Pharmacokinetics of terbinafine in young children treated for tinea capitis.

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytes are the most common cause of human fungal infections. Response rates to existing therapy are lower than optimal, but newer agents like terbinafine hold promise for improved management of such infections. This investigation was designed to evaluate the single dose and steady state pharmacokinetics of terbinafine in young children with tinea capitis. METHODS: Twenty-two otherwise healthy children (4-8 years) with tinea capitis were eligible for enrollment. Children were treated with terbinafine once daily according to body weight (<25 kg, 125 mg; 25-35 kg, 187.5 mg), and pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted after the first dose, at the midpoint of treatment and at steady state. Plasma terbinafine concentrations were quantitated, and the pharmacokinetic indices compared with adult data. RESULTS: Absolute estimates of Cmax and area under the concentration curve (AUC)0-24 were comparable between children and adults for the administered dose; however, children demonstrated significantly lower estimates of exposure when dose was corrected for weight (Cmax SS 200 +/- 104 versus 454 +/- 185 ng/mL per mg/kg dose, P < 0.01; AUCSS: 1110 +/- 640 versus 2756 +/- 1775 ng*h/mL per mg/kg dose, P < 0.01). When examined along a continuum, age accounted for approximately 50% of the variability observed in dose-normalized Cmax and AUC (P < 0.01). A slight but significant reduction in apparent oral clearance was observed with increasing age (0.02 L/h/kg per yr) that likely accounts for the lesser degree of accumulation observed in children at steady state (accumulation ratio, 1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 2.3 +/- 0.6, P < 0.01). Adverse events consisted principally of headache (n = 3) and gastrointestinal complaints (altered eating habits n = 3, loss of appetite n = 3, stomachache n = 4, diarrhea n = 2). A reduction in neutrophil count was observed in 5 children and thought to be related to study drug in 2. CONCLUSIONS: Children require significantly larger weight-normalized doses to approximate the exposure estimates observed in adults. The dosing scheme used in this investigation results in absolute exposure estimates at steady state and a safety profile that are not appreciably different from adults.

Desloratadine has no clinically relevant electrocardiographic or pharmacodynamic interactions with ketoconazole.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to assess the electrocardiographic safety and pharmacokinetics of desloratadine in combination with the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole. DESIGN: A randomised, placebo-controlled, third-party-blind, 2-way crossover study. PARTICIPANTS: 24 healthy volunteers (12 men, 12 women; age 19 to 50 years). INTERVENTIONS: 7.5mg of desloratadine orally per day in combination with placebo or with 200mg of ketoconazole every 12 hours for 10 days. After a minimum 7-day washout period, participants received the alternative treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ECG parameters. RESULTS: Comparable maximum corrected QT (QT(c)) intervals were observed after coadministration of desloratadine and placebo or ketoconazole (431 and 435 msec, respectively). The desloratadine/ketoconazole combination did not induce any statistically significant or clinically relevant changes in QT(c), QT, PR or QRS intervals compared with desloratadine alone; ventricular rate was slightly slower when desloratadine was given with ketoconazole. At steady state, coadministration of ketoconazole resulted in no significant change in area under the desloratadine concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 24 hours compared with desloratadine/placebo. Coadministration of desloratadine and ketoconazole resulted in a 1.3-fold increase in desloratadine maximum concentration (C(max)) that was not clinically relevant. The most common adverse event was headache, reported in 42 and 38% of individuals, respectively, after coadministration of desloratadine/placebo and desloratadine/ketoconazole. There were no reports of dizziness or syncope. CONCLUSION: Coadministration of desloratadine and ketoconazole was well tolerated and was associated with minimal increase in AUC and C(max). The combination did not induce any clinically relevant electrocardiographic changes.

Desloratadine demonstrates dose proportionality in healthy adults after single doses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose proportionality and linearity and pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine after single oral doses over the range of 5 to 20mg. DESIGN: Single centre, randomised, open-label, 4-way crossover study in which healthy adults received single doses of desloratadine (5, 7.5, 10 and 20mg) in 4 different treatment periods. Desloratadine was administered each morning after a 10-hour fast. A washout period of at least 14 days separated each dose. Plasma concentrations were measured prior to each treatment and over the 168 hours after drug administration to determine the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)). PARTICIPANTS: 20 healthy male volunteers (3 White, 17 Black) ranging in age from 19 to 45 (mean 37) years and weighing 54 to 91 (mean 75) kg were enrolled and completed this study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary parameter to assess dose proportionality and linearity was AUC from time zero to final concentration time point (AUC(S)). RESULTS: The C(max) for all doses was observed approximately 4 hours after administration, revealing no dose-related differences in absorption rate. The half-life (t((1/2))) ranged from 21.2 to 24.1 hours. C(max) and AUC(S) increased in a dose-proportional manner over a dose range of 5 to 20mg. Although the recommended clinical dose is 5mg, doses up to 20mg were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this study, single doses of desloratadine as high as 4 times the recommended clinical dose of 5mg were well tolerated. The C(max) and AUC(S) for doses of 5 to 20mg increased in a dose-proportional manner.

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of desloratadine and fluoxetine in healthy volunteers.

The authors assessed the potential for a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic interaction between desloratadine and fluoxetine. This randomized, placebo-controlled, open-label study was conducted in 54 healthy volunteers. Subjects received 1 of 3 treatments: desloratadine 5 mg plus fluoxetine 20 mg, desloratadine 5 mg plus placebo, or fluoxetine 20 mg plus placebo. Serial electrocardiograms (ECGs) were performed at baseline and day 35. Treatment effects on C(max) and AUC were assessed. During coadministration of desloratadine with fluoxetine, the ratio of the mean log-transformed C(max) and AUC values for desloratadine following concomitant fluoxetine therapy revealed a small increase in C(max) values of 15% (90% confidence interval [CI], 95%-139%) but no increase for AUC values (90% CI, 82%-123%). Corresponding values for 3-OH desloratadine demonstrated small increases in mean log-transformed C(max) and AUC ratios: 17% (90% CI, 100%-136%) and 13% (90% CI, 96%-132%), respectively. Statistical evaluation of the ratio of the mean C(max) and AUC values for fluoxetine following concomitant desloratadine therapy revealed small decreases of 9% (90% CI, 72%-115%) and 11% (90% CI, 69%-113%), respectively. Corresponding values for norfluoxetine demonstrated modest increases in mean log-transformed C(max) and AUC ratios: 22% (90% CI, 100%-139%) and 18% (90% CI, 101%-136%), respectively. Coadministration of desloratadine with a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6 did not result in clinically relevant changes in its pharmacokinetic parameters. Desloratadine administration was not associated with clinically important changes in the pharmacokinetics of fluoxetine, a drug metabolized by CYP2D6. The most common adverse event in all groups was headache (65%). Desloratadine plus fluoxetine caused no significant changes in ECGs or ventricular rate.

Safety of desloratadine syrup in children.

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR) and acute urticaria are common childhood maladies. Typically, the firstline treatment options for both include non-sedating antihistamines. First-generation antihistamines, such as diphenhydramine and hydroxyzine, although useful, cause sedation. Desloratadine, an oral non-sedating antihistamine, has been shown in multiple studies to be safe and effective in relieving the symptoms of AR and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) in adults and adolescents. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: The current double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-center studies were undertaken to determine the safety and tolerability of desloratadine syrup in children aged 2 years-11 years with AR or CIU. Over 14 days, subjects aged 2 years-5 years were randomly assigned to receive once a day either 1.25 mg of desloratadine syrup (0.5 mg/mL) or matching placebo, and subjects aged 6 years-11 years were randomly assigned to receive once a day either 2.5 mg of desloratadine syrup or matching placebo. Safety evaluations included adverse event report collection, monitoring of vital signs, clinical laboratory measurements, and standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements. RESULTS: In the study involving subjects aged 2 years-5 years (n = 111), the incidence of adverse events was 7/55 for the group treated with desloratadine and 6/56 for placebo. In the study involving subjects aged 6 years-11 years (n = 120), the incidence of adverse events was 1/60 for the group treated with desloratadine and 6/60 for placebo. No severe or serious adverse events occurred, and no clinically relevant changes were noted in median clinical laboratory test values or mean vital signs in either group. ECG results from both age groups demonstrated no significant changes (p = NS) in mean ventricular rate or PR, QRS, or QT. No subjects had a Fridericia QT(c) interval > 440 ms at day 8 or day 15. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate the safety of desloratadine syrup in children aged 2 years-11 years with AR or CIU.

Once-daily evening dosing of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler does not adversely affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids can suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis with long-term exposure. This study reports the effects of moderate-dose (400 microg) mometasone furoate administered via dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) once daily in the evening on the HPA axis in adults with mild to moderate asthma. METHODS: In this randomized, investigator-blind, placebo-controlled trial, nonsmoking adults aged 18 to 50 years with mild-to-moderate asthma received once-daily MF-DPI 400 microg (2 x 200 microg/inhalation; treatment A), MF-DPI 400 microg (1 x 400 microg/inhalation; treatment B), or placebo (two inhalations, treatment C), delivered at approximately 8:00 pm, for 42 days. Primary end points were area under the serum cortisol concentration-vs-time curve over 24 h (AUC(0-24)), 24-h urinary free cortisol (creatinine corrected) on day 42, maximum serum cortisol concentration (C(max)), time to C(max) (T(max)), and 8 :00 am serum cortisol concentration. This study was initiated April 16, 2001 and completed June 14, 2001. RESULTS: Serum cortisol AUC(0-24), C(max), and 24-h urinary free cortisol levels decreased with all treatments by day 42 with no significant differences between groups. For treatment B, the change in 8:00 am serum cortisol from baseline to day 42 was significantly less than placebo (P = .04), attributed to a large baseline difference between these treatments. A significant difference in T(max) change from baseline by day 42 for treatment B compared with the other treatments (P = .019) was also attributed to significant baseline differences between groups. Actual values at day 42 for T(max) and 8:00 am serum cortisol were not significantly different between treatment groups (P > or = .275). CONCLUSIONS: Once-evening moderate dosing (400 microg) MF-DPI does not suppress HPA axis function in adults with mild to moderate asthma.

Study of the pharmacokinetic interaction of vildagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Metformin is widely used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes, often as first-line therapy; however, many patients with type 2 diabetes are unable to maintain adequate glycemic control with metformin alone. Vildagliptin, an orally active, potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-4) inhibitor, may represent an appropriate antihyperglycemic agent for combination with metformin to improve glycemic control in such patients. This study assessed the effects of coadministration of vildagliptin and metformin on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of each drug. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this open-label, single-center, randomized, three-period, three-treatment crossover study, 17 patients with type 2 diabetes received vildagliptin 100 mg once daily; metformin 1000 mg once daily; or vildagliptin 100 mg once daily plus metformin 1000 mg once daily. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic sampling were taken frequently on the final day (Day 5) of each treatment period. Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction was defined as the ratio of geometric mean (GMR) and 90% confidence interval (CI) for combination:monotherapy being within the range 0.80-1.25. RESULTS: Coadministration with metformin had no effect on vildagliptin AUC(0-24) (GMR, 0.94; 90% CI 0.90, 0.99) although there was an 18% decrease in vildagliptin C(max) (GMR 0.82; 90% CI 0.73, 0.91). Coadministration with vildagliptin had no effect on metformin C(max) (GMR 1.04; 90% CI 0.94, 1.16). but caused a 15% increase in AUC(0-24) (GMR 1.15; 90% CI 1.06, 1.25). Both monotherapies and combination therapy were well tolerated. Seven patients reported a total of 10 adverse events; none was serious. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of vildagliptin and metformin had a small effect on the pharmacokinetics of each drug in patients with type 2 diabetes; however, this is not likely to be clinically relevant. This small, open-label trial suggests that vildagliptin could be coadministered with metformin without any dose adjustment for either agent.

Effects of age, gender, and race/ethnicity on the pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in healthy volunteers.

Posaconazole is a triazole antifungal for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection and treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis. We evaluated the effects of gender, age, and race/ethnicity (black or white) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in two studies on healthy adult subjects (>or=18 years of age). Additionally, we explored the effect of P-glycoprotein expression and MDR1 genotype on posaconazole pharmacokinetics in black and white subjects. Age, gender, and race/ethnicity had no clinically relevant effects on posaconazole pharmacokinetics. No association was observed between any MDR1 single-nucleotide polymorphism and the area under the concentration-time curve for posaconazole. Posaconazole was safe and well tolerated regardless of age, gender, or race/ethnicity. In conclusion, age, gender, and race/ethnicity have no clinically relevant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of posaconazole in healthy adults; therefore, dosage adjustments based on these covariates are unnecessary.