Split-face comparison study of cryogen spray cooling versus pneumatic skin flattening in skin tightening treatments using a long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser.

BACKGROUND: Nd:YAG pulsed lasers are used for non-ablative skin tightening treatment. A common drawback of this procedure is pain, which is often intolerable. Pneumatic skin flattening (PSF) is a new technology which alleviates pain in laser treatments. The purpose of this study is to assess the clinical efficacy and pain reduction in Nd:YAG laser skin tightening treatments with PSF compared to Nd:YAG laser skin tightening treatments with cryogen spray cooling (CSC). METHODS: Eleven patients were treated on the face with an Nd:YAG laser operated at an energy setting of 30 J/cm(2) and a pulse duration of 50 ms. Half of the face was treated with the Nd:YAG using CSC and the other side was treated with the Nd:YAG using PSF. A comparison of pain elicited from each treatment was done by comparing each patient's VAS pain scoring of the two sides. RESULTS: Treatment efficacy with CSC and with PSF was identical. The study confirmed significant pain reduction with PSF (p < 0.01). The average pain scores for PSF and CSC were 2.4 and 6.9, respectively. Mild ecchymosis was observed in two patients on the PSF side. CONCLUSION: Nd:YAG laser skin tightening treatments with PSF are less painful than Nd:YAG laser skin tightening treatments with CSC; the PSF treatments can be done with minimum side effects.

Treatment of traumatic scars using plasma skin regeneration (PSR) system.

OBJECTIVES: Several modalities have been advocated to treat traumatic scars, including surgical techniques and laser resurfacing. Recently, a plasma skin regeneration (PSR) system has been investigated. There are no reports on plasma treatment of traumatic scars. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of plasma treatment of traumatic scars in Asian patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Asian patients with traumatic scars were enrolled in the study. Three treatments were performed at monthly intervals with PSR, using energy settings of 2 to 3J. Patients were seen 1 week after each individual treatment and 3 months after the last treatment. Improvement was determined by patient questionnaires and physician evaluation of digital photographs taken prior to treatment and at 3 months post-treatment. The patients were also evaluated for any side effects from the treatment. RESULTS: Nine of 20 patients showed more than 50% improvement. The average pain score on a 10 point scale was 5.8+/-1.3 SD and all patients tolerated the treatments. The average re-epithelization time was 7.3+/-2.8 SD days. Temporary and local hyperpigmentation was observed in four patients and this hyperpigmentation disappeared within 3 months. Hypopigmentation and worsening of scarring were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma treatment is clinically effective and is associated with minimal complications when used to treat traumatic scars in Asian patients. However, deep traumatic scars are resistant to plasma treatment.

Randomized, evaluator-blind, split-face comparison study of single cross-linked versus double cross-linked hyaluronic acid in the treatment of glabellar lines.

BACKGROUND At present, various hyaluronic acids are being used to rejuvenate facial skin. There is no comparative study of single cross-linked hyaluronic acid (SCHA) versus double cross-linked hyaluronic acid (DCHA). The objective of our study is to compare the effectiveness and complications of SCHA versus DCHA in the treatment of glabellar lines. METHODS Ten female patients were enrolled in this randomized, evaluator-blind study. One side (left vs. right) of each patient's glabellar lines was treated with SCHA and the other side was treated with DCHA. Two independent blinded observers reviewed the clinical photographs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the treatment and assessed for degree of improvement as well as complications. RESULTS The two products were equally effective in producing an optimal cosmetic result, although at 6, 9, and 12 months posttreatment, a higher proportion of patients showed over 50% improvement with DCHA than with SCHA. At 12 months posttreatment, DCHA was considered superior in 70% of patients, whereas SCHA was superior in 10% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Both SCHA and DCHA are equally effective in producing an optimal cosmetic result. DCHA provides a more durable esthetic improvement when compared to SCHA in the treatment of glabellar lines.

Mongolian spots with involvement of mandibular area.

A 1-year-old boy had grayish pigmentation on the left side of his face over the area supplied by the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve. Upon further examination, the lesion was also found on the left side of the neck, shoulder, upper arm, right lower back and buttock. The pigmentation was uniform in intensity. This case report demonstrates that Mongolian spots can occur on the face in the area supplied by the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve. These spots should not be misdiagnosed as nevus of Ota.

Evaluation of fluence and pulse-duration on purpuric threshold using an extended pulse pulsed-dye laser in the treatment of port wine stains.

Laser therapy of port-wine stains (PWS) using the extended pulse pulsed-dye laser (EPPDL) is accepted as the optimal approach because the thermal relaxation time for the vessels in PWS is actually 1-10 msec. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the purpuric threshold using the EPPDL for treatment of PWS. One hundred and seventy-seven Japanese patients with PWS were recruited for this study. All the patients were dark-skinned with skin phototype III (n = 103) and IV (n = 74). PWS were treated with the EPPDL with a pulse duration ranging 1.5-10 msec, fluence ranging 9-15 J/cm(2), and a spot size of 7 mm. Cryogen spray cooling (CSC) was fixed to 30 msec of delay and 30 msec of spray duration. Patients returned to our clinic within 1 week after their initial laser therapy and the treatment sites were examined for the evidence of purpura formation. Of the 177 patients, 108 developed purpura. The lowest fluences that caused purpura and were seen in more than 50% of patients were 10 J/cm(2) with a pulse duration of 1.5 msec, 12 J/cm(2) with a pulse duration of 3 msec, 13 J/cm(2) with a pulse duration of 6 msec, and 13 J/cm(2) with a pulse duration of 10 msec. The fluence and pulse duration thresholds were 12.5 J/cm(2) and 1.65 msec, respectively. Because purpura is one of the treatment endpoints when using a pulsed-dye laser for PWS, higher fluences are necessary when using a long pulse duration.

Treatment of mesh skin grafted scars using a plasma skin regeneration system.

Objectives. Several modalities have been advocated to treat traumatic scars, including surgical techniques and laser resurfacing. Recently, a plasma skin regeneration (PSR) system has been investigated. There are no reports on plasma treatment of mesh skin grafted scars. The objective of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of plasma treatment of mesh skin grafted scars in Asian patients. Materials and Methods. Four Asian patients with mesh skin grafted scars were enrolled in the study. The plasma treatments were performed at monthly intervals with PSR, using energy settings of 3 to 4 J. Improvement was determined by patient questionnaires and physician evaluation of digital photographs taken prior to treatment and at 3 months post treatment. The patients were also evaluated for any side effects from the treatment. Results. All patients showed more than 50% improvement. The average pain score on a 10-point scale was 6.9 +/- 1.2 SD and all patients tolerated the treatments. Temporary, localized hypopigmentation was observed in two patients. Hyperpigmentation and worsening of scarring were not observed. Conclusions. Plasma treatment is clinically effective and is associated with minimal complications when used to treat mesh skin grafted scars in Asian patients.

Comparison study of a long-pulse pulsed dye laser and a long-pulse pulsed alexandrite laser in the treatment of port wine stains.

BACKGROUND: Port wine stains (PWSs) are commonly treated by the pulsed dye laser. Recently, a long-pulse pulsed alexandrite laser was used to treat bulky vascular malformations. OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we compare the efficacy and complications of the long-pulse pulsed dye laser (LPPDL) and the long-pulse pulsed alexandrite laser (LPPAL) in the treatment of PWSs. METHODS: Eleven patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV were enrolled in this study. One section of each patient's PWS was treated with LPPDL and another section was treated with LPPAL. The patients' PWSs were evaluated for efficacy of elimination of erythema and for treatment-related side effects. RESULTS: Both LPPDL and LPPAL treatment are effective in the treatment of PWSs. Hyperpigmentation was seen in two areas treated with LPPDL and in three areas treated with LPPAL. Hypopigmentation was seen in one area treated with LPPAL, but not in any of the areas treated with LPPDL. There was no scarring. CONCLUSION: LPPAL works best with hypertrophic, purple PWSs, while LPPDL yields better clinical improvements with the flat, pink PWSs. Targeting of deoxyhemoglobin, deeper penetration, and higher fluence may explain the effectiveness of LPPAL in purple, hypertrophic PWSs. However, there is a risk of dyspigmentation when using the LPPAL.

Treatment of resistant port-wine stains with a variable-pulse pulsed dye laser.

BACKGROUND: The conventional pulsed dye laser (PDL), operating at a wavelength of 585 nm and a pulse duration of 0.45 ms, usually does not achieve complete clearance in the majority of port-wine stains (PWSs). OBJECTIVE: In this study, we demonstrate the efficacy of a variable-pulse pulsed dye laser (VPPDL) equipped with cryogen spray cooling (CSC) in the treatment of PWS that have become resistant to PDL treatment. METHODS: Forty Asian patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III to IV were enrolled in this study. All patients had previously been treated by the PDL at least eight times (mean, 12.8+/-5.9) and had reached a treatment plateau. A VPPDL with a wavelength of 595 nm and a spot size of 7 mm was used. The patients were treated with fluences between 9 and 15 J/cm(2) and pulse durations of 1.5 to 10 ms. Four treatments were administered at 8-week intervals for each lesion. Three months after the last treatment, all patients were evaluated for the degree of improvement by two independent clinicians. RESULTS: Eight patients had excellent improvement, 9 had good improvement, 11 had fair improvement, and 12 had poor improvement. No complications were observed during the course of laser treatment. Vessels larger than 30 microm were not seen in the biopsy specimens obtained after the final treatment. CONCLUSION: The VPPDL is more effective than the PDL and the VPPDL should be used for treating PDL-resistant PWSs. Nonetheless, vessels less than 30 mum in diameter are resistant to both PDL and VPPDL treatment.

Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.

Currently, various nonablative skin resurfacing techniques are being used to rejuvenate facial skin, including lasers and intense pulsed light (IPL). There are few direct comparison studies between IPLs and lasers. The objective of our study is to compare the effectiveness of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser (LPDL) in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation. Ten Asian patients with Fitzpatrick skin types III-IV were enrolled in this study. One half of the face was treated with IPL (6 treatment sessions) and the other side was treated by LPDL (3 treatment sessions). An LPDL with a wavelength of 595 nm and spot size of 7 mm was used. Utilizing the compression method, lentigines were treated using a PDL with a fluence between 9-12 J/cm and a pulse duration of 1.5 ms. Wrinkles were treated with fluences between 10 to 12 J/cm and a pulse duration of 20 ms, using a pulse-stacking technique. An IPL with a type B handpiece was used. Lentigines and wrinkles were treated with fluences between 27 to 40 J/cm and a pulse duration of 20 ms. The improvement of lentigines was 62.3% and 81.1% for IPL and LPDL respectively. There was no significant difference between IPL and LPDL in wrinkle reduction. There was no scarring or pigmentary change seen with either device. Both IPL and LPDL are effective for facial skin rejuvenation in Asians, but LPDL treatment is significantly better than IPL treatment in the treatment of lentigines. The use of the compression technique may allow this LPDL to be used effectively for facial rejuvenation and with fewer treatment sessions, when compared with the IPL.

Long-pulse pulsed dye laser delivered with compression for treatment of facial lentigines.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The 595-nm long-pulsed dye laser (LPDL) has been used for the treatment of vascular lesions, and although it is well absorbed by blood, it is also well absorbed by melanin. To utilize this device for the treatment of facial lentigines, we attached a glass window to the tip of the laser's handpiece, allowing compression of the skin during treatment. This prospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and complications of using a LPDL delivered with compression for the treatment of facial lentigines in Asian persons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four Asian patients with facial lentigines were enrolled in this study. The laser settings included fluences between 9 and 13 J/cm(2) and a constant pulse duration of 1.5 ms. Cryogen spray cooling was not used. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients showed excellent results, 14 patients showed good results, and 2 patients showed fair results. Hyperpigmentation was seen in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: LPDL delivered with the compression method is effective in the treatment of facial lentigines in Asian patients, and the side effect profile is minimal. The compression technique allows the traditional "vascular" LPDL to be used for treating a variety of pigmented lesions.

