Estrogen replacement therapy after endometrial cancer: a survey of physicians' prescribing practice.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prescribing practice of physicians with regard to estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) in symptomatic women with previous endometrial cancer is consistent with the available evidence. METHODS: A descriptive survey was conducted among physicians in Germany, using a questionnaire containing two hypothetical cases of endometrial cancer patients ('low-risk' and 'high-risk' disease) and menopausal symptoms. Physicians were asked about their prescribing practice concerning moderate to severe menopausal symptoms. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty questionnaires were sent out, with an overall response rate of 39.8%; 45.6% in the 'low-risk' case and 75.4% in the 'high-risk' case (p < 0.0001) stated that ERT is contraindicated. Only 12.9% were willing to prescribe ERT; 81.9% preferred to prescribe non-estrogenic alternatives (44.8% phytoestrogens, 29.0% selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors). CONCLUSION: Despite the evidence that ERT does not increase the risk of recurrence of endometrial cancer, many physicians are reluctant to prescribe ERT in women suffering from moderate to severe menopausal symptoms.

Good prediction of the likelihood for sentinel lymph node metastasis by using the MSKCC nomogram in a German breast cancer population.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure could be omitted in cases of accurate prediction of very high or very low probability of SLN metastasis in early breast cancer patients. We evaluated a breast cancer nomogram, an online tool provided by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), that predicts the likelihood of a positive lymph node. METHODS: Data from 545 patients with successful SLN biopsy were collected, including 118 patients with a positive sentinel lymph node. Histopathological assessment of the SLN included hematoxylin and eosin staining and/or immunohistochemistry. Predictive accuracy was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: In our collective tumor size, histology, lymphovascular infiltration, multifocality, Her-2-neu positivity, and nuclear grade correlated with the probability of SLN metastasis. The ROC of the validated nomogram in our breast cancer population revealed a value of 0.78 compared with 0.75 in the original publication. CONCLUSION: The MSKCC nomogram is a useful tool in our population of breast cancer patients. However, variations in the pathological assessment of the SLN between breast cancer centers worldwide might be an impediment to widespread application of the nomogram.

The MSKCC nomogram for prediction the likelihood of non-sentinel node involvement in a German breast cancer population.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram for prediction of NSLN metastasis is useful in a German breast cancer population and whether the characteristics of the breast tumor and the sentinel lymph node (SLN) are able to predict the likelihood of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastasis. METHODS: A total of 545 patients with primary breast cancer and SLN examination were evaluated. The MSKCC nomogram was applied to 98 patients with a positive SLN who subsequently had completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Predictive accuracy was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. The collective was evaluated by correlating the prevalence of NSLN and SLN metastasis to pathological features. RESULTS: The MSKCC nomogram achieved a ROC of 0.58 indicating a bad accuracy of the nomogram. Tumor size, histology, lymphovascular infiltration, multifocality, Her-2-neu positivity, and nuclear grade correlated with the probability of SLN metastasis. Histology and primary tumor localization correlated significantly with the probability of NSLN metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The MSKCC nomogram did not provide a reliable predictive model in our study population. However, the likelihood of SLN metastasis correlated with the presumed risk factors and no obvious differences between the MSKCC population and our population could be seen. In order to achieve interinstitutional reproducibility, standardization of surgical procedure and of the pathological assessment of the SLN is desirable.