Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Publication year range
1.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 47(4): 1049-1056, 2016 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28080917

RESUMEN

Results of an online survey posted on the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians listserv examined the patterns of analgesic medication and pain management modalities used for captive giraffe and hippopotami. Compiled data included signalment, drugs administered, dosing regimens, subjective efficacy scores, ease of administration, and adverse events. Nineteen institutions exhibiting hippopotami ( Hippopotamus amphibious ) and pygmy hippopotami (Choeropsis liberiensis) and 45 exhibiting giraffe ( Giraffa camelopardalis spp.) responded. Phenylbutazone was the most-commonly administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), followed by flunixin meglumine, but doses varied widely. Eight institutions reported adverse events from NSAID administration. Tramadol was the most-commonly administered opioid followed by butorphanol. Only one adverse event was reported for opioids. Twenty-three of 45 institutions exhibiting giraffe utilized alternative analgesia methods including gabapentin, glucosamine-chondroitin, local anesthetics, and low level laser therapy. Six of 19 institutions exhibiting hippopotami administered omega 3-6 fatty acids, gabapentin, glucosamine-chondroitin, and α-2 adrenergics to provide analgesia. While all reporting zoological institutions administered similar drugs, there was substantial variation and diversity in both dosing regimens and frequencies, indicating the need for both preclinical and clinical studies supporting dosing regimens.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/veterinaria , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Antílopes , Artiodáctilos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgesia/métodos , Animales , Animales de Zoológico , Recolección de Datos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
J Zoo Wildl Med ; 47(1): 301-10, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27010292

RESUMEN

An online survey utilizing Survey Monkey linked through the American Association of Zoo Veterinarians listserve examined current practices in megavertebrate analgesia. Data collected included drugs administered, dosing regimens, ease of administration, efficacy, and adverse events. Fifty-nine facilities (38 housing elephants, 33 housing rhinoceroses) responded. All facilities administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with phenylbutazone (0.25-10 mg/kg) and flunixin meglumine (0.2-4 mg/kg) being most common. Efficacy was reported as "good" to "excellent" for these medications. Opioids were administered to elephants (11 of 38) and rhinoceroses (7 of 33), with tramadol (0.5-3.0 mg/kg) and butorphanol (0.05-1.0 mg/kg) being most common. Tramadol efficacy scores were highly variable in both elephants and rhinoceroses. While drug choices were similar among institutions, substantial variability in dosing regimens and reported efficacy between and within facilities indicates the need for pharmacokinetic studies and standardized methods of analyzing response to treatment to establish dosing regimens and clinical trials to establish efficacy and safety.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/veterinaria , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Elefantes , Dolor/veterinaria , Perisodáctilos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Animales , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Front Vet Sci ; 9: 938021, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35903141

RESUMEN

A 4-year-old, female-spayed, mixed breed dog, weighing 24.2 kg, was presented for acute ingestion of ~12.3 mg/kg of Adderall XRⓇ, an extended-release amphetamine medication. In dogs, the oral median lethal dose for amphetamines ranges anywhere from 9-11 mg/kg to 20-27 mg/kg. On presentation, the patient was agitated, tachycardic and hypertensive. Initial treatment was instituted with intravenous lipid emulsion (IVLE) therapy, and baseline and post-treatment amphetamine concentrations were quantified in serum and plasma. In both serum and plasma, post-IVLE concentrations of amphetamine were lower 1 h after treatment and IVLE was the only treatment instituted during this time. The dog improved significantly while in hospital and was discharged <24 h after presentation. This is the first known reported use of IVLE for treatment of amphetamine toxicosis with documented decreases in both serum and plasma amphetamine levels shortly after administration of IVLE.

4.
J Vet Intern Med ; 34(3): 1206-1213, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dogs are often adminstered >1 immunosuppressive medication when treating immune-mediated diseases, and determining whether these different medications affect IL-2 expression would be useful when performing pharmacodynamic monitoring during cyclosporine therapy. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of 5 medications (prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and leflunomide) on activated T-cell expression of the cytokines IL-2 and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ). ANIMALS: Eight healthy dogs. METHODS: Randomized, cross-over study comparing values before and after treatment, and comparing values after treatment among drugs. Dogs were administered each drug at standard oral doses for 1 week, with a washout of at least 21 days. Activated T-cell expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ mRNA was measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Blood drug concentrations were measured for cyclosporine, mycophenolate, and leflunomide metabolites. RESULTS: Least squares means (with 95% confidence interval) before treatment for IL-2 (2.91 [2.32-3.50] ΔCt) and IFN-γ (2.33 [1.66-3.00 ΔCt]) values were significantly lower (both P < .001) than values after treatment (10.75 [10.16-11.34] and 10.79 [10.11-11.46] ΔCt, respectively) with cyclosporine. Similarly, least squares means before treatment for IL-2 (1.55 [1.07-2.02] ΔCt) and IFN-γ (2.62 [2.32-2.92] ΔCt) values were significantly lower (both P < .001) than values after treatment (3.55 [3.06-4.00] and 5.22 [4.92-5.52] ΔCt, respectively) with prednisone. Comparing delta cycle threshold values after treatment among drugs, cyclosporine was significantly different than prednisone (IL-2 and IFN-γ both P < .001), with cyclosporine more suppressive than prednisone. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Prednisone and cyclosporine both affected expression of IL-2 and IFN-γ, suggesting that both have the ability to influence results when utilizing pharmacodynamic monitoring of cyclosporine treatment.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Interferón gamma/metabolismo , Interleucina-2/metabolismo , Linfocitos T/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Oral , Animales , Azatioprina/administración & dosificación , Azatioprina/farmacología , Estudios Cruzados , Ciclosporina/administración & dosificación , Ciclosporina/metabolismo , Ciclosporina/farmacología , Perros , Femenino , Inmunosupresores/metabolismo , Leflunamida/metabolismo , Leflunamida/farmacología , Masculino , Ácido Micofenólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Micofenólico/metabolismo , Ácido Micofenólico/farmacología , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/farmacología , Distribución Aleatoria , Linfocitos T/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda