Diffusion tensor imaging within the healthy cervical spinal cord: Within- participants reliability and measurement error.

BACKGROUND: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a promising technique for the visualization of the cervical spinal cord (CSC) in vivo. It provides information about the tissue structure of axonal white matter, and it is thought to be more sensitive than other MR imaging techniques for the evaluation of damage to tracts in the spinal cord. AIM: The purpose of this study was to determine the within-participants reliability and error magnitude of measurements of DTI metrics in healthy human CSC. METHODS: A total of twenty healthy controls (10 male, mean age: 33.9 ± 3.5 years, 10 females, mean age: 47.5 ± 14.4 years), with no family history of any neurological disorders or a contraindication to MRI scanning were recruited over a period of two months. Each participant was scanned twice with an MRI 3 T scanner using standard DTI sequences. Spinal Cord Toolbox (SCT) software was used for image post-processing. Data were first corrected for motion artefact, then segmented, registered to a template, and then the DTI metrics were computed. The within-participants coefficients of variation (CV%), the single and average within-participants intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots for WM, VC, DC and LC fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were determined for the cervical spinal cord (between the 2nd and 5th cervical vertebrae). RESULTS: DTI metrics showed poor to excellent within-participants reliability for both single and average ICC and moderate to high reproducibility for CV%, all variation dependent on the location of the ROI. The BA plots showed good within-participants agreement between the scan-rescan values. CONCLUSION: Results from this reliability study demonstrate that clinical trials using the DTI technique are feasible and that DTI, in particular regions of the cord is suitable for use for the monitoring of degenerative WM changes.

Within-participants reliability and measurement error of magnetization transfer imaging determinations within the healthy cervical spinal cord.

PURPOSE: To assess the within-participant reliability and measurement error in the determination of MTR in the healthy human cervical spinal cord. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of twenty healthy controls (10 male, mean ± sd age: 33.9 ± 3.5 years, 10 females, mean ± sd age: 47.5 ± 14.4 years), with no family history of any neurological disorders or a contraindication to MRI scanning were recruited over a period of two months. Each participant was scanned twice with a 3T MRI scanner using standard MTI sequences. Spinal Cord Toolbox (v5.4) was used for image post-processing. Data were first segmented and then registered to a template and then MTR was computed. The within-participant coefficients of variation (CV%), single and average within-participants intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were determined for MT values over the volume between the 2nd and 5th cervical vertebrae for the total WM and for specific WM regions: dorsal column (DC), ventral column (VC) and lateral column (LC). RESULTS: MTR showed poor to excellent within-participant reliability for the total WM, DC, VC and LC with single/average ICC values of 0.03/0.06, 0.10/0.18, 0.39/0.75, and 0.001/0.002, respectively, and the CV% reported an acceptable variation with values less than 10%. The Bland-Altman plots showed good within-participant agreement between the scan-rescan values. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that clinical trials using MTI technique are feasible and shows that quantitative MTI can monitor tissue changes in degenerative WM patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: MTI with its MTR index provide broad assessment of the integrity of white matter tissue and are being studied widely in brain as a diagnostic tool for the assessment of different neurological diseases.

Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: Support, role satisfaction, and advanced clinical practice within the European federation of radiographer society (EFRS) member countries.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing number of radiographers are undertaking image reporting throughout Europe. However, there are variations in practice and experience in European countries. The study aim was to investigate reporting radiographer's perceptions in relation to support for their role and workload satisfaction and elements of advanced practice that may also be undertaken. METHODS: Following institutional ethical approval an online 34 item questionnaire survey was circulated via social media; Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn in a 12-week period in 2022 across Europe. The survey data were managed by the online secure database REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture). Data was collected across a range of questions, of which those relating to support for, and barriers to radiographer reporting, role and job satisfaction, and other role elements are reported here. RESULTS: A response level of 345 individual reporting radiographers replied to the survey from 15 European countries; some questions were optional and therefore had a lower response rate. There was consensus about the need for support from radiologists and management, protected time, and funding to support the reporting role. The majority of respondents received additional pay for taking on this role and expressed satisfaction with their role and workload. In relation to elements of advanced practice, the majority of respondents were involved in educational and managerial activities, and there was interest, but limited involvement, in research. CONCLUSION: There was a consensus about the support needed, and perceived barriers to, radiographer reporting, between reporting radiographers from different countries. Whilst there is some commonality in relation to activities such as supervision and education, there was clearer variety in relation to opportunities for research between the respondents, perhaps reflecting the differences between reporting as a standalone role development and reporting as part of an advanced clinical practice role. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As there is increasingly an emphasis on advanced clinical practice, reporting radiographers are likely to require support to develop their skills so that they can actively participate in the broader activities associated with this role, including education, leadership, and research.

