Surveillance Bronchoscopy for the Care of Lung Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation is often the only treatment for end-stage lung disease. Following lung transplantation, infections and transplant rejections are major obstacles to short- and long-term success. Therefore, close monitoring for these complications is required after lung transplantation. The role of prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies after lung transplantation is controversial. Thus, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the therapeutic implications of surveillance bronchoscopies in 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Results of 400 prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies of 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients were analyzed. Positive results (pathologic histology, microbiology, or virology) were further investigated for their effect on clinical decision making. Additionally, cellular composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred five surveillance bronchoscopies showed pathologic findings. In 81 cases clinical treatment was changed based on the results. That is, 20% of all prescheduled bronchoscopies directly influenced clinical decision making. Furthermore, analyses of BAL indicate that increased alveolar eosinophils are associated with an increased risk of transplant rejection. CONCLUSIONS: Prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies identify clinically unsuspected but therapeutically relevant pathologic findings in approximately 20% of cases. BAL cell composition may confer additional information, especially in cases when biopsy is not possible.

Kinetics of Torque Teno Virus-DNA Plasma Load Predict Rejection in Lung Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the only therapeutic option in end-stage lung diseases; however, survival after transplantation is limited by acute and chronic rejection or infectious events being results of inappropriate immunosuppression. Torque Teno Viruses (TTVs) are ubiquitous DNA viruses in humans but not found to be causative for any disease. However, some reports suggest that TTV-DNA levels reflect the grade of immunosuppression with higher levels being found in more immunosuppressed individuals. METHODS: We investigated the TTV-DNA levels in 34 lung transplant recipients within their first year after transplantation by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Clinical data were extracted from charts. RESULTS: In accordance with previous results TTV-DNA levels increase after lung transplantation reaching a steady state after 3 months. The TTV-DNA levels were not correlated with immunosuppressive trough levels and a selective increase was not observed with other DNA viruses. In steady state TTV-DNA levels were significantly higher in patients with infectious complications compared to the group of patients without. Additionally, TTV-DNA levels decreased significantly before biopsy-proven rejection. Sensitivity of a 10-fold decrease in TTV-DNA levels for a subsequent rejection episode was 0.74 with a specificity of 0.99. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, TTV-DNA might be used as an additional tool to monitor immunosuppression in lung transplant recipients. Higher TTV-DNA levels reflect more intense immunosuppression, whereas the TTV-DNA kinetic (ie, decrease of TTV-DNA levels) indicate rejection.