RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients who are hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pneumonia are unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, hospitalized adults with Covid-19 pneumonia to receive either tofacitinib at a dose of 10 mg or placebo twice daily for up to 14 days or until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the occurrence of death or respiratory failure through day 28 as assessed with the use of an eight-level ordinal scale (with scores ranging from 1 to 8 and higher scores indicating a worse condition). All-cause mortality and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients underwent randomization at 15 sites in Brazil. Overall, 89.3% of the patients received glucocorticoids during hospitalization. The cumulative incidence of death or respiratory failure through day 28 was 18.1% in the tofacitinib group and 29.0% in the placebo group (risk ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.97; P = 0.04). Death from any cause through day 28 occurred in 2.8% of the patients in the tofacitinib group and in 5.5% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.15 to 1.63). The proportional odds of having a worse score on the eight-level ordinal scale with tofacitinib, as compared with placebo, was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.36 to 1.00) at day 14 and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.27 to 1.06) at day 28. Serious adverse events occurred in 20 patients (14.1%) in the tofacitinib group and in 17 (12.0%) in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with Covid-19 pneumonia, tofacitinib led to a lower risk of death or respiratory failure through day 28 than placebo. (Funded by Pfizer; STOP-COVID ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04469114.).
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Pirimidinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Brasil , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Janus Quinasa 3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effects of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve remain uncertain. METHODS: In this randomized trial, we compared rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) with dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve. The primary outcome was a composite of death, major cardiovascular events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, or hospitalization for heart failure), or major bleeding at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 1005 patients were enrolled at 49 sites in Brazil. A primary-outcome event occurred at a mean of 347.5 days in the rivaroxaban group and 340.1 days in the warfarin group (difference calculated as restricted mean survival time, 7.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.4 to 16.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Death from cardiovascular causes or thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 26 (5.1%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.20). The incidence of stroke was 0.6% in the rivaroxaban group and 2.4% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 13 (2.6%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.35). The frequency of other serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the mean time until the primary outcome of death, major cardiovascular events, or major bleeding at 12 months. (Funded by PROADI-SUS and Bayer; RIVER ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02303795.).
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Bioprótesis , Válvula Mitral , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Método Simple Ciego , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Warfarina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. DESIGN: RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. SUMMARY: RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Aleteo Atrial/complicaciones , Bioprótesis , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/uso terapéutico , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Válvula Mitral , Rivaroxabán/uso terapéutico , Trombosis/prevención & control , Administración Oral , Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Brasil , Causas de Muerte , Creatinina/metabolismo , Embolia , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hospitalización , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Rivaroxabán/administración & dosificación , Rivaroxabán/efectos adversos , Tamaño de la Muestra , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Trombosis/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Warfarina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remain uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the TicagRElor in pAtients with ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with Thrombolysis (TREAT) trial is to evaluate the short-term safety of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Key secondary objectives are to assess the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel at 12-months. DESIGN: The TREAT trial is a multicenter, randomized, phase III, Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) study that enrolled 3,799 patients in 152 sites from 10 countries. Following administration of fibrinolytic therapy patients were randomized to a loading dose of ticagrelor 180 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg followed by a maintenance dose of ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg/day for 12-months. The primary outcome is the rate of TIMI major bleeding at 30-days and will be assessed for non-inferiority using an intention-to-treat analysis. Co-treatments include aspirin and anticoagulants. Other evidence based therapies are also recommended. Secondary efficacy outcome include a composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack or other arterial thrombotic event. All-cause mortality as well as individual components of the combined efficacy endpoint will also be ascertained. SUMMARY: TREAT is an international randomized controlled trial comparing ticagrelor with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. The results of this trial will inform clinical practice and international guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/uso terapéutico , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y/efectos adversos , Proyectos de Investigación , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Método Simple Ciego , Ticagrelor/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The cardiovascular safety from azithromycin in the treatment of several infectious diseases has been challenged. In this prespecified pooled analysis of 2 multicenter randomized clinical trials, we aimed to assess whether the use of azithromycin might lead to corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation or clinically relevant ventricular arrhythmias. In the COALITION COVID Brazil I trial, 667 patients admitted with moderate COVID-19 were randomly allocated to hydroxychloroquine, hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, or standard of care. In the COALITION COVID Brazil II trial, 447 patients with severe COVID-19 were randomly allocated to hydroxychloroquine alone versus hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin. The principal end point for the present analysis was the composite of death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or ventricular arrhythmias. The addition of azithromycin to hydroxychloroquine did not result in any prolongation of the QTc interval (425.8 ± 3.6 ms vs 427.9 ± 3.9 ms, respectively, mean difference -2.1 ms, 95% confidence interval -12.5 to 8.4 ms, p = 0.70). The combination of azithromycin plus hydroxychloroquine compared with hydroxychloroquine alone did not result in increased risk of the primary end point (proportion of patients with events at 15 days 17.2% vs 16.0%, respectively, hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval 0.78 to 1.49, p = 0.65). In conclusion, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 already receiving standard-of-care management (including hydroxychloroquine), the addition of azithromycin did not result in the prolongation of the QTc interval or increase in cardiovascular adverse events. Because azithromycin is among the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents, our results may inform clinical practice. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04322123, NCT04321278.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de QT Prolongado , Humanos , Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/tratamiento farmacológico , Azitromicina/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de QT Prolongado/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Translating evidence into clinical practice in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is challenging. Few ACS quality improvement interventions have been rigorously evaluated to determine their impact on patient care and clinical outcomes. We designed a pragmatic, 2-arm, cluster-randomized trial involving 34 clusters (Brazilian public hospitals). Clusters were randomized to receive a multifaceted quality improvement intervention (experimental group) or routine practice (control group). The 6-month educational intervention included reminders, care algorithms, a case manager, and distribution of educational materials to health care providers. The primary end point was a composite of evidence-based post-ACS therapies within 24 hours of admission, with the secondary measure of major cardiovascular clinical events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, and nonfatal stroke). Prescription of evidence-based therapies at hospital discharge were also evaluated as part of the secondary outcomes. All analyses were performed by the intention-to-treat principle and took the cluster design into account using individual-level regression modeling (generalized estimating equations). If proven effective, this multifaceted intervention would have wide use as a means of promoting optimal use of evidence-based interventions for the management of ACS.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Hospitales Públicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Brasil , Método Doble Ciego , HumanosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Studies have found that patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) often do not receive evidence-based therapies in community practice. This is particularly true in low- and middle-income countries. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a multifaceted quality improvement (QI) intervention can improve the use of evidence-based therapies and reduce the incidence of major cardiovascular events among patients with ACS in a middle-income country. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The BRIDGE-ACS (Brazilian Intervention to Increase Evidence Usage in Acute Coronary Syndromes) trial, a cluster-randomized (concealed allocation) trial conducted among 34 clusters (public hospitals) in Brazil and enrolling a total of 1150 patients with ACS from March 15, 2011, through November 2, 2011, with follow-up through January 27, 2012. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted QI intervention including educational materials for clinicians, reminders, algorithms, and case manager training, vs routine practice (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end point was the percentage of eligible patients who received all evidence-based therapies (aspirin, clopidogrel, anticoagulants, and statins) during the first 24 hours in patients without contraindications. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients enrolled was 62 (SD, 13) years; 68.6% were men, and 40% presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 35.6% with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and 23.6% with unstable angina. The randomized clusters included 79.5% teaching hospitals, all from major urban areas and 41.2% with 24-hour percutaneous coronary intervention capabilities. Among eligible patients (923/1150 [80.3%]), 67.9% in the intervention vs 49.5% in the control group received all eligible acute therapies (population average odds ratio [OR(PA)], 2.64 [95% CI, 1.28-5.45]). Similarly, among eligible patients (801/1150 [69.7%]), those in the intervention group were more likely to receive all eligible acute and discharge medications (50.9% vs 31.9%; OR(PA),, 2.49 [95% CI, 1.08-5.74]). Overall composite adherence scores were higher in the intervention clusters (89% vs 81.4%; mean difference, 8.6% [95% CI, 2.2%-15.0%]). In-hospital cardiovascular event rates were 5.5% in the intervention group vs 7.0% in the control group (OR(PA), 0.72 [95% CI, 0.36-1.43]); 30-day all-cause mortality was 7.0% vs 8.4% (ORPA, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.46-1.34]). CONCLUSION: Among patients with ACS treated in Brazil, a multifaceted educational intervention resulted in significant improvement in the use of evidence-based therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00958958.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo de Caso , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/mortalidad , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Brasil , Lista de Verificación , Clopidogrel , Países en Desarrollo , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Sistemas Recordatorios , Método Simple Ciego , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
To discuss and share knowledge around advances in the care of patients with thrombotic disorders, the Third International Symposium of Thrombosis and Anticoagulation was held in São Paulo, Brazil, from October 14-16, 2010. This scientific program was developed by clinicians for clinicians, and was promoted by four major clinical research institutes: the Brazilian Clinical Research Institute, the Duke Clinical Research Institute of the Duke University School of Medicine, the Canadian VIGOUR Centre, and the Uppsala Clinical Research Center. Comprising 3 days of academic presentations and open discussion, the symposium had as its primary goal to educate, motivate, and inspire internists, cardiologists, hematologists, and other physicians by convening national and international visionaries, thought-leaders, and dedicated clinician-scientists. This paper summarizes the symposium proceedings.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Congresos como Asunto , Trombosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombosis/metabolismo , Brasil , HumanosRESUMEN
The importance of thrombosis and anticoagulation in clinical practice is rooted firmly in several fundamental constructs that can be applied both broadly and globally. Awareness and the appropriate use of anticoagulant therapy remain the keys to prevention and treatment. However, to assure maximal efficacy and safety, the clinician must, according to the available evidence, choose the right drug, at the right dose, for the right patient, under the right indication, and for the right duration of time. The first International Symposium of Thrombosis and Anticoagulation in Internal Medicine was a scientific program developed by clinicians for clinicians. The primary objective of the meeting was to educate, motivate and inspire internists, cardiologists and hematologists by convening national and international visionaries, thought-leaders and dedicated clinician-scientists in Sao Paulo, Brazil. This article is a focused summary of the symposium proceedings.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Congresos como Asunto , Trombosis , BrasilRESUMEN
The AngelMed Guardian is an implantable medical device that records cardiac data and detects ischemic events using a standard pacemaker intracardiac lead positioned in the right ventricular apex. The Guardian has been implanted in 55 people in the United States and Brazil and is currently undergoing a Food and Drug Administration phase 2 pivotal trial in the United States. The Guardian detects acute ischemic events by analyzing ST-segment shifts. The ST-segment shifts are calculated as the difference between the ST deviation of a current 10-second electrogram window and a baseline ST deviation value. If the ST-segment shift is greater than a heart rate-dependent programmable threshold, then the device generates an emergency alert signal. Results thus far have demonstrated that (i) the intracardiac electrogram is relatively noise-free and (ii) the ST-shift technique used by the Guardian is effective for detecting acute ischemic events.
Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Computador/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía Ambulatoria/instrumentación , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Marcapaso Artificial , Prótesis e Implantes , Animales , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , Humanos , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of ticagrelor in the long-term post-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in STEMI patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy. METHODS: This international, multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded endpoint adjudication trial enrolled 3,799 patients (age <75 years) with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy. Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300- to 600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter). The key outcomes were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and the same composite outcome with the addition of severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events at 12 months. RESULTS: The combined outcome of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 129 of 1,913 patients (6.7%) receiving ticagrelor and in 137 of 1,886 patients (7.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.73 to 1.18; p = 0.53). The composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, severe recurrent ischemia, transient ischemic attack, or other arterial thrombotic events occurred in 153 of 1,913 patients (8.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 171 of 1,886 patients (9.1%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 1.09; p = 0.25). The rates of major, fatal, and intracranial bleeding were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups. CONCLUSION: Among patients age <75 years with STEMI, administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy did not significantly reduce the frequency of cardiovascular events when compared with clopidogrel. (Ticagrelor in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Pharmacological Thrombolysis [TREAT]; NCT02298088).
Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Causas de Muerte , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Ticagrelor/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Importance: The bleeding safety of ticagrelor in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic therapy remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate the short-term safety of ticagrelor when compared with clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with fibrinolytic therapy. Design, Setting and Participants: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label with blinded end point adjudication trial that enrolled 3799 patients (younger than 75 years) with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving fibrinolytic therapy in 152 sites from 10 countries from November 2015 through November 2017. The prespecified upper boundary for noninferiority for bleeding was an absolute margin of 1.0%. Interventions: Patients were randomized to ticagrelor (180-mg loading dose, 90 mg twice daily thereafter) or clopidogrel (300-mg to 600-mg loading dose, 75 mg daily thereafter). Patients were randomized with a median of 11.4 hours after fibrinolysis, and 90% were pretreated with clopidogrel. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding through 30 days. Results: The mean (SD) age was 58.0 (9.5) years, 2928 of 3799 patients (77.1%) were men, and 2177 of 3799 patients (57.3%) were white. At 30 days, TIMI major bleeding had occurred in 14 of 1913 patients (0.73%) receiving ticagrelor and in 13 of 1886 patients (0.69%) receiving clopidogrel (absolute difference, 0.04%; 95% CI, -0.49% to 0.58%; P < .001 for noninferiority). Major bleeding defined by the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes criteria and by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5 bleeding occurred in 23 patients (1.20%) in the ticagrelor group and in 26 patients (1.38%) in the clopidogrel group (absolute difference, -0.18%; 95% CI, -0.89% to 0.54; P = .001 for noninferiority). The rates of fatal (0.16% vs 0.11%; P = .67) and intracranial bleeding (0.42% vs 0.37%; P = .82) were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, respectively. Minor and minimal bleeding were more common with ticagrelor than with clopidogrel. The composite of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 76 patients (4.0%) treated with ticagrelor and in 82 patients (4.3%) receiving clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.67-1.25; P = .57). Conclusions and Relevance: In patients younger than 75 years with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, delayed administration of ticagrelor after fibrinolytic therapy was noninferior to clopidogrel for TIMI major bleeding at 30 days. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02298088.
Asunto(s)
Clopidogrel/uso terapéutico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Ticagrelor/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Clopidogrel/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ticagrelor/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of mortality in the world, mainly on account of cardiovascular diseases. At present we know that not only DM but also other hyperglycemic states are a risk factor for coronary arterial disease. In the context of acute coronary syndromes, DM determines a worst prognosis, either in short- or long-term outcomes. Since the absolute risk of death is greater among diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients, therapeutical interventions have a greater impact in terms of benefits to these patients as well. Strategies such as strict control of hyperglycemia during hospitalization, acute reperfusion management (either by thrombolysis or by percutaneous coronary intervention), use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors have recently proven to be of greater benefit for diabetics over non-diabetic patients. Meanwhile, in spite of all proven benefits of the use of evidence-based interventions to the treatment of acute coronary syndromes on diabetic patients, there is still an under utilization of these measures. Therefore, taking into account the predictions of an increasing number of diabetics in the world for the future years, and the fact that acute coronary syndromes will be the leading cause of death among them, it becomes increasingly necessary for both cardiologists and endocrinologists to work together in order to reduce the unfavorable outcomes that are expected to arise.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones de la Diabetes/mortalidad , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Angina Inestable/mortalidad , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Angiopatías Diabéticas/mortalidad , Humanos , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Mediadores de Inflamación/fisiología , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Factores de Riesgo , SíndromeAsunto(s)
Coagulación Sanguínea , Trombosis , Brasil , Humanos , Trombosis/metabolismo , Trombosis/patología , Trombosis/fisiopatología , Trombosis/terapiaRESUMEN
Background The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter remain uncertain. Design RIVER was an academic-led, multicenter, open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial with blinded outcome adjudication that enrolled 1005 patients from 49 sites in Brazil. Patients with a bioprosthetic mitral valve and atrial fibrillation or flutter were randomly assigned (1:1) to rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (15 mg in those with creatinine clearance <50 mL/min) or dose-adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0-30.); the follow-up period was 12 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, transient ischemic attack, major bleeding, valve thrombosis, systemic embolism, or hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary composite outcome, bleeding events, and venous thromboembolism. Summary RIVER represents the largest trial specifically designed to assess the efficacy and safety of a direct oral anticoagulant in patients with bioprosthetic mitral valves and atrial fibrillation or flutter. The results of this trial can inform clinical practice and international guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Rivaroxabán , Bioprótesis , Válvula Mitral , AnticoagulantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND The effects of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve remain uncertain. METHODS In this randomized trial, we compared rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily) with dose adjusted warfarin (target international normalized ratio, 2.0 to 3.0) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve. The primary outcome was a composite of death, major cardiovascular events (stroke, transient ischemic attack, systemic embolism, valve thrombosis, or hospitalization for heart failure), or major bleeding at 12 months. RESULTS A total of 1005 patients were enrolled at 49 sites in Brazil. A primary-outcome event occurred at a mean of 347.5 days in the rivaroxaban group and 340.1 days in the warfarin group (difference calculated as restricted mean survival time, 7.4 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.4 to 16.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). Death from cardiovascular causes or thromboembolic events occurred in 17 patients (3.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 26 (5.1%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.35 to 1.20). The incidence of stroke was 0.6% in the rivaroxaban group and 2.4% in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.88). Major bleeding occurred in 7 patients (1.4%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 13 (2.6%) in the warfarin group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.35). The frequency of other serious adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation and a bioprosthetic mitral valve, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin with respect to the mean time until the primary outcome of death, major cardiovascular events, or major bleeding at 12 months.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Bioprótesis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Válvula Mitral , Warfarina , Rivaroxabán , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversosRESUMEN
O diabetes mellitus (DM) é uma das grandes causas de morte no mundo, principalmente em decorrência das doenças cardiovasculares. Atualmente, sabe-se que não somente o DM, como também os demais estados hiperglicêmicos, determinam um risco aumentado de doença arterial coronariana. No contexto das síndromes coronarianas agudas (SCA), o DM determina um pior prognóstico, tanto a curto quanto a longo prazo. Sendo o risco absoluto de mortalidade maior em diabéticos, as intervenções nessa população trazem maior impacto quanto aos benefícios. Estudos têm comprovado um maior benefício em diabéticos contra não-diabéticos na adoção de medidas como controle rigoroso da hiperglicemia intra-hospitalar, terapia de reperfusão (seja por trombólise, seja por intervenção percutânea), uso de inibidores da glicoproteína IIb/IIIa e de inibidores da enzima conversora da angiotensina (ECA). Apesar dos benefícios da adoção de intervenções baseadas em evidências no tratamento das SCA em diabéticos, chama atenção a sub-utilização dessas medidas. Tendo em vista o aumento da prevalência do diabetes mellitus previsto para os próximos anos e levando-se em conta que as síndromes coronarianas agudas serão a principal causa de mortalidade nessa população, torna-se cada vez mais necessário que cardiologistas e endocrinologistas passem a interagir, de maneira a modificar o panorama previsto.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of mortality in the world, mainly on account of cardiovascular diseases. At present we know that not only DM but also other hyperglycemic states are a risk factor for coronary arterial disease. In the context of acute coronary syndromes, DM determines a worst prognosis, either in short- or long-term outcomes. Since the absolute risk of death is greater among diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients, therapeutical interventions have a greater impact in terms of benefits to these patients as well. Strategies such as strict control of hyperglycemia during hospitalization, acute reperfusion management (either by thrombolysis or by percutaneous coronary intervention), use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors have recently proven to be of greater benefit for diabetics over non-diabetic patients. Meanwhile, in spite of all proven benefits of the use of evidence-based interventions to the treatment of acute coronary syndromes on diabetic patients, there is still an under utilization of these measures. Therefore, taking into account the predictions of an increasing number of diabetics in the world for the future years, and the fact that acute coronary syndromes will be the leading cause of death among them, it becomes increasingly necessary for both cardiologists and endocrinologists to work together in order to reduce the unfavorable outcomes that are expected to arise.