Multicenter evaluation of BioFire JI panel related to improved microbiological diagnostics on acute osteoarticular infections.

Microbiological diagnosis of osteoarticular infections (OI) is crucial for a successful treatment. A prospective multicenter study including 262 synovial fluids with suspicion of acute OI was performed between July 2021 and October of 2022. BioFire Joint Infection Panel multiplex-PCR test was performed and results were compared with conventional cultures of synovial fluid specimens. In total, 136 microorganisms were detected, and fourteen samples were positive for more than one microorganism. In monomicrobial infections (n = 87) agreement with culture was 69%. In 26 samples, the multiplex PCR yield an additional positive result when culture result was negative. It helped in the detection of fastidious microorganisms as K. kingae and N. gonorrhoeae. This multiplex PCR has proven to be a useful technique that can be used for patients with high suspicion of acute OI in a rapid and automated manner.

Activity of cefepime, carbapenems and new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations on Enterobacter cloacae complex and Klebsiella aerogenes in Spain (SMART 2016-2022).

Objectives: To analyse the susceptibility profile to cefepime, carbapenems and new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations in Enterobacter cloacae complex and Klebsiella aerogenes isolated from intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory and bloodstream infections in the SMART (Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends) surveillance study in Spain. Methods: The susceptibilities of 759 isolates (473 E. cloacae complex and 286 K. aerogenes) collected in 11 Spanish hospitals from 2016 to 2022 were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 criteria. Molecular characterization looking for ß-lactamase genes was performed through PCR and DNA sequencing analysis. Results: E. cloacae complex showed resistance to third-generation cephalosporins in 25% of the cases, whereas K. aerogenes was resistant in 35%. Regarding cefepime, resistance in E. cloacae was higher (10%) than in K. aerogenes (2%). Carbapenems showed >85% activity in both microorganisms. Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam had good activity against these microorganisms (>95%). In contrast, the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam was lower (80%). A high proportion of the isolates resistant to new ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations carried a carbapenemase, mainly OXA-48-like and VIM-1. Conclusions: Ceftazidime/avibactam, imipenem/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam show high activity against both E. cloacae complex and K. aerogenes isolates recovered in the SMART-Spain study. In contrast, differences have been found in the case of cefepime, showing more activity against K. aerogenes than E. cloacae complex. These results are useful for antimicrobial stewardship programmes and for the implementation of local and national guidelines.