Pharmacokinetics of bilirubin-10-sulfonate and biliverdin in the rat.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Biliverdin (BV) administration induces antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, with previous reports also identifying anti-anaphylactic potential. Interestingly however, intra-duodenal administration of BV in rats leads to the formation of bilirubin-10-sulfonate (BRS), which might be responsible for BV's purported effects. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: This study aimed to assess the intravenous, intraperitoneal and intraduodenal pharmacokinetics of BRS and BV in order to assess their therapeutic potential in future studies. Bile and venous blood were intermittently collected before and after administration, which was subsequently analysed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for quantification of bile pigment concentrations. KEY RESULTS: Interestingly, i.p. BRS administration led to a greater circulating concentration and had a reduced excretion rate, which resulted in a substantially elevated AUC180 when compared to BV administration. Furthermore, BRS was excreted intact in the bile, in contrast to BV which was excreted after chemical reduction and conjugation. Intraperitoneal and intraduodenal administration substantially increased blood BRS concentrations (p<0.05), however, the bioavailability of BV was higher than BRS following i.p. administration (i.p. BV 28.4%, BRS 15.5%) but lower following i.d. administration (i.d. BV 0.04%, BRS 0.07%), over 180 minutes. When BRS was administered i.v., BRS had a significantly (p<0.05) longer distribution (191.9 vs 54.1 minutes) half-life compared to BV, and significantly reduced (p<0.05) volume of distribution (0.026 vs 0.145 L kg-1). As a consequence, intraperitoneal and intraduodenal administration resulted in significantly greater blood concentrations of BRS (p<0.05) over 180 minutes. Therefore, BRS may be more likely to induce antioxidant or molecular effects, when compared to BV, due to greater concentrations and a longer half-life. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cumulatively, these data demonstrate that BRS has a superior pharmacokinetic profile when compared to BV, which is a result of its resistance to hepatic metabolism and excretion. These data therefore provide a basis to explore the capacity of BRS to protect from inflammatory pathology.

Biliverdin and bilirubin sulfonate inhibit monosodium urate induced sterile inflammation in the rat.

BACKGROUND: Biliverdin, a by-product of haem catabolism, possesses potent endogenous antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. Bilirubin-C10-sulfonate (BRS), an active metabolite formed after enteral administration of BV in the rat, also possess antioxidant properties. Therefore, we investigated the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of BV and BRS in an in vivo model of monosodium urate induced sterile inflammation. METHODS: Subcutaneous air pouches were created on the dorsal flanks of Wistar rats (10-12 weeks of age). Prior to stimulation of the 6-day old pouch with monosodium urate (25 mg), groups were pre-treated with intraperitoneal BRS (27 mg/kg) and BV (27 mg/kg). Total and differential leukocyte counts were determined in pouch fluid aspirate at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after monosodium urate stimulation. Biliverdin (BV), BRS and unconjugated bilirubin (UCB) concentrations in the serum and pouch fluid were quantified using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pouch fluid cytokine concentrations (IL-1ß, IL-1α, TNF-α, IL-17A, IL-12, GM-CSF, IL-33, IFN-γ, IL-18, IL-10, MCP-1, CXCL-1 and IL-6) were assessed after 6 h. In addition, 24 h protein carbonyl and chloramine concentrations were assessed in pouch fluid using ELISA and spectrophotometry, respectively. RESULTS: BRS and BV significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited leukocyte (total, neutrophil and macrophage) infiltration into the pouch fluid from 6 to 48 h. For example, after 6 h neutrophil counts decreased following BRS (0.32 ± 0.11 × 106 cells mL-1) and BV (0.17 ± 0.03 × 106 cells mL-1) compared to MSU only (3.51 ± 1.07 × 106 cells mL-1). Both BV and BRS significantly (p < 0.05) reduced pouch GM-CSF (BV: 5.8 ± 1.2 pg mL-1, BRS: 6.9 ± 1.5 pg mL-1 vs MSU only: 13.0 ± 1.9 pg mL-1) and MCP-1 concentrations at 6 h (BV: 1804 ± 269 pg mL-1, BRS: 7927 ± 2668 pg mL-1 vs MSU only: 17,290 ± 4503 pg ml-1), whilst BV additionally inhibited IL-6 (4354 ± 977 pg mL-1 vs MSU only: 25,070 ± 5178 pg mL-1) and IL-18 (17.6 ± 2.0 pg mL-1 vs MSU only: 81.5 ± 19.9 pg mL-1) concentrations at 6 h (p < 0.05). Despite these differences, no change in pouch chloramine or protein carbonyl concentrations occurred at 24 h (p > 0.05). Serum BV concentrations rapidly diminished over 6 h, however, BRS was readily detected in the serum over 48 h, and in pouch fluid over 12 h. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to elucidate anti-inflammatory activity of BRS and the efficacy of BV administration in a model of gouty inflammation. Reduced leukocyte infiltration and cytokine production in response to sterile inflammation further support the importance of these molecules in physiology and their therapeutic potential in sterile inflammation.