Temsirolimus combined with cyclophosphamide and etoposide for pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortium trial (TACL 2014-001).

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling is commonly dysregulated in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The TACL2014-001 phase I trial of the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus in combination with cyclophosphamide and etoposide was performed in children and adolescents with relapsed/refractory ALL. Temsirolimus was administered intravenously (IV) on days 1 and 8 with cyclophosphamide 440 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily on days 1-5. The starting dose of temsirolimus was 7.5 mg/m2 (DL1) with escalation to 10 mg/m2 (DL2), 15 mg/m2 (DL3), and 25 mg/m2 (DL4). PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibition was measured by phosphoflow cytometry analysis of peripheral blood specimens from treated patients. Sixteen heavily-pretreated patients were enrolled with 15 evaluable for toxicity. One dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 pleural and pericardial effusions occurred in a patient treated at DL3. Additional dose-limiting toxicities were not seen in the DL3 expansion or DL4 cohort. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicities occurring in three or more patients included febrile neutropenia, elevated alanine aminotransferase, hypokalemia, mucositis, and tumor lysis syndrome and occurred across all doses. Response and complete were observed at all dose levels with a 47% overall response rate and 27% complete response rate. Pharmacodynamic correlative studies demonstrated dose-dependent inhibition of PI3K/mTOR pathway phosphoproteins in all studied patients. Temsirolimus at doses up to 25 mg/m2 with cyclophosphamide and etoposide had an acceptable safety profile in children with relapsed/refractory ALL. Pharmacodynamic mTOR target inhibition was achieved and appeared to correlate with temsirolimus dose. Future testing of next-generation PI3K/mTOR pathway inhibitors with chemotherapy may be warranted to increase response rates in children with relapsed/refractory ALL.

Survival of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC) versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine (ABVD), the de facto standard of care in adult-onset Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), has not been directly compared to doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC), a pediatric-aimed regimen designed to reduce late effects. We aimed to describe the single-institution experience of using both regimens in patients with pediatric HL. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated a total of 224 patients diagnosed with HL between 1999 and 2018 at Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA), of which 93 patients were eligible having received ABVD (n = 46) or ABVE-PC (n = 47) chemotherapy as their initial treatment. Descriptive analyses were performed using the Student's t-test or Fisher's exact test. Survival analysis used the Kaplan-Meier method. Events included death, relapse, and secondary malignancy. We also describe the use of radiation therapy, pulmonary toxicity, and cardiomyopathy determined by shortening fraction <29%. Analyses followed an intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the patients receiving ABVE-PC or ABVD in regard for stage, risk group, or prognostic variables, such as the presence or absence of "B" symptoms, bulky disease, and extra-nodal involvement. A greater proportion of patients treated with ABVE-PC received consolidating external beam radiation treatment (XRT) either by randomization or by response compared to ABVD (59.6% vs. 32.6%, respectively, p = .01). While not statistically significant, response to therapy, assessed by positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) where available, mirrored the use for radiation (rapid response 58.3% vs. 90.0%, n = 34, p = .11). The median dose of anthracycline (doxorubicin) was the same in patients receiving ABVE-PC versus ABVD (200 vs. 200 mg/m2 , interquartile range 200-250 vs. 200-300 mg/m2 , p = .002). There was no difference in event-free survival (p = .63) or overall survival (p = .37) with a median follow-up length of 3.9 years. CONCLUSIONS: ABVD and ABVE-PC achieved similar survival outcomes in our single-institution cohort.

Nelarabine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide in relapsed pediatric T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia and T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (study T2008-002 NECTAR).

Children with relapse of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) or lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) have a dismal prognosis, largely due to difficulty attaining second remission. We hypothesized that adding etoposide and cyclophosphamide to the nucleoside analog nelarabine could improve response rates over single-agent nelarabine for relapsed T-ALL and T-LBL. This phase I dose-escalation trial's primary objective was to evaluate the dose and safety of nelarabine given in combination with etoposide at 100 mg/m2 /day and cyclophosphamide at 330-400 mg/m2 /day, each for 5 consecutive days in children with either T-ALL (13 patients) or T-LBL (10 patients). Twenty-three patients were treated at three dose levels; 21 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and response. The recommended phase II doses (RP2D) for this regimen, when given daily ×5 every 3 weeks, were nelarabine 650 mg/m2 /day, etoposide 100 mg/m2 /day, and cyclophosphamide 400 mg/m2 /day. DLTs included peripheral motor and sensory neuropathies. An expansion cohort to evaluate responses at the RP2D was terminated early due to slow accrual. The overall best response rate was 38% (8/21), with 33% (4/12) responses in the T-ALL cohort and 44% (4/9) responses in the T-LBL cohort. These response rates are comparable to those seen with single-agent nelarabine in this setting. These data suggest that the addition of cyclophosphamide and etoposide to nelarabine does not increase the incidence of neurologic toxicities or the response rate beyond that obtained with single-agent nelarabine in children with first relapse of T-ALL and T-LBL.

A phase I study of panobinostat in children with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies.

Background: Panobinostat demonstrates activity against pediatric cancers in vitro. A phase I trial in children with refractory hematologic malignancies was conducted. Study design: The trial evaluated two schedules of oral panobinostat using 3 + 3 dose escalations in 28-day cycles. For children with leukemia, panobinostat was given once daily three days a week each week at 24, 30 and 34 mg/m2/day. For children with lymphoma, panobinostat was given once daily three days a week every other week at 16, 20 and 24 mg/m2/day. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from Day 29 of the first cycle, when available, was evaluated for PK. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01321346) Results: Twenty-two subjects enrolled with leukemia. Five enrolled at dose level 1, 6 at dose level 2, and 11 at dose level 3. There was one dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in the leukemia arm at dose level 3 (Grade 4 hypertriglyceridemia), but no maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was identified. No subjects required removal from protocol therapy for QTc prolongation. PK studies were available in 11 subjects with similar exposure in children as in adults. Four Day 29 CSF specimens were found to have panobinostat levels below the lower limit of quantification. Five subjects with lymphoma were enrolled and received study drug, and 4 were evaluable for DLT. A DLT was reported (Grade 3 enteritis) on the lymphoma arm. Conclusions: Panobinostat was tolerated in heavily pretreated pediatric subjects. Gastrointestinal effects were observed on this study. There were no cardiac findings. There were no responses.

Myeloid lineage switch following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in a patient with TCF3-ZNF384 fusion-positive B-lymphoblastic leukemia.

A pediatric patient diagnosed initially with B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) relapsed with lineage switch to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. A TCF3-ZNF384 fusion was identified at diagnosis, persisted through B-ALL relapse, and was also present in the AML relapse cell population. ZNF384-rearrangements define a molecular subtype of B-ALL characterized by a pro-B-cell immunophenotype; furthermore, ZNF384-rearrangements are prevalent in mixed-phenotype acute leukemias. Lineage switch following CAR-T therapy has been described in patients with KMT2A (mixed lineage leukemia) rearrangements, but not previously in any patient with ZNF384 fusion.

ALL and osteonecrosis.

In this issue of Blood, Karol et al establish a link between glutamate receptor polymorphisms and osteonecrosis, using a large discovery cohort and 2 validation cohorts. One validation cohort included patients under treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the second is patients receiving glucocorticoid treatment of various other indications.

Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL): Overview and introduction to the proceedings of the 2016 TACL investigator meeting.

Despite great success in the development of curative therapies for pediatric hematologic malignancies, new approaches are needed to overcome resistance to treatment and to reduce associated side effects. The Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL) Consortium is an early phase clinical trial group dedicated to developing innovative therapies for currently incurable pediatric leukemias and lymphomas ( https://tacl.chla.usc.edu/tacl/ ). In November of 2016, a TACL Investigator Meeting was held, the proceedings of which appear in this edition of Pediatric Hematology Oncology. This introductory article provides an overview of TACL and introduces the five-part proceedings.

Redefining treatment failure for pediatric acute leukemia in the era of minimal residual disease testing.

Technologies for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in leukemia and our understanding of the prognostic implications of MRD at different phases of treatment have significantly improved over the past decade. As a result, definitions of treatment failure based on bone marrow morphology by light microscopy are becoming increasingly inadequate for clinical care and trial design. In addition, novel therapies that may have increased efficacy and decreased toxicity in the setting of MRD compared to overt disease are changing clinical practice and challenging investigators to redefine treatment failure, the role of disease surveillance in remission, and clinical trial eligibility in the era of MRD.

Oligoclonality and new agent evaluation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

New agent development rests on the fundamental assumption that candidate agents or drug combinations that induce objective responses after relapse will prevent relapse, if applied prior to relapse. However, cumulative experience now includes at least 5 examples of interventions with post-relapse objective response rates greater than 50% that failed to improve outcomes when applied prior to relapse. Emerging insights into oligoclonality provide some explanation. In acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, the predominant clones at relapse differ from the predominant clones at presentation. Arguably, the more highly proliferative clones that predominate at relapse differ in drug sensitivity from the less proliferative clones that escape primary therapy. Interventions effective against the predominant clones at relapse may have no effect on the antecedent escapee clones. Response is not sufficient in new agent development. Duration of response has attracted less attention because of variability in post-remission therapy but some patient subsets have such a uniformly dismal outcome that details of post-remission therapy may be irrelevant. Benchmarks are needed. Are recovering blasts members of the same clone or do they represent a new clone? When you eradicate the predominant clones you get a response. When you eradicate all clones, you get a cure.

