Intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous methylprednisolone as optimal induction treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: protocol of an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OPTIC).

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend either intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids as first-line treatment for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). IVIg treatment usually leads to rapid improvement and is generally safe, but does not seem to lead to long-term remissions. Corticosteroids act more slowly and are associated with more side effects, but may induce long-term remissions. The hypothesis of this study is that combined IVIg and corticosteroid induction treatment will lead to more frequent long-term remissions than IVIg treatment alone. METHODS: An international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, in adults with 'probable' or 'definite' CIDP according to the EFNS/PNS 2010 criteria. Three groups of patients are included: (1) treatment naïve, (2) known CIDP patients with a relapse after > 1 year without treatment, and (3) patients with CIDP who improved within 3 months after a single course of IVIg, who subsequently deteriorate at any interval without having received additional treatment. Patients are randomised to receive 7 courses of IVIg and 1000 mg intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) (in sodium chloride 0.9%) or IVIg and placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%), every 3 weeks for 18 weeks. IVIg treatment consists of a loading dose of 2 g/kg (over 3-5 days) followed by 6 courses of IVIg 1/g/kg (over 1-2 days). The primary outcome is remission at 1 year, defined as improvement in disability from baseline, sustained between week 18 and week 52 without further treatment. Secondary outcomes include changes in disability, impairment, pain, fatigue, quality of life, care use and costs and (long-term) safety. DISCUSSION: In case of superiority of the combined treatment, patients will experience the advantages of two proven efficacious treatments, namely rapid improvement due to IVIg and long-term remission due to corticosteroids. Long-term remission would reduce the need for maintenance IVIg treatment and may decrease health care costs. Additionally, we expect that the combined treatment leads to a higher proportion of patients with improvement as some patients who do not respond to IVIg will respond to corticosteroids. Risks of short and long-term additional adverse events of the combined treatment need to be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry ISRCTN15893334 . Prospectively registered on 12 February 2018.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society - first revision.

BACKGROUND: Consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation, and treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) have been previously published in European Journal of Neurology and Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System. OBJECTIVES: To revise these guidelines. METHODS: Disease experts, including a representative of patients, considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews published between August 2004 and July 2009 and prepared statements that were agreed in an iterative fashion. RECOMMENDATIONS: The Task Force agreed on Good Practice Points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIDP with or without concomitant diseases and investigations to be considered. The principal treatment recommendations were: (i) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (Recommendation Level A) or corticosteroids (Recommendation Level C) should be considered in sensory and motor CIDP; (ii) IVIg should be considered as the initial treatment in pure motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (iii) if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective, plasma exchange (PE) should be considered (Recommendation Level A); (iv) if the response is inadequate or the maintenance doses of the initial treatment are high, combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug should be considered (Good Practice Point); (v) symptomatic treatment and multidisciplinary management should be considered (Good Practice Point).

Humoral and cellular immune responses to myelin protein peptides in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

OBJECTIVES: Evidence that chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is an autoimmune disease was sought, by studying cellular and humoral immune responses to peripheral nerve myelin proteins. METHODS: 40 CIDP, 36 healthy control subjects (HC) and subjects with non-immune mediated neuropathies (other neuropathies, ON) for antibodies were studied by ELISA and cellular responses by cytokine ELISPOT (INF gamma, IL10) and ELISA (IL17) to synthetic peptides representing P0, P2 and PMP22. RESULTS: Antibodies to P0, P2 or PMP22 peptides were detected in only a minority of CIDP, both not treated (nT-CIDP) and treated (T-CIDP). IgG antibodies to P2(80-105) were significantly more frequent in CIDP than in HC (4/30 vs 0/32; p<0.05) but the difference from ON (1/25) was not significant. In ELISPOT assays, IFN gamma was detected at a low frequency in CIDP and did not differ from HC or ON. In contrast, IL10 responses against P2(1-85) were more frequent in nT and T-CIDP (7/24 and 3/16) than HC (0/36; p<0.001 and p<0.05, respectively). The production of IL17 in cell-culture supernatants was not increased. CONCLUSIONS: Antibodies to non-conformational antigenic epitopes of myelin proteins rarely occur in CIDP. None of the myelin protein peptides elicited IFN gamma responses, but P2 elicited IL10 responses significantly more often in CIDP patients than in controls. This reactivity may be part of an antigen-specific Th2 type pathogenetic or regulatory mechanism or represent a transitory epiphenomenon due to nerve damage. In our study, P2 was the protein antigen most likely to be involved in the aberrant immune responses in CIDP.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of multifocal motor neuropathy.

Several diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy have been proposed in recent years and a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and various other immunomodulatory drugs has been suggested in several trials and uncontrolled studies. The objectives were to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library in July 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for multifocal motor neuropathy and investigations to be considered. The principal recommendations and good practice points were: (i) IVIg (2 g/kg given over 2-5 days) should be considered as the first line treatment (level A recommendation) when disability is sufficiently severe to warrant treatment. (ii) Corticosteroids are not recommended (good practice point). (iii) If initial treatment with IVIg is effective, repeated IVIg treatment should be considered (level C recommendation). The frequency of IVIg maintenance therapy should be guided by the individual response (good practice point). Typical treatment regimens are 1 g/kg every 2-4 weeks or 2 g/kg every 4-8 weeks (good practice point). (iv) If IVIg is not or not sufficiently effective then immunosuppressive treatment may be considered. Cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, azathioprine, interferon beta1a, or rituximab are possible agents (good practice point). (v) Toxicity makes cyclophosphamide a less desirable option (good practice point).

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of paraproteinaemic demyelinating neuropathies: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society.

BACKGROUND: Paraprotein-associated neuropathies have heterogeneous clinical, neurophysiological, neuropathological and haematological features. Objectives. To prepare evidence-based and consensus guidelines on the clinical management of patients with both a demyelinating neuropathy and a paraprotein (paraproteinaemic demyelinating neuropathy, PDN). METHODS: Search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane library, review of evidence and consensus agreement of an expert panel. RECOMMENDATIONS: In the absence of adequate data, evidence based recommendations were not possible but the panel agreed the following good practice points: (1) Patients with PDN should be investigated for a malignant plasma cell dyscrasia. (2) The paraprotein is more likely to be causing the neuropathy if the paraprotein is immunoglobulin (Ig)M, antibodies are present in serum or on biopsy, or the clinical phenotype is chronic distal sensory neuropathy. (3) Patients with IgM PDN usually have predominantly distal and sensory impairment, with prolonged distal motor latencies, and often anti-myelin associated glycoprotein antibodies. (4) IgM PDN sometimes responds to immune therapies. Their potential benefit should be balanced against their possible side-effects and the usually slow disease progression. (5) IgG and IgA PDN may be indistinguishable from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, clinically, electrophysiologically, and in response to treatment. (6) For POEMS syndrome, local irradiation or resection of an isolated plasmacytoma, or melphalan with or without corticosteroids, should be considered, with haemato-oncology advice.

Randomized trial of interferon beta-1a in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

OBJECTIVE: To test the safety and efficacy of interferon beta-1a (IFN-beta) in treatment-resistant chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). BACKGROUND: Current treatment regimens leave 4% to 30% of patients with CIDP with moderate or severe disability. IFN-beta has been reported as beneficial in one treatment-resistant patient. METHODS: Ten consecutive treatment-resistant patients were randomized in a double-blind, crossover design to receive placebo or IFN-beta (3 MIU for 2 weeks and then 6 MIU for 10 weeks) subcutaneously three times weekly, followed by 4 weeks without treatment, and then the opposite treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was "clinically important" improvement by specified amounts in any three of eight clinical measures: timed 10-m walk, Ambulation Index, expanded Medical Research Council sum score, nine-hole peg test time, Functional Independence Measure, Hammersmith Motor Ability, a new Guy's Neurological Disability Scale, and the EuroQoL quality-of-life scale. These and motor median nerve conduction studies were measured before and after 12 weeks of each treatment. RESULTS: Clinically important improvement was observed in one patient while taking IFN-beta and two patients while taking placebo. There was no significant difference between IFN-beta and placebo in the change in any of the individual clinical or neurophysiological measures between the beginning and end of treatment. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: This trial shows that IFN-beta is safe but not efficacious in treatment-resistant CIDP.

Preceding infections, immune factors, and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that different preceding infections influence the neurophysiologic classification and clinical features of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). METHODS: We tested pretreatment sera, 7 +/- 3 (mean +/- SD) days from onset, from 229 patients with GBS in a multicenter trial of plasma exchange and immunoglobulin, for serological markers of infection, adhesion molecules, and cytokine receptors, and compared these with neurophysiologic and clinical features. RESULTS: Recent infection by Campylobacter jejuni was found in 53 patients (23%), cytomegalovirus in 19 (8%), and Epstein-Barr virus in four (2%). Patients with C. jejuni infection were more likely than others to have neurophysiologic criteria of axonal neuropathy or inexcitable nerves, antiganglioside GM(1) antibodies, pure motor GBS, lower CSF protein, and worse outcome. Patients with cytomegalovirus infection were younger and more likely than others to have raised serum concentrations of molecules important in T lymphocyte activation and migration, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble leukocyte selectin, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R). Concentrations of sICAM-1 and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor were higher in patients with inexcitable nerves than those with demyelinating neurophysiology. Logistic regression analysis showed death or inability to walk unaided at 48 weeks were associated with diarrhea, inexcitable nerves, severe arm weakness, age over 50, raised sIL-2R concentration and absence of immunoglobulin (Ig) M antiganglioside GM(1) antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Subtypes of GBS defined by preceding infections were only approximately associated with different patterns of clinical, neurophysiologic, and immunologic features. A single infectious agent caused more than one type of pathology in GBS, implying interaction with additional host factors. Most patients had no identified infection.

Effects on axonal conduction of anti-ganglioside sera and sera from patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

The efficacy of plasma exchange as a therapy for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) suggests that humoral factors might contribute to the axonal conduction block responsible for the major symptoms of the disease. To explore this possibility, we have applied sera to rat spinal roots in vitro while monitoring axonal conduction. Neither fresh sera from 12 patients with GBS or Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS), nor serum from rabbits immunised with Campylobacter jejuni from patients with GBS, MFS or gastroenteritis were effective in causing acute conduction block, despite the presence of antibodies to gangliosides GD3, GM1, GQ1b and GT1a. Potential explanations are advanced.

Guillain-Barré syndrome serum and anti-Campylobacter antibody do not exacerbate experimental autoimmune neuritis.

To investigate whether antibodies are pathogenic in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), we injected pre-treatment serum from 11 GBS patients intraperitoneally into rats in which the blood-nerve barrier had been opened by induction of mild adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune neuritis. There was no significant clinical, neurophysiological or pathological difference between rats receiving GBS serum compared with those receiving control serum, except that GBS serum caused minor excess weight loss. Murine monoclonal antibody to Campylobacter jejuni and gangliosides also did not exacerbate disease. This experiment failed to show antibody-mediated disease exacerbation and so does not support an antibody-mediated mechanism in GBS.

Pathogenesis of Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Recent neurophysiological and pathological studies have led to a reclassification of the diseases that underlie Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) into acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP), acute motor and sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) and acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN). The Fisher syndrome of ophthalmoplegia, ataxia and areflexia is the most striking of several related conditions. Significant antecedent events include Campylobacter jejuni (4-66%), cytomegalovirus (5-15%), Epstein-Barr virus (2-10%), and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (1-5%) infections. These infections are not uniquely associated with any clinical subtype but severe axonal degeneration is more common following C. jejuni and severe sensory impairment following cytomegalovirus. Strong evidence supports an important role for antibodies to gangliosides in pathogenesis. In particular antibodies to ganglioside GM1 are present in 14-50% of patients with GBS, and are more common in cases with severe axonal degeneration associated with any subtype. Antibodies to ganglioside GQ1b are very closely associated with Fisher syndrome, its formes frustes and related syndromes. Ganglioside-like epitopes exist in the bacterial wall of C. jejuni. Infection by this and other organisms triggers an antibody response in patients with GBS but not in those with uncomplicated enteritis. The development of GBS is likely to be a consequence of special properties of the infecting organism, since some strains such as Penner 0:19 and 0:41 are particularly associated with GBS but not with enteritis. It is also likely to be a consequence of the immunogenetic background of the patient since few patients develop GBS after infection even with one of these strains. Attempts to match the subtypes of GBS to the fine specificity of anti-ganglioside antibodies and to functional effects in experimental models continue but have not yet fully explained the pathogenesis. T cells are also involved in the pathogenesis of most or perhaps all forms of GBS. T cell responses to any of three myelin proteins, P2, PO and PMP22, are sufficient to induce experimental autoimmune neuritis. Activated T cells are present in the circulation in the acute stage, up-regulate matrix metalloproteinases, cross the blood-nerve barrier and encounter their cognate antigens. Identification of the specificity of these T cell responses is still at a preliminary stage. The invasion of intact myelin sheaths by activated macrophages is difficult to explain according to a purely T cell mediated mechanism. The different patterns of GBS are probably due to the diverse interplay between antibodies and T cells of differing specificities.

Guillain-Barré syndrome: recent advances.

Guillain-Barré syndrome is an autoimmune disease of peripheral nerves. Sufferers may require prolonged intensive care and may be permanently disabled. New understanding of the aetiology is revealing different pathological subtypes and helping predict the outcome. Recent advances have improved immunomodulatory and general treatment.

Subacute peripheral and optic neuropathy syndrome with no evidence of a toxic or nutritional cause.

BACKGROUND: The syndrome of subacute simultaneous peripheral neuropathy and bilateral optic neuropathy is known to occur in tropical countries, probably due to malnutrition or toxicity, but not often seen in developed countries. We report seven patients in London who were not malnourished or alcoholic, and in whom no clear cause was found. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the case notes and arranged some further investigations. RESULTS: All patients developed peripheral and bilateral optic neuropathy within 6 months. Patients were aged 30-52, and all of Jamaican birth and race but lived in the UK. Most had subacute, painful ataxic sensory axonal neuropathy or neuronopathy, some with myelopathy. Nerve conduction studies revealed minor demyelinating features in two cases. The optic neuropathy was symmetrical, subacute and monophasic, usually with marked reduction in visual acuity. CSF protein concentration was usually elevated but other laboratory investigations were normal. Patients showed only modest improvement at follow-up. CONCLUSION: These patients share a common clinical and electrophysiological phenotype, age, ethnicity and elevated CSF protein, but otherwise normal laboratory investigations. The syndrome is a cause of significant morbidity in young people. The cause remains uncertain despite thorough investigation.

European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society guideline on management of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Peripheral Nerve Society.

Numerous sets of diagnostic criteria have sought to define chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and randomized trials and systematic reviews of treatment have been published. The objective is to prepare consensus guidelines on the definition, investigation and treatment of CIDP. Disease experts and a patient representative considered references retrieved from MEDLINE and Cochrane Systematic Reviews in May 2004 and prepared statements which were agreed in an iterative fashion. The Task Force agreed on good practice points to define clinical and electrophysiological diagnostic criteria for CIDP with or without concomitant diseases and investigations to be considered. The principal treatment recommendations were: (1) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) or corticosteroids should be considered in sensory and motor CIDP (level B recommendation); (2) IVIg should be considered as the initial treatment in pure motor CIDP (Good Practice Point); (3) if IVIg and corticosteroids are ineffective plasma exchange (PE) should be considered (level A recommendation); (4) If the response is inadequate or the maintenance doses of the initial treatment are high, combination treatments or adding an immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory drug should be considered (Good Practice Point); (5) Symptomatic treatment and multidisciplinary management should be considered (Good Practice Point).

Treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory neuropathies.

Experimental models have suggested potential new treatments for human inflammatory neuropathy, but current practice is largely based on empirical trials. Evidence from randomized trials supports the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMNCB). In Guillain-Barré syndrome and CIDP intravenous immunoglobulin is equivalent to but more convenient than plasma exchange. In MMNCB adequate comparative studies of intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange have not been performed. Corticosteroid treatment is beneficial in CIDP, but not in Guillain-Barré syndrome and may worsen MMNCB. More randomized trials and systematic reviews are needed to improve the evidence base for clinical practice.

Randomized controlled trial of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a pilot study.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has the theoretical potential to protect neurones from axonal degeneration. The objective of this study was to discover whether brain-derived neurotrophic factor is safe in Guillain-Barré syndrome, and to make preliminary observations of its efficacy. This was a parallel group randomized controlled trial of subcutaneous brain-derived neurotrophic factor 25 microg/kg daily compared with placebo for up to 24 weeks or until patients could walk without aid. Six patients received brain-derived neurotrophic factor, of whom three had serious adverse events including one death. Four patients received placebo, of whom two had serious adverse events including one death. The rate and extent of recovery were similar in the two groups. This pilot study did not detect any serious adverse events attributed to brain-derived neurotrophic factor treatment.

Immunoadsorption inferior to plasma exchange in a patient with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.

Staphylococcal protein A immunoadsorption and plasma exchange were compared for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. In a single patient, plasma exchange had a more beneficial effect than immunoadsorption on clinical outcome measures. Serum IgM antibody activity to peripheral nerve fell significantly following plasma exchange. Serum IgM and IgA fell more and IgG less after plasma exchange than after immunoadsorption. The superior efficacy of plasma exchange to immunoadsorption in this case may have been the result of removal of an IgM antibody.

Accumulation of immunoglobulin across the 'blood-nerve barrier' in spinal roots in adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune neuritis.

At the onset of Guillain-Barré syndrome, disruption of diffusion barriers, such as the blood-nerve barrier, probably increases the exposure of spinal roots and peripheral nerves to macromolecules, some of which might be pathogenic. As a measure of such disruption, we measured the accumulation in the endoneurium of spinal roots and sciatic nerve of systemically administered 125I-labelled immunoglobulin in adoptive transfer experimental autoimmune neuritis (AT-EAN) in the rat. AT-EAN is a model of Guillain-Barré syndrome, induced by injection of activated T lymphocytes sensitized to myelin P2 protein. Immunoglobulin accumulation was expressed as counts/min/mg in fixative-perfused roots as a percentage of that in serum, measured 24 h after intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 micro Ci 125I-labelled immunoglobulin. Immunoglobulin accumulation in the roots of normal rats was 3 +/- 1% (mean +/- SE), but this first increased 3(1/2) days after cell injection, peaked at 22 +/- 2% on day 4(1/2), and declined to normal by day 8. T lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leucocytes first appeared within the endoneurium at day 3(1/2), and macrophages and a few erythrocytes at day 4. Neurological deficit appeared on day 4 and was maximal on day 6. Demyelination and axonal degeneration began at day 5. The first abnormality detected in AT-EAN was a rapid increase in the passage of immunoglobulin into spinal roots, together with endoneurial infiltration of T lymphocytes and polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Accumulation of immunoglobulin was maximal during the worsening of neurological deficit, and declined rapidly before the onset of neurological recovery.

Electrophysiological classification of Guillain-Barré syndrome: clinical associations and outcome. Plasma Exchange/Sandoglobulin Guillain-Barré Syndrome Trial Group.

We performed electrophysiological and serological testing within 15 days of symptom onset on 369 patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) enrolled in a trial comparing plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and both treatments. Patients were classified into five groups by motor nerve conduction criteria; 69% were demyelinating, 3% axonal, 3% inexcitable, 2% normal, and 23% equivocal. Six of 10 (60%) patients with axonal neurophysiology had had a preceding diarrheal illness compared with 71 of 359 (20%) in other groups. Antiganglioside GM1 antibodies were present in a higher proportion of patients with axonal physiology or inexcitable nerves than other patients. The number dead or unable to walk unaided at 48 weeks was greater in the group with initially inexcitable nerves (6 of 12, 50%) compared with the rest (52 of 357, 15%), but was not significantly different between the axonal (1 of 10, 10%) and demyelinating (44 of 254, 17%) groups. Sensory action potentials and clinical sensory examination were both normal in 53 of 342 (16%) patients, and these "pure motor GBS" patients were more likely than other GBS patients to have IgG antiganglioside GM1 antibodies and to have had preceding diarrhea but had a similar outcome. The axonal group was more likely than other groups to have normal sensory action potentials. The outcomes in response to the three treatments did not differ in any subgroup (including patients with pure motor GBS or preceding diarrhea) or any neurophysiological category.