Subcutaneous lysophosphatidylcholine administration promotes a febrile and immune response in Holstein heifer calves.

Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) is immunomodulatory in nonruminants; however, the actions of LPC on immunity in cattle are undefined. Our objective was to study the effects of LPC administration on measures of immunity, liver health, and growth in calves. Healthy Holstein heifer calves (n = 46; age 7 ± 3 d) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments (n = 10 to 11 calves/treatment): a milk replacer diet unsupplemented with lecithin in the absence (CON) or presence of subcutaneously (s.c.) administered mixed (mLPC; 69% LPC-16:0, 25% LPC-18:0, 6% other) or pure LPC (pLPC; 99% LPC-18:0), or a milk replacer diet supplemented with 3% lecithin enriched in lysophospholipids containing LPC in the absence of s.c.-administered LPC (LYSO) for 5 wk. Calves received 5 s.c. injections of vehicle (10 mL of phosphate-buffered saline containing 20 mg of bovine serum albumin/mL; CON and LYSO) or vehicle containing mLPC or pLPC to provide 10 mg of total LPC per kilogram of BW per injection every 12 h during wk 2 of life. Calves were fed a milk replacer containing 27% crude protein and 24% fat at 1.75% of BW per day (dry matter basis) until wk 6 of life (start of weaning). Starter grain and water were provided ad libitum. Body measurements were recorded weekly, and clinical observations were recorded daily. Blood samples were collected weekly before morning feeding and at 0, 5, and 10 h, relative to the final s.c. injection of vehicle or LPC. Data were analyzed using a mixed model, with repeated measures including fixed effects of treatment, time, and their interaction. Dunnett's test was used to compare treatments to CON. Peak rectal temperatures were higher in mLPC or pLPC, relative to CON. Plasma LPC concentrations were greater in mLPC and LYSO calves 5 h and 10 h after the final injection, relative to CON. Calves receiving mLPC and pLPC also had higher circulating serum amyloid A concentrations, relative to CON. Calves receiving mLPC had greater serum aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyltransferase, and glutamate dehydrogenase concentrations, relative to CON. Calves provided mLPC experienced lower average daily gain (ADG) after weaning, relative to CON. The LYSO treatment did not modify rectal temperatures, ADG, or measures of liver health, relative to CON. We conclude that LPC administered as s.c. injections induced an acute febrile response, modified measures of liver and immune function, and impaired growth in calves.

Impacts of feeding a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product on productive performance, and metabolic and immunological responses during a feed-restriction challenge of mid-lactation dairy cows.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation products are commonly used in dairy cattle ration to improve production efficiency and health. However, whether these benefits will persist during feed-restriction-induced negative energy balance is unknown. The objective of this experiment was to examine the effect of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product (NT, NutriTek, Diamond V) on performance, metabolic, inflammatory, and immunological responses to a feed-restriction challenge in mid-lactation dairy cows. Sixty Holstein cows were blocked by parity, days in milk, and milk yield and then randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 supplements: NT or placebo (CTL). The supplements were mixed in total mixed ration before feeding at a rate of 19 g/d per cow. The production phase of the experiment lasted 12 wk. Intake and milk yield were recorded daily, and milk composition was measured weekly. After the production trial, a subset of cows (NT: n = 16; CTL: n = 16) were immediately enrolled in a 5-d feed-restriction challenge with 40% ad libitum intake followed by a 5-d realimentation. Milk yield and composition were measured at each milking from d -2 to 10 relative to feed restriction. Blood samples were collected on d -2, -1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 10 relative to the initiation of feed restriction to measure circulating metabolites, insulin, cortisol, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor-α, lipopolysaccharide binding protein, and haptoglobin. Immune function assessments, including peripheral mononuclear cell proliferation and functional assays of circulating granulocytes, were performed on d -3 and 4 of the feed restriction. No differences were observed in dry matter intake, milk yield, or concentrations or yield of components except for fat yield. An interaction of parity and treatment was observed for milk fat yield that was lower for CTL than NT in primiparous cows, but no differences were observed among treatments in milk fat yield of multiparous cows. Feed restriction successfully induced negative energy balance and its associated metabolic changes, including reduced concentrations of plasma glucose and increased nonesterified fatty acids and ß-hydroxybutyrate. Cows fed NT had a similar decrease in milk yield but had a more pronounced reduction in plasma glucose concentration and greater ß-hydroxybutyrate concentration during feed restriction than those fed CTL. Feed restriction did not induce evidence of systemic inflammation but did reduce granulocyte functional activity. Compared with CTL, feeding NT improved the reactive oxygen species production by granulocytes after stimulation by extracellular antigens. In conclusion, feeding NT increased milk fat production of first-lactation cows but did not affect overall productive performance. However, supplementation with NT improved induced granulocyte oxidative burst. This may explain the greater glucose utilization by cows fed NT rather than CTL during feed restriction.