Outcome of Children with Standard-Risk T-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia--Comparison among Different Treatment Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Children with T-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia ALL (T-ALL) historically have had inferior outcomes compared with the children with precursor-B ALL (B-ALL). After 1995, the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) treated patients with B- and T-ALL according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk criteria, basing risk stratification on age and white blood cell (WBC) count regardless of immunophenotype. The Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) treated all the patients with T-ALL on separate, generally more intensive protocols than those used to treat the patients with B-ALL. PROCEDURE: We compared the outcomes of children with T-ALL and NCI standard-risk (SR) criteria treated on CCG and POG trials between 1996 and 2005. CCG SR-ALL 1952 and 1991 enrolled 80 and 86 patients with T-ALL, respectively, utilizing a reduced intensity Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone. Treatment was intensified for slow early responders and only patients with overt central nervous system leukemia received cranial irradiation. Eighty-four patients with T-ALL and SR features were enrolled on POG 9404 comprising more intensive therapy with all patients receiving cranial irradiation. RESULTS: The 7-year event-free survival (EFS) for patients with SR T-ALL on CCG 1952, CCG 1991, and POG 9404 were 74.1 ± 5.8%, 81.8 ± 5.3%, and 84.2 ± 4.3%, respectively (P = 0.18). Overall 7-year survivals were 86.1 ± 4.6%, 88.3 ± 4.4%, 89.1 ± 3.6%, respectively (P = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Comparable high rates of EFS and long-term survival were achieved with all three regimens, with the CCG regimens utilizing a less intensive chemotherapy backbone without prophylactic cranial irradiation for patients with SR T-ALL.

Bortezomib, Dexamethasone, Mitoxantrone, and Vinorelbine (BDMV): An Active Reinduction Regimen for Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Asparaginase Intolerance.

BACKGROUND: Children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) typically receive vincristine-prednisone-L-asparaginase-doxorubicin reinduction chemotherapy similar to contemporary induction regimens. However, up to 20% of patients are unable to receive vincristine-prednisone-L-asparaginase-doxorubicin secondary to asparaginase intolerance. We report our experience with a promising reinduction regimen for children with relapsed ALL who are unable to receive asparaginase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single institution, retrospective review of the safety and activity of bortezomib, dexamethasone, mitoxantrone, and vinorelbine (BDMV) in patients with relapsed ALL. Complete remission and adverse events after reinduction were study endpoints. Patients treated with BDMV between 2012 and 2015 were identified. Response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed by review of medical records. Standard response criteria were used and AEs were graded based on NCI CTCAEv4.0. RESULTS: Seven of 10 patients achieved complete remission after 1 cycle of BDMV, with 4 achieving minimal residual disease negativity. The most common ≥grade 3 nonhematological toxicities were infection (91%), gastrointestinal (45%), metabolic (45%), and cardiovascular (9%). CONCLUSIONS: BDMV is an active reinduction regimen for children with relapsed ALL who cannot receive asparaginase. The toxicity profile is as expected for this patient population. Further prospective clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BDMV.

Improving access to novel agents for childhood leukemia.

Leukemia is the most common pediatric cancer. Despite great progress in the development of curative therapy, leukemia remains a leading cause of death from disease in childhood, and survivors are at life-long risk of complications of treatment. New agents are needed to further increase cure rates and decrease treatment-associated toxicities. The complex biology and aggressive nature of childhood leukemia, coupled with the relatively small patient population available for study, pose specific challenges to the development of new therapies. In this review, the authors discuss strategies and initiatives designed to improve access to new agents in the treatment of pediatric leukemia.

Allergic reactions and antiasparaginase antibodies in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A children's oncology group report.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this study were to assess the incidence of clinical allergy and end-induction antiasparaginase (anti-ASNase) antibodies in children with high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with pegylated (PEG) Escherichia coli ASNase and to determine whether they carry any prognostic significance. METHODS: Of 2057 eligible patients, 1155 were allocated to augmented arms in which PEG ASNase replaced native ASNase postinduction. Erwinia chrysanthemi (Erwinia) ASNase could be used to replace native ASNase after allergy, if available. Allergy and survival data were complete for 990 patients. End-induction antibody titers were available for 600 patients. RESULTS: During the consolidation phase, 289 of 990 patients (29.2%) had an allergic reaction. There were fewer allergic reactions to Erwinia ASNase than to native ASNase (odds ratio, 4.33; P < .0001) or PEG ASNase (odds ratio, 3.08; P < .0001) only during phase 1 of interim maintenance. There was no significant difference in 5-year event-free survival (EFS) between patients who received PEG ASNase throughout the entire study postinduction versus those who developed an allergic reaction to PEG ASNase during consolidation phase and subsequently received Erwinia ASNase (80.8% ± 2.8% and 81.6% ± 3.8%, respectively; P = .66). Patients who had positive antibody titers postinduction were more likely to have an allergic reaction to PEG ASNase (odds ratio, 2.4; P < .001). The 5-year EFS rate between patients who had negative versus positive antibody titers (80% ± 2.6% and 77.7% ± 4.3%, respectively; P = .68) and between patients who did not receive any ASNase postconsolidation and those who received PEG ASNase throughout the study (P = .22) were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The current results demonstrate differences in the incidence rates of toxicity between ASNase preparations but not in EFS. The presence of anti-ASNase antibodies did not affect EFS.

Increased post-induction intensification improves outcome in children and adolescents with a markedly elevated white blood cell count (≥200 × 10(9) /l) with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia but not B cell disease: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Children and adolescents presenting with a markedly elevated white blood cell (ME WBC) count (WBC ≥200 × 10(9) /l) comprise a unique subset of high-risk patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). We evaluated the outcomes of the 251 patients (12% of the study population) with ME WBC treated on the Children's Cancer Group-1961 protocol. Patients were evaluated for early response to treatment by bone marrow morphology; those with a rapid early response were randomized to treatment regimens testing longer and stronger post-induction therapy. We found that ME WBC patients have a poorer outcome compared to those patients presenting with a WBC <200 × 10(9) /l (5-year event-free survival 62% vs. 73%, P = 0·0005). Longer duration of therapy worsened outcome for T cell ME WBC with a trend to poorer outcome in B-ALL ME WBC patients. Augmented therapy benefits T cell ME WBC patients, similar to the entire study cohort, however, there appeared to be no impact on survival for B-ALL ME WBC patients. ME WBC was not a prognostic factor for T cell patients. In patients with high risk features, B lineage disease in association with ME WBC has a negative impact on survival.

Outcomes after induction failure in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Failure of remission-induction therapy is a rare but highly adverse event in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: We identified induction failure, defined by the persistence of leukemic blasts in blood, bone marrow, or any extramedullary site after 4 to 6 weeks of remission-induction therapy, in 1041 of 44,017 patients (2.4%) 0 to 18 years of age with newly diagnosed ALL who were treated by a total of 14 cooperative study groups between 1985 and 2000. We analyzed the relationships among disease characteristics, treatments administered, and outcomes in these patients. RESULTS: Patients with induction failure frequently presented with high-risk features, including older age, high leukocyte count, leukemia with a T-cell phenotype, the Philadelphia chromosome, and 11q23 rearrangement. With a median follow-up period of 8.3 years (range, 1.5 to 22.1), the 10-year survival rate (±SE) was estimated at only 32±1%. An age of 10 years or older, T-cell leukemia, the presence of an 11q23 rearrangement, and 25% or more blasts in the bone marrow at the end of induction therapy were associated with a particularly poor outcome. High hyperdiploidy (a modal chromosome number >50) and an age of 1 to 5 years were associated with a favorable outcome in patients with precursor B-cell leukemia. Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation from matched, related donors was associated with improved outcomes in T-cell leukemia. Children younger than 6 years of age with precursor B-cell leukemia and no adverse genetic features had a 10-year survival rate of 72±5% when treated with chemotherapy only. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ALL with induction failure is highly heterogeneous. Patients who have T-cell leukemia appear to have a better outcome with allogeneic stem-cell transplantation than with chemotherapy, whereas patients who have precursor B-cell leukemia without other adverse features appear to have a better outcome with chemotherapy. (Funded by Deutsche Krebshilfe and others.).

Nanoscale liposomal formulation of a SYK P-site inhibitor against B-precursor leukemia.

We report preclinical proof of principle for effective treatment of B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) by targeting the spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK)-dependent antiapoptotic blast cell survival machinery with a unique nanoscale pharmaceutical composition. This nanoscale liposomal formulation (NLF) contains the pentapeptide mimic 1,4-Bis (9-O dihydroquinidinyl) phthalazine/hydroquinidine 1,4-phathalazinediyl diether (C61) as the first and only selective inhibitor of the substrate binding P-site of SYK. The C61 NLF exhibited a very favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile in mice, induced apoptosis in primary B-precursor ALL blast cells taken directly from patients as well as in vivo clonogenic ALL xenograft cells, destroyed the in vivo clonogenic fraction of ALL blast cells, and, at nontoxic dose levels, exhibited potent in vivo antileukemic activity against patient-derived ALL cells in xenograft models of aggressive B-precursor ALL. Our findings establish SYK as an attractive molecular target for therapy of B-precursor ALL. Further development of the C61 NLF may provide the foundation for therapeutic innovation against therapy-refractory B-precursor ALL.