Gender does not influence outcomes and complications in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The impact of gender on the outcomes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remains a topic of active discussion with limited exploration thus far. The study aims to elucidate the gender effect on clinical outcomes, complications, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes following the implantation of a medial UKA at mid-term follow-up in a large section of patients. METHODS: This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study encompassing patients undergoing medial UKA between 2011 and 2019. The International Knee Society (IKS) Knee and Function score, patient satisfaction, complications, revisions, pre- and postoperative radiological outcomes (coronal plane alignment, femoral and tibial component positioning, posterior tibial slope) were evaluated. Survival rate at the time of the last follow-up was also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 366 knees that met the inclusion criteria, 10 were lost to follow-up, accounting for a 2.7% loss. Mean follow-up was 5.2 ± 2 years [2.1-11.3]. Out of the total population, 205 patients were females (57.6%, 205/356) and 151 were males (42.4%, 151/356). Men exhibited superior pre- and postoperative IKS function scores (p = 0.017). However, no significant differences were observed between women and men regarding improvements of IKS Knee and Function scores, radiographic outcomes and implant survivorship. CONCLUSION: At a mean follow-up of 5 years, this study revealed no significant impact of gender on clinical outcomes and complications in patients undergoing medial UKA. Furthermore, no significant differences were evident in radiographic outcomes, implant positioning and knee phenotype. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Valgus stress knee radiographs accurately anticipate the bone resection in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Protocol validation using an image-based robotic system.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to describe a planning method for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implantation using preoperative stress radiographs to measure the thickness of tibial and femoral bone resections and to validate this method with data from an image-based robotic surgery system. Having such method for preoperative planning would be of interest for surgeons performing UKA in order to anticipate optimal bone resection on both tibia and femoral sides. METHODS: A new planning method for medial UKA based on valgus stress knee radiographs validated it with an image-based robotic surgery system (Restoris MCK, MAKO®, Stryker Corporation) was proposed. This retrospective study involved radiographic measurements of 76 patients who underwent image-based robotic medial UKA between April 2022 and February 2023. Preoperative anteroposterior stress radiographs of the knee were used to simulate UKA implantation. The UKA technique was based on Cartier's angle and aimed at restoring the joint line. The total dimension measured was 14 mm (8 mm for minimal tibial component and polyethylene insert + 4 mm for femoral component + 2 mm for safety laxity). Bone resections were measured in the preoperative valgus stress radiographs and then against the intraoperative bone resection data provided by the robotic system. Inter- and intra-observer reliability was assessed using 25 measurements. RESULTS: The mean planned tibial resection measured in the radiographs was 4.3 ± 0.4 [2.9-5.8], while the mean robotic resection was 4.2 ± 0.5 [2.7-5.8] (mean difference = 0.15 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.27 to 0.57]). There was a strong correlation between these two values (Pearson's rank R = 0.79, p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were also very strong (Pearson's rank R = 0.91, p < 0.001, and Pearson's rank R = 0.82, p < 0.001, respectively). The mean planned femoral bone resection measured in the radiographs was 2.7 ± 0.7 mm [1-4.5], while the mean robotic resection was 2.5 ± 0.9 [1-5] (mean difference = 0.21 mm, 95% CI [-0.66 to 1.08]). There was a strong correlation between these two values (Pearson's rank R = 0.82, p < 0.001). Intra- and inter-observer reliability were also strong (Pearson's rank R = 0.88, p < 0.001, and Pearson's rank R = 0.84, p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study describes and validates with robotic information a simple and reproducible preoperative planning method to determine femoral and tibial bone resection for medial UKA implantation using antero-posterior valgus stress knee radiographs, leaving a medial safety laxity of 2 mm. It represents a very valuable contribution to the understanding of UKA principles, which can serve to extend its indications and increase reproducibility of the surgical technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective cohort study.

Enhancing robotic precision in medial UKA: Image-based robot-assisted system had higher accuracy in implant positioning than imageless robot-assisted system across 292 knees.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the degree of accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment offered by two robot-assisted (RA) systems: an image-based robot-assisted (IBRA) versus an imageless robot-assisted (ILRA) system for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: This retrospective radiographic study included medial UKAs performed between 2011 and 2023. Radiographic measurements taken preoperatively and at 1-year postoperative control visit focusing on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial component coronal alignment relative to Cartier's angle and restoration of proper joint line (JL) height were analyzed. Outliers for postoperative measurements were defined as follows: HKA <175° or >180°, PTS <2° or >8°, >3° or <-3° alterations in Cartier's angle and ±2 mm changes in the height of the joint line. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 292 medial UKAs: 95 (32.5%) with an IBRA system and 197 (67.5%) with an ILRA system. Implant positioning and limb alignment were more accurate in the group of patients treated with IBRA, HKA (77.9% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.07), PTS (93.7% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.01), restoration of tibial varus relative to Cartier's angle (87.4% vs. 65%, p < 0.001) and restoration of JL height (81.1% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Medial UKA surgery using an IBRA system was associated with a higher degree of accuracy in implant positioning and postoperative limb alignment as compared to an ILRA system. This is a valuable contribution to help communicate the advantages of using this surgical technique and improve its reproducibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasties had similar gait patterns in the short term.

PURPOSE: Surgeons want to achieve native kinematics in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cruciate-substituting (CS) implants could restore the knee kinematics more efficiently than posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA. This study aimed to compare gait patterns in patients with CS or PS TKA at 6 months. The hypothesis was that CS implants would demonstrate comparable gait parameters to PS implants at 6 months. METHODS: In this prospective case-control study, 38 primary TKA without coronal laxity were divided into 2 groups: 19 cruciate-substituting (CS) and 19 posterior-stabilised (PS) implants. The type of prosthesis was determined according to the surgical period. Exclusion criteria were TKA revision, associated procedures and inability to walk on a treadmill. Gait analysis was conducted on a treadmill 6 months postoperatively for each patient with a knee assessment device (KneeKG®). Gait characteristics included analysis in three spatial dimensions (flexion-extension, abduction-adduction, internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation). Clinical outcomes (Knee Society Score and Forgotten Joint Score) were compared between both groups at 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: At 6 months, the gait analysis did not demonstrate any significant difference between CS and PS implants. The range and the maximum anteroposterior translation were similar in both groups (9.2 ± 6.5 mm in CS group vs. 8.1 ± 3 mm in PS group (n.s.); and - 5.2 ± 5 mm in CS group vs. - 6.3 ± 5.9 mm in PS group (n.s.), respectively). The internal/external rotation, the flexion, and the varus angle were similar between CS and PS implants. The KSS Knee score was higher at 6 months in the CS group than in the PS group (92.1 ± 5.6 vs. 84.8 ± 8.9 (p < 0.01)). CONCLUSION: Cruciate-substituting and posterior-stabilised TKA had similar gait patterns at 6 months postoperatively, despite a non-equivalent posterior stabilisation system. CS prostheses were an interesting option for primary TKA for knee kinematics restoration without requiring a femoral box. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, case-control study; Level II.

Combination of a High Residual Varus and Joint-Line Lowering Strongly Increases the Risk of Early Implant Failure in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Outliers in implant positioning, malalignment, and joint line height change are risk factors for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) failure. However, their relationships and patterns in large datasets remain unexplored. This study assessed medial UKA survival in a large cohort and explored associated risk factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on medial UKA patients (2011 to 2019). Radiological outcomes included tibial implant positioning in the coronal plane, posterior tibial slope, residual knee deformity, and joint line restitution. Survival rate at last follow-up was recorded. Multinomial logistic regression analyzed risk factors, incorporating demographic and univariate analysis data. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-six knees met inclusion criteria, with 10 lost to follow-up (2.7%). Mean follow-up was 61.3 months [24.1 to 135.1]. 5- and 10-year implant survival rates were 92% ± 1.6 and 88.4% ± 3.8, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) ≤ 175° (OR = 5.30 [1.64 to 17.13], P = .005) and joint line lowering ≥2 mm (OR = 8.86 [2.06 to 38.06]) as significant risk factors for tibial implant failure. Their combination carried a significantly high risk of failure (OR = 10.3 [3.1 to 34.3]). Post-operative HKA < 175° was common in knees with pre-operative HKA < 172°. CONCLUSION: This study reports encouraging 5- and 10-year survival outcomes for medial UKA. Tibial loosening was the main reason for revision. Patients with joint line lowering ≥ 2 mm and post-operative HKA ≤ 175° were at high risk of tibial implant failure. Surgeons should carefully restore the joint line in cases of pre-operative HKA < 172°.

Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees.

PURPOSE: Implant malpositioning, joint line (JL) lowering, and malalignment have been identified as risk factors for implant failure in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The aims of this study were to compare the accuracy of implant positioning in robotic-assisted UKA versus conventional UKA in a large cohort and examine the correlation with implant survival at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective study included 356 medial UKAs from 2011 to 2019. The radiological measurements performed were coronal positioning of tibial implant according to Cartier angle (Δ Cartier), posterior tibial slope (PTS), residual hip-knee-ankle (HKA), and JL restoration. Outliers were defined as follows: post-operative HKA < 175° or > 180°, Δ Cartier > 3° or < - 3°, JL change ≥ 2 mm, and PTS < 2° or > 8°. The survival probability was reported at the last follow-up. RESULTS: Out of the 356 knees included, 159 underwent conventional UKA (44.5%) and 197 (55.5%) robotic-assisted UKA. The mean follow-up was 61.3 months ± 24.0. Robotic UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA in relation to HKA (67% vs 56%, p = 0.023), JL restoration (70% vs 44%, p < 0.0001), PTS (83% vs 55%, p < 0.0001), and tibial varus restoration (65% vs 55%, p = 0.049). Implant survival in the robotic group was found to be superior at the last follow-up (96.4% versus 87.3% at 9 years, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Robotic assistance in patients undergoing medial UKA was associated with better accuracy compared to conventional UKA with respect to tibial implant positioning, post-operative limb alignment, and JL restoration. This was translated in improved survival at mid-term follow-up favouring the robotic group.

Is combined robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction a good solution for the young arthritic knee?

PURPOSE: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency can be a consequence or a cause of femoro-tibial osteoarthritis (OA). Several studies have published satisfactory outcomes of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and combined ACL reconstruction despite its absence classically being considered a contraindication. A major challenge in the ACL deficient knee is obtaining appropriate gap balancing and limb axis. Robotically assisted UKA allows for precise control of these factors; however, it's utilisation as a tool with combined ACL reconstruction and UKA has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of robotically assisted UKA with combined ACL reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study of ten patients operated by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2020. All surgery was performed using a cemented fixed bearing UKA prosthesis (Journey uni, Smith and Nephew®) (8 medial, 2 lateral) inserted with the assistance of an image-free robotic-assisted system (BlueBelt, Navio, Smith and Nephew®). All ACL reconstructions were performed using hamstring autograft. Clinical assessment included International Knee Score (IKS) score, Tegner score and patient satisfaction. Radiological assessment was performed to assess radiolucent lines, progression of OA in the other compartments, Hip-Knee-Ankle angle and Posterior Tibial Slope. RESULTS: There were eight females (80%), mean age was 57 ± 7 [48-70], mean BMI was 26 ± 3 [22-31]. The mean follow-up was 45 months ± 13 months [24-66]. Mean post-operative IKS knee and function score were respectively 96 ± 4.5 [88-100] and 93 ± 8.2 [74-100], mean Tegner score was 4.5 ± 1.4 [3-6]. Nine patients (90%) returned to sport; one patient (10%) was dissatisfied because of residual pain preventing a return to a desired level of sport. 100% of the radiological objectives were achieved. No radiolucent lines were seen at the last follow-up. There were two re-operations (20%) for stiffness requiring arthroscopic arthrolysis at two and three months respectively following surgery, with full recovery of the flexion at the last follow-up in both cases. No other complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Robotic UKA associated with ACL reconstruction provides satisfactory early patient outcomes and accurate implant positioning. The first results in terms of return to sports were promising.

How long does image based robotic total knee arthroplasty take during the learning phase? Analysis of the key steps from the first fifty cases.

