patients operated with the posterior approach compared to lateral (p-value = 0.017) and anterior (p-value = 0.002) approaches. Furthermore, stance time in the posterior approach group is significantly lower than in healthy individuals (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study identified a four-component gait model specific to THA patients. The results showed that patients after THA have longer stride time but shorter stride length, wider base of support, and longer stance time, although the posterior group had a statistically significant shorter stance time than the others. The findings of this research have the potential to simplify the reporting of gait outcomes, reduce redundancy, and inform targeted interventions in regards to specific gait domains.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Análisis de la Marcha , Marcha , Humanos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Marcha/fisiología , Análisis Factorial , Caminata/fisiología , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the clinical and functional results of radial head reconstruction with an autologous bone graft from distal humerus in 12 patients, with a follow-up for a period of 24 months. METHODS: From March 2017 to June 2018, we surgically treated 12 patients using an autologous bone graft from the lateral distal metaphysis of the homolateral humerus. Patients were divided into two groups: -Group A consisted of patients with previous failed ORIF for radial head fracture. Patients underwent revision surgery at an average time of 7 months (between 6 to 8 months) from the first surgery. All the patients reported pain during the elbow range of motion with no gross clinical signs or instability of the joint. They all presented standard X-ray and CT-scan of the elbow suggestive of non-union fracture. None of them presented osteoarthritic modification at the time of surgery. -Group B consisted of patients reporting acute irreparable radial head fractures. Patients were evaluated clinically at 6-, 12-, and 24-months duration according to Disabilities of the Arm. Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), and Visual analogue score for pain (VAS);, range of motion (ROM) was evaluated at 6 and 24 months after surgery. Plain radiographs on anteroposterior and lateral views of the elbow were evaluated at final follow-up. RESULTS: In both, groups (A and B) patients showed a significant improvement with regards to VAS, MEPS, and DASH at each follow-up (p < 0.05). X-rays showed complete bone healing in all patients with no sign of mobilisation or loosening of the screws. One case in group A presented asymptomatic partial ossification of LUCL. No cases of fracture or residual pain at the donor site. Furthermore, no other complications such as infection, wound issues, elbow instability, elbow stiffness, ulnar neuritis, graft non-union were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Distal humerus bone graft should be considered a reliable option for the treatment of acute fractures that are unrepairable fractures or revision surgery for failed ORIF of the radial head, especially among young patients where prosthesis may be reserved as a salvage procedure, and radial head resection is a damaging and is not considered desirable. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV - Prospective Case Series.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Fracturas del Radio , Trasplante Óseo/métodos , Articulación del Codo/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación del Codo/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Humanos , Húmero/diagnóstico por imagen , Húmero/cirugía , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Fracturas del Radio/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by an abnormal contact between the acetabulum and the femoral head-neck junction. Femoroacetabular impingement shows three main clinical frameworks: pincer-FAI, cam-FAI and cam-pincer mixed form. The aim of the study was to investigate the correlation between femoroacetabular impingement, imaging, activity and chondral damages. METHODS: Forty-one patients, undergoing arthroscopic chondroartroplasty for cam and cam-pincer mixed form were considered. All patients underwent an X-Ray hip evaluation (G1 group), while 15 patients also underwent a pelvis MRI evaluation (G2 subgroup). For G1 patients, the superior-inferior offset ratio and alpha angle were calculated from the X-Ray examinations. For G2 patients, the antero-posterior offset ratio was also calculated from pelvis MRI. Chondral damage was classified according to the Outerbridge Classification. RESULTS: The superior-inferior offset ratio and the antero-posterior offset ratio were respectively 0.50±0.23 and 0.33±0.19. The α angle predictive for a chondral damage of IV degree was 81.5°. The chondral damage of the patients suffering from cam-FAI and cam-pincer mixed form were respectively 3.53±0.80 and 3.00±1.41. CONCLUSIONS: From the results was possible to: 1) elaborate two tables providing a reliable indirect calculation of the alpha angle; 2) establish an alpha angle cut-off value indicative for a IV degree chondral damage; 3) show that pincer-FAI does not represent an aggravating factor for chondral damage; 4) show that the level of sports activity was related to the severity of chondral damage; and 5) show that a physically demanding occupation was not an aggravating factor for chondral damage.
Asunto(s)
Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular , Acetábulo/cirugía , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/diagnóstico por imagen , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/cirugía , Fémur , Articulación de la Cadera , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , RadiografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: From February 20 to April 2020, the coronavirus SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome)-CoV-2 spread in northern Italy, drastically challenging the care capacities of the national health care system. Unprepared for this emergency, hospitals have quickly reformulated paths of assistance in an effort to guarantee treatment for infected patients. Orthopaedic departments have been focused on elderly traumatology, especially the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the orthopaedic management strategy for femoral fragility fractures in COVID-19-positive patients with the hypothesis that operative treatment may contribute to the overall stability of the patient. METHODS: Sixteen patients affected by proximal femoral fracture and a recent history of fever, shortness of breath, and desaturation were admitted to the emergency room. Thoracic computed tomography (CT) and oropharyngeal swabs confirmed that they were positive for COVID-19, requiring hospitalization and prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. RESULTS: Three patients died before surgery because of severe respiratory insufficiency and multiple-organ-failure syndrome. Ten patients underwent surgery on the day after admission, whereas 3 patients had suspended their use of direct thrombin inhibitors and needed surgery to be delayed until the third day after admission. In all patients except 1, we noted an improvement in terms of O2 saturation and assisted respiration. In 9 patients, hemodynamic and respiratory stability was observed at an average of 7 days postoperatively. Four patients who underwent surgical treatment died of respiratory failure on the first day after surgery (1 patient), the third day after surgery (2 patients), or the seventh day after surgery (1 patient). CONCLUSIONS: We noted a stabilization of respiratory parameters in 12 COVID-19-positive patients who underwent surgery treatment of proximal femoral fractures. We believe that in elderly patients with COVID-19 who have proximal femoral fractures, surgery may contribute to the overall stability of the patient, seated mobilization, improvement in physiological ventilation, and general patient comfort in bed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/efectos adversos , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Fracturas del Fémur/cirugía , Fijación Intramedular de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Brotes de Enfermedades , Femenino , Fracturas del Fémur/mortalidad , Fracturas del Fémur/virología , Fragilidad/mortalidad , Hospitalización , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To build a post-arthroscopy outcome-predictive score (POPS) associated with the likelihood of lasting benefit after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and based solely on unambiguous preoperative information. METHODS: A population of 220 FAI patients, operated on with standard techniques by orthopaedic surgeons trained in hip arthroscopy in 6 different centres, was evaluated physically or by telephone interview 2 to 5 years after surgery. The criteria of successful mid-term outcome (SMO) were agreed upon by all authors. A multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for patient's age and centre, was applied to predict SMO. In the model, the variables associated with the outcome were included and the relative ORs (odds ratios) were used to compute the FAI-POPS (FAI - post-arthroscopy outcome-predictive score). A ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was plotted and the optimum cut-off was calculated. RESULTS: 155 patients out of 220 showed a successful mid-term outcome. The optimum cut-off of FAI-POPS was calculated to be 6.3 and with this threshold it proved a sensitivity of 0.66 and a specificity of 0.69, a positive predictive value of 0.84 and a negative predictive value of 0.46. CONCLUSIONS: The standard arthroscopic treatment of FAI resulted in satisfactory persistent symptom relief for about 70% of patients. No or minimal osteoarthritis, short time elapsed from the appearance of symptoms and high preoperative modified Harris Hip Score are independent predictive factors of SMO. The FAI-POPS is obtained as sum of 3 odds ratios corresponding to the above prognostic factors and is a useful predictor of mid-term outcome after conventional arthroscopic FAI treatment.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/métodos , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/cirugía , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Unrepairable comminuted fractures of the radial head Mason type III or type IV have poor outcomes when treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Radial head resection has been proposed as good option for surgical treatment, while in the last decades, the development of technology and design in radial head prosthesis has increased efficacy in prosthetic replacement. The present review was conducted to determine the best surgical treatment for comminuted radial head when ORIF is not possible. Better outcomes are reported for radial head arthroplasty in terms of elbow stability, range of motion, pain, and fewer complications compared to radial head excision. Nevertheless, radial head resection still can be considered an option of treatment in isolated radial head fractures with no associated ligament injuries lesion of ligaments or in case of older patients with low demanding function.
Asunto(s)
Artroplastia , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Fracturas Conminutas/cirugía , Fracturas del Radio/cirugía , Articulación del Codo , Humanos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: About 4% of glenohumeral dislocations are posterior and only 1% is associated with fracture of the humeral head. Most frequent causes are high energy traumas, seizures and electrocution. The fracture and the posterior dislocation, associated with the trauma and capsular lesion can cause an important vascular damage of the humeral head. METHODS: We describe 5 cases of posterior fracture-dislocation of the shoulder that required open reduction and internal fixation treated using double approach: posterior approach for reduction humeral head and eventually bone and capsular posterior repair and anterior approach for osteosynthesis. A Clinical examination was performed at one year and follow-up was at two years. CONCLUSIONS: This combined approach is less invasive, easier for dislocation reduction of the humeral head, with minimal biological damage that may occur during the reduction maneuvers. Our thought is that the posterior approach reduce vascular and bone damages during humeral head reduction and permit to suture and retention posterior capsula that is often damaged by the trauma.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Luxación del Hombro/cirugía , Fracturas del Hombro/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: the aim of this study was to evaluate preliminary clinical and radiographic results of arthroscopic treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: thirty-eight patients underwent hip arthroscopy for cam-type FAI between 2009 and 2012. Preoperative assessment was based on clinical examination, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and radiographic examination with anteroposterior pelvis, frog-leg and Lequesne views. The patients' clinical conditions at follow-up were assessed using the mHHS administered as a telephone survey. Radiographic outcome measurements evaluated pre and postoperatively were the alpha angle and femoral head-neck offset. RESULTS: the patients were clinically evaluated at a mean follow-up of 36 months. Radiographic follow-up was performed at an average of 12.7 months. Thirty of the 38 patients (79%) were satisfied with the results of the arthroscopic procedure. A total of nine patients subsequently underwent a total hip replacement. All 30 patients who declared themselves satisfied recorded an mHHS increase; in particular, the mHHS increased from a mean of 52.9 preoperatively (range: 27.5-82.5) to a mean of 85.6 postoperatively (range: 45.1-100.1). Three significant differences between the two groups of patients (satisfied and not satisfied) were recorded: mean age, alpha angle and BMI were all significantly greater in the patients who were not satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: a crucial aspect in order to obtain good clinical outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of cam-type impingement is correct selection of patients who are likely to benefit from this kind of surgery. Hip arthroscopy should be avoided in patients aged over 50 years with risk factors for early osteoarthritis (high BMI and a significantly increased alpha angle). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
RESUMEN
The importance of the lateral meniscus in weight bearing, distribution of force, shock absorption, articular cartilage protection, proprioception, stabilization of the joint, and joint lubrication is well known. Surgeons currently agree on the importance of preserving the menisci. Different suture techniques have been standardized. These include outside-in, inside-out, and all-inside techniques. The all-inside technique can be used to repair lesions of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus. However, this technique presents important disadvantages, such as the necessity for an accessory portal and a high risk of neurovascular damage. For these reasons, we have developed a technique in which a suture hook and a shuttle relay are used to pass the suture wire through the meniscal lesion of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus with an all-inside technique, without the use of accessory portals and cannulas, with a standard 30° arthroscopic camera.