Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 104
Filtrar
1.
BMC Pediatr ; 23(1): 151, 2023 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37005574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Italy, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are inappropriately prescribed to provide relief in URTI symptoms. Extreme variation in ICS prescribing has been described at regional and sub-regional level. During 2020, extraordinary containment measures were implemented in attempt to halt Coronavirus, such as social distancing, lockdown, and the use of mask. Our objectives were to evaluate the indirect impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on prescribing patterns of ICSs in preschool children and to estimate the prescribing variability among pediatricians before and during the pandemic. METHODS: In this real-world study, we enrolled all children residing in the Lazio region (Italy), aged 5 years or less during the period 2017-2020. The main outcome measures were the annual ICS prescription prevalence, and the variability in ICS prescribing, for each study year. Variability was expressed as Median Odds Ratios (MORs). If the MOR is 1.00, there is no variation between clusters (e.g., pediatricians). If there is considerable between-cluster variation, the MOR will be large. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 210,996 children, cared by 738 pediatricians located in the 46 local health districts (LHDs). Before the pandemic, the percentage of children exposed to ICS was almost stable, ranging from 27.3 to 29.1%. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the ICS prescription prevalence dropped to 17.0% (p < 0.001). In each study year, a relevant (p < 0.001) variability was detected among both LHDs and pediatricians working in the same LHD. However, the variability among individual pediatricians was always higher. In 2020, the MOR among pediatricians was 1.77 (95% CI: 1.71-1.83) whereas the MOR among LHDs was 1.29 (1.21-1.40). Furthermore, MORs remained stable over time, and no differences were detected in ICS prescription variability before and after pandemic outbreak. CONCLUSIONS: If on one hand the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic indirectly caused the reduction in ICS prescriptions, on the other the variability in ICS prescribing habits among both LHDs and pediatricians remained stable over the whole study time span (2017-2020), showing no differences between pre- pandemic and pandemic periods. The intra-regional drug prescribing variability underlines the lack of shared guidelines for appropriate ICS therapy in preschool children, and raises equity issues in access to optimal care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Preescolar , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Administración por Inhalación
2.
Epidemiol Prev ; 46(3): 160-167, 2022.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35443573

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to geocode all residence addresses from Lazio Health Information System in order to obtain a geographical regional database. DESIGN: a semiautomatic and multistep geocoding procedure using several tools and software. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all residence addresses of resident population of Lazio Region (Central Italy) in 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: geographic coordinates at residence addresses and accuracy level of geocoding procedure for more than 1 million of addresses. RESULTS: the 99% of residence addresses in the Lazio Region have been geocoded thanks to the purposed procedure; almost 94% of the addresses have been geocoded with a good level of accuracy (more than 56% at civic number level). In the province of Rome, the percentage of addresses geocoded with a good level of accuracy is higher (97.1%), while in the province of Rieti and Frosinone is lower (82.7% and 84.2%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: this method is useful to obtain accurate geographic coordinates of residences of the entire regional population. This database will be useful for several epidemiological studies in the Region.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información Geográfica , Mapeo Geográfico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Estudios Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Italia
3.
Eur J Neurol ; 28(10): 3403-3410, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33896086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex chronic, autoimmune inflammatory disease involving multidisciplinary assessments and interventions. Access to outpatient specialist and home healthcare services was explored during the pandemic outbreak and the lockdown amongst MS patients in the Lazio region. Adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) is also described. METHODS: A population-based study was conducted using regional healthcare administrative databases. A validated algorithm was used to identify MS cases over the period 2011-2018. The numbers of specialist and home-based services were compared between 2019 and 2020. The medication possession ratio was used to measure adherence to DMTs. RESULTS: A total of 9380 MS patients were identified (68% women). A decline in the number of outpatient care services between March and June 2020 compared to the previous year was observed, in particular for rehabilitation (-82%), magnetic resonance imaging (-56%) and neurological specialist services (-91%). Important year-to-year variations were observed in May and June 2020 in home-based nursing and medical care (-91%) and motor re-education services (-74%). Adherence to DMTs was higher in the first 4 months of 2019 compared to the same period of 2020 (67.1% vs. 57.0%). CONCLUSIONS: A notable disruption of rehabilitative therapy and home-based services as well as in DMT adherence was observed. Since the pandemic is still ongoing and interruption of healthcare services could have a major impact on MS patients, it is necessary to monitor access of MS patients to healthcare resources in order to ensure adequate treatments, including rehabilitative therapies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Esclerosis Múltiple , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
4.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 466, 2021 09 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34565326

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medication adherence is a recognized key factor of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention. Cardiac rehabilitation increases medication adherence and adherence to lifestyle changes. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of in-hospital cardiac rehabilitation (IH-CR) on medication adherence as well as other cardiovascular outcomes, following an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This is a population-based study. Data were obtained from the Health Information Systems of the Lazio Region, Italy (5 million inhabitants). Hospitalized patients aged ≥ 18 years with an incident AMI in 2013-2015 were investigated. We divided the whole cohort into 4 groups of patients: ST-elevation AMI (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation AMI (NSTEMI) who underwent or not percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the hospitalization. Primary outcome was medication adherence. Adherence to chronic poly-therapy, based on prescription claims for both 6- and 12-month follow-up, was defined as Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) ≥ 75% to at least 3 of the following medications: antiplatelets, ß-blockers, ACEI/ARBs, statins. Secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, hospital readmission for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), and admission to the emergency department (ED) occurring within a 3-year follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 13.540 patients were enrolled. The median age was 67 years, 4.552 (34%) patients were female. Among the entire cohort, 1.101 (8%) patients attended IH-CR at 33 regional sites. Relevant differences were observed among the 4 groups previously identified (from 3 to 17%). A strong association between the IH-CR participation and medication adherence was observed among AMI patients who did not undergo PCI, for both 6- and 12-month follow-up. Moreover, NSTEMI-NO-PCI participants had lower risk of all-cause mortality (adjusted IRR 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.95), hospital readmission due to MACCE (IRR 0.78; 95% CI 0.65-0.94) and admission to the ED (IRR 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the benefits of IH-CR and support clinical guidelines that consider CR an integral part in the treatment of coronary artery disease. However, IH-CR participation was extremely low, suggesting the need to identify and correct the barriers to CR participation for this higher-risk group of patients.


Asunto(s)
Rehabilitación Cardiaca , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Infarto del Miocardio/rehabilitación , Prevención Secundaria , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Causas de Muerte , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Readmisión del Paciente , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polifarmacia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 180, 2021 04 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33853534

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The benefits of chronic polytherapy in reducing readmissions and death after myocardial infarction (MI) have been clearly shown. However, real-world evidence shows poor medication adherence and large geographic variation, suggesting critical issues in access to optimal care. Our objectives were to measure adherence to polytherapy, to compare the amount of variation attributable to hospitals of discharge and to community-based providers, and to identify determinants of adherence to medications. METHODS: This is a population-based study. Data were obtained from the information systems of the Lazio and Tuscany Regions, Italy (9.5 million inhabitants). Patients hospitalized with incident MI in 2010-2014 were analyzed. The outcome measure was medication adherence, defined as a Medication Possession Ratio (MPR) ≥ 0.75 for at least 3 of the following drugs: antiplatelets, ß-blockers, ACEI/ARBs, statins. A 2-year cohort-study was performed. Cross-classified multilevel models were applied to analyze geographic variation. The variance components attributable to hospitals of discharge and community-based providers were expressed as Median Odds Ratio (MOR). RESULTS: A total of 32,962 patients were enrolled. About 63% of patients in the Lazio cohort and 59% of the Tuscan cohort were adherent to chronic polytherapy. Women and patients aged 85 years and over were most at risk of non-adherence. In both regions, adherence was higher for patients discharged from cardiology wards (Lazio: OR = 1.58, p < 0.001, Tuscany: OR = 1.59, p < 0.001) and for patients with a percutaneous coronary intervention during the index admission. Relevant variation between community-based providers was observed, though when the hospital of discharge was included as a cross-classified level, in both Lazio and Tuscany regions the variation attributable to hospitals of discharge was the only significant component (Lazio: MOR = 1.30, p = 0.001; Tuscany: MOR = 1.31, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Adherence to best practice treatments after MI is not consistent with clinical guidelines, and varies between patient groups as well as within and between regions. The variation attributable to providers is affected by the hospital of discharge, up to two years from the acute episode. This variation is likely to be attributable to hospital discharge processes, and could be reduced through appropriate policy levers.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/tendencias , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Polifarmacia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Epidemiol Prev ; 44(5-6): 359-366, 2020.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33706488

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic on the access to the emergency services of the Lazio Region (Central Italy) for time-dependent pathologies, for suspected SARS-CoV-2 symptoms, and for potentially inappropriate conditions. DESIGN: observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: accesses to the emergency departments (EDs) of Lazio Region hospitals in the first three months of 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: total number of accesses to the emergency room and number of specific accesses for cardio and cerebrovascular diseases, for severe trauma, for symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions, and for symptoms related to pneumonia. RESULTS: in the first 3 months of 2019, there were 429,972 accesses to the EDs of Lazio Region; in the same period of 2020, accesses arise to 353,806, (reduction of 21.5%), with a 73% reduction in the last three weeks of march 2020 as compared with the corresponding period of 2019. Comparing the first 3 months of the 2017-2019 with 2020, the accesses for acute coronary syndrome and acute cerebrovascular disease decreased since the 10th week up to more than 57% and 50%, respectively. The accesses due to symptoms, signs, and ill-defined conditions, proxy of potentially inappropriate conditions, decreased since the 8th week, with a maximum reduction of 70%. Access to severe trauma decreased by up to 70% in the 11th week. The accesses for pneumonia increased up to a 70% increment in the 12th week. CONCLUSIONS: the evaluation of accesses to emergency services during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic can provide useful elements for the promotion and improvement of the planning, for the management of critical situations, and for the reprogramming of the healthcare offer based on clinical and organizational appropriateness.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología
7.
Epidemiol Prev ; 43(5-6): 364-373, 2019.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659884

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate equity in the Lazio regional Health System, both in terms of unequal access to health care among individuals with different educational levels and of heterogeneity in hospital performance, between 2012 and 2017. DESIGN: retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: all patients living in Lazio region and discharged from a regional facility between 2012 and 2017 were enrolled. Three cohorts of hospitalizations were selected: acute myocardial infarctions with ST segment elevation (STEMI), hip fractures, and deliveries. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the proportions of STEMIs with PCI within 90 minutes, of patients with a hip fracture who underwent surgery within 2 days, and of deliveries with primary caesarean section were evaluated, accounting for patient demographic characteristics and comorbidities that could affect the outcome under study. These proportions were calculated by education and by hospital of admission. The heterogeneity among facilities was assessed through the median odds ratio (MOR). RESULTS: in Lazio region, between 2012 and 2017, an improvement of the quality of care was observed: in 2017, 50.4% of STEMI patients underwent to a PCI within 90 minutes, 54.4% of patients with a hip fracture underwent surgery within 2 days, and 26.2% of women had a C-section. In 2012, when comparing the adjusted proportions of outcomes by educational level, the probability of being treated with a PCI within 90 minutes for STEMIs and with surgery within 2 days for hip fractures was higher for graduated patients than for those with the lowest education. In contrast, graduated women had the highest risk of having a C-section. In 2017, there was no difference anymore between classes of education in STEMIs and C-sections, while in patients with hip fracture the difference was decreased, but still present. For hip fractures, a reduction of heterogeneity of hospital performances was also detected. CONCLUSION: in Lazio region, a reduction in inequalities in access to health care was observed for different clinical areas. The "public disclosure" of the PReValE results and the management strategy applied in mid-2013 could have driven the overall improvement of the health system for the conditions under study, helping to achieve a fairer access to health.


Asunto(s)
Equidad en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/terapia , Humanos , Italia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Factores de Tiempo
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 18(1): 383, 2018 Sep 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30249198

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The rates of caesarean section (CS) are increasing globally. CS rates are one of the most frequently used indicators of health care quality. Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC) could be considered a reasonable and safe option for most women with a previous CS. Despite this fact, in some European countries, many women who had a previous CS will have a routine CS subsequently and VBAC rates are extremely variable across countries. VBAC use is inversely related to caesarean use. The objective of the present study was to analyze VBAC rates with respect to caesarean rates and the variations among areas of residence, hospitals and hospital ownership types in Italy. METHODS: This study was based on information from the Hospital Information System (HIS). We collected data from all deliveries in Italy from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 and we considered only deliveries with a previous caesarean section. Applying multivariate logistic regression analysis, the adjusted proportions of VBAC for each Local Health Units (LHU), each hospital and by hospital ownership types were calculated. Cross-classified logistic multilevel models were performed to analyze within geographic, hospitals and hospital ownership types variations. RESULTS: We studied a total of 77,850 deliveries with a previous caesarean section in Italy between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2014. The proportion of VBAC in Italy slightly increased in the last few years, from 5.8% in 2010 to 7.5% in 2014. Proportions of VBAC ranged from 0.29 to 50.05% in Italian LHUs. The LHUs with lower proportions of VBAC deliveries were characterized by higher values for primary caesarean deliveries. Private hospitals showed the lowest mean of crude VBAC proportions but the highest variation among hospitals, ranging from 0 to 47.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital rates of caesarean section for women with at least one previous caesarean section vary widely, and only some of the variation can be explained by case-mix and hospital-level factors, suggesting that additional factors influence practices. Identifying disparities in VBAC may have important implications for health services planning and targeted efforts to reduce overall rates of caesarean deliveries.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea Repetida/tendencias , Maternidades/tendencias , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Vaginal Después de Cesárea/tendencias , Adulto , Cesárea/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Italia , Trabajo de Parto , Parto , Embarazo , Esfuerzo de Parto , Adulto Joven
9.
Acta Cardiol ; 73(1): 50-59, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28812435

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We compared the outcome of anaemic patients undergoing transcatheter (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic valve stenosis. METHODS: Anaemic patients (haemoglobin <13.0 g/dL in men and <12.0 g/dL in women) undergoing TAVI and SAVR from the OBSERVANT study were the subjects of this analysis. RESULTS: Preoperative anaemia was an independent predictor of 3-year mortality after either TAVI (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.12-1.68) and SAVR (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.37-1.99). Propensity score matching resulted in 302 pairs with similar characteristics. Patients undergoing SAVR had similar 30-d mortality (3.6% versus 3.3%, p = .81) and stroke (1.3% versus 2.0%, p = .53) compared with TAVI. The rates of pacemaker implantation (18.6% versus 3.0%, p < .001), major vascular damage (5.7% versus 0.4%, p < .001) and mild-to-severe paravalvular regurgitation (47.4% versus 9.3%, p < .001) were higher after TAVI, whereas acute kidney injury (50.7% versus 27.9%, p < .001) and blood transfusion (70.0% versus 38.6%, p < .001) were more frequent after SAVR. At 3-year, survival was 74.0% after SAVR and 66.3% after TAVI, respectively (p = .065), and freedom from MACCE was 67.6% after SAVR and 58.7% after TAVI, respectively (p = .049). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that TAVI is not superior to SAVR in patients with anaemia.


Asunto(s)
Anemia/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anemia/sangre , Anemia/mortalidad , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/complicaciones , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
BMC Public Health ; 17(1): 886, 2017 Nov 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29149875

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: According to scientific literature, antibacterials are prescribed for common pediatric conditions that do not benefit from antibiotic therapy. The link between antibiotic use and bacterial resistance is well known. Antibiotic overprescribing generates high social costs and severe consequences for children. Our objectives were to analyze antibiotic prescription patterns in pediatric outpatients residing in the Lazio region (Italy), to identify physicians' characteristics associated with increased propensity for prescription, to identify the priority axes for action to improve the rational use of antibiotics. METHODS: We enrolled all children aged 13 years or less in 2014. Antibiotic prescription patterns were analyzed during a one-year follow-up period. The main outcome measures were the antibiotic prescription prevalence, and the geographic variation in antibiotic prescribing. Multilevel models were performed to analyze variation. Variation was expressed as Median Odds Ratios (MORs). If the MOR is 1.00, there is no variation between clusters. If there is considerable between-cluster variation, the MOR will be large. RESULTS: We enrolled 636,911 children. Most of them were aged 6-13 years (57.3%). In 2015, the antibiotic prescription prevalence was 46% in the 0-13, 58% in the 0-5, and 37% in the 6-13 age group. Overall, penicillins were the most prescribed antibiotics, their consumption increased from 43% to 52% during the 2007-2015 period. In 2015, the antibiotic prescription prevalence ranged from 30% to 62% across local health districts (LHDs) of the region. Moreover, a significant (p < 0.001) variation was observed between physicians working in the same LHD: MORs were equal to 1.52 (1.48-1.56) and 1.46 (1.44-1.48) in the 0-5 and 6-13 age groups, respectively. The probability of prescribing antibiotics was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for more-experienced physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric antibiotic use in the Lazio region is much higher than in other European countries. The intra-regional drug prescribing variability underlines the lack of therapeutic protocols shared at regional level and raises equity issues in access to optimal care. Both LHD managers and individual physicians should be involved in training interventions to improve the targeted use of antibiotics and mitigate the effect of contextual variables, such as the spatial-related socioeconomic status of the patient/parent binomial.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia , Gobierno Local , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multinivel , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol Profesional
11.
COPD ; 14(1): 86-94, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27419396

RESUMEN

In moderate-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), long-acting bronchodilators (LBs) are recommended to improve the quality of life. The aims of this study were to measure adherence to LBs after discharge for COPD, identify determinants of adherence, and compare amounts of variation attributable to hospitals of discharge and primary care providers, i.e. local health districts (LHDs) and general practitioners (GPs). This cohort study was based on the Lazio region population, Italy. Patients discharged in 2007-2011 for COPD were followed up for 2 years. Adherence was defined as a medication possession ratio >80%. Cross-classified models were performed to analyse variation. Variances were expressed as median odds ratios (MORs). An MOR of 1.00 stands for no variation, a large MOR indicates considerable variation. We enrolled 13,178 patients. About 29% of patients were adherent to LBs. Adherence was higher for patients discharged from pneumology wards and for patients with GPs working in group practice. A relevant variation between LHDs (MOR = 1.21, p = 0.001) and GPs (MOR = 1.28, p = 0.035) was detected. When introducing the hospital of discharge in the model, the MOR related to LHDs decreased to 1.05 (p = 0.345), MOR related to GPs dropped to 1.22 (p = 0.086), whereas MOR associated with hospitals of discharge was 1.38 (p < 0.001). Treatments with proven benefit for COPD were underused. Moreover, a relevant geographic variation was observed. This heterogeneity raises equity concerns in access to optimal care. The reduction of variability among LHDs and GPs after entering the hospital level proved that differences we observe in primary care partially 'reflect' the clinical approach of hospitals of discharge.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica de Grupo/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Neumología/estadística & datos numéricos
12.
Epidemiol Prev ; 41(5-6 (Suppl 2)): 1-128, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés, Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29205995

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Improving quality and effectiveness of healthcare is one of the priorities of health policies. Hospital or physician volume represents a measurable variable with an impact on effectiveness of healthcare. An Italian law calls for the definition of «qualitative, structural, technological, and quantitative standards of hospital care¼. There is a need for an evaluation of the available scientific evidence in order to identify qualitative, structural, technological, and quantitative standards of hospital care, including the volume of care above or below which the public and private hospitals may be accredited (or not) to provide specific healthcare interventions. OBJECTIVES To identify conditions/interventions for which an association between volume and outcome has been investigated. To identify conditions/interventions for which an association between volume and outcome has been proved. To analyze the distribution of Italian health providers by volume of activity. To measure the association between volume of care and outcomes of the health providers of the Italian National Health Service (NHS). METHODS Systematic review An overview of systematic reviews was performed searching PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library up to November 2016. Studies were evaluated by 2 researchers independently; quality assessment was performed using the AMSTAR checklist. For each health condition and outcome, if available, total number of studies, participants, high volume cut-off values, and metanalysis have been reported. According to the considered outcomes, health topics were classified into 3 groups: positive association: a positive association was demonstrated in the majority of studies/participants and/or a pooled measure (metanalysis) with positive results was reported; lack of association: both studies and/or metanalysis showed no association; no sufficient evidence of association: both results of single studies and metanalysis do not allow to draw firm conclusions on the association between volume and outcome. Analysis of the distribution of Italian hospitals by volume of activity and the association between volume of activity and outcomes: the Italian National Outcome evaluation Programme 2016 The analyses were performed using the Hospital Information System and the National Tax Register (year 2015). For each condition, the number of hospitals by volume of activity was calculated. Hospitals with a volume lower than 3-5 cases/year were excluded. For conditions with more than 1,500 cases/year and frequency of outcome ≥1%, the association between volume of care and outcome was analyzed estimating risk-adjusted outcomes. RESULTS Bibliographic searches identified 80 reviews, evaluating 48 different clinical areas. The main outcome considered was intrahospital/30-day mortality. The other outcomes vary depending on the type of condition or intervention in study. The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes was considered in 47 out of 48 conditions: 34 conditions showed evidence of a positive association; • 14 conditions consider cancer surgery for bladder, breast, colon, rectum, colon rectum, oesophagus, kidney, liver, lung, ovaries, pancreas, prostate, stomach, head and neck; • 11 conditions consider cardiocerebrovascular area: nonruptured and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, acute myocardial infarction, brain aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy, coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass, paediatric heart surgery, revascularization of lower limbs, stroke, subarachnoid haemorrhage; • 2 conditions consider orthopaedic area: knee arthroplasty, hip fracture; • 7 conditions consider other areas: AIDS, bariatric surgery, cholecystectomy, intensive care unit, neonatal intensive care unit, sepsis, and traumas; for 3 conditions, no association was demonstrated: hip arthroplasty, dialysis, and thyroidectomy. for the remaining 10 conditions, the available evidence does not allow to draw firm conclusions about the association between hospital volume and considered outcomes: surgery for testicular cancer and intracranial tumours, paediatric oncology, aortofemoral bypass, cardiac catheterization, appendectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia, respiratory failure, and hysterectomy. The relationship between volume of clinician/surgeon and outcomes was assessed only through the literature re view; to date, it is not possible to analyze this association for Italian health provider hospitals, since information on the clinician/surgeon on the hospital discharge chart is missing. The literature found a positive association for 21 conditions: 9 consider surgery for cancer: bladder, breast, colon, colon rectum, pancreas, prostate, rectum, stomach, and head and neck; 5 consider the cardiocerebrovascular area: ruptured and nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid endarterectomy, paediatric heart surgery, and revascularization of the lower limbs; 2 consider the orthopaedic area: knee and hip arthroplasty; 5 consider other areas: AIDS, bariatric surgery, hysterectomy, intensive care unit, and thyroidectomy. The analysis of the distribution of Italian hospitals concerned the 34 conditions for which the systematic review has shown a positive volume-outcome association. For the following, it was possible to conduct the analysis of the association using national data: unruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, coronary angioplasty, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, coronary artery bypass, cancer surgery (colon, liver, breast, pancreas, lung, prostate, kidney, and stomach), laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hip fracture, stroke, acute myocardial infarction. For these conditions, the association between volume and outcome of care was observed. For laparoscopic cholecystectomy and surgery of the breast and stomach cancer, the association between the volume of the discharge (o dismissal) operating unit and the outcome was analyzed. The outcomes differ depending on the condition studied. The shape of the relationship is variable among different conditions, with heterogeneous slope of the curves. DISCUSSION For many conditions, the overview of systematic reviews has shown a strong evidence of association between higher volumes and better outcomes. The quality of the available reviews can be considered good for the consistency of the results between the studies and for the strength of the association; however, this does not mean that the included studies are of good quality. Analyzing national data, potential confounders, including age and comorbidities, have been considered. The systematic review of the literature does not permit to identify predefined volume thresholds. The analysis of national data shows a strong improvement in outcomes in the first part of the curve (from very low to higher volumes) for most conditions. In some cases, the improvement in outcomes remains gradual or constant with the increasing volume of care; in other, the analysis could allow the identification of threshold values beyond which the outcome does not further improve. However, a good knowledge of the relationship between effectiveness of treatments and costs, the geographical distribution and the accessibility to healthcare services are necessary to choose the minimum volumes of care, under which specific health procedures could not been provided in the NHS. Some potential biases due to the use of information systems data should also be considered. The different way of coding among hospitals could lead to a different selection of cases for some conditions. Regarding the definition of the exposure (volume of care), a possible bias could result from misclassification of health providers with high volume of activity. Performing the intervention in different departments/ units of the same hospital would result in an overestimation of the volume of care measured for hospital rather than for department/unit. For the conditions with a further fragmentation within the same structure, the association between volumes of discharge department and outcomes has also been evaluated. In this case, the two curves were different. The limit is to attribute the outcome to the discharge unit, which in case of surgery may not be the intervention unit. A similar bias could occur if the main determinant of the outcome of treatment was the caseload of each surgeon. The results of the analysis may be biased when different operators in the same hospital/unit carried out the same procedure. In any case, the observed association between volumes and outcome is very strong, and it is unlikely to be attributable to biases of the study design. Another aspect on which there is still little evidence is the interaction between volume of the hospital and of the surgeon. A MEDICARE study suggests that in some conditions, especially for specialized surgery, the effect of the surgeon's volume of activity is different depending on the structure volume, whereas it would not differ for some less specialized surgery conditions. The data here presented still show extremely fragmented volumes of both clinical and surgical areas, with a predominance of very low volume structures. Health systems operate, by definition, in a context of limited resources, especially when the amount of resources to allocate to the health system is reduced. In such conditions, the rationalization of the organization of health services based on the volume of care may make resources available to improve the effectiveness of interventions. The identification and certification of services and providers with high volume of activity can help to reduce differences in the access to non-effective procedures. To produce additional evidence to guide the reorganization of the national healthcare system, it will be necessary to design further primary studies to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of policies aimed at concentrating interventions in structures with high volumes of activity.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Causalidad , Cuidados Críticos , Departamentos de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales/provisión & distribución , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/provisión & distribución , Humanos , Infectología , Italia/epidemiología , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Ortopedia , Literatura de Revisión como Asunto , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos
13.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 25(11): 1295-1304, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27396695

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Whether inhaled medications improve long-term survival in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is an open question. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of adherence to inhaled drug use on 5-year survival in COPD. METHODS: A population-based cohort study in three Italian regions was conducted using healthcare linked datasets (hospitalization, mortality, drugs). Individuals (45+ years) discharged after COPD exacerbation in 2006-2009 were enrolled. Inhaled drug daily use during 5-year follow-up was determined through Proportion of Days Covered on the basis of Defined Daily Doses. Five levels of time-dependent exposure were identified: (i) long-acting ß2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (LB/ICS) regular use; (ii) LB/ICS occasional use; (iii) LB regular use; (iv) LB occasional use; and (v) respiratory drugs other than LB. Cox regression models adjusted for baseline (socio-demographic, comorbidities, drug use) and time-dependent characteristics (COPD exacerbations, cardiovascular hospitalizations, cardiovascular therapy) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 124 individuals were studied, 46% women, mean age 73,8 years. Average follow-up time 2,4 year. A total of 3415 subjects died (mortality rate = 11.9 per 100 person years). In comparison to LB/ICS regular use, higher risks of death for all remaining treatments were found, the highest risk for respiratory drugs other than LB category (HR = 1.63, 95%CI 1.43-1.87). Patients with regular LB use had higher survival than those with LB/ICS occasional use (HR = 0.89, 95%CI 0.79-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support clinical guidelines and recommendations for the regular use of inhaled drugs to improve health status and prognosis among moderate-severe COPD patients. © 2016 The Authors. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 2/administración & dosificación , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo
14.
BMC Public Health ; 16: 408, 2016 05 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27184959

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The reasons for socioeconomic inequity in stroke mortality are not well understood. The aim of this study was to explore the role of ischemic stroke care-pathways on the association between education level and one-year survival after hospital admission. METHODS: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke during 2011/12 were selected from Lazio health data. Patients' clinical history was defined by retrieving previous hospitalizations and drugs prescriptions. The association between education level and mortality after stroke was studied for acute and post-acute phases using multilevel logistic models (Odds Ratio (OR)). Different scenarios of quality care-pathways were identified considering hospital performance, access to rehabilitation and drug treatment post-discharge. The probability to survive to acute and post-acute phases according to education level and care-pathway scenarios was estimated for a "mean-severity" patient. One-year survival probability was calculated as the product of two probabilities. For each scenario, the 1-year survival probability ratio, university versus elementary education, and its Bootstrap Confidence Intervals (95 % BCI) were calculated. RESULTS: We identified 9,958 patients with ischemic stroke, 53.3 % with elementary education level and 3.2 % with university. The mortality was 14.9 % in acute phase and 14.3 % in post-acute phase among survived to the acute phase. The adjusted mortality in acute and post-acute phases decreased with an increase in educational level (OR = 0.90 p-trend < 0.001; OR = 0.85 p-trend < 0.001). For the best care-pathway, the one-year survival probability ratio was 1.06 (95 % BCI = 1.03-1.10), while it was 1.17 (95 % BCI = 1.09-1.25) for the worst. CONCLUSIONS: Education level was inversely associated with mortality both in acute and post-acute phases. The care-pathway reduces but does not eliminate 1-year survival inequity.


Asunto(s)
Escolaridad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Atención Subaguda/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Socioeconómicos
15.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 30(5): 1238-43, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27495961

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) compared with general anesthesia (GA) in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). DESIGN: Secondary analysis from the observational and prospective OBSERVANT (OBservational Study of Effectiveness of avR-taVi procedures for severe Aortic steNosis Treatment) study. SETTING: Multicenter study, including Italian hospitals performing TAVR interventions. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand four hundred ninety-four patients with severe and symptomatic aortic stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: Transfemoral TAVR under general or local anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A propensity score procedure was applied, and 310 pairs were matched with similar baseline characteristics (EuroSCORE II: local anesthesia 6.6±5.9% v general anesthesia 7.0±7.7%, p = 0.430). MAC was associated with similar 30-day mortality compared with GA (3.9% v 4.8%, p = 0.564). TAVR was performed under MAC without any increased risk of other adverse events. The risk of paravalvular regurgitation≥mild was similar between the study groups (MAC 49.5% v general anesthesia 57.0%, p = 0.858). Two patients receiving on MAC had severe paravalvular regurgitation, whereas this complication was not observed after GA. Permanent pacemaker implantation was 19.1% in the MAC group v 14.8% in the GA group (p = 0.168). Mean intensive care unit stay was 3.5 days for the GA group v 2.9 days for the MAC group (p = 0.086). A similar 3-year survival rate was observed (MAC 69.4% v GA 69.9%, p = 0.966). CONCLUSIONS: Transfemoral TAVR can be performed under MAC with similar immediate and late outcomes as compared with GA. A possible risk of severe paravalvular regurgitation and pacemaker implantation with TAVR under MAC requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General/métodos , Anestesia Local/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
COPD ; 13(3): 293-302, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514912

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Chronic therapy with long-acting bronchodilators (LB) is recommended to treat moderate-to-severe COPD. Although the benefits of adding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) to LB are still unclear, patients who experience repeated exacerbations are suggested to add ICS to their LB treatment. The objective of this study is to analyze whether adding ICS to LB therapy reduces mortality. METHODS: We identified a cohort of patients discharged from hospital with COPD diagnosis between 2006 and 2009. The first prescription for LB or ICS following discharge was defined as the index prescription. Only new users were included (no use of any study drug in the 6 months before treatment). A 4-day time window was used to classify patients into "LB alone" or "LB plus ICS" initiators. We used propensity score to balance the study groups. Sensitivity analyses were performed in patients with recent out-of-hospital exacerbations. RESULTS: Among the 18615 adults enrolled, 12207 initiated "LB plus ICS" therapy and 6408 "LB alone." Crude mortality rates were 110 and 143 cases per 1000 person-years in the "LB plus ICS" and "LB alone" groups, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72-0.97; p-value: 0.024). When analyzing patients with recent out-of-hospital exacerbations, the benefit of the combination therapy was more pronounced, HR = 0.63 (95% CI: 0.44-0.90; p-value: 0.012). DISCUSSION: Our findings showed a beneficial effect on mortality of adding inhaled corticosteroids to long-acting bronchodilators. The advantage was much more pronounced in patients with frequent exacerbations.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Administración por Inhalación , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Broncodilatadores/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Combinación de Medicamentos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bromuro de Tiotropio/uso terapéutico
17.
BMC Geriatr ; 15: 141, 2015 Oct 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26510919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture injuries are identified as one of the most serious healthcare problems affecting older people. Many studies have explored the associations among patient characteristics, treatment processes, time to surgery and various outcomes in patients hospitalized for hip fracture. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the difference in 1-year mortality after hip fracture between patients undergoing early surgery (within 2 days) and patients undergoing delayed surgery in Italy. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on the Hospital Information System (HIS). This cohort study included patients aged 65 years and older who were residing in Italy and were admitted to an acute care hospital for a hip fracture between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2012. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the effect of early surgery on the likelihood of 1-year mortality after hip fracture, adjusting for risk factors that could affect the outcome under study. The absolute number of deaths prevented by exposure to early surgery was calculated. RESULTS: We studied a total of 405,037 admissions for hip fracture. Patients who underwent surgery within 2 days had lower 1-year mortality compared to those who waited for surgery more than 2 days (Hazard Ratios -HR-: 0.83; 95 % CI: 0.82-0.85). The number of deaths prevented by the exposure to early surgery was 5691. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to evaluate the association between time to surgery and 1-year mortality for all Italian elderly patients hospitalized for hip fracture. The study confirmed the previous reports on the association between delayed surgery and increased mortality and complication rates in elderly patients admitted for hip fracture. Our data support the notion that deviating from surgical guidelines in hip fracture is costly, in terms of both human life and excess hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Médica Temprana , Fracturas de Cadera , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervención Médica Temprana/métodos , Intervención Médica Temprana/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fracturas de Cadera/epidemiología , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos
18.
Epidemiol Prev ; 39(1): 19-27, 2015.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25855543

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effect of the 2010 legal decree (DCA) in the Lazio Region (Central Italy), promoting appropriateness on use of agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system, and limiting use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) within this drug group to levels below 30%. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: two cohorts of incident patients with diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were enrolled from the regional hospital information system: the first cohort included patients discharged during the 12 months before DCA (35,917 patients), and the second one patients discharged during the 12 months after DCA (35,491 patients). DESIGN: the first prescriptions of angiotensin- converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and ARBs in the 30 days after discharge were collected from the drug claims registry. The trends of monthly prescription proportions for the two drug groups were compared through a segmented regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: comparison between the pre- and post-DCA periods, distinguishing between prescription made by hospital physicians and by general practitioners, and between naïve and prevalent users. RESULTS: proportion of patients with CVD treated with ACEIs/ARBs after discharge was 50% in both pre-DCA (35,917 patients) and post-DCA (35,491 patients) cohorts, with the same share of ACEIs (60%) and ARBs (40%). ARB proportions met the threshold only for hospital prescriptions. Among naïve users, the target was met for both hospital physicians and general practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: the specific DCA has not led to an overall improvement in the appropriateness of prescribing of ACEIs/ARBs in secondary cardiovascular prevention. However, there is a suitable prescription choice for naïve patients and when the drug is dispensed in hospital pharmacies.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Prescripción Inadecuada/legislación & jurisprudencia , Prevención Secundaria/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Medicina General , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Regresión , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
19.
BMC Public Health ; 14: 1049, 2014 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25297561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive studies on exposure and disease misclassification, few studies have investigated misclassification of confounders. This study aimed to identify differentially misclassified confounders in a comparative evaluation of hospital care quality and to quantify their impact on hospital-specific risk-adjusted estimates, focusing on the appropriateness of caesarean sections (CS). METHODS: We gathered data from the Hospital Information System in Italy for women admitted in 2005-2010. We estimated adjusted proportions of CS with logistic regression models. Among several confounders, we focused on high fetal head at term (HFH), which is seldom objectively documentable in medical records. RESULTS: A total of 540 maternity units were compared. The median HFH prevalence was 0.9%, ranging from 0 to 70%. In some units, HFH was coded so frequently that it was unlikely to reflect a natural heterogeneity. This "over-coding" was conditional on the outcome because it occurred more frequently for women that underwent CS. This suggested an opportunistic coding to justify the choice of a CS. HFH misclassification was not randomly distributed over Italy; it had an excess in the Campania region where, in some units, the proportion of HFHs gradually increased from 2005 to 2010 (e.g., from 0 to 26%), but the national average remained constant (2.5%). The inclusion of the misclassified diagnosis in the models favored those hospitals that codified in a less-than-fair manner. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings emphasized the importance of rigorously inspecting for differential misclassification of confounders. Their validity may be subject to substantial heterogeneity over hospitals, over time and geographical areas.


Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Hospitales/normas , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/cirugía , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Cesárea/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Hospitalización , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
20.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 14: 495, 2014 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25339263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital discharge records are an essential source of information when comparing health outcomes among hospitals; however, they contain limited information on acute clinical conditions. Doubts remain as to whether the addition of clinical and drug consumption information would improve the prediction of health outcomes and reduce confounding in inter-hospital comparisons. The objective of the study is to compare the performance of two multivariate risk adjustment models, with and without clinical data and drug prescription information, in terms of their capability to a) predict short-term outcome rates and b) compare hospitals' risk-adjusted outcome rates using two risk-adjustment procedures. METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on hospital data collected at the regional level.Two cohorts of patients discharged in 2010 from hospitals located in the Lazio Region, Italy: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and hip fracture (HF). Multivariate logistic regression models were implemented to predict 30-day mortality (AMI) or 48-hour surgery (HF), adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities plus clinical data and drug prescription information. Risk-adjusted outcome rates were derived at the hospital level. RESULTS: The addition of clinical data and drug prescription information improved the capability of the models to predict the study outcomes for the two conditions investigated. The discriminatory power of the AMI model increases when the clinical data and drug prescription information are included (c-statistic increases from 0.761 to 0.797); for the HF model the increase was more slight (c-statistic increases from 0.555 to 0.574). Some differences were observed between the hospital-adjusted proportion estimated using the two different models. However, the estimated hospital outcome rates were weakly affected by the introduction of clinical data and drug prescription information. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the available clinical variables and drug prescription information were important complements to the hospital discharge data for characterising the acute severity of the patients. However, when these variables were used for adjustment purposes their contribution was negligible. This conclusion might not apply at other locations, in other time periods and for other health conditions if there is heterogeneity in the clinical conditions between hospitals.


Asunto(s)
Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Fracturas de Cadera/tratamiento farmacológico , Fracturas de Cadera/mortalidad , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda