Effects of a healthcare students' prevention intervention for school children on their own substance use: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dissonance theory and research has suggested that engaging in prevention interventions for other students may be a means of reducing one's own problematic behaviors in order to reduce potential cognitive dissonance. This study assessed the effects of a new mandatory prevention intervention program for healthcare students in France. The aim was to measure the effects of engaging in a prevention program in schools on the usual increase in substance use in student populations. METHODS: Healthcare students were trained in a French university to develop psychosocial competences as a health promotion means (FEPS training) or more specifically to prevent substance use in teenagers (Unplugged program training). The students (n = 314) who accepted to take part in the study from both groups completed questionnaires before their interventions in schools, and at the end of the year, measuring their representations and behaviors regarding psychoactive substances. RESULTS: The results indicated a significant reduction in alcohol consumption in terms of quantity, but no significant reduction in tobacco and marijuana consumption. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, contrary to the usual increase in substance use in students as they advance in their year, the students who took part in this study showed reduced self-reported consumption of alcohol after they had performed the prevention intervention in schools regardless of the type of training they had received (general health promotion vs. specific substance use prevention program). Limitations and future perspectives are discussed.

Assessment of the contribution of morbidity and mortality conferences to quality and safety improvement: a survey of participants' perceptions.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of the morbidity and mortality conferences in improving patient safety is lacking. The aim of this survey was to assess the opinion of participants concerning the benefits and the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, according to their organizational characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a survey of professionals involved in a morbidity and mortality conference using a self-administered questionnaire in three French teaching hospitals in 2012. The questionnaire focused on the functioning of morbidity and mortality conferences, the perceived benefits, the motivations of participants, and how morbidity and mortality conferences could be improved. The perception of participants was analysed according to the characteristics of morbidity and mortality conferences. RESULTS: A total of 698 participants in 54 morbidity and mortality conferences completed the questionnaire. Most of them (91 %) were satisfied with how the morbidity and mortality conference they attended was conducted. The improvements in healthcare quality and patient safety were the main benefits perceived by participants. Effectiveness in improving safety was mainly perceived when cases were thoroughly analysed (adjusted odds ratio [a0R] =2.31 [1.14-4.66]). The existence of a written charter (p = 0.05), the use of a standardized case presentation (p = 0.049), and prior dissemination of the meeting agenda (p = 0.02) were also associated with the perception of morbidity and mortality conference effectiveness. The development and achievement of improvement initiatives were associated with morbidity and mortality conferences perceived as being more effective (p < 0.01). Participants suggested improving the attendance of medical and paramedical professionals to enhance the effectiveness of morbidity and mortality conferences. CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity and mortality conferences were positively perceived. These results suggest that a structured framework and thoroughly analyzing cases improve their effectiveness.

[From professional practice assessment to continuing professional development: hospital practitioners' involvement and opinion concerning professional practice assessment activities]. / De l’évaluation des pratiques professionnelles au développement professionnel continu : engagement et opinion des praticiens hospitaliers dans les activités d’évaluation des pratiques professionnelles.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to describe implementation of professional practice assessment (PPA) programmes and participation of physicians and pharmacists in these programmes in a French university hospital. METHODS: We conducted an observational study based on PPA programmes validated in Grenoble university hospital continuing education board between 2007 and 2011. Data were extracted from individual commitment forms filled in by professionals and programme validation forms. The main outcome was the proportion of full-time hospital practitioners who validated at least one PPA programme. RESULTS: Over a 5-year period, 64 PPA programmes and 509 individual commitments involving 366 professionals were validated. At study endpoint, 264 (47%) permanent professionals had validated their mandatory PPA programme. The main methods used in PPA programmes included mortality and morbidity reviews (23), multidisciplinary meetings (23), staff PPA (8) and experience feedback committees (6). The most commonly reported strengths of these programmes included team work (49%) and improvement of patient care (30%). The most commonly reported drawbacks were organizational issues (27%) and unavailability to participate (23%). CONCLUSION: Hospital practitioners and pharmacists adhered to team-based PPA programmes. Implementation of team-base continuing development programmes was the preferred modality during the study period. Implementation of continuing professional development should help support this dynamic.