A multicenter post-marketing evaluation of the Elixir DESolve® Novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: First results from the DESolve PMCF study.

OBJECTIVES: To date, experience with bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) that elute agents other than everolimus is limited. Thus, a post-marketing clinical follow-up study was conducted to evaluate the continued safety and effectiveness of the DESolve® NOVOLIMUS™ Eluting BRS as treatment for patients with stable coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: The DESolve BRS combines a poly-l-lactide-based backbone with a biodegradable polylactide-based polymer and Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone mTOR inhibitor. METHODS: One hundred and two patients (mean age 62 years, 77.5% male) were enrolled at 10 European sites. Comparison of baseline and post-procedural angiographic assessment was performed, and a device-oriented composite endpoint (comprising cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) and rate of scaffold thrombosis at 12 months were examined. RESULTS: The device was successfully delivered and deployed in 98.2% (107/109) of the lesions, with two failures to cross the lesion. A total of 100 patients (109 lesions) were treated with a DESolve BRS. Post-procedural angiographic assessment indicated an in-scaffold acute gain of 1.54 ± 0.44 mm, with a reduction in % diameter stenosis from 61.00 ± 11.29 to 12.69 ± 0.44. At 12 months, the device-oriented composite endpoint had occurred in 3.0% (3/100) of patients, with 1.0% (1/100) experiencing scaffold thrombosis and myocardial infarction and 3.0% (3/100) undergoing target lesion revascularization. There were no cardiac deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Results through 12 months indicate that the DESolve BRS is a safe and effective treatment for coronary lesions, though larger, long-term prospective studies are needed.

Transcatheter valve-in-ring implantation of a repositionable valve system for treatment of severe mitral regurgitation.

INTRODUCTION: Years after mitral valve surgery, progressive degeneration of reconstructed mitral valves or bioprostheses might lead to severe mitral valve regurgitation. Patients with significant comorbidity, or impaired left ventricular function are poor candidates for redo surgery at an acceptable risk at that later time point. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study reports the first-in-man transapical valve-in-ring implantations in the mitral position of the fully repositionable Lotus valve system approved for transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Europe. Transapical valve-in-ring implantations with this valve system were successfully performed in a 64-year-old female, and a 53-year-old male patient. Both patients were NHYA class IV, and carried an unacceptably high risk of cardiac surgery due to clinical condition and comorbidity. The first patient was successfully implanted a 25 mm valve, improved to NYHA class II, and was discharged 2 weeks after the procedure. The second patient required a short episode of cardiopulmonary resuscitation after valve implantation (27 mm), and was placed on veno-venous ECMO for 24 hr to improve oxygenation. He developed stroke on day 7, and deceased from fatal, toxic rhabdomyolysis 13 days after the procedure. CONCLUSION: Transapical valve-in-ring implantation of the repositionable Lotus valve system in the mitral position is a feasible and promising option that merits further evaluation. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mechanism of luminal patency of the self-expanding Sideguard sidebranch stent: evaluation by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography.

BACKGROUND: The Cappella Sideguard (CS) sidebranch stent is a self-expanding, thin-strut, nitinol device with anatomic flaring at the sidebranch ostium designed to treat bifurcation lesions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mechanism of long-term lumen patency of the novel, self-expanding CS sidebranch stent compared with a balloon-expandable stent in the main vessel. METHODS: We performed intravascular ultrasound postintervention and at follow-up in 24 CS stents and in 28 balloon-expandable drug-eluting stents deployed in the corresponding main vessel. Thirteen patients also had optical coherence tomography (OCT) at follow-up to evaluate neointimal hyperplasia and strut coverage. RESULTS: CS stent area at the sidebranch carina increased significantly from 3.8 ± 1.2 mm(2) postintervention to 4.6 ± 1.2 mm(2) at follow-up (P < 0.001), resulting in no change in lumen area (3.8 ± 1.2 mm(2) to 3.7 ± 1.2 mm(2) , P = 0.72) despite a neointimal area at follow-up of 0.9 ± 0.8 mm(2) . Volumetric changes were similar, and the distribution of neointimal hyperplasia peaked 1-2 mm distal to the carina. Change of lumen volume inversely correlated to the neointimal volume (R = -0.48, P < 0.001), but correlated positively to the change in stent volume (R = 0.52, P < 0.0001). By OCT, most CS struts were covered (100% [98.9, 100]) at the bifurcation site, whereas 61% of floating DES struts that crossed the sidebranch were covered by smooth tissue with a similar texture compared with neointima. CONCLUSION: Although neointimal hyperplasia accumulates within the CS stent mainly 1-2 mm distal to the carina, the self-expanding CS stent may be effective in maintaining an adequate patency in the sidebranch by continued stent expansion noted at follow-up.

Intravascular ultrasound comparison of the self-expanding Sideguard stent in the side branch versus a balloon-expandable stent in the main vessel to assess mechanisms of acute lumen gain in bifurcation lesions.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the mechanisms of lumen gain after Cappella Sideguard (CS) side branch (SB) bifurcation stent deployment versus a balloon-expandable stent in the corresponding main vessel (MV). BACKGROUND: The novel CS SB bifurcation stent is a self-expanding, thin-strut, nitinol device with anatomic flaring at the SB ostium. METHODS: In 28 bifurcation lesions, intravascular ultrasound imaging of both the SB and the MV was performed both pre- and postintervention; vessel and lumen areas were measured every 1 mm over a 5 mm segment beginning at the carina. RESULTS: Although minimum lumen area (MLA) within the distal 5 mm segment beginning at the carina increased from 2.8 ± 1.3 mm(2) to 3.8 ± 1.1 mm(2), P < 0.001, in the SB and from 3.4 ± 1.4 mm(2) to 6.0 ± 1.1 mm(2), P < 0.001, in the MV, stent expansion (minimum stent area/distal reference lumen area) was significantly less in the SB compared with the MV (77.8 ± 21.3% vs. 91.6 ± 18.4%, P = 0.02). Post stenting, the MLA site was located at the carina more frequently in the SB (85.7%) than in the MV (60.7%), P = 0.04. Plaque volume in the 5 mm proximal to carina in the MV tended to decrease, whereas plaque volume in the SB increased slightly with no change in overall plaque volume in the 5-mm-long segment distal to the carina in the MV, suggesting plaque shift from the proximal MV to the SB. CONCLUSIONS: Acute CS lumen gain is less than the lumen gain of a balloon-expandable stent in the MV because of less aggressive acute expansion and/or the plaque shift from the proximal MV to the SB.

The impact of peripheral arterial disease on early outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions Registry.

BACKGROUND: A significant proportion of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have concomitant peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which plays a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process of determining an optimal vascular access site. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of PAD on clinical outcome after TAVI in a real-world setting. METHODS: A total of 1,315 patients (mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation 20.6% ± 13.7%) underwent TAVI in 27 centers and were included in the prospective German TAVI Registry. RESULTS: Of the 1,315 patients with TAVI, 330 (25.1%) had PAD. These patients had a higher logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation score (27.7% ± 16.0% vs 18.3% ± 12.0%, P < .0001), mainly attributed to more frequent and severe comorbidities. Compared with patients without PAD, patients with PAD had a higher rate of vascular complications (28.5% vs 20.7%, P < .01), dialysis-dependent renal failure (11.2% vs 5.4%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (1.2% vs 0.3%, P < .05), and, subsequently, 30-day mortality (12.7% vs 6.9%, P < .001). Choosing a surgical approach, for example, transapical access, did not reduce the periprocedural risk associated with PAD; in-hospital mortality was 15.7% for surgical and 10.5% for percutaneous patients with TAVI having PAD (P < .001). In a multivariate regression analysis, PAD was an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.7, P = .004) after TAVI. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world TAVI Registry, PAD was an independent predictor of mortality in patients with percutaneous and surgical TAVI, including vascular complications. Assessment of PAD should play a crucial role in the preinterventional selection process, regardless of the access strategy.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry.

AIMS: Treatment of elderly symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and co-morbidities is challenging. Transcatheter aortic valve interventions [balloon valvuloplasty and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)] are evolving as alternative treatment options to surgical valve replacement. We report the first results of the prospective multi-centre German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions-Registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2009 and December 2009, a total of 697 patients (81.4 ± 6.3 years, 44.2% males, and logistic EuroScore 20.5 ± 13.2%) underwent TAVI. Pre-operative aortic valve area was 0.6 ± 0.2 cm² with a mean transvalvular gradient of 48.7 ± 17.2 mmHg. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was performed percutaneously in the majority of patients [666 (95.6%)]. Only 31 (4.4%) procedures were done surgically: 26 (3.7%) transapically and 5 (0.7%) transaortically. The Medtronic CoreValve™ prosthesis was used in 84.4%, whereas the Sapien Edwards™ prosthesis was used in the remaining cases. Technical success was achieved in 98.4% with a post-operative mean transaortic pressure gradient of 5.4 ± 6.2 mmHg. Any residual aortic regurgitation was observed in 72.4% of patients, with a significant aortic insufficiency (≥Grade III) in only 16 patients (2.3%). Complications included pericardial tamponade in 1.8% and stroke in 2.8% of patients. Permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI became necessary in 39.3% of patients. In-hospital death rate was 8.2%, and the 30-day death rate 12.4%. CONCLUSION: In this real-world registry of high-risk patients with aortic stenosis, TAVI had a high success rate and was associated with moderate in-hospital complications. However, careful patient selection and continued hospital selection seem crucial to maintain these results.

Final 5-year results of the TAXUS II trial: a randomized study to assess the effectiveness of slow- and moderate-release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stents for de novo coronary artery lesions.

BACKGROUND: The TAXUS II trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the commercialized slow-release (SR) and an investigation-only moderate-release (MR) polymer-based TAXUS paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with a bare-metal stent for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial enrolled 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts to compare TAXUS SR (n=131) and TAXUS MR (n=135) with an identical but uncoated bare-metal stent control (n=270). The present analysis reports final 5-year clinical outcomes of TAXUS II. At 5 years, both TAXUS SR and MR showed superior outcomes compared with control. The 5-year rates of major adverse cardiac events were 27.6%, 20.4%, and 15.1% (P=0.01); rates of target-vessel revascularization were 22.5%, 16.6%, and 9.0% (P=0.004); and rates of target-lesion revascularization were 18.4%, 10.3%, and 4.5% (P<0.001) for the control, TAXUS SR, and TAXUS MR groups, respectively. The rates of all-cause death and myocardial infarction were low and similar between groups, with 2 stent thromboses with bare-metal stents compared with no event beyond 2 years with either of the TAXUS stents. CONCLUSIONS: TAXUS II is the first large TAXUS trial to have reached 5-year follow-up. Both the SR and MR stents lowered the rates of target-vessel and target-lesion revascularization, which indicates their sustained efficacy. Furthermore, the low overall rates of all death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis support the long-term safety of the TAXUS stent system.

Five-year clinical outcome of multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus - with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term data from randomized studies on polymer-free stents are scarce. Long-term data of Cre8 amphilimus eluting stent are still not available. We sought to investigate contribution of a polymer-free design versus a permanent-polymer one on the long-term. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomized 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté (323 overall, 126 Cre8). Original primary endpoint (6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss) already demonstrated the superiority of Cre8 vs Taxus (0.14 + 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 + 0.40 mm; p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints were the device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) up to 5-year. Long-term follow-up data confirmed the superiority shown by Cre8 in the analysis of the angiographic endpoint at 6-month, especially in the diabetic patients, where the device strongly reduced the clinical difference with non-diabetic. Landmark analysis demonstrated that the incidence of DOCE after 1-year and up to 5-year follow up was significantly lower in patients implanted with Cre8 AES (2.1% Cre8 vs. 9.3% Taxus, p = 0.009). While no differences were found in terms of DOCE rate among diabetic and non-diabetic patients treated with the Cre8 AES (HR 1.039; 95%CI 0.320-3.374), this was not true for Taxus (HR 2.64; 95%CI 1.112-6.278). CONCLUSIONS: Cre8 showed favourable safety and efficacy results versus Taxus at 5-years follow-up, with a superior clinical performance for the DOCE endpoint from 1 to 5 years. Cre8, differently from Taxus, has been able to strongly reduce the differences in clinical outcome between diabetic and non-diabetic up to 5 years, suggesting the higher efficacy of Cre8 in the treatment of diabetic patients.

Carotid artery stenting: do procedural complications relate to the side intervened upon?: results from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of the side intervened upon on outcomes during carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: Anatomic and technical aspects may influence the results of CAS. The value of the side intervened upon has not been analyzed yet. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS)-Registry. RESULTS: A total of 3,165 CAS procedures, 1,613 (51%) at the left and 1,552 (49%) at the right carotid artery were included. There was a higher proportion of patients treated for symptomatic stenoses when CAS was performed at the left carotid artery (50.1% versus 45.8%, P = 0.016) and more patients already had prior carotid endarterectomy (8.5% versus 5.8%, P = 0.003). Interventions at the left side took 3 min longer than interventions at the right side (46.6 +/- 24.3 versus 43.8 +/- 23.6, P = 0.003). In patients treated at the left carotid artery amaurosis fugax (0.7% versus 0.1%, P = 0.005), ipsilateral stroke (3.1% versus 1.8%, P = 0.017), and the primary endpoint of in-hospital death or stroke (4.1% versus 2.3%, P = 0.005) occurred significantly more often. Even after adjusting for confounding parameters, CAS procedures performed at the left carotid arteries remained an independent predictor of death or stroke (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.15-2.72, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In current clinical practice, CAS is performed frequently at the right carotid artery as at the left carotid artery. CAS interventions have a higher in-hospital complication rate if performed at the left carotid artery. Technical improvements might help to overcome this situation.

Symptoms, disease severity and treatment of adults with a new diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Contemporary data on patients with previously undiagnosed severe aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce. We aimed to address this gap by gathering data from consecutive patients diagnosed with severe AS on echocardiography. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, multinational, registry in 23 tertiary care hospitals across 9 European countries. Patients with a diagnosis of severe AS were included using echocardiography (aortic valve area (AVA) <1 cm2, indexed AVA <0.6 cm2/m2, maximum jet-velocity (Vmax) >4 m/s and/or mean transvalvular gradient >40 mm Hg). RESULTS: The 2171 participants had a mean age of 77.9 years and 48.0% were female. The mean AVA was 0.73 cm2, Vmax4.3 m/s and mean gradient 47.1 mm Hg; 62.1% had left ventricular hypertrophy and 27.3% an ejection fraction (EF) <50%. 1743 patients (80.3%) were symptomatic (shortness-of-breath 91.0%; dizziness 30.2%, chest pain 28.9%). Patients had a EuroSCORE II of 4.0; 25.3% had a creatinine clearance <50 mL/min, and 3.2% had an EF <30%. Symptomatic patients were older and had more comorbidities than asymptomatic patients. Despite European Society of Cardiology 2017 valvular heart disease guideline class I recommendation, in only 76.2% a decision was made for an intervention (transcatheter 50.4%, surgical aortic valve replacement 25.8%). In asymptomatic patients, 57.7% with a class I/IIa indication were scheduled for a procedure, while 36.3% patients without an indication had their valve replaced. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients with severe AS presented at an advanced disease stage. Management of severe AS remained suboptimal in a significant proportion of contemporary patients with severe AS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02241447;Results.

Facilitated Data Relay and Effects on Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis in Europe.

Background Many patients with severe aortic stenosis are referred late with advanced symptoms or inappropriately denied intervention. The objective was to investigate whether a structured communication to referring physicians (facilitated data relay) might improve the rate and timeliness of intervention. Methods and Results A prospective registry of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis at 23 centers in 9 European countries with transcatheter as well as surgical aortic valve replacement being available was performed. The study included a 3-month documentation of the status quo (phase A), a 6-month intervention phase (implementing facilitated data relay), and a 3-month documentation of a legacy effect (phase-B). Two thousand one hundred seventy-one patients with severe aortic stenoses were enrolled (phase A: 759; intervention: 905; phase-B: 507). Mean age was 77.9±10.0 years, and 80% were symptomatic, including 52% with severe symptoms. During phase A, intervention was planned in 464/696 (67%), 138 (20%) were assigned to watchful waiting, 8 (1%) to balloon aortic valvuloplasty, 60 (9%) were listed as not for active treatment, and in 26 (4%), no decision was made. Three hundred sixty-three of 464 (78%) patients received the planned intervention within 3 months. Timeliness of the intervention improved as shown by the higher number of aortic valve replacements performed within 3 months (59% versus 51%, P=0.002) and a significant decrease in the time to intervention (36±38 versus 30±33 days, P=0.002). Conclusions A simple, low-cost, facilitated data relay improves timeliness of treatment for patients diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis, resulting in a shorter time to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This effect was mainly driven by a significant improvement in timeliness of intervention in transcatheter aortic valve replacement but not surgical aortic valve replacement. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT02241447.

[Temporal trends in the use of drug-eluting stents in German clinical practice]. / Trends im Einsatz von Drug-eluting Stents im klinischen Alltag in Deutschland. Daten des ALKK-Registers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: : Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to reduce the risk of in-stent stenosis, one of the major problems of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with implantation of baremetal stents. DES are approved in Germany since 2002. The following study is based on data of the ALKK PCI registry and assesses the use of DES depending on patient characteristics, indication and coronary status comparing the treatment years 2003 and 2005. METHODS: : The ALKK (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitende Kardiologische Krankenhausärzte) PCI registry is focused on quality management based on guidelines in coronary interventions. Data were obtained by standardized questionnaires and analyzed centrally at the KL-Neuhaus Datenzentrum, Ludwigshafen, Germany. For this study, data of 40,434 PCI procedures of 32 hospitals were obtained. RESULTS: : In 2003, a total of 18,564 PCIs, and in 2005, a total of 21,870 PCIs were registered. Figure 1 shows the rate of DES in PCI in the hospitals participating in the registry in both years, 2003 and 2005. The use of DES was low with 4.3% in 2003 and increased to 19.1% in 2005. DES were mostly used in patients with stable angina (2003: 68.4%, 2005: 55.3%), in patients with former PCI (2003: 42.5%, 2005: 48.1%) and a positive stress test (DES 2003: 58.4%, 2005: 32.0%; Table 1). The rate of DES was high in unprotected left main procedures (DES 2003: 15.6%, 2005: 35.9%), PCI of ostial lesions (DES 2003: 6.4%, 2005: 32.7%), in in-stent stenosis (DES 2003: 9.5%, 2005: 40.6%), and in multivessel PCI (DES 2003: 7.6%, 2005: 29.3%; Figure 3). CONCLUSION: : DES were mainly applied in a stable situation (Figure 2), but were also increasingly used for complex coronary interventions in off-label indications.

The role of echocardiography and CT angiography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation patients.

The transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) consist an alternative treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Multimodality imaging using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and multislice CT (MSCT) constitute cornerstone techniques for the pre-operative management, peri-procedural guidance, follow up and recognition of possible transcatheter valve related complications. CT angiography is much more accurate regarding the total definition of aortic annulus diameter and circumferential area. Two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, underestimates the aortic valve annulus diameter compared to 3D imaging techniques (MSCT, MRI and 3D TOE). Three-dimensional TOE imaging provides measurements of the aortic valve annulus similar to those delivered by MSCT. The pre-procedural MSCT constitutes the gold standard modality minimizing the presence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation, one of the most frequent complications. TOE/TTE and MSCT performance could predict the possibility of pacemaker implantation post-procedural. The presence of a new transient or persisting MR can be assessed well by TOE. Both TTE and TOE, consist initially the basic examination for post TAVI evaluation. In case of transcatheter heart valve failure, the MSCT could be used as additional imaging technique.

Comparison of in-hospital outcomes of patients with versus without previous carotid endarterectomy undergoing carotid stenting (from the German ALKK CAS Registry).

Repeat carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for recurrent stenosis remains a challenging treatment option associated with high morbidity and mortality. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an attractive alternative management option for these patients. However, data about the effectiveness and safety of CAS in a large number of unselected patients are less known. We evaluated 3,070 patients who underwent CAS enrolled in a German registry from 1996 to 2006 at 31 sites. We compared clinical and angiographic features and in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without previous CEA who underwent CAS. Of 3,070 patients in the registry, 223 (7.3%) underwent CAS for restenosis after previous CEA. Median age was similar in patients with and without previous CEA (70 years, interquartile range 64 to 76 vs 71 years, interquartile range 65 to 76). Ipsilateral neurologic symptoms occurred in approximately 1/2 the patients in both groups. Other co-morbid conditions and angiographic or procedural factors did not differ between the 2 groups. In-hospital events including death (0% vs 0.4%), ipsilateral major stroke (1.4% vs 1.5%), death or major ipsilateral stroke (1.4% vs 1.7%), ipsilateral transient ischemic attack (1.9% vs 2.8%), myocardial infarction (0.4% vs 0.1%), and reintervention (0.7% vs 0.4%) were all low and not significantly different between those with and without previous CEA (p >0.05 for all comparisons). In conclusion, our data for a large number of patients who underwent CAS in a recent contemporary community-based practice attests to the low risk of periprocedural events in patients with recurrent stenosis after previous CEA. This low risk along with the less invasive nature of the procedure should make CAS an attractive and perhaps preferred option for the treatment of these patients.

Incomplete stent apposition after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents or bare metal stents: insights from the randomized TAXUS II trial.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of late incomplete stent apposition (ISA) for drug-eluting stents is unknown. We sought to prospectively investigate the incidence and extent of ISA after the procedure and at 6-month follow-up of paclitaxel-eluting stents in comparison with bare metal stents (BMS) and survey the clinical significance of ISA over a period of 12 months. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS II was a randomized, double-blind study with 536 patients in 2 consecutive cohorts comparing slow-release (SR; 131 patients) and moderate-release (MR; 135 patients) paclitaxel-eluting stents with BMS (270 patients). This intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy included patients who underwent serial IVUS examination after the procedure and at 6 months (BMS, 240 patients; SR, 113; MR, 116). The qualitative and quantitative analyses of ISA were performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. More than half of the instances of ISA observed after the procedure resolved at 6 months in all groups. No difference in the incidence of late-acquired ISA was observed among the 3 groups (BMS, 5.4%; SR, 8.0%; MR, 9.5%; P=0.306), with a similar ISA volume (BMS, 11.4 mm3; SR, 21.7 mm3; MR, 8.5 mm3; P=0.18). Late-acquired ISA was the result of an increase of vessel area without change in plaque behind the stent. Predictive factors of late-acquired ISA were lesion length, unstable angina, and absence of diabetes. No stent thrombosis occurred in the patients diagnosed with ISA over a period of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and extent of late-acquired ISA are comparable in paclitaxel-eluting stents and BMS. ISA is a pure IVUS finding without clinical repercussions.

Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the efficacy of a filter embolic protection device (F-EPD) and a distal occlusive embolic protection device (DO-EPD) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: The embolic protection device (EPD) may lower the periprocedural rate of cerebral ischemic events during CAS. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the different types of EPD. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. RESULTS: From July 1996 to July 2003, 1,734 patients were included in the prospective CAS Registry. Of these patients, 729 patients were treated with an EPD, 553 (75.9%) with F-EPD, and 176 (24.1%) with DO-EPD. Patients treated with DO-EPD were more likely to be treated for symptomatic stenosis (64.5% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.011). The carotid lesions in patients treated under DO-EPD seemed to be more complicated, as expressed by a higher proportion of ulcers (p = 0.035), severe calcification (p = 0.039), a longer lesion length (p = 0.025), and a higher pre-interventional grade of stenosis (p < 0.001). The median duration of the CAS intervention was 30 min in the DO-EPD group, compared with 48 min in the filter group (p < 0.001). No differences in clinical events rate between the two groups of protection devices were observed. Multivariate analysis on the occurrence of the combined end point of in-hospital death or stroke found no difference between filter- and DO-EPD (4 of 176 [2.3%] for DO-EPD vs. 10 of 551 [1.8%] for F-EPD; adjusted odds ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 4.44; p = 0.958). CONCLUSIONS: Filter EPD is the currently preferred method of EPD in clinical practice. Both F-EPD and DO-EPD seem to be equally effective during CAS.

Clinical and angiographic analysis with a cobalt alloy coronary stent (driver) in stable and unstable angina pectoris.

The Clinical and Angiographic analysis with a Cobalt Alloy Coronary Stent (Driver) (CLASS) study was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study designed to assess the safety and efficacy of a cobalt-chromium alloy-based stent in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris. A total of 203 lesions were treated in 202 enrolled patients. The percentage of major adverse cardiac event-free patients was 87.6% (177 of 202) at 6 months (primary safety end point; major adverse cardiac events were defined as death, myocardial infarction, emergency bypass surgery, or target lesion revascularization [percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass grafting]). The angiographic success rate (primary efficacy end point) was 100%, and the procedural success rate was 98%. The binary in-stent restenosis rate at 6 months was 12.6%. Our results have demonstrated that the Driver cobalt-chromium alloy stent can be used with a low 6-month incidence of major adverse cardiac events, a low 6-month binary restenosis rate, and high angiographic and procedural success rates.

Angiographic results of the first human experience with the Biolimus A9 drug-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions.

This report describes angiographic findings of the first-in-human evaluation of the Biolimus A9 drug-eluting stent (Biolimus stent) in the treatment of noncomplex coronary lesions. In total, 120 patients with 122 de novo coronary lesions (2.75- to 4.00-mm vessels, < or = 24-mm lesion length) were prospectively randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive the Biolimus stent (n = 80, 82 lesions) or the control uncoated stent (n = 40). Baseline lesion and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 6-month follow-up, late lumen loss was significantly decreased with the Biolimus stent in the stent (0.26 +/- 0.43 vs 0.74 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.001) and in the segment (0.14 +/- 0.45 vs 0.40 +/- 0.41 mm, p = 0.004). In-stent restenosis was 3.9% in the Biolimus stent group versus 7.7% in the control group (p = 0.40). There was no exaggerated hyperplasia at the proximal and/or distal edge of the stent.

Effect of everolimus-eluting stents in different vessel sizes (from the pooled FUTURE I and II trials).

The everolimus-eluting stent (EES) has been shown to significantly decrease neointimal proliferation at 6 months compared with the bare metal stent (BMS) in patients with de novo coronary lesions. We report mid-term outcomes based on different vessel sizes in the combined FUTURE I and II trials. In the prospective, randomized, FUTURE I trial (single center) and expanded FUTURE II trial (multicenter), 106 patients (107 lesions) were randomized to EESs (n = 49 lesions) or BMSs (n = 58 lesions). Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on preprocedure reference diameter as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (small vessel < 2.75 mm, medium vessel 2.75 to 3.25 mm, and large vessel > 3.25 mm). At 6-month follow-up, EESs decreased in-stent late lumen loss (decreased rate range of 78% to 94%), resulting in significantly larger minimum lumen area as assessed by intravascular ultrasound (increased range of 34% to 42%) compared with the BMS across all vessel sizes. There were no cases of in-stent restenosis with EESs at any vessel size but 8 cases with BMSs (5 in small vessels). No stent thrombosis, aneurysm formation, or late stent incomplete apposition was observed in any group. The EES appears to be effective for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in decreasing neointimal proliferation at 6-month follow-up compared with BMSs, regardless of vessel size.

Reducing Patient Radiation Dose With Image Noise Reduction Technology in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Procedures.

X-ray radiation exposure is of great concern for patients undergoing structural heart interventions. In addition, a larger group of medical staff is required and exposed to radiation compared with percutaneous coronary interventions. This study aimed at quantifying radiation dose reduction with implementation of specific image noise reduction technology (NRT) in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures. We retrospectively analyzed 104 consecutive patients with TAVI procedures, 52 patients before and 52 after optimization of x-ray radiation chain, and implementation of NRT. Patients with 1-step TAVI and complex coronary intervention, or complex TAVI procedures, were excluded. Before the procedure, all patients received a multislice computed tomography scan, which was used to size aortic annulus, select the optimal implantation plane, valve type and size, and guide valve implantation using a software tool. Air kerma and kerma-area product were compared in both groups to determine patient radiation dose reduction. Baseline parameters, co-morbidity, or procedural data were comparable between groups. Mean kerma-area product was significantly lower (p <0.001) in the NRT group compared with the standard group (60 ± 39 vs 203 ± 106 Gy × cm(2), p <0.001), which corresponds to a reduction of 70%. Mean air kerma was reduced by 64% (494 ± 360 vs 1,355 ± 657 mGy, p <0.001). In conclusion, using optimized x-ray chain combined with specific image noise reduction technology has the potential to significantly reduce by 2/3 radiation dose in standard TAVI procedures without worsening image quality or prolonging procedure time.