RESUMEN
A retrospective study of 41 trapeziometacarpal prostheses showed that the implant survival rate decreased linearly over time with a critical period in the first years; ranging from 83% after 5 years to 50% after 30 years.Level of evidence: IV.
Asunto(s)
Articulaciones Carpometacarpianas , Prótesis Articulares , Osteoartritis , Diseño de Prótesis , Humanos , Osteoartritis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Articulaciones Carpometacarpianas/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Falla de Prótesis , Anciano , Hueso Trapecio/cirugía , Artroplastia de Reemplazo , AdultoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Soft tissue coverage of the posterior aspect of the elbow requires thin and flexible flaps to adapt to movements without constraining them. The authors report a clinical series of reconstruction by the descending superficial radial artery (DSRA) flap, a proximal forearm perforator flap which use is rarely reported in the literature. METHODS: Seven patients with a mean age of 50 years (range 24-88 years) were treated for a posterior elbow defect using the DSRA flap with an adipofascial pedicle. The flap was tunneled to the defect in the subcutaneous tissue or raised using the racket-like technique to avoid any pedicle compression. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 3.3 months (range 1-12 months). A partial necrosis of the skin paddle occurred in an 88-year-old patient. In the other cases, the flap evolution was straightforward. At the last follow-up, the appearance of the flaps was satisfactory in terms of color, texture, and thickness. No complications were observed at the donor site. CONCLUSION: The DSRA flap with an adipofascial pedicle is a simple, reliable, and reproducible method for reconstruction of small to moderate-sized defect on the posterior aspect of the elbow. Its use is easier for defects on the posterolateral side, but it can reach the medial olecranon.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Surgery for congenital malformation of the hand is complex and protocols are not available. Simulation could help optimize results. The objective of the present study was to design, produce and assess a 3D-printed anatomical support, to improve success in rare and complex surgeries of the hand. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We acquired MRI imaging of the right hand of a 30 year-old subject, then analyzed and split the various skin layers for segmentation. Thus we created the prototype of a healthy hand, using 3D multi-material and silicone printing devices, and drew up a printing protocol suitable for all patients. We printed a base comprising bones, muscles and tendons, with a multi-material 3D printer, then used a 3D silicone printer for skin and subcutaneous fatty cell tissues in a glove-like shape. To evaluate the characteristics of the prototype, we performed a series of dissections on the synthetic hand and on a cadaveric hand in the anatomy lab, comparing realism, ease of handling and the final result of the two supports, and evaluated their respective advantages in surgical and training contexts. A grading form was given to each surgeon to establish a global score. RESULTS: This evaluation highlighted the positive and negative features of the model. The model avoided intrinsic problems of cadavers, such as muscle rigidity or tissue fragility and atrophy, and enables the anatomy of a specific patient to be rigorously respected. On the other hand, vascular and nervous networks, with their potential anatomical variants, are lacking. This preliminary phase highlighted the advantages and inconveniences of the prototype, to optimize the design and printing of future models. It is an indispensable prerequisite before performing studies in eligible pediatric patients with congenital hand malformation. CONCLUSION: The validation of 3D-printed anatomical model of a human hand opens a large field of applications in the area of preoperative surgical planning. The postoperative esthetic and functional benefit of such pre-intervention supports in complex surgery needs assessing.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Factibilidad , Mano , Modelos Anatómicos , Impresión Tridimensional , Humanos , Mano/cirugía , Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , CadáverRESUMEN
The influence of the anatomy of the proximal articular surface of the trapezium (PAST) and the trapezoidal articular surface of the trapezium (TRAST) on cup placement during trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty was retrospectively evaluated on 56 preoperative anteroposterior radiographs of patients who underwent surgery for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. The percentage coverage of the prosthetic cup by the PAST and the available height of the trapezium were calculated. In 39% of cases, there was a significant difference (up to a mean 4.5 mm, p < 0.001) between the radial height of the trapezium (which is usually considered) and the available height of the trapezium. The anatomy of the PAST and the TRAST has an impact on the placement of the prosthetic cup when trapezium height is low. The results of the present study suggest that these considerations must be known by all operators performing trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty; that lateralization, implant suspension, or surgical alternatives should be considered to prevent several intra- and postoperative surgical complications. Level of evidence: IV.
Asunto(s)
Pulgar , Hueso Trapecio , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pulgar/cirugía , Artroplastia/métodos , Hueso Trapecio/diagnóstico por imagen , Hueso Trapecio/cirugía , Extremidad Superior/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugíaRESUMEN
Background: Arm transplantation has been proposed as a valid therapeutic option for arm amputees. A bilateral arm transplantation including reconstruction of the left shoulder was performed on January 13, 2021 in Lyon (France). Methods: The recipient was a 48-year-old man with bilateral amputation at proximal arm level on both sides following an electric shock in 1998. He had received a liver transplant in 2002. The donor was a 35-year-old man. On the right side, the donor humerus was fixed on the remaining 9-cm-long proximal stump, and was reinforced with the donor fibula in an intramedullary fashion. On the left side, the whole donor humerus (including the humeral head) was transplanted with reconstruction of the gleno-humeral joint, including a suspension ligamentoplasty. The immunosuppressive protocol was based on antithymocyte globulins as induction therapy, and tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate mofetil as maintenance therapy. Results: Good bone healing and a well-positioned ligamentoplasty on the left side were achieved. At 2 years, the recipient was able to flex both elbows, and wrist extension, finger flexion, and extension were appreciated on both sides. Intrinsic muscle activity was detectable by electromyography during the eighth posttransplant month, and sensitivity was recovered. The patient is satisfied with his autonomy in some daily activities, but his greatest satisfaction is the recovery of his body image. Conclusions: These results confirm that it is possible to propose this transplantation to proximal-level arm amputees. The patients' information about risks and limits as well as their compliance and determination remain important prerequisites.