Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Psychol ; 80(2): 391-405, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37866970

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have investigated the relationship between stress-related mental health problems and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD). Similarly, little research has focused on the moderating effect of OCPD on recovery in clinical patients with stress-related mental health problems. The general aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of OCPD and the associations between OCPD and level of burnout, anxiety, and depression symptoms, during a 7-years follow-up in a clinical longitudinal sample of female patients with stress-related exhaustion. METHOD: The included patients (n = 84) were referred to a specialist outpatient clinic for patients with stress-related exhaustion between 2006 and 2011. Data was collected at the initial examination and during a 7-year treatment follow-up. RESULTS: OCPD was the most common personality disorder in the present clinical sample, with 40% of patients fulfilling the criteria. There was a significant association between OCPD and the degree of burnout symptoms as well as the degree of depression, both at baseline and during the 7-year follow-up. No significant association between OCPD and levels of anxiety was observed. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that there might be an association between OCPD and stress-related exhaustion, including preservation of symptoms over time. OCPD and its related traits, such as perfectionism, may be important factors to consider when constructing effective treatment and rehabilitation plans for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Perfeccionismo , Humanos , Femenino , Trastorno de Personalidad Compulsiva/epidemiología , Trastorno de Personalidad Compulsiva/psicología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/diagnóstico , Prevalencia , Agotamiento Psicológico
2.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1110, 2019 Aug 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31412832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Experiencing work-related stress constitutes an obvious risk for becoming sick-listed. In primary health care, no established method to early identify, advise and treat people with work-related stress exists. The aim was to evaluate if the use of the Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) brief intervention, including feedback from the general practitioner (GP), had an impact on the level of sickness absence. METHOD/DESIGN: In total 271 (intervention group, n = 132, control group, n = 139) non-sick-listed employed women and men, aged 18 to 64 years, who had mental and physical health complaints and sought care at primary health care centers participated in this two-armed randomized controlled trial. The main outcomes were the number of registered sick leave days and episodes, and time to first sick leave during the 12-months follow-up. The intervention included early identification of work-related stress by the WSQ, GP awareness supported by a brief training session, patients' self-reflection by WSQ completion, GP feedback at consultation, and initiation of preventive measures. RESULTS: The mean days registered for the WSQ intervention group and the control group were 39 and 45 gross days respectively, and 31 and 39 net days respectively (ns). No statistical significant difference for the number of sick leave episodes or time to first day of sick leave episode were found between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The WSQ brief intervention combined with feedback and suggestions of measures at patient-GP-consultation was not proven effective in preventing sick leave in the following 12 months compared to treatment as usual. More research is needed on methods to early identify, advise and treat people with work-related stress in primary health care, and on how and when GPs and other professionals in primary health care can be trained to understand this risk of sick leave due to work-related stress, on how to prevent it, and on how to advise and treat employees at risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02480855 . Registered 20 May 2015.


Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales/psicología , Estrés Laboral/diagnóstico , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
3.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 87(4): 373-9, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23609321

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of perceived stress and musculoskeletal ache/pain, separately and in combination, at baseline, on self-rated work ability and work performance at two-year follow-up. METHODS: Survey data were collected with a 2-year interval. Health care workers participating at both waves were included. Inclusion criteria were good self-reported work ability and unchanged self-rated work performance at baseline, resulting in 770 participants; 617 women and 153 men. Musculoskeletal pain was assessed using the question "How often do you experience pain in joints and muscles, including the neck and low back?", perceived stress with a modified version of a single item from the QPS-Nordic questionnaire, work performance by the question "Have your work performance changed during the preceding 12 months?" and work ability by a single item from the work ability index. Associations between baseline data and the two outcomes at follow-up were analysed by means of the log binomial model and expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: A combination of frequent musculoskeletal pain and perceived stress constituted the highest risk for reporting decreased work performance (RR 1.7; CI 1.28-2.32) and reduced work ability (RR 1.7; CI 1.27-2.30) at follow-up. Separately, frequent pain, but not stress, was clearly associated with both outcomes. CONCLUSION: The results imply that proactive workplace interventions in order to maintain high work performance and good work ability should include measures to promote musculoskeletal well-being for the employees and measures, both individual and organizational, to minimize the risk of persistent stress reactions.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas , Trabajo/psicología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia
4.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 83(5): 511-20, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19943058

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the construct and predictive validity of a new instrument for self-rating of stress-related Exhaustion Disorder (s-ED). METHODS: Public healthcare workers and social insurance officers, 85% females, were included (N = 2,683) in a longitudinal study. The s-ED instrument, based on clinical criteria for Exhaustion Disorder, was used at baseline to classify participants into three categories: non-s-ED, light/moderate s-ED and pronounced s-ED. Other assessments include burnout, anxiety, depression and work ability. Sick leave at follow-up after 2 years was defined as 14 days of ongoing sick leave (SA14) or a period of 60 days of sick leave during the last 12 months (SA60). Associations at baseline were expressed as prevalence ratios, and adjusted relative risks (RR) were calculated using Cox regression. RESULTS: At baseline, 16% reported s-ED. Scores of depression, anxiety and burnout and the rate of poor work ability increased with increasing severity of s-ED. Self-reported exhaustion at baseline increased the risk of reporting sickness absence at follow-up; pronounced s-ED RR 2.7; CI 1.8-4.0 for SA14 and RR 3.4; CI 2.3-5.2 for SA60. CONCLUSIONS: Self-rated ED corresponded well to established scales for mental health, indicating sufficient construct validity. Individuals reporting s-ED at baseline were more likely to report sickness absence at follow-up, confirming its predictive properties. The s-ED instrument may be a useful tool for occupational health services in identifying human service workers at risk of having or developing a potentially disabling stress-related mental illness.


Asunto(s)
Absentismo , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Seguridad Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Depresión/epidemiología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/psicología , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores Socioeconómicos , Suecia/epidemiología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda