Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 26(5): e122-e127, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28236570

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic excision of an osteoid osteoma was first reported in the knee joint; since then, there have been several reports of arthroscopic excisions in the knee, shoulder, and elbow, with inconclusive outcomes because of a limited number of cases. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the medium-term functional effects of arthroscopic ablation in cases of an osteoid osteoma around the elbow. METHODS: We treated osteoid osteoma of the elbow through arthroscopic ablation in 10 patients. The arthroscopic resection procedure was performed 23 ± 9 months (range, 12-36 months) after initial symptoms. At the preoperative examination and last follow-up examination, the elbow flexion-extension and forearm supination-pronation ranges of motion were measured. The patients were assessed by the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the visual analog scale for the elbow and wrist, and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score. Finally, the patients' general satisfaction was assessed. RESULTS: The postoperative elbow flexion-extension range of motion was significantly higher compared with range of motion before surgery (P = .001; r = 0.86). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, the average score increased significantly at the final follow-up examination. The mean preoperative and final Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores were 47 ± 14 and 1.6 ± 2.8, respectively (P < .001). All patients were satisfied with the operation result. CONCLUSION: According to the results of our study, arthroscopic ablation is a safe and efficient method of treatment for osteoid osteoma of the elbow, with a fast rehabilitation time.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación , Artroscopía , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Articulación del Codo , Osteoma Osteoide/cirugía , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Pronación , Estudios Prospectivos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Recuperación de la Función , Supinación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Iran Red Crescent Med J ; 18(7): e38884, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27703802

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nonunion of distal radius fractures is disabling. Treatment is difficult and the results are not predictable. However, posterior interosseous bone flap (PIBF) has been successful in treating forearm nonunion. OBJECTIVES: To treat distal radius fracture nonunion with PIBF as a new procedure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective non-randomized cohort study was performed at two hospitals in Tehran between January 2011 and September 2015. PIBFs were applied in nine patients (10 nonunions) with a mean age of 55 years. Union success rate, grip strength, wrist range of motion, and forearm rotation were then evaluated. RESULTS: Although four of the patients had a history of infection, all participants achieved fracture union at a mean time of 3.8 months. Grip strength improved by 12.4 kg. There was also 36° improvement in wrist flexion, 20° improvement in wrist extension, 60° improvement in forearm supination, and 46° improvement in forearm pronation. The range of motion and grip strength improvements were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Pedicled PIBF is a new option for treating distal radius fracture nonunion. The results are predictable in achieving union and good function, and this technique can be successfully used in cases with extensive soft-tissue damage or infection.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda