RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir, an RNA-polymerase prodrug inhibitor approved for treatment of COVID-19, shortens recovery time and improves clinical outcomes. This prespecified analysis compared remdesivir plus standard-of-care (SOC) with SOC alone in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen support in the early stage of the pandemic. METHODS: Data for 10-day remdesivir treatment plus SOC from the extension phase of an open-label study (NCT04292899) were compared with real-world, retrospective data on SOC alone (EUPAS34303). Both studies included patients aged ≥18 years hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 up to 30 May 2020, with oxygen saturation ≤94%, on room air or supplemental oxygen (all forms), and with pulmonary infiltrates. Propensity score weighting was used to balance patient demographics and clinical characteristics across treatment groups. The primary endpoint was time to all-cause mortality or end of study (day 28). Time-to-discharge, with a 10-day landmark to account for duration of remdesivir treatment, was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: 1974 patients treated with remdesivir plus SOC, and 1426 with SOC alone, were included after weighting. Remdesivir significantly reduced mortality versus SOC (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.46, 95% confidence interval: 0.39-0.54). This association was observed at each oxygen support level, with the lowest HR for patients on low-flow oxygen. Remdesivir significantly increased the likelihood of discharge at day 28 versus SOC in the 10-day landmark analysis (HR: 1.64; 95% confidence interval: 1.43-1.87). CONCLUSIONS: Remdesivir plus early-2020 SOC was associated with a 54% lower mortality risk and shorter hospital stays compared with SOC alone in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 requiring oxygen support. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence is an essential component of evidence-based medicine. The aim of the BICSTaR (BICtegravir Single Tablet Regimen) study is to assess effectiveness and safety of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) in antiretroviral treatment-naïve (TN) and treatment-experienced (TE) people with HIV. METHODS: BICSTaR is a prospective, observational cohort study. Participants (≥18 years) are being followed for 24 months. A pooled analysis is presented at 12 months, with the primary endpoint of effectiveness (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) and secondary endpoints of safety and tolerability (as per protocol). An exploration of patient-reported outcome measures using standardized questionnaires is included. RESULTS: Between June 2018 and May 2021, 1552 people with HIV were enrolled across 12 countries. The analysed population comprised 1509 individuals (279 TN, 1230 TE); most were white (76%), male (84%) and had one or more comorbid conditions (68%). Median age was 47 years. After 12 months of B/F/TAF treatment, HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies/mL in 94% (221/236) of TN participants and 97% (977/1008) of TE participants. Median CD4 cell count increased by 214 cells/µL (p < 0.001) in TN participants and 13 cells/µL (p = 0.014) in TE participants; median CD4/CD8 ratios increased by 0.30 and 0.03, respectively (both p < 0.001). Persistence was high at 12 months (TN, 97%; TE, 95%). No resistance to B/F/TAF emerged. Study drug-related adverse events occurred in 13% of participants through 12 months, leading to B/F/TAF discontinuation in 6%. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study provide robust real-world evidence to support the broad use of B/F/TAF in both TN and TE people with HIV.
Asunto(s)
Alanina , Amidas , Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Piperazinas , Piridonas , Tenofovir , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Combinación de Medicamentos , Emtricitabina/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos con 3 Anillos/efectos adversos , Compuestos Heterocíclicos de 4 o más Anillos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN/uso terapéutico , Tenofovir/análogos & derivados , Resultado del Tratamiento , FemeninoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) is an effective treatment for HIV-1 infection; however, clinical trial data in older people living with HIV (PLWH) are lacking. The primary 24-week and secondary 48-week analyses of study GS-US-380-4449 (NCT03405935), which assessed the efficacy and safety of switching to B/F/TAF in older PLWH, have been published. Here we report the results of the final 96-week analyses from the study. METHODS: In this 96-week, phase 3b, open-label, single-arm trial, virologically suppressed PLWH aged ≥65 years switched from elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide or a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-based regimen to B/F/TAF. Viral suppression, resistance, immune response, safety, tolerability and adherence were evaluated through week 96. RESULTS: Of 90 participants screened, 86 were enrolled and switched to B/F/TAF. No participants had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/ml (by FDA Snapshot algorithm) at weeks 72 or 96; virologic suppression rates were 94.2% (81/86; 95% CI 87.0-98.1) and 74.4% (64/86; 95% CI 63.9-83.2), respectively. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed, and CD4 counts remained stable. There were no study drug-related serious adverse events. Three participants experienced drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events that led to premature drug discontinuation. There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline to week 96 in fasting lipid parameters, and the median change in body weight at week 96 was 0.0 kg (IQR -2.3, 2.0). Median self-reported adherence was 100% (IQR 100-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to B/F/TAF is an effective long-term option for virologically suppressed adults ≥65 years of age, with favourable safety and tolerability profiles in this population.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , VIH-1 , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Emtricitabina/efectos adversos , Adenina/efectos adversos , Tenofovir/efectos adversos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Combinación de MedicamentosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Remdesivir (RDV) improved clinical outcomes among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in randomized trials, but data from clinical practice are limited. METHODS: We examined survival outcomes for US patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between August and November 2020 and treated with RDV within 2 days of hospitalization vs those not receiving RDV during their hospitalization using the Premier Healthcare Database. Preferential within-hospital propensity score matching with replacement was used. Additionally, patients were also matched on baseline oxygenation level (no supplemental oxygen charges [NSO], low-flow oxygen [LFO], high-flow oxygen/noninvasive ventilation [HFO/NIV], and invasive mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [IMV/ECMO]) and 2-month admission window and excluded if discharged within 3 days of admission (to exclude anticipated discharges/transfers within 72 hours, consistent with the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial [ACTT-1] study). Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess time to 14-/28-day mortality overall and for patients on NSO, LFO, HFO/NIV, and IMV/ECMO. RESULTS: A total of 28855 RDV patients were matched to 16687 unique non-RDV patients. Overall, 10.6% and 15.4% RDV patients died within 14 and 28 days, respectively, compared with 15.4% and 19.1% non-RDV patients. Overall, RDV was associated with a reduction in mortality at 14 days (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.76 [0.70-0.83]) and 28 days (0.89 [0.82-0.96]). This mortality benefit was also seen for NSO, LFO, and IMV/ECMO at 14 days (NSO: 0.69 [0.57-0.83], LFO: 0.68 [0.80-0.77], IMV/ECMO: 0.70 [0.58-0.84]) and 28 days (NSO: 0.80 [0.68-0.94], LFO: 0.77 [0.68-0.86], IMV/ECMO: 0.81 [0.69-0.94]). Additionally, HFO/NIV RDV group had a lower risk of mortality at 14 days (0.81 [0.70-0.93]) but no statistical significance at 28 days. CONCLUSIONS: RDV initiated upon hospital admission was associated with improved survival among patients with COVID-19. Our findings complement ACTT-1 and support RDV as a foundational treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Hospitales , Humanos , Oxígeno , Respiración Artificial , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Daily adherence to lifelong antiretroviral therapy (ART) is required to achieve long term treatment success. However, patient preferences for ART tablet size have not been well studied. Our study assessed factors associated with the ease of swallowing (EoS) and tolerability of two placebo tablets representing and matching B/F/TAF (BPT) and DTG/ABC/3TC (DPT). Fifty ART-naïve patients were randomized into a two-period cross-over study. Likert scale (1-5) questionnaires were administered to assess patient factors influencing the ease of swallowing, adherence, home medications, medication preferences and perceptions. Comparisons were done using Student t-tests and ordinal regression. Participants were 64% female, 61% white, mean age 43 years, and taking a mean (median) of 4(1) pills/day. BPT was reported to be easier than DPT with ease of swallowability 1.76 vs. 2.42 (p < 0.001) (1 = very easy). DPT tablet was correctly perceived as larger than BPT (p < 0.001); with both tablets perceived as smaller than actual size (p < 0.001). EoS of either tablet was positively associated with the EoS of the largest home tablet medication (p = 0.021, p = 0.03). Patient's perceptions of EoS can affect their medication adherence, especially in HIV, and should be considered in treatment regimens.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Estudios Cruzados , Deglución , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Comprimidos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Daily oral tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) is effective for reducing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition among cisgender women. We report results from the first US observational open-label demonstration project of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among at-risk cisgender women. METHODS: Adherence Enhancement Guided by Individualized Texting and Drug Levels was a 48-week, single-arm, open-label demonstration study of daily oral TDF/FTC in cisgender women ≥18 years old at risk for HIV. Adherence was supported using 2-way text messaging and titrated adherence counseling based on rapid-turnaround tenofovir diphosphate concentrations from dried blood spots. Study visits occurred at baseline, weeks 4 and 12, and quarterly through week 48. Outcomes included TDF/FTC adherence, retention, and persistence. RESULTS: From June 2016 to October 2018, 136 cisgender women enrolled (mean age, 40 years (standard deviation, 11); 38% non-Hispanic Black and 19% Latina). At 48 weeks, 84 (62%) participants were retained and 62 (46%) remained on PrEP. More than one-third (12/31) of those on study but off PrEP throughout the study discontinued TDF/FTC because of side effects, and 1 adverse event led to study discontinuation. Of 120 participants with drug concentrations measured, 67 (56%) had at least 1 concentration consistent with 6 doses/week; 22 (18%) had consistent ≥6 doses/week across all study visits attended. There were no incident HIV infections and 4 incident bacterial sexually transmitted infections. CONCLUSION: Adequate PrEP adherence for protective drug concentrations was not achieved for most study participants. More work needs to be done to fully explicate the reasons for nonadherence and low retention in cisgender women.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Adolescente , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Emtricitabina , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tenofovir , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of the antiviral agent, remdesivir, versus standard-of-care treatment in adults with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) using data from a phase 3 remdesivir trial and a retrospective cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 treated with standard of care. METHODS: GS-US-540-5773 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, open-label trial comparing two courses of remdesivir (remdesivir-cohort). GS-US-540-5807 is an ongoing real-world, retrospective cohort study of clinical outcomes in patients receiving standard-of-care treatment (non-remdesivir-cohort). Inclusion criteria were similar between studies: patients had confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, were hospitalized, had oxygen saturation ≤94% on room air or required supplemental oxygen, and had pulmonary infiltrates. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighted multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the treatment effect of remdesivir versus standard of care. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with recovery on day 14, dichotomized from a 7-point clinical status ordinal scale. A key secondary endpoint was mortality. RESULTS: After the inverse probability of treatment weighting procedure, 312 and 818 patients were counted in the remdesivir- and non-remdesivir-cohorts, respectively. At day 14, 74.4% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had recovered versus 59.0% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.03: 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-3.08, P < .001). At day 14, 7.6% of patients in the remdesivir-cohort had died versus 12.5% in the non-remdesivir-cohort (aOR 0.38, 95% CI: .22-.68, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative analysis, by day 14, remdesivir was associated with significantly greater recovery and 62% reduced odds of death versus standard-of-care treatment in patients with severe COVID-19. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04292899 and EUPAS34303.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Saturación de Oxígeno , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Nivel de Atención , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A hepatitis C (HCV) cure is associated with changes in lipids and inflammatory biomarkers, but its impact on clinical endpoints among treated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfected persons is unclear. METHODS: People living with HIV from EuroSIDA with a known HCV status after January 2001 were classified into strata based on time-updated HCV RNA measurements and HCV treatment, as either HCV antibody-negative; spontaneously resolved HCV; chronic, untreated HCV; cured HCV (HCV RNA-negative); or HCV treatment failures (HCV RNA-positive). Poisson regression was used to compare incidence rates between HCV groups for end-stage liver disease (ESLD; including hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), non-acquired immunodeficiency virus defining malignancy (NADM; excluding HCC), and cardiovascular disease (CVD). RESULTS: There were 16 618 persons included (median follow-up 8.3 years, interquartile range 3.1-13.7). There were 887 CVD, 902 NADM, and 436 ESLD events; crude incidence rates/1000 person-years follow-up were 6.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.0-6.9) for CVD, 6.5 (95% CI 6.1-6.9) for NADM, and 3.1 (95% CI 2.8-3.4) for ESLD. After adjustment, there were no differences in incidence rates of NADM or CVD across the 5 groups. HCV-negative individuals (adjusted incidence rate ratio [aIRR] 0.22, 95% CI 0.14-0.34) and those with spontaneous clearance (aIRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36-1.02) had reduced rates of ESLD compared to cured individuals. Persons with chronic, untreated HCV infections (aIRR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02-2.13) or treatment failure (aIRR 1.80, 95% CI 1.22-2.66) had significantly raised rates of ESLD, compared to those who were cured. CONCLUSIONS: Incidences of NADM or CVD were independent of HCV group, whereas those cured had substantially lower incidences of ESLD, underlining the importance of successful HCV treatment for reducing ESLD.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Coinfección , Infecciones por VIH , Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Coinfección/epidemiología , VIH , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , HumanosRESUMEN
Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are prodrugs of the HIV-1 nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor tenofovir (TFV). In vivo, TAF achieves >4-fold-higher intracellular levels of TFV diphosphate (TFV-DP) compared to TDF. Since thymidine analog-associated mutations (TAMs) in HIV-1 confer reduced TFV susceptibility, patients with TAM-containing HIV-1 may benefit from higher TFV-DP levels delivered by TAF. Moreover, the presence of the M184V mutation increases TFV susceptibility during TDF- or TAF-based therapy. The susceptibilities to antiviral drugs of site-directed mutants (SDMs) and patient-derived mutants containing combinations of TAMs (M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y, and K219Q) with or without the M184V mutation (TAMs±M184V) were evaluated using either 5-day multicycle (MC; n = 110) or 2-day single-cycle (SC; n = 96) HIV assays. The presence of M184V in TAM-containing HIV-1 SDMs (n = 48) significantly increased TAF sensitivity compared to SDMs without M184V (n = 48). The comparison of TAF and TDF resistance profiles was further assessed in viral breakthrough (VB) experiments mimicking clinically relevant drug concentrations. A total of 68 mutants were assayed at physiological concentration in VB experiments, with 15/68 mutants breaking through with TDF (TFV, the in vitro equivalent of TDF, was used in these experiments), and only 3 of 68 mutants breaking through under TAF treatment. Overall, in the VB assay mimicking the 4-fold-higher intracellular levels of TFV-DP observed clinically with TAF versus TDF, TAF inhibited viral breakthrough of most TAM-containing HIV-1, whereas TDF did not. These results indicate that TAF has a higher resistance threshold than TDF and suggest that higher resistance cutoffs should be applied for TAF compared to TDF in genotypic and phenotypic resistance algorithms.
Asunto(s)
Adenina/análogos & derivados , Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacología , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , VIH-1/genética , Mutación , Adenina/farmacología , Alanina , Farmacorresistencia Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Viral/genética , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Mutagénesis Sitio-Dirigida , Profármacos/farmacología , Tenofovir/farmacología , Timidina/análogos & derivadosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The M184V/I reverse transcriptase mutation, which confers major resistance to lamivudine and emtricitabine, is still quite frequent in people living with HIV. The underlying presence of the M184V/I mutation may undermine virological outcomes of ART, particularly in the context of proposed treatment with two-drug combinations that include drugs affected by M184V, such as lamivudine. In suppressed patients for whom historical data are seldom available, resistance assays evaluating integrated viral DNA can help select a fully active switch regimen. OBJECTIVES: To compare detectability of M184V/I in historical HIV-1 RNA analyses versus HIV-1 DNA sequencing. METHODS: We analysed the detection of the M184V/I mutation in a prospective study and compared HIV historical genotypes (plasma) versus integrated HIV DNA (PBMCs) obtained via a validated commercial proviral HIV DNA assay. Eligible participants had HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for ≥6 consecutive months prior to screening. A plasma historical genotypic report (HGR) showing the presence of M184V/I was required for all participants and proviral HIV DNA analysis was conducted prior to enrolment. RESULTS: All 84 participants had evidence of M184V or M184I in their HGR (100%), whereas the mutation was detected in only 40/84 participants by proviral HIV DNA sequencing analysis (48%). Differential detection of M184V/I was not associated with timing differences between the HGR and proviral HIV DNA sampling, the overall duration of ART, or CD4 cell counts and HIV-1 viral load at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that undetected M184V/I should be considered when switching virologically suppressed patients to new regimens, particularly two-drug lamivudine- or emtricitabine-containing combinations.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH , Infecciones por VIH , VIH-1 , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Fármacos Anti-VIH/farmacología , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Genotipo , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , VIH-1/genética , Humanos , Lamivudine/uso terapéutico , Mutación , Estudios Prospectivos , Carga ViralRESUMEN
Background: Adherence is critical for efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (FTC) as preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Methods: Between February 2013 and February 2016, 398 men who have sex with men and transgender women were randomized 1:1 to receive individualized texting for adherence building (iTAB) or standard care (SoC) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was dried blood spot (DBS) tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) concentrations at both week 12 and the last on-drug visit of >719 fmol/punch (ie, adequate adherence). Secondary outcomes included DBS TFV-DP concentrations of >1246 fmol/punch (ie, near-perfect adherence) and plasma FTC >350 ng/mL (consistent with dosing within the past 24 hours). Results: Concentrations >719 fmol/punch of TFV-DP were found in 88.6% of participants at week 12 and 82.5% at week 48. For the primary endpoint, the study arms did not differ (72.0% in iTAB and 69.2% in SoC; P > .05). For the secondary composite endpoint of >1246 fmol/punch the iTAB arm was superior to SoC (33.5% vs 24.8%; P = .06), reaching statistical significance when adjusting for age (odds ratio, 1.56 [95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.42]; P < .05). At week 48, iTAB was superior to SoC for near-perfect adherence (51.0% vs 37.4%; P = .02). At week 12, iTAB was superior to SoC for dosing in past 24 hours by plasma FTC (47.5% vs 33.3%; P = .007), but not at weeks 24, 36, and 48 (all P > .05). Conclusions: Automated text messaging is a low-burden tool that improves durability of near-perfect PrEP adherence. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT01761643.
Asunto(s)
Adenina/análogos & derivados , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Organofosfatos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Pre-Exposición , Adenina/administración & dosificación , Adenina/sangre , Adenina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Anti-VIH/sangre , Humanos , Masculino , Organofosfatos/administración & dosificación , Organofosfatos/sangre , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Personas TransgéneroRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We report data from two similarly designed studies that evaluated the efficacy, safety, and optimal duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) ± ribavirin (RBV) for retreatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in individuals who failed to achieve sustained virological response (SVR) with prior SOF-based, non-NS5A inhibitor-containing regimens. METHODS: The RESCUE study enrolled HCV mono-infected adults with genotype (GT) 1 or 4. Non-cirrhotic participants were randomized to 12 weeks of LDV/SOF or LDV/SOF + RBV. Compensated cirrhotic participants were randomized to LDV/SOF + RBV (12 weeks) or LDV/SOF (24 weeks). The AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5348 study randomized genotype 1 adults with HCV/HIV co-infection to LDV/SOF + RBV (12 weeks) or LDV/SOF (24 weeks). Both studies used SVR at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) as the primary endpoint. RESULTS: In the RESCUE study, 82 participants were randomized and treated, and all completed treatment. Overall, SVR12 was 88% (72/82); 81-100% in non-cirrhotic participants treated with LDV/SOF or LDV/SOF + RBV for 12 weeks and 80-92% in cirrhotic participants treated with LDV/SOF + RBV for 12 weeks or LDV/SOF for 24 weeks. Adverse events (AEs), mostly mild-to-moderate in severity, were experienced by 78% of participants, with headache and fatigue most frequently reported. One serious AE, not related to treatment, was observed. No premature discontinuations of study drug, or deaths occurred. In the A5348 study, seven participants were randomized (cirrhotic n = 1; GT1a n = 5) and all attained SVR12, with no serious AEs or premature discontinuations. CONCLUSIONS: In this SOF-experienced, NS5A inhibitor-naïve population, which included participants with cirrhosis or HCV/HIV co-infection, high SVR12 rates were achieved.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Coinfección/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorenos/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Uridina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Coinfección/virología , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Fluorenos/efectos adversos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/virología , Cefalea/etiología , Hepacivirus/genética , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Ribavirina/efectos adversos , Sofosbuvir , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Uridina Monofosfato/administración & dosificación , Uridina Monofosfato/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Poor linkage, engagement and retention remain significant barriers in achieving HIV treatment goals in the US. HIV-infected persons entering or re-entering care across three Southern California academic HIV clinics, were randomized (1:1) to an Active, Linkage, Engagement, Retention and Treatment (ALERT) specialist for outreach and health coaching, or standard of care (SOC). The primary outcome of time to loss to follow up (LTFU) was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. No differences in the median time to LTFU (81.7 for ALERT versus 93.6 weeks for SOC; HR 1.27; p = 0.40), or time to ART initiation was observed (N = 116). Although, ALERT participants demonstrated worsening depressive symptomatology from baseline to week 48 compared to SOC (p = 0.02). The ALERT intervention did not improve engagement and retention in HIV care over SOC. Further studies are needed to determine how best to apply resources to improve retention and engagement.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Tutoría , Participación del Paciente , Retención en el Cuidado , Adulto , California , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Perdida de Seguimiento , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Nivel de AtenciónRESUMEN
Background: We examined associations between suicidality and genotypes that predict plasma efavirenz exposure among AIDS Clinical Trials Group study participants in the United States. Methods: Four clinical trials randomly assigned treatment-naive participants to efavirenz-containing regimens; suicidality was defined as reported suicidal ideation or attempted or completed suicide. Genotypes that predict plasma efavirenz exposure were defined by CYP2B6 and CYP2A6 polymorphisms. Associations were evaluated with weighted Cox proportional hazards models stratified by race/ethnicity. Additional analyses adjusted for genetic ancestry and selected covariates. Results: Among 1833 participants, suicidality was documented in 41 in exposed analyses, and 34 in on-treatment analyses. In unadjusted analyses based on 12 genotype levels, suicidality increased per level in exposed (hazard ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, .96-1.27) and on-treatment 1.16; 1.01-1.34) analyses. In the on-treatment analysis, the association was strongest among white but nearly null among black participants. Considering 3 metabolizer levels (extensive, intermediate and slow), slow metabolizers were at increased risk. Results were similar after baseline covariate-adjustment for genetic ancestry, sex, age, weight, injection drug use history, and psychiatric history or recent psychoactive medication. Conclusions: Genotypes that predict higher plasma efavirenz exposure were associated with increased risk of suicidality. Strength of association varied by race/ethnicity.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Benzoxazinas/efectos adversos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacogenética , Suicidio/etnología , Adulto , Alquinos , Fármacos Anti-VIH/administración & dosificación , Fármacos Anti-VIH/sangre , Benzoxazinas/administración & dosificación , Benzoxazinas/sangre , Ciclopropanos , Citocromo P-450 CYP2A6/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2B6/genética , Etnicidad , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Grupos Raciales , Factores de Riesgo , Ideación Suicida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The interaction between follicular T helper cells (TFH) and B cells in the lymph nodes and spleen has a major impact on the development of antigen-specific B cell responses during infection or vaccination. Recent studies described a functional equivalent of these cells among circulating CD4 T cells, referred to as peripheral TFH cells. Here, we characterize the phenotype and in vitro B cell helper activity of peripheral TFH populations, as well as the effect of HIV infection on these populations. In co-culture experiments we confirmed CXCR5+ cells from HIV-uninfected donors provide help to B cells and more specifically, we identified a CCR7(high)CXCR5(high)CCR6(high)PD-1(high) CD4 T cell population that secretes IL-21 and enhances isotype-switched immunoglobulin production. This population is significantly decreased in treatment-naïve, HIV-infected individuals and can be recovered after anti-retroviral therapy. We found impaired immunoglobulin production in co-cultures from HIV-infected individuals and found no correlation between the frequency of peripheral TFH cells and memory B cells, or with neutralization activity in untreated HIV infection in our cohort. Furthermore, we found that within the peripheral TFH population, the expression level of TFH-associated genes more closely resembles a memory, non-TFH population, as opposed to a TFH population. Overall, our data identify a heterogeneous population of circulating CD4 T cells that provides in vitro help to B cells, and challenges the origin of these cells as memory TFH cells.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Linfocitos B/inmunología , Anticuerpos Anti-VIH/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/inmunología , Adulto , Antígenos de Diferenciación/inmunología , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/patología , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Humanos , Memoria Inmunológica , Masculino , Linfocitos T Colaboradores-Inductores/patologíaRESUMEN
We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled trial of an internet-based safer-sex intervention to reduce HIV transmission risk behaviors. HIV-infected men who have sex with men (n = 179) were randomized to receive a monthly internet survey alone or a monthly survey plus tailored risk reduction messages over 12 months. The primary outcome was the cumulative sexually transmitted infection (STI) incidence over 12 months. Secondary outcomes included self-reported unprotected sex with an at risk partner and disclosure of HIV status to partners. In a modified intent to treat analysis, there was no difference in 12-month STI incidence between the intervention and control arms (30 vs. 25 %, respectively; p = 0.5). Unprotected sex decreased and disclosure increased over time in both study arms. These improvements suggest that addition of the risk-reduction messages provided little benefit beyond the self-monitoring of risky behavior via regular self-report risk behavior assessments (as was done in both study arms).
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/prevención & control , Homosexualidad Masculina , Internet , Sexo Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexo Inseguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/transmisión , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Asunción de Riesgos , Autoinforme , Parejas Sexuales , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are often included in antiretroviral regimens in treatment-experienced patients in the absence of data from randomized trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment success between participants who omit versus those who add NRTIs to an optimized antiretroviral regimen of 3 or more agents. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00537394). SETTING: Outpatient HIV clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection and viral resistance. INTERVENTION: Open-label optimized regimens (not including NRTIs) were selected on the basis of treatment history and susceptibility testing. Participants were randomly assigned to omit or add NRTIs. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy outcome was regimen failure through 48 weeks using a noninferiority margin of 15%. The primary safety outcome was time to initial episode of a severe sign, symptom, or laboratory abnormality before discontinuation of NRTI assignment. RESULTS: 360 participants were randomly assigned, and 93% completed a 48-week visit. The cumulative probability of regimen failure was 29.8% in the omit-NRTIs group versus 25.9% in the add-NRTIs group (difference, 3.2 percentage points [95% CI, -6.1 to 12.5 percentage points]). No significant between-group differences were found in the primary safety end points or the proportion of participants with HIV RNA level less than 50 copies/mL. No deaths occurred in the omit-NRTIs group compared with 7 deaths in the add-NRTIs group. LIMITATION: Unblinded study design, and the study may not be applicable to resource-poor settings. CONCLUSION: Treatment-experienced patients with HIV infection starting a new optimized regimen can safely omit NRTIs without compromising virologic efficacy. Omitting NRTIs will reduce pill burden, cost, and toxicity in this patient population. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCES: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Merck, ViiV Healthcare, Roche, and Monogram Biosciences (LabCorp).
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Fármacos Anti-VIH/efectos adversos , Recuento de Linfocito CD4 , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , VIH/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , ARN Viral/sangre , Inhibidores de la Transcriptasa Inversa/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Efavirenz and abacavir are components of recommended first-line regimens for HIV-1 infection. We used genome-wide genotyping and clinical data to explore genetic associations with virologic failure among patients randomized to efavirenz-containing or abacavir-containing regimens in AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) protocols. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Virologic response and genome-wide genotype data were available from treatment-naive patients randomized to efavirenz-containing (n=1596) or abacavir-containing (n = 786) regimens in ACTG protocols 384, A5142, A5095, and A5202. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of association results across race/ethnic groups showed no genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10) with virologic response for either efavirenz or abacavir. Our sample size provided 80% power to detect a genotype relative risk of 1.8 for efavirenz and 2.4 for abacavir. Analyses focused on CYP2B genotypes that define the lowest plasma efavirenz exposure stratum did not show associations nor did analysis limited to gene sets predicted to be relevant to efavirenz and abacavir disposition. CONCLUSION: No single polymorphism is associated strongly with virologic failure with efavirenz-containing or abacavir-containing regimens. Analyses to better consider context, and that minimize confounding by nongenetic factors, may show associations not apparent here.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/genética , Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Benzoxazinas/administración & dosificación , Didesoxinucleósidos/administración & dosificación , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , VIH-1/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/epidemiología , Alquinos , Ciclopropanos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/genética , Humanos , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Asymptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication occurs frequently in the genital tract in untreated HIV-infected men and is associated with increased immune activation and HIV disease progression. To determine the connections between CMV-associated immune activation and the size of the viral reservoir, we evaluated the interactions between (i) asymptomatic seminal CMV replication, (ii) levels of T cell activation and proliferation in blood, and (iii) the size and transcriptional activity of the HIV DNA reservoir in blood from 53 HIV-infected men on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with suppressed HIV RNA in blood plasma. We found that asymptomatic CMV shedding in semen was associated with significantly higher levels of proliferating and activated CD4(+) T cells in blood (P < 0.01). Subjects with detectable CMV in semen had approximately five times higher average levels of HIV DNA in blood CD4(+) T cells than subjects with no CMV. There was also a trend for CMV shedders to have increased cellular (multiply spliced) HIV RNA transcription (P = 0.068) compared to participants without CMV, but it is unclear if this transcription pattern is associated with residual HIV replication. In multivariate analysis, the presence of seminal plasma CMV (P = 0.04), detectable 2-long terminal repeat (2-LTR), and lower nadir CD4(+) (P < 0.01) were independent predictors of higher levels of proviral HIV DNA in blood. Interventions aimed at reducing seminal CMV and associated immune activation may be important for HIV curative strategies. Future studies of anti-CMV therapeutics will help to establish causality and determine the mechanisms underlying these described associations. Importance: Almost all individuals infected with HIV are also infected with cytomegalovirus (CMV), and the replication dynamics of the two viruses likely influence each other. This study investigated interactions between asymptomatic CMV replication within the male genital tract, levels of inflammation in blood, and the size of the HIV DNA reservoir in 53 HIV-infected men on long-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) with suppressed HIV RNA in blood plasma. In support of our primary hypothesis, shedding of CMV DNA in semen was associated with increased activation and proliferation of T cells in blood and also significantly higher levels of HIV DNA in blood cells. These results suggest that CMV reactivation might play a role in the maintenance of the HIV DNA reservoir during suppressive ART and that it could be a target of pharmacologic intervention in future studies.