10-year follow-up of the Columbus knee prostheses system in a prospective multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: As endpoint of a prospective multicenter 10-year documentation using the Columbus system, this evaluation carried out results of clinical scores (Knee Society Score and Oxford Knee Score), an evaluation of radiological imaging, survival rates and a collection of complication statistics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There was a multicenter prospective recruitment of consecutive patients with the indication for total knee replacement (TKR). Preoperatively and 10 years after implantation, clinical scores, range of motion and radiological imaging was performed. During this period, a detailed documentation of complications was made. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were recruited in 5 centers. 140 patients were available for endpoint examination 10 years after surgery. A survival rate of 96.6% (CI 95%) for the implanted Columbus prostheses after 10 years was demonstrated. Cumulative KSS showed an improvement of 75.3 (± 38.1) points and was highly significant (p < 0.0001, t test). The average functional improvement in the Oxford score was 20.6 (± 9.5) points and was also highly significant (p < 0.0001). The ROM improved from 106.5° (± 20.5) preoperatively to 116.0° (± 11.5) (p < 0.0001, t test). There were no implant-related complications as well as no new complication documented between 5- and 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The endpoint analysis after an observation period of 10 years provided good clinical and radiographic results. In particular, an excellent survival rate of 96.6% after 10 years was demonstrated. The data published in this study are the first to be available in a prospective multicenter study on this system, which leads to a high level of clinical significance.

[5-year follow-up of 210 Columbus knee prostheses : A prospective multicentre study]. / 5-Jahres-Follow-up von 210 Columbus-Knietotalendoprothesen : Eine prospektive multizentrische Studie.

INTRODUCTION: As part of 10-year documentation using the Columbus system, the interim evaluation was carried out 5 years after implantation with a collection of clinical scores, evaluation of radiological imaging and collection of statistics concerning complications. METHODS: There was a multicentre prospective recruitment of consecutive patients with the indication of implantation of a surface replacement prosthesis (Columbus CR, Deep Dish fixed inlay). Preoperatively, clinical scores were recorded (KSS and Oxford score). Five years postoperatively a new evaluation of clinical scores, the range of motion (ROM) and a radiological check-up including full leg imaging under load was performed. During this period, detailed complication documentation was made. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were recruited in five centres. 187 patients were available for examination 5 years after surgery. Cumulative KSS increased from 87.5 (±26.6) preoperatively to 170 (±29.1) 5 years postoperatively. The cumulative KSS improvement was 81.5 (±35.2) points and was highly significant (p < 0.0001; t­test). The average functional improvement in the Oxford score between the preoperative and 5­year follow-up was 21.7 (±8.8) points and was also highly significant (p < 0.0001). The ROM improved from 106.3° (±20.2) preoperatively to 114.0° (±12.1) 5 years postoperatively (p < 0.0001; t test). Five years after implantation, the average mechanical leg axis was 178.0° (±2.1). There was no clinically apparent or native radiologic visible aseptic loosening of the femoral or tibial joint component. There were 33 complications, but no implant-related complications such as inlay dislocation, material fracture or aseptic loosening. In total, 6 revision surgeries were performed during the follow-up period, which corresponds to a survival rate of 97.1% (CI 95%) for the implanted Columbus knee in the present patient collective for 5 years. CONCLUSION: The interim analysis at 5 years of long-term observation of the Columbus system provided good clinical and radiographic results.