Ketoconazole inhibits the clearance of the enantiomers of the antidepressant reboxetine in humans.

BACKGROUND: Ketoconazole is a potent inhibitor of the cytochrome P450 3A4 enzyme. Reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4. The potential interaction of reboxetine with this representative from the azole derivative class was examined. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers received (1) 4 mg reboxetine orally on the second day of a 5-day regimen of 200 mg ketoconazole once daily and (2) 4 mg reboxetine orally in a crossover design. Plasma concentrations of reboxetine enantiomers [R,R(-)-reboxetine and the more active S,S(+)-reboxetine] were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Effects of ketoconazole on enantiomer pharmacokinetics were assessed by ANOVA. RESULTS: Ketoconazole increased R,R(-)-reboxetine and S,S(+)-reboxetine mean area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) by 58% and 43%, respectively (P < .02). Oral clearance of both enantiomers was consequently decreased 34% and 24%, respectively, by ketoconazole (P < .005). Ketoconazole did not significantly affect maximal plasma concentrations (P > .1). Mean terminal half-life after administration of ketoconazole (21.5 hours and 18.9 hours) was significantly longer than after reboxetine alone (14.8 hours and 14.4 hours; P < or = .005). The AUC ratio for R,R(-)-reboxetine to S,S(+)-reboxetine was reduced by ketoconazole administration (2.76 after ketoconazole versus 2.39; P < .003). CONCLUSION: Ketoconazole decreases clearance of both reboxetine enantiomers. Although the adverse effect profile for reboxetine was not altered by ketoconazole, the results of this study suggest that caution should be used and that a reduction in reboxetine dose should be considered when the two are coadministered.

The effect of phenytoin on the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate in healthy male volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic interaction between phenytoin and tirilazad was studied in 12 healthy men who received 200 mg phenytoin orally every 8 hours for 11 doses and 100 mg for the remaining 5 doses in one period of a two-way crossover study. In both periods, 1.5 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate was administered (as 10-minute intravenous infusions) every 6 hours for 21 doses (5 days). Plasma tirilazad mesylate and U-89678 (an active metabolite) were quantified by HPLC. After dose 21, area under the plasma concentration-time curve [AUC(0-6)] for tirilazad mesylate was significantly lower (p = 0.0061) after phenytoin treatment (3029 +/- 982 ng.hr/ml) than after tirilazad mesylate alone (4647 +/- 1562 ng.hr/ml). AUC(0-6) for U-89,678 after dose 21 was reduced from 1485 +/- 1173 ng.hr/ml after tirilazad mesylate alone to 195 +/- 223 ng.hr/ml after phenytoin coadministration. U-89678 normally accumulates during multiple dosing, but mean U-89678 trough concentrations decreased after 24 hours during tirilazad and phenytoin coadministration. No clinically significant interactions of tirilazad mesylate and phenytoin for medical events, vital signs, or laboratory parameters were identified. These results suggest that phenytoin rapidly induces tirilazad mesylate metabolism; it may also induce the metabolism of U-89678 or shunt tirilazad mesylate metabolism through other pathways.

Clinical pharmacology of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam mesylate after single oral doses of each compound in healthy volunteers.

The tolerance, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were assessed after single oral doses of 10, 30, and 50 mg adinazolam mesylate, NDMAD mesylate, and placebo. Within doses, six healthy male volunteers received these treatments in a double-blind crossover design. No clinically significant changes were observed in blood pressure, pulse, respiration, or clinical laboratory test results. Untoward effects were typical of benzodiazepines. Adinazolam and NDMAD kinetics were dose independent. Greater than 95% of the adinazolam dose was metabolized to NDMAD. Adinazolam and NDMAD mesylate produced dose-related increases in uric acid clearance and decreases in plasma uric acid. Both adinazolam and NDMAD mesylate administration resulted in dose-related sedation and decrements in psychomotor performance. Within doses, decrements produced by adinazolam and NDMAD were quantitatively similar. These results suggest that both adinazolam and NDMAD possess uricosuric activity and support the hypothesis that NDMAD primarily mediates benzodiazepine-like effects of adinazolam mesylate.

