Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 40(4): 615-624, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31834475

RESUMEN

The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence, localization, and severity of bone erosions on radiography (RX) and ultrasonography (US) according to ACPA status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). 78 patients with ACPA-positive (ACPA+) RA and 30 patients with ACPA-negative (ACPA-) RA fulfilling the ACR 1987 and/or ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria were consecutively included. On RX, a modified Sharp erosion score (SHSe) was evaluated by two blinded readers and one adjudicator for discordant cases (number of eroded joints ≤ three). On US, erosions were scored on six bilateral joints (MCP2, 3, 5; MTP2, 3, 5) with a four-point scale to calculate the total US score for erosions (USSe). The mean total SHSe and USSe were 3.7 and 4.4 times higher in the ACPA+ group than in the ACPA- group, respectively (P < 0.001). On both RX and US, the most discriminating joint between the two groups was MTP5, especially in cases with bilateral erosion. Based on multivariate analyses, ACPA + status was associated with erosive RA on RX according to the EULAR 2013 definition criteria [OR 4.4 (95% CI 1.2-16.4)], and on US according to the following two definitions: the presence of at least two eroded joint facets [OR 3.7 (95% CI 1.4-9.9)] or at least one grade 2 joint facet erosion [OR 9.0 (95% CI 2.8-28.4)]. Compared to ACPA- RA, ACPA + RA is associated independently with more severe erosive disease on RX and US. Both US and RX bilateral erosions in MTP5 joints are highly discriminant for ACPA + RA patients (97.8% in US and 100% in RX).


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antiproteína Citrulinada/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/clasificación , Articulaciones del Pie/patología , Articulaciones de la Mano/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Artritis Reumatoide/patología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Articulaciones del Pie/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulaciones de la Mano/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía
2.
J Rheumatol ; 48(3): 335-338, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801137

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between the UltraSound Score for Erosions (USSe) and the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score for erosions (SHSe). METHODS: One hundred eight patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included. On radiography, SHSe was evaluated by 2 or 3 blinded readers (in case of discordance). On ultrasonography, erosions were scored on 6 bilateral joints (metacarpophalangeal joints 2,3,5; metatarsophalangeal joints 2,3,5) with a 4-point scale to calculate the USSe. RESULTS: The Pearson correlation was good (r = 0.68, P < 0.001) and the agreement illustrated by a Bland-Altman plot was excellent (91%) between the 2 scores, which were complementary in detecting erosions. CONCLUSION: The USSe seems to be a valuable tool for assessing erosive damage in RA.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Articulación Metatarsofalángica , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Articulación Metacarpofalángica/diagnóstico por imagen , Articulación Metatarsofalángica/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Ultrasonografía
3.
Eur J Radiol ; 136: 109536, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33465551

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the performance of ultrasonography (US) to detect bone erosion progression at the patient level and at the joint level by the US score for erosions (USSe) in early-stage and late-stage rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Clinical and demographic information was recorded at baseline, and hands and feet RX were scored according to the Sharp erosion score. USSe was performed at baseline and over 2 years of follow-up on six bilateral joints (MCP2, 3, 5; MTP2, 3, 5). Inter-examiner reproducibility was performed on 14 patients, and the smallest detectable change (SDC) was calculated. US progression was defined as a change in USSe > SDC. RESULTS: 71 patients were included: 22 (31.0 %) early RA, and 49 (69.0 %) late RA. The intra-class correlation coefficient values of the USSe for intra- and inter-examiner studies were 0.96 (CI95: 0.93-0.98), and 0.92 (CI95: 0.75-0.97), respectively. On US, erosions prevailed at baseline in MTP5 joints followed by MCP2 and MCP5 joints. With an SDC calculated at 2.3, 28 patients (39.4 %) were classified as progressors, 30 (42.3 %) were stable, and 13 (18.3 %) were regressors during the follow-up. At the joint level, erosion progression was significant on the MCP2 and MTP5 joints in early RA (p < 0.01) and on the MCP5 and MTP5 joints for all RA (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: US is a highly reproducible method that is able to detect erosion progression at the patient level for both early and late RA and at the joint level (MCP2 and MTP5) for only early RA.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Pie , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Ultrasonografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda