The lymphocyte/monocyte ratio predicts the efficacy of isatuximab plus pomalidomide in multiple myeloma patients.

BACKGROUND: Isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, has been widely used in treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Despite its high efficacy, not all patients achieve a lasting therapeutic response with isatuximab. OBJECTIVE: We tried to identify biomarkers to predict the effectiveness of isatuximab by focusing on the host's immune status before treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 134 relapsed/refractory MM patients in the Kansai Myeloma Forum database who had received only a first isatuximab treatment. RESULTS: Among the 134 patients, an isatuximab, pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-PD) regimen, isatuximab, carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-KD) regimen and isatuximab and/or dexamethasone (Isa-D) regimen were used in 112, 15 and 7 patients, respectively. The median age at treatment, number of prior treatment regimens, and progression-free survival (PFS) were 71, 6, and 6.54 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the PFS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR ≥ 4), fewer prior treatment regimens (< 6), and no use of prior daratumumab treatment. The OS under the Isa-PD regimen was longer in patients with higher white blood cell counts (WBC counts ≥ 3000/µL) and higher LMR. The PFS under the Isa-D regimen was longer in patients with fewer prior treatment regimens in univariate analysis, but no parameters were correlated with PFS/OS under the Isa-KD regimen. CONCLUSION: We found that the patients with higher LMR (≥ 4) could obtain longer PFS and OS under the Isa-PD regimen. Other cohort studies of isatuximab treatment might be necessary to substantiate our results.

Efficacy of elotuzumab for multiple myeloma deteriorates after daratumumab: a multicenter retrospective study.

Elotuzumab-based regimens are sometimes selected for multiple myeloma treatment after daratumumab-based regimens. However, there has been insufficient discussion on the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. We used Kansai Myeloma Forum registration data in a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of elotuzumab after daratumumab. Overall survival (OS) rate and time to next treatment (TTNT) were significantly worse in the cohort given elotuzumab after daratumumab (Dara cohort, n = 47) than in the cohort with no history of daratumumab administration before elotuzumab (No-Dara cohort, n = 80, OS: P = 0.03; TTNT: P = 0.02; best response: P < 0.01). In the Dara cohort, OS and TTNT rates were worse with sequential elotuzumab use after daratumumab than with non-sequential (OS: P = 0.02; TTNT: P = 0.03). In patients given elotuzumab < 180 days after daratumumab, OS (P = 0.08) and best response (P = 0.21) tended to be worse, and TTNT was significantly worse (P = 0.01), than in those given elotuzumab after ≥ 180 days. These findings were confirmed by subgroup analyses and multivariate analyses. Monoclonal-antibody-free treatment might be preferable after daratumumab-based regimens. If possible, elotuzumab-based regimens should be considered only ≥ 180 days after daratumumab use.