The efficacy of different torque profiles for weight compensation of the hand.

Orthotic wrist supports will be beneficial for people with muscular weakness to keep their hand in a neutral rest position and prevent potential wrist contractures. Compensating the weight of the hands is complex since the level of support depends on both wrist and forearm orientations. To explore simplified approaches, two different weight compensation strategies (constant and linear) were compared to the theoretical ideal sinusoidal profile and no compensation in eight healthy subjects using a mechanical wrist support system. All three compensation strategies showed a significant reduction of 47-53% surface electromyography activity in the anti-gravity m. extensor carpi radialis. However, for the higher palmar flexion region, a significant increase of 44-61% in the m. flexor carpi radialis was found for all compensation strategies. No significant differences were observed between the various compensation strategies. Two conclusions can be drawn: (1) a simplified torque profile (e.g., constant or linear) for weight compensation can be considered as equally effective as the theoretically ideal sinusoidal profile and (2) even the theoretically ideal profile provides no perfect support as other factors than weight, such as passive joint impedance, most likely influence the required compensation torque for the wrist joint.

Minimization of metabolic cost of transport predicts changes in gait mechanics over a range of ankle-foot orthosis stiffnesses in individuals with bilateral plantar flexor weakness.

Neuromuscular disorders often lead to ankle plantar flexor muscle weakness, which impairs ankle push-off power and forward propulsion during gait. To improve walking speed and reduce metabolic cost of transport (mCoT), patients with plantar flexor weakness are provided dorsal-leaf spring ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs). It is widely believed that mCoT during gait depends on the AFO stiffness and an optimal AFO stiffness that minimizes mCoT exists. The biomechanics behind why and how an optimal stiffness exists and benefits individuals with plantar flexor weakness are not well understood. We hypothesized that the AFO would reduce the required support moment and, hence, metabolic cost contributions of the ankle plantar flexor and knee extensor muscles during stance, and reduce hip flexor metabolic cost to initiate swing. To test these hypotheses, we generated neuromusculoskeletal simulations to represent gait of an individual with bilateral plantar flexor weakness wearing an AFO with varying stiffness. Predictions were based on the objective of minimizing mCoT, loading rates at impact and head accelerations at each stiffness level, and the motor patterns were determined via dynamic optimization. The predictive gait simulation results were compared to experimental data from subjects with bilateral plantar flexor weakness walking with varying AFO stiffness. Our simulations demonstrated that reductions in mCoT with increasing stiffness were attributed to reductions in quadriceps metabolic cost during midstance. Increases in mCoT above optimum stiffness were attributed to the increasing metabolic cost of both hip flexor and hamstrings muscles. The insights gained from our predictive gait simulations could inform clinicians on the prescription of personalized AFOs. With further model individualization, simulations based on mCoT minimization may sufficiently predict adaptations to an AFO in individuals with plantar flexor weakness.

Design requirements of upper extremity supports for daily use in Duchenne muscular dystrophy with severe muscle weakness.

Background: People with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) cope with progressive muscular weakness and consequential upper extremity function loss. They benefit from arm supports, or arm exoskeletons, to assist arm function. Especially for severe muscle weakness (DMD ≥ Brooke Scale 4), the design of such arm support is challenging. This study aims to structurally develop functional and technical design requirements of arm supports for people with DMD Brooke Scale 4. Methods: An overview of clinical characteristics and a classification of clinically meaningful activities were derived from data from the Dutch Dystrophinopathy Database and available literature. Based on these, functional and technical design requirements of arm supports were developed and matched to the achievable needs of the user. Results: First, the clinical characteristics of the target population, such as strength, range of motion, and functional ability, are given. Next, clinically relevant activities of daily living are translated to functional requirements categorised in a 'must,' 'should,' and 'could' category. Last, the technical requirements to realise these functional goals are presented. Conclusions: The recommendations following from the functional user needs, technical requirements, and safety considerations can be used to make the development of assistive arm supports for people with DMD Brooke Scale 4 more user-centred.

Skin marker-based versus bone morphology-based coordinate systems of the hindfoot and forefoot.

Segment coordinate systems (CSs) of marker-based multi-segment foot models are used to measure foot kinematics, however their relationship to the underlying bony anatomy is barely studied. The aim of this study was to compare marker-based CSs (MCSs) with bone morphology-based CSs (BCSs) for the hindfoot and forefoot. Markers were placed on the right foot of fifteen healthy adults according to the Oxford, Rizzoli and Amsterdam Foot Model (OFM, RFM and AFM, respectively). A CT scan was made while the foot was loaded in a simulated weight-bearing device. BCSs were based on axes of inertia. The orientation difference between BCSs and MCSs was quantified in helical and 3D Euler angles. To determine whether the marker models were able to capture inter-subject variability in bone poses, linear regressions were performed. Compared to the hindfoot BCS, all MCSs were more toward plantar flexion and internal rotation, and RFM was also oriented toward more inversion. Compared to the forefoot BCS, OFM and RFM were oriented more toward dorsal and plantar flexion, respectively, and internal rotation, while AFM was not statistically different in the sagittal and transverse plane. In the frontal plane, OFM was more toward eversion and RFM and AFM more toward inversion compared to BCS. Inter-subject bone pose variability was captured with RFM and AFM in most planes of the hindfoot and forefoot, while this variability was not captured by OFM. When interpreting multi-segment foot model data it is important to realize that MCSs and BCSs do not always align.

A passive mechanism for decoupling energy storage and return in ankle-foot prostheses: A case study in recycling collision energy.

Individuals with lower limb amputation experience reduced ankle push-off work in the absence of functional muscles spanning the joint, leading to decreased walking performance. Conventional energy storage and return (ESR) prostheses partially compensate by storing mechanical energy during midstance and returning this energy during the terminal stance phase of gait. These prostheses can provide approximately 30% of the push-off work performed by a healthy ankle-foot during walking. Novel prostheses that return more normative levels of mechanical energy may improve walking performance. In this work, we designed a Decoupled ESR (DESR) prosthesis which stores energy usually dissipated at heel-strike and loading response, and returns this energy during terminal stance, thus increasing the mechanical push-off work done by the prosthesis. This decoupling is achieved by switching between two different cam profiles that produce distinct, nonlinear torque-angle mechanics. The cams automatically interchange at key points in the gait cycle via a custom magnetic switching system. Benchtop characterization demonstrated the successful decoupling of energy storage and return. The DESR mechanism was able to capture energy at heel-strike and loading response, and return it later in the gait cycle, but this recycling was not sufficient to overcome mechanical losses. In addition to its potential for recycling energy, the DESR mechanism also enables unique mechanical customizability, such as dorsiflexion during swing phase for toe clearance, or increasing the rate of energy release at push-off.