Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open Qual ; 11(4)2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36418070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: AWaRe is a tool to categorise and guide antibiotic use. Antibiotics are classified in three groups: Access, Watch and Reserve. The Access group contains first choice antibiotics for 25 of the most common infections. Antibiotics in the Watch and Reserve groups should be restricted to cases that cannot be effectively treated with drugs from the Access group. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate and adapt the WHO 2019 AWaRe classification for use with antibiotic usage data in Danish hospitals. The secondary aim was to study the usefulness of the abxaware; software package for visualisation and analysis of temporal trends in antibiotic use patterns. METHODS: We obtained data on purchases of antibiotics in Danish hospitals from January 2015 to July 2021. Sixty-seven unique drugs had been purchased. To better correspond with Danish guidelines, we moved two drugs one AWaRe level upwards. To help aggregate antibiotics according to AWaRe and visualise use patterns, we developed an R package, abxaware. RESULTS: After adding two drugs that were not included in the original AWaRe classification nearly all antibiotics (>99%) used in Danish hospitals were covered. The abxaware software package for R is a useful tool to help aggregate, visualise and analyse antibiotic use patterns. CONCLUSIONS: With minor modifications, we adapted the AWaRe classification to cover most antibiotics used in Danish hospitals and to reflect Danish treatment guidelines. The abxaware package is a useful tool to aggregate and plot antibiotic usage data according to the AWaRe classification and to test for non-random variation in the percentage use of Access antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Utilización de Medicamentos , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Dinamarca
2.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234308, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32525882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the leading causes of healthcare utilisation and death worldwide. Treatment according to evidence-based clinical guidelines can reduce mortality, antibiotic exposure and length of hospital stay related to CAP. LOCAL PROBLEM: Several studies, including a pilot study from one of our sites, indicate that physicians show a low grade of guideline adherence when managing patients with CAP. METHODS: To improve the guideline-based treatment of patients with CAP admitted to hospital, we designed a quality improvement study. Four process indicators were combined in a CAP care bundle: chest X-ray, CURB-65 severity score, lower respiratory tract samples and antibiotics within 8 hours from admission. After a 4-month baseline period, we applied multiple interventions at three hospitals during 8 months. Progression in our process indicators was measured continuously and compared with a control site without interventions. After the 8-month intervention period, we continued with a 4-month follow-up period to assess the sustainability of the improvements. RESULTS: The care bundle utilisation rate within 8 hours increased from 11% at baseline to 41% in the follow-up period at the intervention sites, whereas it remained below 3% at the control site. The most considerable improvements have been observed regarding documentation of CURB-65 (34% at baseline, 68% at follow-up) and the collection of lower respiratory tract samples (43% at baseline, 63% at follow-up). CONCLUSION: Our study has demonstrated poor adherence to CAP guidelines at all sites at baseline. After implementing multiple tailored interventions, guideline adherence increased substantially. In conclusion, we recommend that CAP guidelines should be actively adapted in order to be followed in a daily routine.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Paquetes de Atención al Paciente/normas , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico por imagen , Dinamarca , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Neumonía/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
4.
Open Microbiol J ; 6: 98-101, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23248717

RESUMEN

We conducted a retrospective epidemiologic study of catheter related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) in patients receiving long-term home parenteral nutrition (HPN) from January 2002 to December 2005. Our results showed that coagulase negative staphylococci (CoNS) were the most prevalent pathogens (44.7% of all CRBSI episodes), followed by Enterobacteriaceae (33.2%). Prevalence for candidemia and Enterococcus bacteremia was relatively high (14.4% and 10.8%, respectively). Cefuroxime resistance was observed in 65.4% CoNS and 31.5% Enterobacteriaceae. Based on the results from the study, a new empiric antimicrobial treatment regiment was suggested.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda