Promoting men-inclusive maternity services: exploring the expectations, experiences and needs of men as fathers.

AIM: This study aimed to explore the 'real time' expectations, experiences and needs of men who attend maternity services to inform the development of strategies to enhance men's inclusion. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive design was adopted for the study. Semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted with 48 men attending the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital before and after their partner gave birth. Data were coded and analysed thematically. RESULTS: Most respondents identified their role as a support person rather than a direct beneficiary of maternity services. They expressed the view that if their partner and baby's needs were met, their needs were met. Factors that contributed to a positive experience included the responsiveness of staff and meeting information needs. Factors promoting feelings of inclusion were being directly addressed by staff, having the opportunity to ask questions, and performing practical tasks associated with the birth. CONCLUSION: Adopting an inclusive communication style promotes men's feelings of inclusion in maternity services. However, the participants' tendency to conflate their needs with those of their partner suggests the ongoing salience of traditional gender role beliefs, which view childbirth primarily as the domain of women.

Intravenous Smart Pump Drug Library Compliance: A Descriptive Study of 44 Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Although intravenous (IV) smart pumps with built-in dose-error reduction systems (DERS) can reduce IV medication administration error, most serious adverse events still occur during IV medication administration. Sources of error include overriding DERS and manually bypassing drug libraries and the DERS. METHODS: Our purpose was to use the Regenstrief National Center for Medical Device Informatics data set to better understand IV smart pump drug library and DERS compliance. Our sample consisted of 12 months of data from 7 hospital systems, 44 individual hospitals, and descriptive data from the American Hospital Directory (AHD) for 2015. The aims of the study were (1) to determine whether there are differences in IV smart pump drug library compliance between hospital systems and (2) to provide a broad descriptive overview of relevant trends related to IV smart pump compliance. RESULTS: For aim 1, we found 3 significant relationships among the 7 hospital systems: systems 3 (P < 0.001), 6 (P = 0.003), and 7 (P = 0.002) had significantly higher IV smart compliance as compared with system 4. For aim 2, the number of drug library profiles was positively correlated (P = 0.029) with IV smart pump compliance and the IV smart pump type used was significantly correlated (P = 0.013) with IV smart pump compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that there are differences in IV smart pump compliance both within and between hospital systems and that IV smart pump type and the number of drug library profiles may be influencing factors. Further research is required to more accurately identify the impact of these factors in this very important area of patient safety.