Lack of effect of reboxetine on cardiac repolarization.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of reboxetine on electrocardiographic parameters, particularly the QTc interval, was assessed in 20 healthy subjects (15 male, 5 female). METHODS: In a 5-way crossover study, subjects received placebo, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 6 mg reboxetine, or 6 mg reboxetine and 200 mg ketoconazole twice daily for 7 days. Plasma samples, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained during one dosing interval of days 1, 4, and 7. Additional ECGs were recorded immediately after an exercise paradigm, so that the RR versus QT relationship might be used in calculating QTc. Plasma concentrations of R,R (-)reboxetine and the more active S,S (+)reboxetine were measured by HPLC-dual mass spectrometry. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences among treatments in mean dose-corrected pharmacokinetic parameters were observed, except that the dose-corrected area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hours and the peak plasma concentration were significantly increased on days 4 and 7 in the presence of ketoconazole. As expected, heart rate increased from baseline (approximately 8-11 beats/min) at > or =8 mg reboxetine daily. No statistically significant prolongation of QTc (Fridericia correction) occurred after any of the treatments. No relationships between DeltaQTc and plasma concentrations of reboxetine enantiomers were apparent. Similar results were obtained with Bazett's correction and two linear corrections that relied on exercise data generated before drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Reboxetine, at systemic exposures approximately twice the recommended dose, did not significantly affect cardiac repolarization in healthy subjects. Use of QT versus RR relationship in the drug-free state to correct QT for heart rate in the drug-treated state may provide an acceptable alternative to classic correction equations.

Pharmacokinetic interaction between verapamil and almotriptan in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interaction between almotriptan, a 5-HT1B/1D-receptor agonist used to treat migraine, and verapamil, an agent for migraine prophylaxis. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers received the following treatments in a crossover design: (1) 120-mg sustained-release verapamil tablet twice daily for 7 days and one 12.5-mg almotriptan tablet on day 7 and (2) one 12.5-mg almotriptan tablet alone on day 7. Serial plasma and urine samples were obtained on day 7. Almotriptan plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; urine samples were analyzed by ultraviolet HPLC. Safety measures included blood pressure and pulse measurements, electrocardiography, and adverse event monitoring. Statistical comparisons of pharmacokinetic parameters and vital sign data were made by ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean almotriptan peak concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve were significantly higher and volume of distribution and oral clearance were significantly lower after coadministration of almotriptan and verapamil compared with administration of almotriptan alone. The magnitudes of these differences were approximately 20%. Renal clearance was unaffected by verapamil coadministration. No significant effects of treatment on blood pressure or pulse were detected, with the exception of sitting systolic blood pressure at 2 hours after administration. However, the difference in mean change from baseline at this time point was only 8 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: Verapamil modestly inhibited almotriptan clearance to a degree consistent with the modest contribution of CYP3A4 to almotriptan metabolism. This observation and the lack of effect of verapamil on the tolerability to almotriptan administration suggest that no reduction of the almotriptan dose is warranted.

Alprazolam absorption kinetics affects abuse liability.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the behavioral, subjective, and reinforcing effects of immediate-release (IR) alprazolam and extended-release (XR) alprazolam to assess the effect of release rate on laboratory measures of abuse liability. METHODS: Fourteen healthy men with histories of sedative abuse participated as subjects in a double-blind crossover study. All subjects received placebo, 1 and 2 mg immediate-release alprazolam, and 2 and 3 mg extended-release alprazolam in random order. Behavioral performance, subjective effects, and alprazolam plasma concentrations were assessed repeatedly 1/2 hour before and 1/2, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, and 24 hours after drug administration. RESULTS: Mean peak alprazolam plasma concentrations occurred 1.7 and 9.2 hours after immediate-release alprazolam and extended-release alprazolam, respectively. Compared to placebo, 2 mg immediate-release alprazolam impaired all measures of psychomotor and cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test), motor coordination (circular lights and balance), and memory (digit entry and recall); 2 mg extended-release alprazolam did not affect any of these measures and 3 mg extended-release alprazolam impaired circular lights only. Immediate-release alprazolam, 2 mg, increased all six measures of positive drug effects (e.g., ratings of liking or good effects); none of these measures were increased by 2 mg extended-release alprazolam and only three of the six measures were increased by 3 mg extended-release alprazolam. A drug versus money multiple-choice procedure designed to assess the relative reinforcing effects of each condition was administered 24 hour after the drug. The amount of money subjects were willing to "pay" to take the drug was significantly greater than placebo for both doses of immediate-release alprazolam but for neither dose of extended-release alprazolam. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that extended-release alprazolam has less potential for abuse than immediate-release alprazolam.

Effect of age and gender on tirilazad pharmacokinetics in humans.

Tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetics were assessed in 12 young and 12 elderly volunteers (six men and six women per age group). Subjects received single 10-minute intravenous infusions of 1.5 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate. Plasma tirilazad mesylate concentrations were determined by HPLC. There were no significant dose effects on clearance, but half-life increased with dose because of assay insensitivity at the lower dose. Mean half-lives were 16.3 +/- 15.5 and 21.4 +/- 12.6 hours for young and elderly subjects, respectively, at the 3.0 mg/kg dose. At the same dose, mean tirilazad mesylate systemic clearance was 0.630 +/- 0.254 and 0.428 +/- 0.090 L/hr/kg, respectively. The decreased clearance in elderly volunteers was primarily attributable to a lower clearance in elderly women relative to young women. The small effect of age on tirilazad clearance is likely to have minimum clinical impact. Tirilazad clearance was approximately 40% higher in young women than in young men. The clinical importance of this observation is unknown.

Effects of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam in humans.

The effects of probenecid (2 gm) on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and uricosuric effects of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were assessed after single dose administration of adinazolam mesylate sustained-release tablets (60 mg) in a randomized, four-way crossover, double-blind study involving 16 healthy male volunteers. Probenecid decreased adinazolam oral clearance, renal N-desmethyladinazolam clearance, and the amount of N-desmethyladinazolam excreted in the urine. Probenecid increased the N-desmethyladinazolam/adinazolam AUC ratio, adinazolam maximum concentration (Cmax), N-desmethyladinazolam Cmax, and N-desmethyladinazolam time to reach Cmax. Uric acid renal clearance was increased significantly by adinazolam or probenecid administration compared with placebo; however, coadministration of adinazolam plus probenecid had no additive effect on uric acid clearance. Psychomotor performance was decreased in the adinazolam plus probenecid treatment compared with the adinazolam treatment. Probenecid potentiated the psychomotor effects of adinazolam after coadministration of the compounds, predominantly because of alterations in N-desmethyladinazolam pharmacokinetics. Therefore the adinazolam dose may need to be reduced when coadministered with probenecid.

Effects of acute and chronic alprazolam treatment on cerebral blood flow, memory, sedation, and plasma catecholamines.

The effects of 0.014 mg/kg intravenous alprazolam administration on cerebral blood flow (CBF), memory, sedation, and plasma norepinephrine and epinephrine were determined in eight healthy males at baseline levels and following 1 week of daily oral alprazolam treatment. At baseline, intravenous alprazolam administration caused acute reductions in whole-brain CBF (25% to 30% decrease), memory, plasma epinephrine, and self-rated alertness. Following 1 week of alprazolam treatment, tolerance developed to the acute effects of intravenous alprazolam on CBF, memory, and plasma epinephrine. There were no consistent regional neuroanatomic differences in the CBF effects of acute alprazolam, or in the development of tolerance to these effects, and no correlations between the various measures of acute alprazolam effects on either test day.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of reboxetine, a selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor for the treatment of patients with depression.

Reboxetine is a novel selective norepinephrine inhibitor that has been evaluated in the treatment of patients with depression. Reboxetine is a racemic mixture, and the (S,S)-(+)-enantiomer appears to be the more potent inhibitor. However, the ratio of the areas under the concentration-time curves of the (S,S)-(+)- and (R,R)-(-)-enantiomers in vivo is approximately 0.5. There is no evidence for chiral inversion. Differences in the clearances of the 2 enantiomers may be explained by differences in protein binding. The pharmacokinetics of reboxetine are linear following both single and multiple oral doses up to a dosage of 12 mg/day. The plasma concentration-time profile following oral administration is best described by a 1-compartment model, and the mean half-life (approximately 12 hours) is consistent with the recommendation to administer the drug twice daily. Reboxetine is well absorbed after oral administration. The absolute bioavailability is 94.5%, and maximal concentrations are generally achieved within 2 to 4 hours. Food affects the rate, but not the extent, of absorption. The distribution of reboxetine appears to be limited to a fraction of the total body water due to its extensive (>97%) binding to plasma proteins. The primary route of reboxetine elimination appears to be through hepatic metabolism. Less than 10% of the dose is cleared renally. A number of metabolites formed through hepatic oxidation have been identified, but reboxetine is the major circulating species in plasma. In vitro studies show that reboxetine is predominantly metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4; CYP2D6 is not involved. Reboxetine plasma concentrations are increased in elderly individuals and in those with hepatic or renal dysfunction, probably because of reduced metabolic clearance. In these populations, reboxetine should be used with caution, and a dosage reduction is indicated. Ketoconazole decreases the clearance of reboxetine, so that the dosage of reboxetine may need to be reduced when potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 are coadministered. Quinidine does not affect the in vivo clearance of reboxetine, confirming the lack of involvement of CYP2D6. There is no pharmacokinetic interaction between reboxetine and lorazepam or fluoxetine. Reboxetine at therapeutic concentrations has no effect on the in vitro activity of CYP1A2, 2C9, 2D6, 2E1 or 3A4. The lack of effect of reboxetine on CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 was confirmed by the lack of effect on the metabolism of dextromethorphan and alprazolam in healthy volunteers. Thus, reboxetine is not likely to affect the clearance of other drugs metabolised by CYP isozymes.

The effect of colestipol dose on postprandial serum bile acid concentration: assessment by an enzymic bioluminescence procedure.

A dose-response study was performed with three doses of colestipol, using postprandial serum bile acid levels to assess bile acid sequestering activity in 40 volunteers with asymptomatic hyperlipidaemia. Subjects who entered the study had total serum cholesterol concentrations greater than 220 mg/dl and triglyceride concentrations less than 200 mg/dl. They were randomly assigned to one of four parallel treatment groups: (a) placebo b.d., (b) colestipol (as Colestid hydrochloride granules) 2.5 g b.d., (c) colestipol 5 g b.d., and (d) colestipol 7.5 g b.d. Subjects were maintained on a constant repeating solid diet throughout the 6-day study period, and colestipol was ingested 30 min before breakfast and dinner. No drug was administered on Days 1-3; baseline (pre-treatment) serum bile acid concentration profiles were determined on Day 3. The above treatments were given on Days 4-6, and total serum bile acid concentrations were determined at 30- or 60-min intervals for 10 h on Days 4 and 6. Serum bile acids were measured using a bioluminescence procedure which enzymically measures total 3 alpha hydroxy bile acids. Serum bile acid concentrations were significantly decreased from the pretreatment period by 5.0 and 7.5 g/day as compared to 2.5 g/day or placebo. Differences from the pre-treatment period in the area under the serum bile acid time curve revealed the same trends in the data as analysis of percentage difference (Day 6 vs pre-treatment period) in serum bile acid concentrations. These results indicate that postprandial serum bile acid concentrations are influenced by colestipol in a dose-related manner, with doses of 5 and 7.5 g b.d. having a significantly greater effect than 2.5 g b.d. The dose of 7.5 g b.d. had an identical effect on serum bile acid patterns as a dose of 5.0 g t.d.s., which was previously reported. Our findings also show that changes in serum bile acid concentrations may be used to follow the immediate effects of bile acid sequestration in hypercholes terolaemic subjects, and that the bioluminescence enzyme technique is sufficiently sensitive to detect such changes.

Adinazolam pharmacokinetics and behavioral effects following administration of 20-60 mg oral doses of its mesylate salt in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam were studied in 15 normal, healthy, non-obese volunteers. Placebo capsules and capsules containing 20, 40, and 60 mg adinazolam mesylate were administered as single oral doses in a randomized, 4-way crossover design. Plasma concentrations of adinazolam and mono-N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were determined by HPLC. Psychomotor performance and memory tests were performed and the degree of sedation assessed at designated times following drug administration. Adinazolam and NDMAD pharmacokinetics were linear throughout the dosage range studied. The ratio of NDMAD to adinazolam area under the curve was approximately 4:1. Dose-related decrements in psychomotor performance and memory were observed up to 8 h after dosing (P less than 0.025 in all cases). Psychomotor performance decrements correlated more closely with NDMAD plasma concentrations than with adinazolam concentrations. These results suggest that NDMAD is responsible for a significant degree of the sedative and psychomotor effects observed after the administration of adinazolam.

N-desmethyladinazolam pharmacokinetics and behavioral effects following administration of 10-50 mg oral doses in healthy volunteers.

Results of previous studies suggest that N-desmethyladinazolam, the major metabolite of adinazolam in man, contributes substantially to psychomotor effects and sedation observed following adinazolam administration. Therefore, the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of N-desmethyladinazolam were explored following administration of single oral doses of placebo and solutions containing 10, 30, and 50 mg N-desmethyladinazolam mesylate in a double-blind, randomized, four-way crossover design to 15 healthy male volunteers. Plasma concentrations of N-desmethyladinazolam were determined by HPLC. Psychomotor performance tests (digit symbol substitution and card sorting by fours and suits), memory tests and sedation scoring were also performed following drug administration. N-Desmethyladinazolam pharmacokinetics were dose independent over this range. Dose-related performance effects were observed at 1, 2, and 6 h after dosing. Memory was likewise affected at 2 h. Psychomotor performance decrements correlated with log N-desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations. Analysis of the relationship between percentage decrements in digit-symbol substitution and plasma N-desmethyladinazolam using the Hill equation revealed a EC50 of 325 ng/ml. These results establish the relationship between N-desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations and performance effects; these data will be helpful in assessing the contribution of N-desmethyladinazolam to clinical effects observed after adinazolam administration.

Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers with different ethnic descents.

RATIONALE: Ethnicity can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of psychopharmacologic drugs. OBJECTIVES: Reboxetine disposition differences among Asians, blacks, and Caucasians were examined. METHODS: Healthy subjects (12 Asians, 12 blacks, 12 Caucasians) received a single oral dose of one 4-mg reboxetine tablet in an open label, parallel study design. Plasma concentrations of reboxetine enantiomers [R,R(-) reboxetine and predominantly active S,S(+) reboxetine] were quantified using HPLC-MS-MS. Plasma unbound fractions of reboxetine enantiomers were evaluated by equilibrium dialysis. Ethnic group effects on pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed by ANOVA. RESULTS: Mean S,S(+) reboxetine CLPO for blacks was significantly greater, compared to Asians and Caucasians (154+/-82 ml/min, 101+/-19 ml/min and 101+/-18 ml/min, respectively). Mean S,S(+) reboxetine free fractions (fu) were significantly greater for Asians and blacks, compared to Caucasians (3.04+/-1.28%, 2.89+/-0.69%, and 1.99+/-0.58%, respectively). S,S(+) Reboxetine unbound clearance (CLu) was significantly less for Asians, compared to blacks and Caucasians (3742+/-1468 ml/min, 5187+/-2027 ml/min, and 5294+/-1163 ml/min, respectively). S,S(+) Reboxetine mean unbound AUC (AUCu) in these groups were 20.2+/-7.1 ng.h/ml, 14.6+/-5.1 ng.h/ml, and 13.2+/-3.2 ng.h/ml, respectively. AUCu was significantly greater for Asians. CLu and AUCu did not differ significantly between blacks and Caucasians. Ethnic effects of R,R(-) reboxetine were similar to those observed for S,S(+) reboxetine. CONCLUSIONS: The AUCu difference between Asian and black and Caucasian subjects was modest. Tolerability differences among groups were not observed. No dosage adjustment is necessary for Asians or blacks.