INTRODUCTION: Robotically assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is an emerging surgical tool. The purpose of this study was to analyze the length of time taken to perform the key steps of a RA-TKA for a surgeon and centre new to the MAKO robotic system. METHOD: This was a prospective cohort study of the first 50 patients undergoing TKA using a robotic platform (Mako, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) performed by a single surgeon. Each key surgical step was recorded. The first 50 patients were chronologically allocated into five groups of ten and compared. RESULTS: Mean operation length was 59.4 ± 7.4 min with significant improvement after 30 cases. A significant effect on certain steps of the surgery also occurred over 50 cases: after 30 cases for pre-operative planning (3.8 min in group 1 versus 1.2 min in group 4, p < 0.005), ten cases for registration time (5.2 min in group 1 versus 3.8 in group 2, p = 0.039) and ten cases for tibial cutting time (1.6 min in group 1 versus 1.3 in group 2, p < 0.005). Nurse setup, femur cutting, and intraoperative planning did not demonstrate a significant improvement in time over 50 cases. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in total operating length occurred after the 30th case. Anatomical registration and tibial cutting time demonstrated the largest improvements. MAKO image-based robotically assisted TKA is not a time-intensive intervention for both the surgeon and scrub nursing staff, and significant improvements in total surgical time occurs early in the learning phase.

Image-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty through direct anterior approach allows a better orientation of the acetabular cup and a better restitution of the centre of rotation than a conventional procedure.

PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate the contribution of robotics assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) through direct anterior approach (DAA) in improving radiographic precision, functional results and complications. METHODS: This retrospective study compared 100 primary conventional THA (cTHA) to 50 primary robotic THA (rTHA) through DAA. All cups were placed with the objective of having no anterior overhang while respecting the safe zones (SZ). Radiographic analysis included cup inclination and anteversion, vertical and horizontal changes of the rotation centre (ΔVCOR, ΔHCOR), acetabular and femoral offset. SZ were 30-50° of inclination and 10-30° of anteversion. Outliers were defined as medial displacement of the COR > 5 mm, vertical displacement of the COR > 3 mm superiorly. Harris hip score (HHS) and complications were compared at one year of follow-up. RESULTS: The robotic cups were better oriented with 98% in the global SZ versus 68% in the cTHA group (p = 0.0002). The COR was on average better restored in the robotic group in both the horizontal and vertical planes (Δ HCOR = - 5.0 ± 5.0 vs - 3.4 ± 4.9, p = 0.03; Δ VCOR = 1.6 ± 3.3 vs 0.2 ± 2.7, p = 0.04). There were fewer outliers in the rTHA group concerning VCOR (28% versus 10%, p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in HHS and complication rate at one year. CONCLUSION: The use of robotics for THA by DAA provided an advantage in controlling the orientation of the cup and the restoration of its rotation centre. Thanks to the 3D planning on CT scan, it allowed to respect the thresholds while avoiding the anterior overhangs.

Functional implant positioning in total hip arthroplasty and the role of robotic-arm assistance.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate implant positioning, tailored to the phenotype and unique biomechanics of each patient is the single most important objective in achieving stability in THA and maximise range of motion. The spine-pelvis-hip construct functions as a single unit adapting to postural changes. It is widely accepted in the literature that no universaltarget exists and variations in spinopelvic mobility mandate adjustments to the surgical plan; thus bringing to the fore the concept of personalised, functional component positioning. METHODS: This manuscript aims to outline the challenges posed by spinopelvic imbalance and present a reproducible, stepwise approach to achieve functional-component positioning. We also present the one-year functional outcomes and Patient Reported Outcome Measures of a prospective cohort operated with this technique. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Robotic-arm assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty has facilitated enhanced planning based on the patient's phenotype and evidence suggests it results in more reproducible and accurate implant positioning. Preservation of offset, avoiding leg-length discrepancy, accurate restoration of the centre of rotation and accomplishing the combinedversion target are very important parameters in Total Hip Arthroplasty that affect post-operative implant longevity, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Similar kinematic patterns between revision total stabilized (TS) and primary posterior stabilized (PS) knee prostheses: a prospective case-controlled study with gait assessment.

PURPOSE: There are increased surgical considerations when revising total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in active patients. Few studies have assessed if a semi-constrained [Total Stabilized (TS)] prostheses has similar knee biomechanics to a primary posterior stabilized (PS) prosthesis. The aim was to compare the gait parameters in patients with PS or TS TKA and normal controls. METHODS: 32 patients with TKA were prospectively included with either a primary PS (n = 15) or a revision TS (n = 17) prosthesis. Gait analysis was performed at 6 months postoperatively for each patient, with an optoelectronic knee assessment device (KneeKG®) assessing the displacement of the tibia relative to the femur during the different gait phases (flexion/extension, anterior/posterior translation, adduction/abduction, internal/external rotation). A control group (n = 12) of healthy knees was compared with the TKA groups. RESULTS: There were no significant kinematic differences between PS and TS groups. The maximum knee flexion during gait was 53° ± 8.1° in the PS group vs 52° ± 8.7° in the TS group. The antero-posterior translation was similar in both group (2.3 ± 0.5 mm vs 2.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively). Peak varus angle during loading and swing phase was slightly higher in the TS group (2.7° ± 0.7° and 5.2° ± 0.9°) than in the PS group (2.9° ± 0.6° and 5.6° ± 1.2°), without significant difference. The ranges in internal/external rotation were similar between PS and TS TKA (3.7° ± 0.5° vs 3.3° ± 0.6°, respectively). Both designs approached closely the normal gait patterns of the control group except in the frontal plane. CONCLUSION: Single radius TS TKA has gait parameters similar to single radius PS TKA. Use of a single radius TS TKA in revision TKA is not detrimental to a patient's gait pattern. Both designs approached closely the normal gait patterns of the control group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, case-control study; Level III.

Greater trochanter fractures in the direct anterior approach: evolution during learning curve, risk factors and consequences.

INTRODUCTION: Greater trochanter (GT) fractures affect 0.6-29% of patients after direct anterior approach (DAA) total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the growing popularity of this approach, this study aimed to assess the evolution of the GT fractures during the learning curve, their risk factors and their consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 537 total hip arthroplasties were retrospectively included from May 2013 to December 2017 in a single academic centre. Patient characteristics, perioperative management, clinical consequences and postoperative radiographs were analysed. RESULTS: GT fractures represented 2.4% (n = 13) of the THA, and there was not a decrease with experience. The GT fracture patients did not require any additional support during the surgery, and full weight bearing was always allowed without any restriction. This complication only happened in females, with the risk significantly increased in those > 70 years old (OR = 4.9). There was no specific consequence during the follow-up, mean HHS score was 98.5 and all of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Older osteoporotic women are known to be at risk for GT fracture during DAA THA. Those results reinforce the argument in favour of proper patient selection in DAA to lower the complications since it does not improve with surgeon's experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective, consecutive case series; Level IV.

Transitioning the total hip arthroplasty technique from posterior approach in lateral position to direct anterior approach in supine position-risk factors for acetabular malpositioning and the learning curve.

PURPOSE: Cup positioning is important for optimum hip stability, avoiding component impingement and decreasing both bearing surface wear and revision rate. Transitioning from posterior approach in a lateral position to direct anterior approach (DAA) in a supine presents unique challenges for surgeons. The aim of this study was to examine the learning curve when using standard instrumentation that was not specific to DAA. METHODS: A consecutive retrospective series of 537 total hip arthroplasty by DAA from May 2013 to December 2017. Cup positioning was analysed on radiographs and classified whether inside or outside two safe zones (inclination 30-50° and anteversion 10-30°). The demographic data (age, BMI, gender, neck shaft angle (NSA)), surgeon's dominant side and experience were assessed as risk factors. RESULTS: Eighty per cent of cups (n = 426) were in the combined safe zones. Eighty-eight per cent (n = 470) were in appropriate anteversion and 87% (n = 463) abduction. Two factors that were significant were identified: Cups of left hips operated by right-handed surgeons were more anteverted (OR = 4.06) and more vertical (OR = 2.23); females had a higher anteversion of the cup (OR = 2.42). Obesity, age and NSA were not risk factors for cup malposition. There was a spike of cups too horizontal at the beginning of the experience (OR = 3.86), and no learning curve was observed in the other orientations. CONCLUSION: With our DAA technique using standard instrumentation, there were no risk factors linked to the patient identified for cup malposition. DAA-specific instrumentation is not required to achieve optimum positioning of the cup. Surgeon has to be aware of an excess of abduction at the beginning of his experience and an excess of anteversion and adduction when performing THA on the opposite side of his dominant hand.

Adapting hip arthroplasty practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: Assessing the impact of outpatient care sudden increase on early complications and clinical outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected access to timely care for patients with hip osteoarthritis requiring total hip replacement (THR). This study aimed to assess the changes in surgical activity, outpatient treatment, length of stay (LOS), discharge destinations, readmission rates, clinical outcomes, and patient satisfaction before and after the pandemic at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study encompassed patients undergoing primary THR through the direct anterior approach at a single university hospital. Data on demographic characteristics, surgical technique, perioperative management, LOS, discharge destinations, complications, and clinical outcomes were collected. Furthermore, a comparative analysis between the pre-pandemic (2019) and post-pandemic (2022) periods was conducted. RESULTS: There was a 14% increase in surgical activity post-pandemic, with 214 patients undergoing surgery in 2019 versus 284 in 2022. The percentage of patients managed as outpatients significantly increased from 0.5% in 2019 to 29.6% in 2022 (p < 0.001). LOS decreased from 2.7 ± 1 [0-8] days to 1.4 ± 1.1 [0-12] days (p < 0.001), and the rate of discharge to rehabilitation centres declined from 21.5% to 8.8% (p < 0.001). No significant increase in the readmission rates was observed (1.4% in both periods). At two months postoperatively, the mean HHS and satisfaction rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 1 and p = 0.73, respectively). DISCUSSION: Despite the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, surgical activity at our institution demonstrated an increase compared to the pre-pandemic levels by expanding outpatient care, reducing LOS, and increasing rates of home discharges. Importantly, these changes did not adversely affect rehospitalization rates or early clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Do the porous custom implants have a position consistent with the planning and allow anatomical reconstruction of hip center of rotation in complex acetabular revisions Paprosky III?

INTRODUCTION: In revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), the advent of porous custom-made triflange acetabular implants with 3D scan planning offers a new perspective to improve implantation accuracy and anatomical restoration of the center of rotation (COR). This issue was investigated using CT-scan as the measurement tool, but in limited series (±10 cases) and without investigating the factors that may influence errors in positioning. Therefore we performed a retrospective study aiming to: (1) assess the placement accuracy of such implants with respect to the preoperative planning, (2) examine whether the volume of bone to be resected in order to apply the implant had an impact on this accuracy, (3) assess if errors in position at surgery had any influence on function, complications and survival. HYPOTHESIS: Preoperative planning could be accurately reproduced when implanting porous custom-made acetabular implants, and that accuracy would decrease in proportion to the volume of bone to be resected METHOD: Twenty patients undergoing THA revision with porous custom-made acetabular implants were included in this single-center retrospective study. Mean follow-up was 17.9 months ± 9.4 [2-45.1]. Preoperative planning was performed using 3D scanographic modeling. A post-operative CT scan was performed to assess implantation accuracy in terms of orientation and COR restitution. Demographic data, Oxford scores, complications and survival were recorded. RESULTS: Mean deviation from the preoperative planning in inclination, anteversion and rotation were 4.3 ° ± 2.5, 6.1 ° ± 4.7, and 7 ° ± 4.6, respectively. Restoration of the COR showed a mean deviation of 2.1 ± 1.3 mm anteroposteriorly, 2.5 ± 2 mm mediolaterally and 2.2 ± 1.3 mm proximodistally. In total, 45% (9/20) of implants were positioned with perfect restoration of orientation (±10 °) and COR (±5 mm). The mean planned bone resection was 8.1 ± 4.9 cm3, with placement accuracy and COR restitution decreasing significantly when the volume of bone to be resected exceeded 2.7 cm3. One dislocation was found (5%, 1/20). Survival at last follow-up was 100%, the mean Oxford score at follow-up was 31.7 ± 7.9 [16-52], without being influenced by errors in position or COR restitution. CONCLUSION: In total 45% of the implants restored an orientation and a COR as planned, particularly when the volume of bone to be resected is less than 2.7 cm3. Although these are complex cases with large amounts of bone loss, 3D manufacturing could give us hope of greater precision. The link between better precision and low bone resection volume could be an area to develop with the manufacturer in order to improve results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; diagnostic using CT in transversal retrospective study.

Monobloc dual-mobility acetabular component versus a standard single-mobility acetabular component.

Aims: The benefit of a dual-mobility acetabular component (DMC) for primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is controversial. This study aimed to compare the dislocation and complication rates when using a DMC compared to single-mobility (SM) acetabular component in primary elective THA using data collected at a single centre, and compare the revision rates and survival outcomes in these two groups. Methods: Between 2010 and 2019, 2,075 primary THAs using either a cementless DM or SM acetabular component were included. Indications for DMC were patients aged older than 70 years or with high risk of dislocation. All other patients received a SM acetabular component. Exclusion criteria were cemented implants, patients treated for femoral neck fracture, and follow-up of less than one year. In total, 1,940 THAs were analyzed: 1,149 DMC (59.2%) and 791 SM (40.8%). The mean age was 73 years (SD 9.2) in the DMC group and 57 years (SD 12) in the SM group. Complications and revisions have been analyzed retrospectively. Results: The mean follow-up was 41.9 months (SD 14; 12 to 134). There were significantly fewer dislocations in the DMC group (n = 2; 0.17%) compared to the SM group (n = 8; 1%) (p = 0.019). The femoral head size did not influence the dislocation rate in the SM group (p = 0.702). The overall complication rate in the DMC group was 5.1% (n = 59) and in the SM group was 6.7% (n = 53); these were not statistically different (p = 0.214). No specific complications were attributed to the use of DMCs. In the DMC group, 18 THAs (1.6%) were revised versus 15 THAs in the SM group (1.9%) (p = 0.709). There was no statistical difference for any cause of revisions in both groups. The acetabular component aseptic revision-free survival rates at five years were 98% in the DMC group and 97.3% in the SM group (p = 0.780). Conclusion: The use of a monobloc DMC had a lower risk of dislocation in a high-risk population than SM component in a low-risk population at the mid-term follow-up. There was no significant risk of component-specific complications or revisions with DMCs in this large cohort.

Predictive radiological parameters of failure following surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement associated with borderline acetabular dysplasia.

INTRODUCTION: The role of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in mild or borderline hip dysplasia (lateral center edge angle=18-25) is controversial. It is recommended to combine capsular plication with femoral neck osteoplasty and suture repair of the labrum. Few studies have investigated which radiological parameters are associated with failure of this procedure. HYPOTHESIS: A larger number of radiological signs of mild or borderline hip dysplasia than radiological signs of FAI negatively influence the outcomes of arthroscopic treatment. METHODS: This was a retrospective study done with data collected prospectively after a minimum of 2 years' follow-up in patients who underwent arthroscopic treatment of FAI due to cam impingement combined with mild to moderate hip dysplasia. Patients with hip osteoarthritis graded as ≥ Tönnis 2 were excluded. Functional outcome scores (mHHS and NAHS) were determined along with the need for reoperation. Three groups were defined based on the outcomes: success (mHHS ≥ Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State [PASS]); moderate improvement (improvement in mHHS + mHHS

Transverse subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy with double tension-band fixation during THA for Crowe III-IV developmental dysplasia: 12-year outcomes.

BACKGROUND: When performing total hip arthroplasty in patients with severe developmental dysplasia, shortening the femur facilitates reduction while also preventing sciatic or crural nerve injury and excessive length of the operated limb. No consensus exists about the optimal type of implant and best internal fixation procedure, two parameters that directly govern the risk of the most common intraoperative and postoperative complications (diaphyseal fractures, dislocation, non-union). To minimise these risks, we developed a technique combining a transverse subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy, a long ovoid-profiled, cementless stem anchored in the metaphysis, and double tension-band wiring for internal fixation. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of this technique with emphasis on (i) complications and femoral implant survival, (ii) clinical outcomes (functional scores and lower-limb length inequality [LLLI]), and time to healing. HYPOTHESIS: Our technique is associated with low rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-centre retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent THA with a transverse subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and fixation using double tension-band wiring to treat severe (Crowe III or IV) developmental hip dysplasia. The femoral implant was a long, ovoid, cementless stem fully coated with hydroxyapatite. We collected the intraoperative and postoperative complications, survival, LLLI, functional scores (Harris Hip Score [HHS] and Forgotten Joint Score [FJS]), patient satisfaction, and radiographic outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 31 hips in 25 patients. Two patients (2/31 hips, 6.5%) were lost to follow-up, leaving 29 hips for the analysis of postoperative outcomes. Mean follow-up was 13.7±4.2 years (range, 5.8-18.3 years). The four intraoperative complications (4/31, 12.9%) consisted fracture of the diaphysis (2/31, 6.5%), fracture of the greater trochanter (1/31, 3.2%), and sciatic nerve injury followed by a full recovery (1/29, 3.4%). The 8 (8/29, 27.5%) postoperative complications consisted of dislocation (2/29, 6.9%), stem subsidence (2/29, 6.9%), and non-union (4/29, 13.8%). Femoral implant survival at last follow-up was 87.1% (95% CI, 76.1-99.7). The mean HHS increased from 39.6±12.0 (range, 14-61) before surgery to 81.7±13.2 (range, 48-100) at last follow-up (p<0.01). The FJS at last follow-up indicated that the joint was forgotten in 14/29 (48.2%) cases and caused only acceptable symptoms in 9/29 (31.0%) of cases. Clinically significant (≥ 1cm) LLLI was present in 8/29 (27.6%) patients postoperatively compared to 19/29 (65.5%) preoperatively. The mean LLLI decreased from 20.8±19.7mm (range, 0-60mm) to 5.0±7.3mm (range, 0-30mm). Mean time to healing was 4.3±2.4 months (range, 2-11 months). CONCLUSION: Regarding these complex procedures, this technique was associated with low rates of intraoperative fractures and early postoperative complications. However, femoral stem survival was shorter than in earlier studies and the non-union rate was high, despite satisfactory functional and clinical outcomes.

No dislocation and low complication rate for a modern dual mobility cup with pre-impacted femoral head in primary hip replacement: A consecutive series of 175 hips at minimum 5-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its excellent results in preventing dislocation, the dual mobility cup (DMC) is still struggling to be adopted by some teams due to premature wear and loosening reported on first-generation implants. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the mid-term survivorship of a modern DMC with a pre-impacted head and the radio-clinical results at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-centre study performed on patients who had a primary total hip replacement for osteoarthritis in 2016. The cup was a third-generation DMC with a pre-impacted femoral head. Clinical (harris hip score (HHS)) and radiological (cup abduction, anteversion, overhang, and radiolucent lines) results were recorded, as well as complications, particularly dislocations and survivorship. A minimum of five years of follow-ups was required. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-five hips (167 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Five hips (2.9%, 5/175) were lost to follow-up and excluded from the postoperative analysis. The mean follow-up period was 70 ± 2.9 months [63.6-76.5]. Three cups needed revision surgery (1.8%, 3/170): one for septic loosening, and two for chronic infection. At 77 months, the global survival probability was 98.2% ± 1, and the survival probability excluding septic aetiology was 100%. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from pre-operatively (48.3 ± 6.0 [14.0-70.0]) to post-operatively (96 ± 4.5 [50-100]) (p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative dislocations recorded, nor any iliopsoas-impingement or symptomatic cam-effect. DISCUSSION: This study showed excellent survival and good radiological and clinical results of this dual mobility cup at a mid-term follow-up. None of the patients had dislocation or any specific complication feared with dual mobility cups.

Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty-Rationale and Technique for the Valgus Morphotype Using an Image Based Robotic Platform and Individualized Planning.

Functional alignment (FA) is a novel philosophy to deliver a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that respects individual bony and soft tissue phenotypes within defined limitations. The purpose of this paper is to describe the rationale and technique of FA in the valgus morphotype with the use of an image-based robotic-platform. For the valgus phenotype the principles are personalized pre-operative planning, reconstitution of native coronal alignment without residual varus or valgus of more than 3°, restoration of dynamic sagittal alignment within 5° of neutral, implant sizing to match anatomy, and achievement of defined soft tissue laxity in extension and flexion through implant manipulation within the defined boundaries. An individualized plan is created from pre-operative imaging. Next, a reproducible and quantifiable assessment of soft tissue laxity is performed in extension and flexion. Implant positioning is then manipulated in all three planes if necessary to achieve target gap measurements and a final limb position within a defined coronal and sagittal range. FA is a novel TKA technique that aims to restore constitutional bony alignment and balance the laxity of the soft tissues by placing and sizing implants in a manner that respects variations in individual anatomy and soft tissues within defined limits.