RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a dual-ring wound protector for preventing incisional surgical site infection (SSI) among patients with preoperative biliary stents undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study was a parallel, dual-arm, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Adult patients with a biliary stent undergoing elective PD at 2 tertiary care institutions were included (February 2013 to May 2016). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a surgical dual-ring wound protector or no wound protector, and also the current standard of care. The main outcome measure was incisional SSI, as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, within 30 days of the index operation. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were recruited (mean age 67.2 years; standard deviation 12.9; 65% male). No significant differences were identified between the intervention and control groups (age, sex, body mass index, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, prestent cholangitis). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of incisional SSI in the wound protector group (21.1% vs 44.0%; relative risk reduction 52%; P = 0.010). Patients with completed PD also displayed a decrease in incisional SSI with use of the wound protector compared with those palliated surgically (27.3% vs 48.7%; P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis did not identify any significant modifying factor relationships (estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, hospital site, etc.) (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with intrabiliary stents, the use of a dual-ring wound protector during PD significantly reduces the risk of incisional SSI.
Asunto(s)
Pancreaticoduodenectomía/instrumentación , Stents , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite supporting evidence, many staff surgeons and surgical trainees do not routinely double glove. We performed a study to assess rates of and attitudes toward double gloving and the use of eye protection in the operating room. METHODS: We conducted an electronic survey among all staff surgeons and surgical trainees at 2 tertiary care centres in Alberta between September and November 2015.We analyzed the data using log-binomial regression for binary outcomes to account for multiple independent variables and interactions. For 2-group comparisons, we used a 2-group test of proportions. RESULTS: The response rate was 34.3% (361/1051); 205/698 staff surgeons (29.4%) and 156/353 surgical trainees (44.2%) responded. Trainees were more likely than staff surgeons to ever double glove in the operating room (p = 0.01) and to do so routinely (p = 0.01). Staff surgeons were more likely than trainees to never double glove (p = 0.01). A total of 300/353 respondents (85.0%) reported using eye protection routinely in the operating room. Needle-stick injury was common (184 staff surgeons [92.5%], 115 trainees [74.7%]). Reduced tactile feedback, decreased manual dexterity and discomfort/poor fit were perceived barriers to double gloving. CONCLUSION: Rates of double gloving leave room for improvement. Surgical trainees were more likely than staff surgeons to double glove. Barriers remain to routine double gloving among staff surgeons and trainees. Increased education on the benefits of double gloving and early introduction of this practice may increase uptake.
CONTEXTE: Malgré les preuves à l'appui, plusieurs chirurgiens en poste et chirurgiens en formation n'utilisent pas d'emblée le double gantage. Nous avons procédé à une étude pour évaluer le taux d'utilisation du double gantage, les opinions à son endroit et l'utilisation de la protection oculaire au bloc opératoire. MÉTHODES: Nous avons envoyé un sondage électronique à tous les chirurgiens en poste et chirurgiens en formation de 2 centres de soins tertiaires de l'Alberta entre septembre et novembre 2015. Nous avons analysé les données à l'aide d'un modèle de régression logarithmique binomiale pour les résultats binaires afin de tenir compte des variables indépendantes et des interactions. Pour les comparaisons à 2 groupes, nous avons utilisé le test de comparaison de 2 proportions. RÉSULTATS: Le taux de réponse a été de 34,3 % (361/1051); 205 chirurgiens en poste sur 698 (29,4 %) et 156 chirurgiens en formation sur 353 (44,2 %) ont répondu. Au bloc opératoire, les stagiaires étaient plus susceptibles de doubler leurs gants que les chirurgiens en poste (p = 0,01) et de le faire d'emblée (p = 0,01); et les chirurgiens en poste étaient plus susceptibles de ne jamais doubler leurs gants que les stagiaires (p = 0,01). En tout 300 répondeurs sur 353 (85,0 %) ont dit utiliser d'emblée une protection oculaire au bloc opératoire. Les piqûres d'aiguille accidentelles ont été fréquentes (184 chez les chirurgiens en poste [92,5 %], 115 chez les stagiaires [74,7 %]). Une réduction de la sensibilité tactile et de la dextérité manuelle et l'inconfort ou le piètre ajustement ont été les obstacles perçus au double gantage. CONCLUSION: Les taux de double gantage laissent à désirer. Les chirurgiens en formation sont plus susceptibles d'adopter le double gantage que les chirurgiens en poste. Des obstacles continuent de nuire à l'utilisation du double gantage d'emblée, tant chez les chirurgiens en poste que chez les chirurgiens en formation. Une meilleure sensibilisation aux avantages du double gantage et l'introduction de cette pratique dès le début de la formation pourrait faciliter son adoption.