Comparison of the spectrum of cognitive effects of alprazolam and adinazolam after single doses in healthy subjects.

Single doses of alprazolam (0, 0.5, 1.5 mg) or adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablets (SR) (0, 15, 45 mg) were administered to separate groups of 12 healthy men in a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution (DSST), and memory was assessed using a test battery which reflects various aspects of memory, including attention/working memory, explicit memory (recall of categorically related words), semantic memory (fragmented picture recognition, generation of category exemplars), and implicit memory (time saved in resolving fragmented pictures on the second exposure). Maximal psychomotor performance and memory decrements for the highest active doses were significantly different from placebo for all tasks at some time after dosing. The maximum decrement in DSST was not significantly different between drugs at the high dose (P = 0.288). Maximum attention/working memory decrements were significantly different between the high doses of the active compounds (P = 0.031), and the difference in maximum category recall decrement was marginally significant (P = 0.067). Access to knowledge memory was not significantly altered by these drugs; these results are similar to those obtained for other benzodiazepines. Both drugs exhibited slight effects on implicit memory. The results suggest that the sedative and memory effects of these triazolobenzodiazepines may not be closely related and suggest that adinazolam has a somewhat different spectrum of cognitive effects relative to alprazolam.

Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic evaluation of the combined administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of concomitant administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine were studied in this double-blind parallel study in 80 healthy, male volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Drug treatments consisted of 4-day regimens of 1 mg alprazolam four times daily, 60 mg fluoxetine every morning, 1 mg alprazolam four times daily and 60 mg fluoxetine every morning, and placebo four times daily. Psychomotor performance, mood status, and degree of sedation were evaluated at designated times. Combined administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine resulted in an approximate 30% increase in plasma alprazolam concentrations relative to plasma concentrations following the administration of alprazolam alone. There were no significant differences in fluoxetine or norfluoxetine plasma concentrations between the alprazolam/fluoxetine and fluoxetine treatments. Psychomotor decrements increased when fluoxetine was administered with alprazolam relative to alprazolam administration alone. Psychomotor performance of the fluoxetine treatment group was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. No significant changes were observed in mood status, and sedation was minimal in all treatment groups. As when any two psychoactive drugs are administered together, increased patient monitoring and patient education is recommended when alprazolam and fluoxetine are prescribed concurrently.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam: multi-ethnic comparisons.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD), its major active metabolite, were compared in 39 healthy male volunteers (13 Asian, 12 Caucasian and 14 African-American). In a four-way, double-blind crossover design, subjects were administered (1) 30 mg oral adinazolam mesylate SR tablets, (2) 10 mg parenteral (i.v.) adinazolam mesylate, (3) 30 mg i.v. NDMAD and (4) placebo. Venous blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD concentrations. Sedation was rated at the time of each blood draw according to the Nurse-Rated Sedation Scale, and the digit-symbol substitution test was administered to evaluate psychomotor performance. After i.v. administration of adinazolam, Asians manifested significantly higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL of both adinazolam and NDMAD than their Caucasian and African-American counterparts. Likewise, after i.v. NDMAD Asians had significantly higher NDMAD Cmax and AUC than Caucasians and African-Americans. Most of these differences remained statistically significant after controlling for body surface area. With PO adinazolam, Asians also manifested substantially higher Cmax, larger AUC and lower CL for both adinazolam and NDMAD; however, with the exception of Cmax, these differences did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with previous observations for ethnic-related differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In contrast, pharmacodynamic differences were not noted among the three study groups.

Evaluation of a potential interaction between erythromycin and glyburide in diabetic volunteers.

The effects of erythromycin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glyburide were evaluated in 12 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose levels 140-280 mg/dL), who received 4 days of treatment with erythromycin base (333 mg administered orally every 8 hr) and a control treatment in a randomized crossover design; 5 mg glyburide was administered on day 4 of each study period. Serum glyburide concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Peak serum glyburide concentrations were increased by 18%, and mean time to peak glyburide concentrations (Tmax) decreased from 4.9 to 3.0 hours during erythromycin treatment; only the difference in Tmax was statistically significant. No significant effects on glyburide clearance were observed. No significant differences in glucose clearance after carbohydrate loads were observed between erythromycin + glyburide and glyburide treatments. These data show that oral erythromycin base treatment does not affect glyburide metabolism but does affect the rate of glyburide absorption. This effect may be mediated by the stimulation of gastric motility by erythromycin. The clinical significance of the effects of erythromycin on glyburide kinetics appears to be minimal, based on the determinations of serum glucose concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics of tirilazad and U-89678 in ischemic stroke patients receiving a loading regimen and maintenance regimen of 10 mg/kg/day of tirilazad.

The pharmacokinetics of tirilazad mesylate and its active reduced metabolite, U-89678, were evaluated in ischemic stroke patients receiving 2.5 mg/kg tirilazad every 3 hours for the first 12 hours of dosing followed by 2.5 mg/kg every 6 hours for a total of 22 doses (5 days). Trough and serial samples drawn during the 6 hours after administration of the last dose were analyzed for plasma levels of tirilazad and U-89678 by means of high-performance liquid chromatography. Complete concentration-time profiles were available for 20 patients, including 12 men (mean age, 68.0 years) and 8 women (mean age, 75.0 years). Trough concentrations of tirilazad and U-89678 were consistent with the loading regimen used. The mean area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 6 hours (AUC0-6) of tirilazad was 8181 +/- 2398 ng.hr/mL in men and 8135 +/- 3671 ng.hr/mL in women. The mean AUC0-6 of U-89678 was 2761 +/- 1834 ng.hr/mL in men and 1477 +/- 903 ng.hr/mL in women. These results show that gender has a modest effect on the pharmacokinetics of U-89678 but little effect on the pharmacokinetics of tirilazad in elderly ischemic stroke patients. These observations are consistent with previous findings in healthy young and elderly subjects.

Lack of a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction between nimodipine and tirilazad mesylate in healthy volunteers.

The potential interaction between tirilazad mesylate, a membrane lipid peroxidation inhibitor, and nimodipine, a calcium-channel antagonist, was assessed in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received 60 mg nimodipine orally, 2.0 mg/kg tirilazad mesylate as a 10-minute intravenous infusion, and a combination of the two treatments according to a balanced 3-way crossover design. No significant effects of nimodipine on tirilazad mesylate pharmacokinetic parameters were observed (P > .05). Values for tirilazad mesylate clearance (34.9 +/- 8.96 L/hr) and half-life (29 +/- 7.83 hr) were consistent with previous studies. Nimodipine pharmacokinetic parameters exhibited substantial variability, and mean AUC was approximately 25% below the range of previously published values. However, no significant differences in nimodipine pharmacokinetics were observed between treatments. Nimodipine administration increased heart rate slightly without a change in blood pressure, which was not observed after tirilazad administration and was not altered when tirilazad and nimodipine were coadministered. Thus, no significant interaction between tirilazad mesylate and nimodipine is detectable after single-dose administration.