Investigation of DNA condensing properties of amphiphilic triblock cationic polymers by atomic force microscopy.

Introduction of nucleic acids into cells is an important biotechnology research field which also holds great promise for therapeutic applications. One of the key steps in the gene delivery process is compaction of DNA into nanometric particles. The study of DNA condensing properties of three linear cationic triblock copolymers poly(ethylenimine-b-propylene glycol-b-ethylenimine), namely, LPEI(50)-PPG(36)-LPEI(50), LPEI(19)-PPG(36)-LPEI(19), and LPEI(14)-PPG(68)-LPEI(14), indicates that proper DNA condensation is driven by both the charge and the size of the respective cationic hydrophilic linear polyethylenimine (LPEI) and neutral hydrophobic poly(propylene glycol) (PPG) parts. Atomic force microscopy was used to investigate the interactions of the triblock copolymers with plasmid DNA at the single molecule level and to enlighten the mechanism involved in DNA condensation.

Synthesis of poly(propylene glycol)-block-polyethylenimine triblock copolymers for the delivery of nucleic acids.

LPEIs, which are efficient DNA transfection agents, were found to be far less effective for the delivery of siRNAs. Here, two amphiphilic triblock copolymers LPEI(50) -b-PPG(36) -b-LPEI(50) (2) and LPEI(14) -b-PPG(68) -b-LPEI(14) (4) have been synthesized. The transfection assays showed that compound 2 was efficient for DNA transfection whilst it was almost inactive for siRNA delivery. In contrast, polymer 4 was inefficient for DNA transfection while it showed capabilities for siRNA delivery. Taken together, our results indicate that the properties required for DNA and siRNA delivery are different. Moreover, we show that introduction of a hydrophobic segment that allows self-assembly confers siRNA delivery capacities.

Amphiphilic poly[(propylene glycol)-block-(2-methyl-2-oxazoline)] copolymers for gene transfer in skeletal muscle.

Amphiphilic triblock copolymers such as poly(ethylene glycol-b-propylene glycol-b-ethylene glycol) PE6400 (PEG(13)-PPG(30)-PEG(13)) have been recently shown to promote gene transfer in muscle. Herein we investigated the effect of a chemical change of the PEG moiety on the transfection activity of these compounds. We synthesized new amphiphilic copolymers in which the PEG end blocks are replaced by more hydrophilic poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) (PMeOxz) chains of various lengths. The resulting triblock PMeOxz-PPG-PMeOxz compounds were characterized by NMR, SEC, TGA, and DSC techniques and assayed for in vivo muscle gene transfer. The results confirm both the block structure and the monomer unit composition (DP(PG)/DP(MeOxz)) of the new PPG(34)-PMeOxz(41) and PPG(34)-PMeOxz(21) triblock copolymers. Furthermore, in vivo experiments show that these copolymers are able to significantly increase DNA transfection efficiency, despite the fact that their chemical nature and hydrophilic character are different from the poloxamers. Overall, these results show that the capacity to enhance DNA transfection in skeletal muscle is not restricted to PEG-PPG-PEG arrangements.

Synthesis of linear polyethylenimine derivatives for DNA transfection.

A series of linear polymers containing varying amounts of ethylenimine or N-propylethylenimine units were synthesized by hydrolysis and/or reduction of polyethyloxazolines. The pK(a)s of the polyamines were determined potentiometrically. Gel mobility shift assay showed that the efficiency of DNA complexation was related to the fraction of amino groups that are protonated at neutral pH. The effects of cationic charge density and molar weight of the polymers on the transfection efficiency were evaluated on HepG2 cells. The results obtained with different copolymers show that the transfection efficiency primarily depends on the fraction of ethylenimine units included in the polymer albeit the molar weight is also of importance. On the basis of the results obtained with poly(N-propylethylenimines), we also demonstrate that the high transfection efficiency of polyethylenimines does not solely rely on their capacity to capture protons which are transferred into the endo-lysosomes during acidification.