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Guantes Quirúrgicos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Anciano , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones por Pinchazo de Aguja , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multimodal treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) relies on precise upfront assessment of resectability. Variability in the definition of resectable disease and the importance of early consultation by a liver surgeon have been reported. In this pilot study we investigated the initial resectability assessment and patterns of referral of patients with CRLMs. METHODS: Surgeons and medical oncologists involved in the management of colorectal cancer at 2 academic institutions and affiliated community hospitals were surveyed. Opinions were sought regarding resectability of CRLMs and the type of initial specialty referral (hepatobiliary surgery, medical oncology, palliative care or other) in 6 clinical cases derived from actual cases of successfully performed 1- or 2-stage resection/ablation of hepatic disease. Case scenarios were selected to illustrate critical aspects of assessment of resectability, best therapeutic approaches and specialty referral. Standard statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 75 surgeons contacted, 64 responded (response rate 85%; 372 resectability assessments completed). Hepatic metastases were more often considered resectable by hepatobiliary surgeons than all other respondents (92% v. 57%, p < 0.001). Upfront systemic therapy was most commonly prioritized by surgical oncologists (p = 0.01). Hepatobiliary referral was still considered in 73% of "unresectable" assessments by colorectal surgeons, 59% of those by general surgeons, 57% of those by medical oncologists and 33% of those by surgical oncologists (p = 0.1). CONCLUSION: Assessment of resectability varied significantly between specialties, and resectability was often underestimated by nonhepatobiliary surgeons. Hepatobiliary referral was not considered in a substantial proportion of cases erroneously deemed unresectable. These disparities result largely from an imprecise understanding of modern surgical indications for resection of CRLMs.
CONTEXTE: Le traitement multimodal des métastases hépatiques du cancer colorectal (MHCR) repose sur une rigoureuse évaluation initiale de la résécabilité. On a fait état de l'imprécision de la définition de résécabilité et de l'importance de demander rapidement une consultation en chirurgie du foie. Au cours de cette étude, nous avons fait le point sur l'évaluation initiale de la résécabilité et sur les types de consultations demandées pour les patients présentant des MHCR. MÉTHODES: Nous avons interrogé les chirurgiens et oncologues médicaux responsables de la prise en charge du cancer colorectal dans 2 établissements universitaires et leurs hôpitaux communautaires affiliés. Nous leur avons demandé leur opinion sur la résécabilité des MHCR et le type de consultation demandée initialement (chirurgie hépatobiliaire, oncologie médicale, soins palliatifs ou autres) concernant 6 cas cliniques inspirés de cas réels de résection ou ablation réussie pour maladie hépatique de stade 1 ou 2. Ces scénarios de cas cliniques ont été choisis pour illustrer certains aspects cruciaux de l'évaluation de la résécabilité, des approches thérapeutiques optimales et des demandes de consultation. Des analyses statistiques standards ont été effectuées. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 75 chirurgiens rejoints, 64 ont répondu (taux de réponse 85â¯%; 372 évaluations de résécabilité ont été effectuées). Les métastases hépatiques ont été plus souvent jugées résécables par les chirurgiens hépatobiliaires que par tous les autres répondants (92â¯% c. 57â¯%, p < 0,001). Un traitement systémique initial a le plus souvent été privilégié par les chirurgiens-oncologues (p = 0,01). Une consultation auprès de spécialistes hépatobiliaires était encore considérée comme nécessaire pour les cas jugés «â¯non résécables⯼ dans une proportion de 73â¯% par les chirurgiens spécialistes du cancer colorectal, de 59 % par les chirurgiens généraux, de 57â¯% par les oncologues médicaux et de 33â¯% par les chirurgiens-oncologues (p = 0,1). CONCLUSION: L'évaluation de la résécabilité a significativement varié d'une spécialité à l'autre et la résécabilité a souvent été sous-estimée par les chirurgiens non spécialistes de voies hépatobiliaires. La consultation auprès des spécialistes hépatobiliaires n'a pas été envisagée pour une proportion substantielle de cas jugés à tort non résécables. Ces disparités se soldent en bonne partie d'une mécompréhension des indications actuelles de la chirurgie pour MHCR.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta , Especialidades QuirúrgicasRESUMEN
SUMMARY: A wide range of factors have traditionally led to early in-hospital death following severe injury. The primary goal of this commentary was to evaluate the causes of early posttraumatic inpatient deaths over an extended period. Although early posttraumatic in-hospital death remains multifactorial, severe traumatic brain injuries are the dominant cause and have increased in proportion over time. Other traditional causes of death have also decreased owing to improved clinical care.
Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Pacientes Internos , Canadá , Causas de Muerte , Muerte , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Variance in prehospital time among severely injured blunt trauma patients is dependent upon numerous factors. Effects on subsequent mortality and trauma team activation (TTA) rates are also unclear. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between prehospital time and mortality at level I trauma referral centers amongst critically blunt injured patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multiinstitutional study from three geographically distinct level I trauma centers analyzed all severely blunt injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥12). The relationship between prehospital time and survival was evaluated. Secondary outcomes included the association between prehospital time and TTA. Standard statistical methodology was used (P < 0.05 = significance). RESULTS: Between January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016, 5375 severely blunt injured patients (mean ISS = 25; mean length of stay = 16.3 d) were analyzed (center 1 = 3376; center 2 = 2401; and center 3 = 1104). As prehospital time interval increased, overall mortality decreased (0-30 min = 24.1%; 31-60 min = 14.7%; 61-90 min = 10.3%; 91-120 min = 10.4%; 121-150 min = 10.2%; P < 0.05). This pattern was especially strong for patients with an arrival measurement of hypotension, despite corrections for ISS (P < 0.05). TTA and patient outcomes were extremely variable across intervals and centers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A trial of life effect is present for severely blunt injured patients who arrive with vital signs. Despite arrival measurements of hypotension, patients with prolonged prehospital times have a substantially lower risk of subsequent mortality. This concept should contribute to decision-making with regard to TTA.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas no Penetrantes/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Transporte de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas no Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
SUMMARY: Over the last 3 decades, expansion in the scope and complexity of hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery has resulted in significant improvements in postoperative outcomes. As a result, the importance of dedicated fellowship training for HPB surgery is now well established, and the definition of formal program requirements has been actively pursued by a collaboration of the 3 distinct accrediting bodies within North America. While major advances have been made in defining minimum case volume requirements, qualitative assessment of the operative experience remains challenging. Our research collaborative (HPB Manpower and Education Study Group) has previously explored the perceived case volume adequacy of core HPB procedures within fellowship programs. We conducted a 1-year follow-up survey targeting the same cohort to investigate the association between operative case volumes and comfort performing HPB procedures within initial independent practice.
Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/educación , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
SUMMARY: You graduate from medical school with dreams of beginning your residency, during which you will study and train within the specialty you love more than any other. While you may be book-smart at this point in your career, medical school does not teach you everything you need to know. During residency you will learn the didactic and technical requirements for your future staff job, but medical school won't explicitly address many of the crucial "dos and don'ts" of a successful 2- to 5-year postgraduate training voyage. Here we discuss a few of the important things about residency that you'll need to know that they don't teach you in medical school.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia/normas , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Facultades de Medicina/normas , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging has been indirectly linked with subsequent cancer and increased costs. Computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for defining pancreatic anatomy and complications. Our primary goal was to identify the temporal trends associated with diagnostic imaging for inpatients with pancreatic diseases. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2000 to 2008. Pancreas-related ICD-9 diagnostic codes were matched to all relevant imaging modalities. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2008, a significant increase in admissions (p < 0.001), but decrease in overall imaging procedures (p = 0.032), for all pancreatic disorders was observed. This was primarily a result of a reduction in the number of CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography examinations (i.e., reduced radiation exposure, p = 0.008). A concurrent increase in the number of inpatient magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography/magnetic resonance imaging performed was observed (p = 0.040). Intraoperative cholangiography and CT remained the dominant imaging modality of choice overall (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Inpatients with pancreatic diseases often require diagnostic imaging during their stay. This results in substantial exposure to ionizing radiation. The observed decrease in the use of CT may reflect an improved awareness of potential stochastic risks.
CONTEXTE: Les faibles doses de rayonnement ionisant associées à l'imagerie médicale ont été indirectement associées à des cas subséquents de cancer et à une augmentation des coûts. Considérée comme la norme dans le domaine, la tomographie par ordinateur est utilisée pour étudier l'anatomie et les complications pancréatiques. Notre principal objectif consistait à dégager les tendances temporelles associées à l'utilisation de l'imagerie diagnostique chez des patients hospitalisés atteints de maladies pancréatiques. MÉTHODES: Des données ont été extraites de la base de données du Nationwide Inpatient Sample [échantillon national sur les malades hospitalisés] associé au Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project [Projet sur les coûts et l'utilisation des soins de santé] pour les années 2000 à 2008. Les codes de la CIM-9 attribués aux maladies pancréatiques ont été associés aux techniques d'imagerie pertinentes. RÉSULTATS: De 2000 à 2008, une hausse importante du nombre d'admissions (p < 0,001) a été observée pour l'ensemble des maladies pancréatiques, parallèlement à une baisse du nombre total d'examens d'imagerie (p = 0,032). Ces changements sont principalement attribuables à une diminution du nombre de tomographies par ordinateur et de cholangiopancréatographies rétrogrades endoscopiques effectuées (donc à une diminution de l'exposition au rayonnement, p = 0,008). Par ailleurs, une augmentation du nombre de tomographies et de cholangio-pancréatographies par résonance magnétique effectuées sur des patients hospitalisés (p = 0,040) a également été observée. Dans l'ensemble, les cholangio-pancréatographies et les tomographies peropératoires demeurent les techniques d'imagerie les plus utilisées (p = 0,027). CONCLUSION: Les patients atteints de maladies pancréatiques ont généralement besoin de subir un examen d'imagerie médicale pendant leur séjour à l'hôpital, et peuvent donc être exposés à une dose substantielle de rayonnement ionisant. La baisse observée du nombre de tomographies par ordinateur pourrait témoigner d'une sensibilisation améliorée aux risques stochastiques potentiels.
Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiación Ionizante , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
This article characterizes the Canadian hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery workforce (demographics, practice patterns, career satisfaction, education and recruitment plans). This information will serve as a baseline for future national comparisons, allow informed workforce planning and facilitate mathematical modelling of the HPB workforce in Canada.
Asunto(s)
Gastroenterología , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Adulto , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Recolección de Datos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Gastroenterología/educación , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Personal , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship programmes have recently undergone significant changes with regards to training standards, case-volume thresholds and multimodality educational platforms. The goals of this study were to compare the perspectives of fellows and programme directors (PDs) on perceptions of readiness to enter practice and identify core Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) procedures that require increased emphasis during training. METHODS: This survey targeted PDs and trainees participating in the Fellowship Council/AHPBA pathway. Data related to demographics, education and career plans were collected. Analysis of PD and fellow opinions regarding their confidence to perform core HPB procedures was completed. RESULTS: The response rate was 88% for both fellows (21/24) and PDs (23/26). There was good agreement between PDs and fellows in the perception of case volumes. Select differences where PDs ranked higher perceptions included major hepatectomies (PDs: 87% versus fellows: 57%, P = 0.04), pancreaticoduodenectomies (100% versus 81%, P = 0.04) and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (78% versus 43%, P = 0.03). 'Good or excellent' case volumes translated into increased fellow readiness, except for some pancreatitis procedures, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies and potentially major hepatectomies. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into content domains that may require additional attention to achieve an appropriate level of proficiency and confidence upon completion of training.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Vías Biliares/cirugía , Competencia Clínica , Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Gastroenterología/educación , Internado y Residencia/normas , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Enfermedades Pancreáticas/cirugía , Desarrollo de Programa , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the demographics, training and practice characteristics of physicians performing thoracic surgery across Canada to better assess workforce needs. METHODS: We developed a questionnaire using a modified Delphi process to generate questionnaire items. The questionnaire was administered to all Canadian thoracic surgeons via email (n = 102) or mail (n = 35). RESULTS: In all, 97 surgeons completed the survey (71% response rate). The mean age of respondents was 47.7 (standard deviation 9.1) years; 10.3% were older than 60. Ninety respondents (88.7%) were men, 95 (81.1%) practised in English and 93 (76%) were born in Canada. Most (90.4%) had a medical school affiliation, with an equal proportion practising in community or university teaching hospitals. Only 18% of respondents reported working fewer than 60 hours per week, and 34% were on call more than 1 in 3. Three-quarters of work hours were devoted to clinical care, with the remaining time split among research, administration and teaching. Malignant lung disease accounted for 61.2% of practice time, with the remaining time equally split between benign and malignant thoracic diseases. Preoperative testing (49.4%) and insufficient operating time (49.5%) were the most common factors delaying delivery of care. More than 80% of respondents reported being satisfied with their careers, with 62.1% planning on retiring after age 60. CONCLUSION: This survey characterizes Canadian thoracic surgeons by providing specific demographic, satisfaction and scope of practice information. Despite challenges in obtaining adequate resources for providing timely care, job satisfaction remains high, with a balanced workforce supply and demand anticipated for the foreseeable future.
CONTEXTE: Cette étude a pour but de décrire les caractéristiques démographiques, de formation et de pratique des chirurgiens thoracique au Canada afin de mieux cerner les besoins en effectifs. MÉTHODES: Nous avons mis au point un questionnaire à l'aide d'une méthode Delphi modifiée pour générer les questions. Nous avons envoyé le questionnaire à tous les chirurgiens thoraciques canadiens par courriel (n = 102) ou par la poste (n = 35). RÉSULTANTS: En tout, 97 chirurgiens ont répondu au sondage (taux de réponse de 71 %). L'âge moyen des répondants était de 47,7 (écart-type 9,1) ans; 10,3 % avaient plus de 60 ans. Quatre-vingt-dix répondants (88,7 %) étaient des hommes, 95 (81,1 %) exerçaient en anglais et 93 (76 %) étaient nés au Canada. La plupart (90,4 %) étaient rattachés à une faculté de médecine ou, en proportion égale, exerçaient dans des centres hospitaliers communautaires ou universitaires. Seulement 18 % des répondants ont déclaré travailler moins de 60 heures par semaine et 34 % étaient « sur appel ¼ plus d'un jour sur 3. Les trois quarts des heures travaillées étaient consacrées aux soins cliniques et le temps restant se répartissait entre la recherche, les tâches administratives et l'enseignement. Le cancer du poumon a occupé 61,2 % du temps de pratique, le reste du temps se répartissant également entre diverses maladies thoraciques bénignes et malignes. Les épreuves préopératoires (49,4 %) et le manque de temps opératoire qui leur est accordé (49,5 %) figurent parmi les principaux facteurs qui retardent les chirurgies. Plus de 80 % des répondants se sont dits satisfaits de leur carrière et 62,1 % prévoient prendre leur retraite après l'âge de 60 ans. CONCLUSIONS: Ce sondage a permis de dégager les caractéristiques des chirurgiens thoraciques canadiens en fournissant des données démographiques spécifiques, leur taux de satisfaction et la portée de leur pratique. Même s'il leur est difficile d'obtenir toutes les ressources nécessaires pour prodiguer les traitements en temps opportun, leur satisfaction au travail demeure élevée et l'offre et la demande semblent équilibrées en regard des effectifs et des besoins prévus pour l'avenir prévisible.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Torácica , Distribución por Edad , Análisis de Varianza , Canadá , Técnica Delphi , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Jubilación , Distribución por Sexo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cirugía Torácica/educación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Recursos Humanos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior efforts to capture the cardiothoracic surgery community rely on survey data with potentially biased or low response rates. Our goal is to better understand our community by assessing the membership directories from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS), European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), and Asian Society for Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery (ASCVTS). METHODS: Membership data were obtained from membership directories. Data for STS and EACTS were supplemented by the associations from their internal databases. The inclusion criterion was active membership; trainees and wholly incomplete profiles were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 12 053 membership profiles were included (STS, 6365; EACTS, 3661; AATS, 1495; ASCVTS, 532). Membership is 7% female overall (EACTS, 9%; STS, 6%; AATS, 5%; ASCVTS, 3%), with a median age of 57 years (STS, 60 years; EACTS, 52 years). All societies had a broad scope of practice including members who practiced both adult cardiac and thoracic (20% overall), but most members practiced adult cardiac (31% overall; ASCVTS, 48%; AATS, 36%; EACTS, 30%; STS, 28%) and were in the late stage of their careers. CONCLUSIONS: We present the makeup of our 4 major societies. We are global with a diversity of careers but concerning factors that require immediate attention. The future of our specialty depends on our ability to evolve, to promote the specialty, to attract trainees, and to include and promote female surgeons. It is crucial that we wake up to these issues, change the narrative, and create action on both individual and leadership levels.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos , Cirugía Torácica , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Sociedades Médicas , CorazónRESUMEN
At some point as the on-call trauma surgeon, you may need to operate on a bleeding lung. This concise review addresses preoperative and intraoperative considerations for traumatic lung injuries, including how to deal with specific findings at the time of surgery.
RESUMEN
The contributors to this article have been recognized as outstanding leaders in thoracic surgery. Each has addressed particular elements that he or she considers to be important in developing a successful thoracic surgical career. These unique perspectives provide valuable insights.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Torácica , Competencia Clínica , Consejo , Docentes Médicos , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Mentores , Satisfacción Personal , PersonalidadRESUMEN
As surgeons progress through their careers, they are often entrusted with leadership roles in administration, education, research, and patient management. Insights into one's own personality type and leadership style as well as an understanding of the value of emotional intelligence are critical for success. Knowledge of group dynamics and team leading; networking; techniques in leading, changing, and innovation; as well as proficiency in negotiation and conflict resolution are also essential to the development of leadership skills.
Asunto(s)
Liderazgo , Cirugía Torácica , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Negociación , Autonomía Personal , Médicos/psicología , Cirugía Torácica/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
Determining which organizations to join can be challenging given the wide selection of associations, societies, and clubs available to practicing thoracic surgeons. This article briefly reviews 7 important North American thoracic surgery organizations (the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons, the General Thoracic Surgical Club, the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, the Western Thoracic Surgical Association, and Women in Thoracic Surgery). The authors also review the criteria that may assist in deciding which organizations best meet a surgeon's career goals and personal expectations.
Asunto(s)
Sociedades Médicas , Humanos , América del Norte , Objetivos Organizacionales , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Cirugía TorácicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: An incomplete major pulmonary fissure can make anatomic lung resection technically more difficult and may increase the risk of complications, such as prolonged postoperative air leak. The objective of this study was to determine if preoperative computed tomography (CT) of the chest could accurately predict the completeness of the major pulmonary fissure observed at the time of surgery. METHODS: From October 2008 to June 2009, patients at a single university institution were enrolled if they underwent surgery for a pulmonary nodule, mass or known cancer. At the time of surgery, completeness of the major pulmonary fissure was graded 1 if pulmonary lobes were entirely separate, 2 if the visceral cleft was complete with an exposed pulmonary artery at the base with some parenchyma fusion, 3 if the visceral cleft was only evident for part of the fissure without a visible pulmonary artery and 4 if the fissure was absent. The preoperative CT scan of each patient was graded by a single, blinded chest radiologist using the same scale. We used the Pearson χ2 test with 2-tailed significance to test the independence of the operative and radiologic grading. RESULTS: In 48% (29 of 61) of patients, the radiologic and operative grading were the same. Of those graded differently, 94% (30 of 32) were within 1 grade. Despite this agreement, we observed no statistically significant correlation between the operative and radiologic grading (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The major fissure can often be well-visualized on a preoperative CT scan, but preoperative CT cannot accurately predict the completeness of the major pulmonary fissure discovered at surgery.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/patología , Neumonectomía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Practically, hiatal hernias are divided into sliding hiatal hernias (type I) and PEH (types II, III, or IV). Patients with PEH are usually symptomatic with GERD or obstructive symptoms, such as dysphagia. Rarely, patients present with acute symptoms of hernia incarceration, such as severe epigastric pain and retching. A thorough evaluation includes a complete history and physical examination, chest radiograph, UGI series, esophagogastroscopy, and manometry. These investigations define the patient's anatomy, rule out other disease processes, and confirm the diagnosis. Operable symptomatic patients with PEH should be repaired. The underlying surgical principles for successful repair include reduction of hernia contents, removal of the hernia sac, closure of the hiatal defect, and an antireflux procedure. Debate remains whether a transthoracic, transabdominal, or laparoscopic approach is best with good surgical outcomes being reported with all three techniques. Placement of mesh to buttress the hiatal closure is reported to reduce hernia recurrence. Long-term follow-up is required to determine whether the laparoscopic approach with mesh hiatoplasty becomes the procedure of choice.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal/complicaciones , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Gastroplastia , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Mallas QuirúrgicasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) results from the rupture of blebs or emphysematous bullae. Rapid changes in weather may precipitate this process. The city of Calgary is well suited to examine the effects of weather and specifically the rapid changes in weather associated with a chinook event and the occurrence of SP. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all cases of SP in the Calgary Health Region from 2001 to 2005. We obtained local hourly weather data over the same period from Environment Canada. We then compared the rates of SP on chinook and nonchinook days. Further, we compared mean daily temperature, humidity, wind speed and atmospheric pressure on chinook and nonchinook days. RESULTS: In all, 220 SP events from 149 patients occurred during the 4.5-year study period. There was no significant difference in the rate of SP on chinook days versus nonchinook days (p = 0.80). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the rate of SP in each of the 4 seasons (p = 0.30). We observed significantly higher average wind speed and lower mean atmospheric pressure on days with SP versus days without (p = 0.009, p = 0.020, respectively). There was no difference in mean temperature or mean relative humidity when comparing days with SP versus days without. CONCLUSION: We found no association between SP and chinook events. We observed significantly higher wind speeds and lower atmospheric pressures on days with SP versus days without.
Asunto(s)
Presión Atmosférica , Neumotórax/epidemiología , Neumotórax/etiología , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Viento , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Alberta/epidemiología , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Humedad , Incidencia , Masculino , Conceptos Meteorológicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumotórax/fisiopatología , Probabilidad , Pronóstico , Radiografía Torácica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Distribución por Sexo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Temperatura , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
Innovation can be variably defined, but when applied to healthcare is often considered to be the introduction of something new, whether an idea, method or device, into an unfilled void or needy environment. Despite the introduction of many positive surgical subspecialty altering concepts/devices however, epic failures are not uncommon. These failures can be dramatic in regards to both their human and economic costs. They can also be very public or more quiet in nature. As surgical leaders in our communities and advocates for patient safety and outcomes, it remains crucial that we meet new introductions in technology and patient care with a measured level of curiosity, skepticism and science-based conclusions. The aim of an expert committee was to identify the most dominant failures in technological innovation and/or dogmatic clinical beliefs within each major surgical subspecialty. In summary, this effort was pursued to highlight the past failures and remind surgeons to remain vigilant and appropriately skeptical with regard to the introduction of new innovations and clinical beliefs within our craft.