Cognitive-attentional mechanisms of cooperation-with implications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and cognitive neuroscience.

People's cooperativeness depends on many factors, such as their motives, cognition, experiences, and the situation they are in. To date, it is unclear how these factors interact and shape the decision to cooperate. We present a computational account of cooperation that not only provides insights for the design of effective incentive structures but also redefines neglected social-cognitive characteristics associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Leveraging game theory, we demonstrate that the source and magnitude of conflict between different motives affected the speed and frequency of cooperation. Integrating eye-tracking to measure motivation-based information processing during decision-making shows that participants' visual fixations on the gains of cooperation rather than its costs and risks predicted their cooperativeness on a trial-by-trial basis. Using Bayesian hierarchical modeling, we find that a situation's prosociality and participants' past experience each bias the decision-making process distinctively. ADHD characteristics explain individual differences in responsiveness across contexts, highlighting the clinical importance of experimentally studying reactivity in social interactions. We demonstrate how the use of eye-tracking and computational modeling can be used to experimentally investigate social-cognitive characteristics in clinical populations. We also discuss possible underlying neural mechanisms to be investigated in future studies.

For Which Children with ADHD is TBR Neurofeedback Effective? Comorbidity as a Moderator.

We examined psychiatric comorbidities moderation of a 2-site double-blind randomized clinical trial of theta/beta-ratio (TBR) neurofeedback (NF) for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Seven-to-ten-year-olds with ADHD received either NF (n = 84) or Control (n = 58) for 38 treatments. Outcome was change in parent-/teacher-rated inattention from baseline to end-of-treatment (acute effect), and 13-month-follow-up. Seventy percent had at least one comorbidity: oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) (50%), specific phobias (27%), generalized anxiety (23%), separation anxiety (16%). Comorbidities were grouped into anxiety alone (20%), ODD alone (23%), neither (30%), or both (27%). Comorbidity (p = 0.043) moderated acute effect; those with anxiety-alone responded better to Control than to TBR NF (d = - 0.79, CI - 1.55- - 0.04), and the other groups showed a slightly better response to TBR NF than to Control (d = 0.22 ~ 0.31, CI - 0.3-0.98). At 13-months, ODD-alone group responded better to NF than Control (d = 0.74, CI 0.05-1.43). TBR NF is not indicated for ADHD with comorbid anxiety but may benefit ADHD with ODD.Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT02251743, date of registration: 09/17/2014.

A diffusion decision model analysis of the cognitive effects of neurofeedback for ADHD.

OBJECTIVE: To examine cognitive effects of neurofeedback (NF) for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a secondary outcome of a randomized clinical trial. METHOD: In a double-blind randomized clinical trial (NCT02251743), 133 7-10-year olds with ADHD received either 38 sessions of NF (n = 78) or control treatment (n = 55) and performed an integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test at baseline, mid- and end-treatment. We used the diffusion decision model to decompose integrated visual and auditory continuous performance test performance at each assessment into cognitive components: efficiency of integrating stimulus information (v), context sensitivity (cv), response cautiousness (a), response bias (z/a), and nondecision time for perceptual encoding and response execution (Ter). Based on prior findings, we tested whether the components known to be deficient improved with NF and explored whether other cognitive components improved using linear mixed modeling. RESULTS: Before NF, children with ADHD showed main deficits in integrating stimulus information (v), which led to less accurate and slower responses than healthy controls (p = .008). The NF group showed significantly more improvement in integrating auditory stimulus information (v) than control treatment (significant group-by-time-by-modality effect: p = .044). CONCLUSIONS: NF seems to improve v, deficient in ADHD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Cognitive Signatures of Depressive and Anhedonic Symptoms and Affective States Using Computational Modeling and Neurocognitive Testing.

BACKGROUND: Deeper phenotyping may improve our understanding of depression. Because depression is heterogeneous, extracting cognitive signatures associated with severity of depressive symptoms, anhedonia, and affective states is a promising approach. METHODS: Sequential sampling models decomposed behavior from an adaptive approach-avoidance conflict task into computational parameters quantifying latent cognitive signatures. Fifty unselected participants completed clinical scales and the approach-avoidance conflict task by either approaching or avoiding trials offering monetary rewards and electric shocks. RESULTS: Decision dynamics were best captured by a sequential sampling model with linear collapsing boundaries varying by net offer values, and with drift rates varying by trial-specific reward and aversion, reflecting net evidence accumulation toward approach or avoidance. Unlike conventional behavioral measures, these computational parameters revealed distinct associations with self-reported symptoms. Specifically, passive avoidance tendencies, indexed by starting point biases, were associated with greater severity of depressive symptoms (R = 0.34, p = .019) and anhedonia (R = 0.49, p = .001). Depressive symptoms were also associated with slower encoding and response execution, indexed by nondecision time (R = 0.37, p = .011). Higher reward sensitivity for offers with negative net values, indexed by drift rates, was linked to more sadness (R = 0.29, p = .042) and lower positive affect (R = -0.33, p = .022). Conversely, higher aversion sensitivity was associated with more tension (R = 0.33, p = .025). Finally, less cautious response patterns, indexed by boundary separation, were linked to more negative affect (R = -0.40, p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the utility of multidimensional computational phenotyping, which could be applied to clinical samples to improve characterization and treatment selection.

Cognitive markers for efficacy of neurofeedback for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - personalized medicine using computational psychiatry in a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Exploring whether cognitive components (identified by baseline cognitive testing and computational modeling) moderate clinical outcome of neurofeedback (NF) for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHOD: 142 children (aged 7-10) with ADHD were randomly assigned to either NF (n = 84) or control treatment (n = 58) in a double-blind clinical trial (NCT02251743). The NF group received live, self-controlled downtraining of electroencephalographic theta/beta ratio power. The control group received identical-appearing reinforcement from prerecorded electroencephalograms from other children. 133 (78 NF, 55 control) children had cognitive processing measured at baseline with the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA2-CPT) and were included in this analysis. A diffusion decision model applied to the IVA2-CPT data quantified two latent cognitive components deficient in ADHD: drift rate and drift bias, indexing efficiency and context sensitivity of cognitive processes involving information integration. We explored whether these cognitive components moderated the improvement in parent- and teacher-rated inattention symptoms from baseline to treatment end (primary clinical outcome). RESULTS: Baseline cognitive components reflecting information integration (drift rate, drift bias) moderated the improvement in inattention due to NF vs. control treatment (p = 0.006). Specifically, those with either the most or least severe deficits in these components showed more improvement in parent- and teacher-rated inattention when assigned to NF (Cohen's d = 0.59) than when assigned to control (Cohen's d = -0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-treatment cognitive testing with computational modeling identified children who benefitted more from neurofeedback than control treatment for ADHD.

Characterizing Underlying Cognitive Components of ADHD Presentations and Co-morbid Diagnoses: A Diffusion Decision Model Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To Explore whether subtypes and comorbidities of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) induce distinct biases in cognitive components involved in information processing. METHOD: Performance on the Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA-CPT) was compared between 150 children (aged 7 to 10) with ADHD, grouped by DSM-5 presentation (ADHD-C, ADHD-I) or co-morbid diagnoses (anxiety, oppositional defiant disorder [ODD], both, neither), and 60 children without ADHD. Diffusion decision modeling decomposed performance into cognitive components. RESULTS: Children with ADHD had poorer information integration than controls. Children with ADHD-C were more sensitive to changes in presentation modality (auditory/visual) than those with ADHD-I and controls. Above and beyond these results, children with ADHD+anxiety+ODD had larger increases in response biases when targets became frequent than children with ADHD-only or with ADHD and one comorbidity. CONCLUSION: ADHD presentations and comorbidities have distinct cognitive characteristics quantifiable using DDM and IVA-CPT. We discuss implications for tailored cognitive-behavioral therapy.

Improving neurocognitive testing using computational psychiatry-A systematic review for ADHD.

Computational models, in conjunction with (neuro)cognitive tests, are increasingly used to understand the cognitive characteristics of participants with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We reviewed 50 studies from a broad range of cognitive tests for ADHD to synthesize findings and to summarize the new insights provided by three commonly applied computational models (i.e., diffusion decision models, absolute accumulator models, ex-Gaussian distribution models). Four areas are discussed to improve the utility of (neuro)cognitive testing for ADHD: (a) the requirements for appropriate application of the computational models; (b) the consideration of sample characteristics and neurophysiological measures; (c) the integration of findings from cognitive psychology into the literature of cognitive testing to reconcile mixed evidence; and (d) future directions for the study of ADHD endophenotypes. We illustrate how computational models refine our understanding of cognitive concepts (slow processing speed, inhibition failures) presumed to characterize ADHD. We also show that considering sample characteristics and integrating findings from computational models and neurophysiological measures provide evidence for ADHD endophenotype-specific cognitive characteristics. However, studying the cognitive characteristics of ADHD endophenotypes often lies beyond the scope of existing research for three reasons: some cognitive tests lack sensitivity to detect clinical characteristics; analysis methods do not allow the study of subtle cognitive differences; and the precategorization of participants restricts the study of symptom severity on a continuous spectrum. We provide recommendations for cognitive testing, computational modeling, and integrating electrophysiological measures to produce more valuable tools in research and clinical practice (above and beyond the research domain of ADHD). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Effects of aging in a task-switch paradigm with the diffusion decision model.

We investigated aging effects in a task-switch paradigm with degraded stimuli administered to college students, 61-74 year olds, and 75-89 year olds. We studied switch costs (the performance difference between task-repeat and task-switch trials) in terms of accuracy and mean reaction times (RTs). Previous aging research focused on switch costs in terms of mean RTs (with accuracy at ceiling). Our results emphasize the importance of distinguishing between switch costs indexed by accuracy and by RTs because these measures lead to different interpretations. We used the Diffusion Decision Model (DDM; Ratcliff, 1978) to study the cognitive components contributing to switch costs. The DDM decomposed the cognitive process of task switching into multiple components. Two parameters of the model, the quality of evidence on which decisions were based (drift rate) and the duration of processes outside the decision process (nondecision time component), indexed different sources of switch costs. We found that older participants had larger switch costs indexed by nondecision time component than younger participants. This result suggests age-related deficits in preparatory cognitive processes. We also found group differences in switch costs indexed by drift rate for switch trials with high stimulus interference (stimuli with features relevant for both tasks). This result suggests that older participants have less effective cognitive processes involved in resolving interference. Our findings show that age-related effects in separate components of switch costs can be studied with the DDM. Our results demonstrate the utility of using discrimination tasks with degraded stimuli in conjunction with model-based analyses. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).