Reporting radiographers within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries - motivation for becoming a reporting radiographer.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographer-led reporting originated in the United Kingdom as a strategy to reduce reporting backlog and time taken to report images. The effectiveness of reporting radiographers has been demonstrated, but their motivational factors have not been thoroughly explored. This survey aims to understand the incentives for radiographers to pursue postgraduate education in reporting radiography across Europe. METHODS: An online survey was conducted, collecting data across a range of topics such as demographic information, professional role, and job satisfaction. Questions assessing the influence of motivational factors on the decision to become a reporting radiographer are presented in this study. Descriptive statistics characterized the respondents' demographics. The motivational aspects were analysed quantitatively by regression analyses. Thematic analyses were performed for the free text responses on motivational aspects. RESULTS: 239 respondents from the UK, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, The Netherlands, Ireland, and Malta completed the survey's motivation section. Increased knowledge and new challenges were the most motivating factors for becoming a reporting radiographer, while less exposure to radiation and less patient contact were the least motivating factors. Job satisfaction was a significant motivator. Gender significantly correlated with the importance of social connections for female reporting radiographers. A cross-country comparison showed that title and position and job security were more important for reporting radiographers from the UK. CONCLUSION: Taking in consideration that a sample of 239 is not generalisable for the role, this survey does provides insights into the motivation behind being a reporting radiographer in Europe. Factors such as increased knowledge, new challenges, and job satisfaction play significant roles. Hindrances experienced by reporting radiographers included lack of time, support, and standards, while aspirations for further professional development were expressed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: A thorough understanding of the motivation behind pursuing postgraduate studies in reporting radiography is a valuable tool for managers, aiding in fostering a positive work environment and attracting/keeping qualified personnel. The findings of this study can be employed in the development of strategies to support and enhance the practice of reporting radiographers.

Reporting radiographers in Europe survey: An overview of the role within the European Federation of Radiographer Society (EFRS) member countries.

INTRODUCTION: Reporting radiographers undertake an important role in healthcare and for the radiographer profession in general. First introduced in the United Kingdom, reporting radiographers are now practicing in several other European countries. Our objective was to investigate the workforce of reporting radiographers across the European Federation of Radiographer Societies (EFRS) community. METHOD AND MATERIAL: A voluntary anonymous 34 item electronic survey was distributed online using social media accounts such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn covering a wide range of topics relating to professional role, advanced practice, education, and seniority. The questionnaire was distributed during a 12-week period in 2022. RESULT: A total of 345 individual responses were received from 15 countries with majorities of respondent from United Kingdom (n = 245, 71%) and Denmark (n = 66, 19%). Mean age was 41.9 (S.D 9.8), similar for females, 42.5 (S.D 9.0) and men 40.9 years (S.D 9.7). Most reporting radiographers worked in public hospitals (90%). The vast majority of the respondents (n = 270, n = 94%) authored and signed their own clinical reports while a minority (n = 18, 6%) stated that their reports were checked by radiologists. CONCLUSION: The survey highlights the scope of practice of reporting radiographers working in Europe. Reporting is becoming a career path for an increasing number of radiographers across Europe and there is assess to academic education and clinical support. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Reporting radiographers fulfil an important role within the current demands of healthcare. This demand is likely to increase in the future, and therefore it is vital that there is some form of standardisation in the level of education that this group of healthcare professionals receive.

Exploring current undergraduate student perspectives on the introduction of the degree apprenticeship scheme in diagnostic radiography - a single institution study.

INTRODUCTION: The first degree apprenticeship programme in diagnostic radiography was launched in March 2020. This route into radiography runs in parallel with 'conventional' pre-registration programmes where students apply to a higher education institution (HEI) and undertake discrete clinical placements. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of pre-registration students on the diagnostic radiographer degree apprenticeship route. METHODS: A qualitative approach (online questionnaire) gathered attitudes and opinions of pre-registration students from a single HEI, regarding the degree apprenticeship programme. Participants were pre-registration medical imaging students from all stages of the programme (n = 204). Braun and Clarks's thematic analysis was employed for data analysis. RESULTS: A response rate of 21% (n = 44) was recorded. Four themes emerged from data analysis: (1) misunderstandings surrounding the degree apprenticeship, (2) financial implications and (3) practical experience associated with both degree courses and (4) the experience the pre-registration degree has to offer. CONCLUSION: There was an apparent lack of understanding regarding the degree apprenticeship leading students to misinterpret aspects of the course. Additionally, students highlighted the earning aspect of the apprenticeship to be an advantage in comparison to student debts associated with the traditional pre-registration programmes. Furthermore, students emphasised the advantage of the clinical focus practice associated with the degree apprenticeship. Nevertheless, students who have selected the HEI route still value what the traditional pre-registration degree offers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: As degree apprenticeship programmes become widely available, a greater awareness should, therefore, follow. In the interim, there is scope for HEIs to seek to raise awareness of degree apprenticeship provision. HEIs should seek to allay any concerns and highlight the benefits of having this alternative route into the profession.

Radiographer advanced and consultant practice and community diagnostic hubs - a vision for the future.

OBJECTIVES: This article combines a brief narrative review of the Richards Report with an overview of current radiographer advanced and consultant clinical practice (ACCP) to provide suggestions for future ACCP within radiography. KEY FINDINGS: The 'Diagnostics: Recovery and Renewal' report by Professor Sir Mike Richards, published in 2020, has identified a need for improvements to be made to diagnostic services. His recommendations include the introduction of Community Diagnostic Hubs (CDHs) that would provide quicker and easier access to diagnostic tests for patients(1) A narrative review around the concept of Advanced and Consultant Clinical Practice (ACCP) for radiographers demonstrates the capability of the radiographers to expand their role. The article concludes with a vision of how CDHs could potentially provide multiple career pathways for radiographers working at this level of practice. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is acknowledged that some of these concepts are a combination of visionary and aspirational in outlook rather than being entirely based on current practice. The intention of this article, and the implications for practice, are to support on-going discussions to enable radiography, as a profession, to seek ways and opportunities to do things differently whilst ensuring that the patient remains at the centre of the services delivered.