Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 31(1): 7-9, 1987 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3825478

RESUMEN

Twenty-five non-smokers and 35 smokers who had abstained overnight from cigarette smoking and were undergoing minor elective orthopaedic surgery were studied in order to compare gastric volume and pH. There was no significant difference in aspirated volume and pH both just after intubation and prior to extubation between the two groups, thus indicating that habitual smokers undergoing elective surgery in general anaesthesia do not have increased risk of acid pulmonary aspiration compared with non-smokers.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Determinación de la Acidez Gástrica , Jugo Gástrico/análisis , Halotano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Óxido Nitroso , Ortopedia , Neumonía por Aspiración/prevención & control , Riesgo , Tiopental
3.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 28(2): 128-31, 1984 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-6730871

RESUMEN

Delayed hypersensitivity to four common antigens was assessed in 32 patients undergoing major abdominal surgery randomly allocated to either general anesthesia (fentanyl + O2/N2O + postoperative pain relief with systemic opiates) or general anaesthesia + epidural analgesia (local anaesthetics + morphine) continued for 72 h. Skin-test responses were performed 2 days before surgery and 1 day after surgery and compared to a similar retesting schedule in 16 comparable non-operative control patients. Cumulated mean skin-test responses increased from 1290 to 2330 mm2 (P less than 0.0001) during retesting in the non-operative control group. In contrast, mean skin-test responses in patients operated during general anaesthesia + systemic opiates for postoperative pain relief fell from 1422 to 1227 mm2 (P = 0.3) and in patients receiving epidural analgesia from 1228 to 890 mm2 (P = 0.06), without statistically significant differences between these two groups (P greater than 0.5). Thus, surgery leads to depression of delayed hypersensitivity and this impairment in immunofunction is not modified by an epidural analgesic regimen providing adequate pain relief.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/inmunología , Anciano , Anestesia General , Humanos , Inmunocompetencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pruebas Cutáneas
4.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 29(8): 790-6, 1985 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-4082879

RESUMEN

A hundred patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery were randomized to either general anaesthesia (low-dose fentanyl) and systemic morphine for postoperative pain or combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia with etidocaine 1.5% intraoperatively (T4-S5) and bupivacaine 0.5% 5 ml/4 h for 24 h and morphine 4 mg/12 h for 72 h. Postoperative pain was better controlled by the epidural regimen (P less than 0.0001). We found no significant reduction in postoperative mortality (6% to 2%), pneumonia (28% to 20%), cardiac dysrhythmia (10% to 5%) and wound complications (14% to 11%) by the epidural analgesic regimen. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (125I-fibrinogen scan) was 32% after general anaesthesia and low-dose heparin and 34% after epidural analgesia with no prophylactic antithrombotic treatment (P greater than 0.9). Postoperative weight loss and decrease in serum-albumin and serum-transferrin, as well as the reduction in haemoglobin and the need for postoperative transfusions, were similar in the two groups. Convalescence, as assessed by postoperative fatigue, restoration of bowel function (flatus, bowel movement and food intake) and the time until the patients were self-aided at their preoperative level, was not reduced by epidural analgesia. Since 50% of the patients in each group suffered from one or more of the above-mentioned postoperative complications, this epidural regimen was not effective in reducing postoperative morbidity after major abdominal surgery despite the achievement of adequate pain relief.


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Anestesia Epidural , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Morfina/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Bupivacaína/administración & dosificación , Etidocaína/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Distribución Aleatoria
5.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 31(2): 165-7, 1987 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3564874

RESUMEN

Paracetamol 20 mg kg-1 dissolved in 200 ml of water was given by mouth to seven patients undergoing minor orthopaedic surgery in spinal analgesia, and again 2 weeks later. The rate of paracetamol absorption was significantly delayed by spinal analgesia and surgery, indicating an inhibition of peroperative drug absorption and gastric emptying. The effect of spinal analgesia on gastric emptying was not able to normalize the delayed peroperative gastric emptying produced by surgery, and suggests that surgery is an important factor in peroperatively delayed gastric emptying.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Absorción Intestinal , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/metabolismo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Acetaminofén/metabolismo , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda