Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 96(1): 150-154, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35016893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The current methods for treatment of giant gastric bezoars mainly include chemical dissolution, endoscopic fragmentation, and surgical removal, which often have limited curative effects or generate multiple adverse events. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find new methods to overcome such a dilemma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a novel guidewire-based tangential sawing fragmentation (GTSF) technique to treat giant gastric bezoars. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study was performed in the Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital. Ten patients with giant bezoars were consecutively enrolled from December 8, 2019 to April 8, 2021. We treated the 10 patients with the GTSF technique, recorded the GTSF procedure, and followed the patients with gastroscopy 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: All patients were successfully treated by the GTSF technique, and the giant bezoar was broken into small pieces (<2 cm in diameter). The average operation time was 21.73 minutes, and the average fragmentation time was 8.06 minutes. Ten patients treated with the GTSF technique attained satisfactory treatment results, with no acute adverse events or alimentary canal injury during the procedure, and no bezoar residue remained as shown by gastroscopy 2 weeks after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The GTSF technique is a safe, effective, and feasible method for removing giant bezoars and can be considered as an alternative treatment of this disease.


Asunto(s)
Bezoares , Bezoares/cirugía , Gastroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estómago/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Helicobacter ; 25(4): e12692, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32314468

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy (high-dose dual therapy) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy is effective. METHODS: We searched several publication databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy with controls up to March 2019. Meta-analyses of eradication rates were performed using random-effects models. RESULTS: Data from twelve RCTs including 2249 patients suggested that PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy and the current mainstream guidelines-recommended therapies achieved similar efficacy (83.2% vs 85.3%, risk ratio [RR]: 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03, intention-to-treat analysis), (87.5% vs 90.1%, RR: 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.02, per-protocol analysis), and compliance (94.3% vs 93.5%, RR: 1.11, 95% CI 0.78-1.59), but side effects were less likely in the dual therapy (12.9% vs 28.0%, RR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.76). Further subgroup analyses showed that the seven RCTs (1302 patients) that reported antimicrobial susceptibility test results also showed that PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy and the current guidelines-recommended therapies achieved similar efficacy, and PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy was as effective for rescue therapy (RR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.89-1.05) as for first-line treatment (RR: 0.97, 95% CI 0.93-1.02). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the current mainstream guidelines-recommended therapies, PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy has the same efficacy and compliance, and generally PPI-amoxicillin dual therapy causes fewer side effects.


Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Amoxicilina/farmacología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 14: 21, 2014 Feb 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24502423

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic gastritis is one of the most common findings at upper endoscopy in the general population, and chronic atrophic gastritis is epidemiologically associated with the occurrence of gastric cancer. However, the current status of diagnosis and treatment of chronic gastritis in China is unclear. METHODS: A multi-center national study was performed; all patients who underwent diagnostic upper endoscopy for evaluation of gastrointestinal symptoms from 33 centers were enrolled. Data including sex, age, symptoms and endoscopic findings were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: Totally 8892 patients were included. At endoscopy, 4389, 3760 and 1573 patients were diagnosed to have superficial gastritis, erosive gastritis, and atrophic gastritis, respectively. After pathologic examination, it is found that atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia were prevalent, which accounted for 25.8%, 23.6% and 7.3% of this patient population. Endoscopic features were useful for predicting pathologic atrophy (PLR = 4.78), but it was not useful for predicting erosive gastritis. Mucosal-protective agents and PPI were most commonly used medications for chronic gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests non-atrophic gastritis is the most common endoscopic finding in Chinese patients with upper GI symptoms. Precancerous lesions, including atrophy, intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia are prevalent in Chinese patients with chronic gastritis, and endoscopic features are useful for predicting pathologic atrophy.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal , Gastritis/epidemiología , Gastritis/patología , Estómago/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , China/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Gastritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Gastritis Atrófica/epidemiología , Gastritis Atrófica/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Metaplasia/epidemiología , Metaplasia/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
8.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(7): e14396, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762742

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) versus bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Comparing HDDT to BQT were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases in Chinese up to March 2018. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 to compare the efficacy and side effects of these 2 therapies for H pylori infection. Dichotomous data were pooled to score the relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Four randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including 829 patients with a diagnosis of H pylori infection were assessed. Overall the meta-analysis showed that both HDDT and BQT achieved similar efficacy of intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rate, 85.5% versus 87.2%, RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.96-1.06), P = .63, and of per-protocol (PP) eradication rate, 88.4% versus 91.5%, RR 1.00 (95% CI: 0.96-1.04), P = .99, and adherence 97.8% versus 95.0%, RR 1.01 (95% CI: 0.99-1.04), P = .32, but side effects were more likely in BQT (14.4% vs 40.4%, RR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32-0.54), P <.00001). CONCLUSION: Both HDDT and BQT can achieve similar eradication rate for H pylori infection and adherence, and generally HDDT causes fewer side effects.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Bismuto/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
10.
Clin Exp Med ; 15(4): 469-75, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25398664

RESUMEN

MicroRNAs are found to play an important role in gastric cancer. Reduced expression of microRNA-218 (miR-218) is of key interest. The target gene of microRNA-218, epidermal growth factor receptor-coamplified and overexpressed protein (ECOP) encoded by the VOPP1 gene, has been implicated in tumorigenesis. However, few studies on expression and function of ECOP in gastric cancer have been reported. ECOP expression was determined in matched normal and gastric adenocarcinoma tissue specimens by immunohistochemistry and western blot. Subsequently, ectopic overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing of VOPP1 was effected in the human gastric cancer cell line, AGS. Proliferation and migration of parental, VOPP1 overexpressing and VOPP1-silenced AGS cells were evaluated by cell proliferation assay and scratch wound-healing motility assay. Finally, intracellular localization of ECOP in AGS cells was assessed by green fluorescent protein tagging and fluorescent microscopy. Western blot and immunohistochemistry showed overexpression of ECOP in gastric adenocarcinoma tissues compared to matched normal tissue specimens. Ectopic overexpression and RNAi-mediated silencing of VOPP1 promoted and inhibited, respectively, cell proliferation and migration in AGS cells. Intracellular localization of ECOP in perinuclear lysosomes mimicked colocalization earlier reported for other cancerous cells. VOPP1 is overexpressed in gastric adenocarcinoma, which is involved in promoting cell proliferation and migration and thus might serve as a putative oncogene.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Proteínas Oncogénicas/análisis , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Factores de Transcripción/análisis , Western Blotting , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular , Proliferación Celular , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda