Psychological impact of BRAF mutational status in advanced melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to highlight the psychological aspects involved in patients with advanced melanoma and to describe the differences between subjects who are positive and negative for the BRAFv600e genetic mutation, a variable that leads to a different medical approach to cancer therapy. The hypothesis is that following knowledge of the genetic mutation and the therapeutic possibilities inherent to it, mutation positive patients (BRAF+) exhibit fewer negative psychological reactions than negative patients (BRAF-) at the time of diagnosis. METHODS: The tests used (SF-12, MHQ) were administered at the time of diagnosis and after three months. RESULTS: The main findings suggest a greater impairment of quality of life at T1 than at T0, regardless of the mutation; BRAF mutated patients show more favorable scores at diagnosis and a reversal of the trend at three months after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained, in line with the literature under review, show a significant general psychological distress in the present oncological sample, suggesting the importance of a psychological, as well as medical, care of the patient and the family.

The national COVID-19 vaccination campaign targeting the extremely vulnerable: the Florence Medical Oncology Unit experience in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: International and national oncology societies had released recommendations in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. In the context of the national vaccination campaign targeting the so called extremely vulnerable, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines in a cohort of 623 patients. METHODS: Between March 26 and April 04, 2021, the Pfizer and BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA and the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines were given as a two-dose prime-boost regimen. Starting on September 25th 2021 a third dose was offered to patients in whom a suboptimal immunogenicity with COVID-19 vaccination could be expected. Safety assessments were performed by phone call 7 days after each dose. Electronic health records were accessed to review demographic information, disease history, treatment detail, and outcome events of participants patients'. FINDINGS: No toxicities were reported in 63.7%, 54%, and in 48.7% patients with cancer after each dose. Mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site was the most commonly adverse event. After the second dose, 46% of the 610 patients reported toxicity, with more systemic side-effects observed. Fever was reported in 45% of patients, with a temperature ≥ 38 °C in 21.4% of them. Of the 335 patients receiving a third vaccine dose, 51% reported toxicity, with 13% of patients reporting more than one effect. Logistic regression analysis reported mixed results, with limited variables or categories reporting a significant odd ratio. The type of vaccine reported a significant value at first dose (OR = 0.12; CI 0.52, 0.26; p = 0.00). Thirty-four cases of COVID-19 infection were reported with only one patient requiring a short-term hospitalization for monitoring. INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of the mRNA vaccines does not raise any specific concerns and support prioritization of vaccination for cancer patients.

Body image and awareness in patients with advanced-stage melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Body image (BI) is a very important aspect to be taken care of, especially in cancer patients. METHODS: We administered the Body Image Scales, with a specifically created semi-structured questionnaire which includes items that investigate the level of awareness and the degree of acceptance of the disease of the patient, was administered to patients giving their written informed consent to participate to the study. RESULTS: The results show that our population sample got an average score of 17.25 showing precisely problems related to body image. CONCLUSIONS: An adequate psychological support is crucial, as it has been widely demonstrated that body-image-related issues have a negative impact on patients' quality of life, especially in the oncology field. Such support has the aim of dealing with those aspects which can compromise the patients' equilibrium and quality of life.

Tyrosinase mRNA levels in the blood of uveal melanoma patients: correlation with the number of circulating tumor cells and tumor progression.

We measured tyrosinase mRNA levels by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR), in the blood of patients with uveal melanoma. Results were correlated with clinical data and, in a subgroup of patients, with the number of circulating tumor cells (CTC) assessed using isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET). Forty-one patients with uveal melanoma were longitudinally investigated over a period of 5 years. The standard curve of the qRT-PCR method used melanoma cell line SK-MEL-28, added to the blood of normal donors and it was calibrated on a synthetic RNA standard (1 SK-MEL-28 cell corresponding to 18 tyrosinase mRNA copies) to improve the procedural standardization to facilitate the comparison of data collected at different laboratories. Increased tyrosinase mRNA levels were found in at least one of the blood samples in 20 of 41 (49%) uveal melanoma patients (median 0.8 SK-MEL-28 cell equivalents/ml blood; range 0.1-14.4). A significant correlation was found between mRNA tyrosinase levels and tumor dimension (P<0.01), disease-free and overall survival (P<0.05). CTC were isolated by ISET in five of 16 patients (5.8, 2.33, 2.00, 1.25, and 0.75 CTC/ml of blood) and the corresponding tyrosinase mRNA levels were 2.13, 1.37, 0.83, 0.58, and 0.35 SK-MEL-28 cell equivalents/ml of blood. Tyrosinase was undetectable in 11 ISET-negative patients. Tyrosinase assay by qRT-PCR is a noninvasive method for the detection of tumor progression in uveal melanoma patients. The mRNA tyrosinase levels can be taken as an indirect parameter correlated to the number of CTC isolated from blood by ISET.

Gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line biweekly therapy in locally advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a phase II study.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate objective response rate, survival and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine-docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule as first-line treatment in advanced/relapsed or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Treatment consisted of the sequenced administration of gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (2 h intravenous infusion) on days 1, 14 of a 28-day cycle for 6 months. A total of 33 patients, 22 men and 11 women, were enrolled, aged 41-75 years (median 64 years). The majority of patients had a good performance status (94%; status<2). Thirteen patients had locally advanced disease (39%) and 20 metastasic disease (41%). A total of 178 treatment cycles were administered with a median number of 5.4 cycles for a patients (range 2-8). Toxicity was primarily hematologic with the most frequent grade >2 being neutropenia (11%), with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were milder and had a lower incidence. The most frequent nonhematological toxicities were alopecia, followed by asthenia. Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity was minimal. No toxic deaths were recorded during study and follow-up. Overall response rate was 53.1%, including four complete responses (12.5%) and 13 partial responses (40.6%), whereas six patients (18.8%) had disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-13.7), with a median survival of 14.8 months (95% confidence interval: 9.4-20.2) after an observation of 30 months (range 4-30+). The results of this study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel administered twice a week is particularly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Once data are confirmed in a larger study and longer follow-up, the favorable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative to the cisplatin-based regimen.