Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Am J Med ; 83(3): 425-30, 1987 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3661581

RESUMEN

Use of pneumococcal vaccine remains controversial. To further study this question, 89 patients hospitalized at the Denver Veterans Administration Medical Center with pneumococcal bacteremia were chosen as the case group for a case-control study. The control group was made up of patients matched on the basis of age, date of admission, and comorbid conditions. Vaccination status in the bacteremic patients and control patients was determined, as were pneumococcal serotypes among the bacteremic patients. If the vaccine were protective, vaccination rates should be higher among the control patients, and serotype distribution should be different in vaccinated and nonvaccinated bacteremic patients. There were no differences between vaccination rates among bacteremic patients (29 percent) and control patients (24 percent). Furthermore, 65 percent of the blood isolates from nonvaccinated bacteremic patients were serotypes included in the vaccine, as compared with 69 percent of the isolates in vaccinated bacteremic patients. Pneumococcal vaccine did not appear to be protective in this high-risk population.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas Bacterianas , Neumonía Neumocócica/prevención & control , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Vacunación , Factores de Edad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas , Factores de Riesgo , Sepsis/inmunología , Serotipificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/clasificación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda