Low-dose dobutamine nitrate-enhanced technetium 99m sestamibi gated SPECT versus low-dose dobutamine echocardiography for detecting reversible dysfunction in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: The simultaneous assessment of perfusion and function with the use of technetium 99m sestamibi gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is helpful for the detection of myocardial viability, but its value in comparison with more established methods is not yet defined. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study compared low-dose dobutamine (LDD) nitrate-enhanced gated SPECT with LDD echocardiography for predicting recovery of regional ventricular function after revascularization in 25 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In both studies, regional function (wall motion and thickening) at rest, during inotropic stimulation, and after revascularization was scored by a 4-point scale. In LDD echocardiography, the prediction of reversible dysfunction was based on the recognition of contractile reserve in asynergic (hypokinetic or a-dyskinetic) segments. In LDD gated sestamibi SPECT, reversible dysfunction was predicted on the basis of perfusion quantification (sestamibi uptake >or= 50%) in a-dyskinetic segments and on the basis of contractile reserve in hypokinetic segments. LDD echocardiography predicted reversible dysfunction with sensitivity, specificity, and global accuracy of 57%, 85%, and 75%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of LDD gated SPECT for identifying dysfunctional segments capable of functional recovery were 77% and 88%, respectively, with a diagnostic accuracy of 84% (P <.02 vs LDD echocardiography). CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of 2 different markers of viability, such as cellular integrity in a-dyskinetic segments and contractile reserve in hypokinetic segments, as permitted by LDD gated sestamibi SPECT, showed higher predictive accuracy for reversible dysfunction than the assessment of contractile reserve in all asynergic segments with LDD echocardiography.

Heart rate regularisation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation implanted with a VVI(R) pacemaker.

UNLABELLED: Irregularity of ventricular cycles is a cause of haemodynamic impairment and symptoms in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). AIM OF THE STUDY: Aim of the study was to determine the optimal pacing rate to stabilise ventricular cycle length at rest in patients with chronic AF, bradycardiac symptoms and VVI pacing. METHODS: The compensatory pause (CP) in AF, as defined by Langendorf, was used as a reference value in pacing the heart. The spontaneous mean heart rate (MHR) was assessed with the PM OFF. The CP was then calculated with the pacing rate programmed at 40 bpm. Four pacing rates were tested: rate of the CP (RCP), RCP + 5 bpm, RCP - 5 bpm and RCP - 10 bpm. RESULTS: RCP provided a good estimate of the MHR (r = 0.92). Pacing percentage (P%) was 24 +/- 15% at the pacing rate of RCP - 10 bpm, 39 +/- 19% at RCP - 5 bpm, 63 +/- 17% at RCP, and 79 +/- 19% at RCP + 5 bpm (p < 0.001). The corresponding HR modestly increased from 65 +/- 13 bpm to 66 +/- 13 bpm (p = NS), 68 +/- 13 bpm (p < 0.001) and 71 +/- 13 bpm (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: The RCP estimates, during pacing, what the spontaneous MHR would be. Ventricular stimulation at the RCP causes a high P%, stabilising cardiac cycles with a modest increase in HR.