Neurophysiologic study in idiopathic overactive bladder.

AIM: Idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) is a prevalent, mystifying disorder with a questionable neurogenic background. We aimed to investigate the possible subtle neuropathic affection underlying its pathogenesis. METHODS: A cross-sectional cut off study was carried out on a series of 38 females with idiopathic OAB and 22 healthy matched female volunteers. The following was performed: symptom score questionnaire, determination of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML), sacral reflexes' latencies, pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials, and needle electromyography of the external anal and urethral sphincters. RESULTS: A highly significant prolongation of PNTMLs and sacral reflexes latencies among the patients group was detected (P ≥ 0.001). Pudendal somatosensory evoked potentials showed non- significance among the two studied groups (P ≥ 0.05). External anal sphincter neuropathic affection was detected in 27 patients (71%) and external urethral sphincter neuropathic affection was detected in 30 patients (78.9%). The clitoral anal reflex showed the highest sensitivity and specificity among the neurophysiologic tests used in assessing the neuropathic affection (86.7 and 83%, respectively), followed by PNTML (83.3 and 80%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Pudendal neuropathy is the dominating possible attributing factor in the pathogenesis underlying idiopathic OAB. An integrated clinical, urodynamic, and electro-physiological assessment is recommended for evaluation of any overactive bladder patients.

Osteoporosis treatment gap in patients at risk of fracture in Egypt: a multi-center, cross-sectional observational study.

Despite the wide availability of a wide variety of approved osteoporosis medications and DXA scan centers in Egypt, only a minority of patients at high risk of sustaining a fragility fracture receive treatment, even after their first fracture. Such big "treatment gap" leaves the most high-risk individuals unprotected against fragility fractures. This study provides a benchmark to monitor national trends in osteoporosis management and service uptake. PURPOSE: To assess the treatment gap among men and postmenopausal women presenting with a fragility fracture, and to analyze the characteristics and fracture risks of the patients presenting with an index fragility fracture. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study. Both men and postmenopausal women, admitted with an osteoporotic fracture (whether major osteoporosis or hip fracture), were consecutively recruited for this work. The fracture risk was assessed based on their FRAX calculation prior to the index fracture. All the patients were assessed for their falls and sarcopenia risks. Blood tests for bone profile as well as DXA scan were offered to all the patients. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-six patients presenting with fragility fractures were included in this work. 70.8% were women and 29.2% were men. Mean age was 70.1 (SD = 9.2) years. Ten-year probability of fracture (without BMD) was high in 65.9% of the postmenopausal women and 40.3% of the men. 82.1% of the postmenopausal women and 100% in men identified to be eligible for osteoporosis therapy did not receive any form of osteoporosis therapy. FRAX score correlated significantly with bone mineral density assessment at both hip and spine. Falls, sarcopenia, and functional disability showed significant relation to the fracture risk. CONCLUSIONS: There is a large treatment gap in Egyptian older adults. The recent guidelines for osteoporosis management in Egypt endorsed fracture centric approach to identify people at risk. The gap appears to be related to a low rate of osteoporosis diagnosis and lack of patient education.

Targeted optimum care approach for osteoporotic fragility fractures: tailored strategy based on risk stratification to reduce incidents of falls-an initiative by the Egyptian Academy of bone health based on the FLS national register.

Since falling is the third cause of chronic disability, a better understanding of the frequency, severity, and risk factors of falls across diagnostic groups is needed to design and implement customized, effective fall prevention, and management programs for these individuals, particularly those at risk of sustaining a fragility fracture. OBJECTIVE: (1) To assess the incidence of falls among osteoporotic patients with fragility fractures. (2) To evaluate the potential for stratifying the people at risk of falling in bone health setting aiming to provide targeted optimum care for them. METHODS: This was a multi-center, cross-sectional, observational study. Both men and postmenopausal women, admitted with an osteoporotic fracture (whether major osteoporosis or hip fracture), were consecutively recruited for this work and managed under Fracture Liaison Service. All the patients were assessed for their Fracture risk (FRAX), falls risk (FRAS), and sarcopenia risk (SARC-F) as well as functional disability (HAQ). Blood tests for bone profile as well as DXA scan were offered to all the patients. RESULTS: Four hundred five patients (121 males, 284 females) were included in this work. Mean age was 70.1 (SD = 9.2) years. The incidence of falls was 64.9%. The prevalence of falls was high (64.8%) in the patients presenting with major osteoporosis fractures and in those with hip fractures (61.8%). The prevalence of fragility fractures was positively correlated with HAQ score and the SARC-F score (p = 0.01 and 0.021 respectively). Falls risk score was positively correlated with FRAX score of major osteoporotic fractures, HAQ score, and SARC-F score (p = 0.01, 0.013, and 0.003 respectively). Seventy percent of the osteopenia patients who sustained fragility fracture had high falls risk and/or SARC-F score. CONCLUSION: This study highlighted the importance of falls risk stratification in osteoporotic patients presenting with fragility fractures. Identification of the patients at increased risk of falls should be a component of the standard practice.

Incidence and geographic characteristics of the population with osteoporotic hip fracture in Egypt- by the Egyptian Academy of Bone Health.

This work studies the epidemiology of hip fracture in Egypt. While the incidence of hip fracture in Egypt matches that of the Mediterranean region, there was geographic variation in osteoporotic hip fracture incidence between the north and south of Egypt. PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of hip fracture in Egypt, with special emphasis on the geographic and demographic variation among the Egyptian population. METHODS: The incidence of hip fractures treated in two Egyptian FLS centers was calculated for the period of February 2022-February 2023. Demographic information was recorded for every patient on the national register. All patients completed a baseline questionnaire, had clinical evaluation, fracture risk, falls, and sarcopenia risk assessment. A DXA scan was carried out for every patient. RESULTS: The annual incidence of low-energy hip fracture in individuals aged 40 years or more in Egypt in 2022-2023 was 123.34 per 100,000 in women and 55.19 per 100,000 in men. The incidence of hip fractures was higher in south Egypt (113.62) versus north Egypt (64.8). This was consistent for both genders. Bone mineral density was significantly (p < 0.01) lower in south Egypt at both the spine, distal forearm, as well as hip trochanters, whereas there was no significant difference between both locations in terms of the total hip and neck of the femur. Yet, falls risk, sarcopenia, as well as functional disability rates were significantly (p < 0.001) higher in the north. CONCLUSION: In Egypt, the hip fracture incidence was higher in the south compared to the north. Several modifiable factors contribute to fragility fracture risk independent of BMD, creating complex interrelationships between BMD, risk factors, and fracture risk.

Consensus Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treat-To-Target Management of Osteoporosis in Chronic Kidney Disease Stages G4-G5D and Post-transplantation: An Initiative of Egyptian Academy of Bone Health.

Objective: The aim of this study was to reach a consensus on an updated version of the recommendations for the diagnosis and Treat-to-Target management of osteoporosis that is effective and safe for individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) G4-G5D/kidney transplant. Methods: Delphi process was implemented (3 rounds) to establish a consensus on 10 clinical domains: (1) study targets, (2) risk factors, (3) diagnosis, (4) case stratification, (5) treatment targets, (6) investigations, (7) medical management, (8) monitoring, (9) management of special groups, (10) fracture liaison service. After each round, statements were retired, modified, or added in view of the experts' suggestions, and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus. Results: The surveys were sent to an expert panel (n = 26), of whom 23 participated in the three rounds (2 were international experts and 21 were national). Most of the participants were rheumatologists (87%), followed by nephrologists (8.7%), and geriatric physicians (4.3%). Eighteen recommendations, categorized into 10 domains, were obtained. Agreement with the recommendations (rank 7-9) ranged from 80 to 100%. Consensus was reached on the wording of all 10 clinical domains identified by the scientific committee. An algorithm for the management of osteoporosis in CKD has been suggested. Conclusion: A panel of international and national experts established a consensus regarding the management of osteoporosis in CKD patients. The developed recommendations provide a comprehensive approach to assessing and managing osteoporosis for all healthcare professionals involved in its management.

Consensus evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treat-to-target management of osteoporosis in Africa: an initiative by the African Society of Bone Health and Metabolic Bone Diseases.

The objective of this consensus statement is to inform the clinical practice communities, research centres and policymakers across Africa of the results of the recommendations for osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. The developed guideline provides state-of-the-art information and presents the conclusions and recommendations of the consensus panel regarding these issues. PURPOSE: To reach an African expert consensus on a treat-to-target strategy, based on current evidence for best practice, for the management of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. METHOD: A 3-round Delphi process was conducted with 17 osteoporosis experts from different African countries. All rounds were conducted online. In round 1, experts reviewed a list of 21 key clinical questions. In rounds 2 and 3, they rated the statements stratified under each domain for its fit (on a scale of 1-9). After each round, statements were retired, modified or added in view of the experts' suggestions and the percent agreement was calculated. Statements receiving rates of 7-9 by more than 75% of experts' votes were considered as achieving consensus. RESULTS: The developed guidelines adopted a fracture risk-centric approach. Results of round 1 revealed that of the 21 proposed domains, 10 were accepted whereas 11 were amended. In round 2, 32 statements were presented: 2 statements were retired for similarity, 9 statements reached consensus, whereas modifications were suggested for 21 statements. After the 3rd round of rating, the experts came to consensus on the 32 statements. Frequency of high-rate recommendation ranged from 83.33 to 100%. The response rate of the experts was 100%. An algorithm for the osteoporosis management osteoporosis was suggested. CONCLUSION: This study is an important step in setting up a standardised osteoporosis service across the continent. Building a single model that can be applied in standard practice across Africa will enable the clinicians to face the key challenges of managing osteoporosis; furthermore, it highlights the unmet needs for the policymakers responsible for providing bone health care together with and positive outcomes of patients' care.

The role of laryngeal electromyography in vocal fold immobility.

AIM OF STUDY: To assess the utility of laryngeal electromyography (EMG) as a diagnostic method for patients with immobile vocal folds and to evaluate its possible role as a prognostic indicator in the management of those cases. METHODOLOGY: The study included 35 patients with unilateral vocal fold immobility (VFI) and 10 normal controls. All patients were subjected to full history taking and thorough clinical examination and radiological investigations. Laryngeal EMG was performed for all the patients and controls. RESULTS: The specificity of EMG was 100%, while the sensitivity was 65.7% in detecting VFI. Seventeen cases (74%) with abnormal EMG data had a combined lesion of recurrent and superior laryngeal nerves and 6 cases (26%) had isolated recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion. In both groups there was no statistical difference as regards the position of the paralyzed vocal fold in either paramedian or lateral positions. Clinical follow-up with indirect laryngoscopy, 6 months later, revealed recovery in 10 of the 25 cases (40%). None of the recovered patients showed abnormal EMG data at presentation, while 13 out of 15 cases of non-recovered patients showed abnormal EMG data, i.e. the specificity of EMG was 100%, while the sensitivity was 86.6% in predicting recovery in patients with VFI. The quantitative analysis of the interference pattern was more sensitive (65.7 and 86.6%) than the conventional methods of analysis (60 and 80%) in detecting and predicting recovery in patients with immobile vocal folds, respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical use of laryngeal EMG is an efficient and objective test in the study of patients with immobile vocal folds and in predicting recovery of those cases. It is also a useful tool in the diagnostic algorithm in vocal fold paralysis.