Prospective direct comparison study of fractional resurfacing using different fluences and densities for skin rejuvenation in Asians.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Fractional resurfacing is a new concept of cutaneous remodeling whereby laser-induced zones of microthermal injury are surrounded by normal untreated tissue. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and complications of Fraxel laser treatment when using different fluences and density settings. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty female Asian patients were enrolled in the study. Group 1 (n = 10); half of the face was treated with eight passes at 125 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 8 mJ. The other half of the face was treated with eight passes at 250 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 8 mJ. Group 2 (n = 10); half of the face was treated with eight passes at 125 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 8 mJ. The other half of the face was treated with eight passes at 125 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 16 mJ. Group 3 (n = 10); half of the face was treated with eight passes at 125 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 16 mJ. The other half of the face was treated with eight passes at 250 MTZ/cm2 at an energy setting of 8 mJ. Ice pack cooling was used during and after laser treatment. The patients were evaluated for clinical efficacy and treatment-related side effects. RESULTS: Pain, erythema, and swelling were observed to be significantly more evident or persisted longer in patients treated with higher densities and fluences (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction is significantly greater in patients treated with higher fluences (P<0.05), but not in patients treated with higher densities. Hyperpigmentation was observed in two patients. CONCLUSION: Increased density was more likely to produce swelling, redness, and hyperpigmentation when compared to increased energy. Patient satisfaction is significantly higher when their skin is treated with high fluences, but not when patients' skin is treated with high densities.

Treatment of port wine stains with the pulse dye laser.

The pulsed dye lasers (PDL) are the gold standard in the treatment of port wine stains (PWS). However, clearance rates vary widely, and many lesions are not completely cleared with laser treatment. This article reviews the use of different types of PDL for the treatment of PWS. Longer pulse durations and higher fluences in conjunction with skin cooling are required for larger vessels. Controversy still exists as to which wavelength induces greater photothermal damage to the blood vessels in PWS. The incomplete response of PWS to the conventional PDL is due to the suboptimal irradiation parameters of energy fluence, pulse duration, and wavelength currently used in clinical settings. New-generation PDL are more effective than conventional PDL, but vessels smaller than 30-50 microm appear resistant to all kinds of PDL treatment.

Comparison study of a traditional pulsed dye laser versus a long-pulsed dye laser in the treatment of early childhood hemangiomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The role of pulsed dye laser (PDL) in the treatment of childhood hemangiomas is still controversial because of the inherent characteristics of hemangiomas as well as the side effects of the PDL. Recently, the long pulsed dye laser (LPDL) with cryogen spray cooling (CSC) has been found relatively more effective and safer than the PDL in the treatment of port-wine stains and telangiectasia. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and complication rate of PDL versus LPDL for treating childhood hemangiomas. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: We did a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in which we enrolled 52 Asian infants, aged 1-3 months, with early hemangiomas. These infants were assigned to PDL treatment (n = 26) or LPDL treatment (n = 26) and followed to age 1 year. A PDL with a wavelength of 585 nm and spot size of 7 mm and a LPDL with a wavelength of 595 nm and spot size of 7 mm were used. Each patient in the PDL group was treated with energy fluence between 6 and 7 J/cm(2) and a pulse duration of 0.45 milliseconds without epidermal cooling. Each patient in the LPDL group was treated with energy fluence between 9 and 15 J/cm(2) and a pulse duration of 10-20 milliseconds, utilizing CSC to protect the epidermis. Each group was treated at 4-week intervals until the lesion cleared. When each patient reached an age of 1 year, outcome measures such as clearance rate, time period of maximum proliferation, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: The number of children whose lesions showed complete clearance or minimal residual signs at 1 year of age was 14 (54%) in the PDL group and 17 (65%) in the LPDL group (P = 0.397). Compared with the LPDL, PDL treated children had more hypopigmentation (3, 12% vs. 8, 31%; P = 0.001), more hyperpigmentation (2, 8% vs. 4, 15%; P = 0.005), and more textural changes (1, 4% vs. 6, 23%; P = 0.001). The average time period of maximum proliferation in the LPDL group was significantly shorter than that of the PDL group (106 days vs. 177 days; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Early treatment of childhood hemangiomas with the LPDL is safer and more effective than the PDL.