RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To help increase the number of transplants available for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers, this single-centre retrospective study compared the safety and feasibility of new, more liberal, selection criteria--no more than five tumours, with the largest tumour no greater than 5 cm (5/5 criteria)--with classical criteria. METHODS: Data from operations performed in 1990-2005 were extracted from preoperative radiological findings and postoperative specimen analyses, and four groups were constructed: Paul Brousse, Milan, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and 5/5 criteria. A fifth group comprised patients whose tumour load exceeded the 5/5 criteria. Survival and recurrence rates were compared. RESULTS: For the 110 patients in the study, survival rates (overall and disease-free) were 72.8 and 66.8 per cent at 5 and 10 years respectively, with a 5.5 per cent recurrence rate. The 5-year survival rate was 65, 77, 68 and 77 per cent for Paul Brousse, Milan, UCSF and 5/5 preoperative radiological criteria, with recurrence rates of 4, 4, 3 and 3 per cent, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the only factor that influenced survival was tumour load in excess of the 5/5 criteria. CONCLUSION: Use of the more liberal 5/5 criteria for selecting patients for liver transplantation results in similar disease-free and overall survival rates to classical criteria.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , PronósticoRESUMEN
AIM: To assess the consequences of graft steatosis on postoperative liver function as compared with normal liver grafts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2007, liver transplant patients were prospectively included, excluding those who experienced arterial or biliary complications or presented acute rejection. All patients had a surgical biopsy after reperfusion. Patients were compared according to the rate of macrovacuolar steatosis: namely above or below 20%. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were included: 10 in the steatosis group and 43 in the control group. No significant difference was observed in terms of morbidity, mortality, and primary non- or poor function. Nevertheless, biological changes after the procedure were significantly different during the first postoperative week. Prothrombin time, serum bilirubin, and transaminases were significantly increased among the steatosis group compared with the control group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: This case-controlled study including a small number of patients, described postoperative biological changes among liver transplantations with steatosis in the graft.
Asunto(s)
Factor V/análisis , Hígado Graso/epidemiología , Trasplante de Hígado/fisiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Tiempo de Protrombina , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/sangre , Bilirrubina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Choledocholithiasis is a not uncommon and potentially grave condition which requires a well-adapted approach. Echo endoscopy and biliary MRI have improved the ability to make the diagnosis non-invasively, but intraoperative cholangiography remains the most accurate study. A surgical approach permits simultaneous treatment of both choledocholithiasis and the associated cholecystolithiasis; laparoscopic common duct exploration has been more frequently performed through a laparoscopic approach in recent years, but this procedure requires specific equipment and surgical experience. In most circumstances, surgery should be preferred to endoscopic clearance of the common duct, but endoscopy may be preferred in the setting of severe cholangitis or pancreatitis. The importance of a systematic search for asymptomatic choledocholithiasis is once again emphasized.