Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Reprod Immunol ; 163: 104218, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38422808

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the endometrial receptivity array (ERA), endometrial immune profiling, and a combination of both in improving the pregnancy outcomes for multiple implantation failure patients. According to patients' willingness, 1429 women who incurred at least two or more consecutive implantation failures in IVF/ICSI treatment opted for frozen embryo transfer and were divided into four groups: 'No test', 'Immune Profiling', 'ERA' and 'ERA+ Immune Profiling'. Women in three test groups underwent timed endometrial biopsy for ERA, immune profiling, a combination of both. We observed the overall incidence rates of the displaced window of implantation (WOI) and endometrial immune dysregulation were 75.14% and 79.29%, respectively. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), our data revealed that the 'ERA' and 'ERA + Immune Profiling' groups demonstrated significantly higher rates of biochemical, clinical, ongoing pregnancy, and implantation compared to the 'No test' group (p < 0.01). The 'Immune Profiling' group showed a higher implantation rate compared to 'No test' group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, when comparing three test groups, the 'ERA + Immune Profiling' group exhibited notably higher rates of clinical and ongoing pregnancy compared to the 'Immune Profiling' group (p < 0.017). However, there was no association between endometrial immune profiling and ERA phases, and their results did not differ between embryo implantation and non-implantation in these patients. Our findings underline the increased implantation rates by use of ERA and endometrial immune profiling in patients with multiple implantation failure, either individually or corporately. Moreover, a combination of both could improve their pregnancy outcomes significantly.


Asunto(s)
Implantación del Embrión , Transferencia de Embrión , Endometrio , Fertilización In Vitro , Puntaje de Propensión , Humanos , Femenino , Endometrio/inmunología , Endometrio/patología , Embarazo , Implantación del Embrión/inmunología , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transferencia de Embrión/métodos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Resultado del Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo
2.
Heliyon ; 10(9): e30640, 2024 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774102

RESUMEN

The skeletal muscle is the largest organ in mammals and is the primary motor function organ of the body. Our previous research has shown that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are significant in the epigenetic control of skeletal muscle development. Here, we observed progressive upregulation of lncRNA 4930581F22Rik expression during skeletal muscle differentiation. Knockdown of lncRNA 4930581F22Rik hindered skeletal muscle differentiation and resulted in the inhibition of the myogenic markers MyHC and MEF2C. Furthermore, we found that lncRNA 4930581F22Rik regulates myogenesis via the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway, and this effect could be attenuated by the ERK-specific inhibitor PD0325901. Additionally, in vivo mice injury model results revealed that lncRNA 4930581F22Rik is involved in skeletal muscle regeneration. These results establish a theoretical basis for understanding the contribution of lncRNAs in skeletal muscle development and regeneration.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda