Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 218
Filtrar
1.
Circulation ; 149(2): 124-134, 2024 01 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031887

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Primary aldosteronism, characterized by overt renin-independent aldosterone production, is a common but underrecognized form of hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Growing evidence suggests that milder and subclinical forms of primary aldosteronism are highly prevalent, yet their contribution to cardiovascular disease is not well characterized. METHODS: This prospective study included 1284 participants between the ages of 40 and 69 years from the randomly sampled population-based CARTaGENE cohort (Québec, Canada). Regression models were used to analyze associations of aldosterone, renin, and the aldosterone-to-renin ratio with the following measures of cardiovascular health: arterial stiffness, assessed by central blood pressure (BP) and pulse wave velocity; adverse cardiac remodeling, captured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, including indexed maximum left atrial volume, left ventricular mass index, left ventricular remodeling index, and left ventricular hypertrophy; and incident hypertension. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of participants was 54 (8) years and 51% were men. The mean (SD) systolic and diastolic BP were 123 (15) and 72 (10) mm Hg, respectively. At baseline, 736 participants (57%) had normal BP and 548 (43%) had hypertension. Higher aldosterone-to-renin ratio, indicative of renin-independent aldosteronism (ie, subclinical primary aldosteronism), was associated with increased arterial stiffness, including increased central BP and pulse wave velocity, along with adverse cardiac remodeling, including increased indexed maximum left atrial volume, left ventricular mass index, and left ventricular remodeling index (all P<0.05). Higher aldosterone-to-renin ratio was also associated with higher odds of left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio, 1.32 [95% CI, 1.002-1.73]) and higher odds of developing incident hypertension (odds ratio, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.03-1.62]). All the associations were consistent when assessing participants with normal BP in isolation and were independent of brachial BP. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of brachial BP, a biochemical phenotype of subclinical primary aldosteronism is negatively associated with cardiovascular health, including greater arterial stiffness, adverse cardiac remodeling, and incident hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hiperaldosteronismo , Hipertensión , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Aldosterona , Remodelación Ventricular , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/epidemiología , Hipertrofia Ventricular Izquierda/complicaciones , Renina , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hiperaldosteronismo/complicaciones , Hiperaldosteronismo/epidemiología , Atrios Cardíacos
2.
Circulation ; 149(8): e347-e913, 2024 02 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38264914

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association (AHA), in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, nutrition, sleep, and obesity) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, glucose control, and metabolic syndrome) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The AHA Heart Disease and Stroke Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, brain health, complications of pregnancy, kidney disease, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, sudden cardiac arrest, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, valvular disease, venous thromboembolism, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS: The AHA, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States and globally to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2024 AHA Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2023 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and AHA staff members. The AHA strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional global data, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains. RESULTS: Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS: The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Cardiopatías , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , American Heart Association , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Obesidad/epidemiología
3.
Circulation ; 147(8): e93-e621, 2023 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36695182

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs). METHODS: The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2023 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2022 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. The American Heart Association strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) publications, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains. RESULTS: Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics. CONCLUSIONS: The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Cardiopatías , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , American Heart Association , COVID-19/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Cardiopatías/epidemiología
4.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol ; 325(1): F99-F104, 2023 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37262087

RESUMEN

Hypertension is among the most prevalent medical conditions globally and a major contributor to chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and death. Prevention through nonpharmacological, population-level interventions is critically needed to halt this worldwide epidemic. However, there are ongoing disagreements as to where public policy efforts should focus. Recently the Salt Substitute and Stroke Study demonstrated the efficacy of substituting table salt with potassium salt to reduce the risk of stroke, major cardiovascular events, and death. However, this sparked debate over whether sodium or potassium should be prioritized in countries where table salt substitution was less feasible. In this commentary, we summarize arguments in favor of either strategy: reduced sodium or increased potassium intake. Moreover, we discuss evidence and policy approaches related to either or combined approaches relevant to cultural context. Ultimately, there is an urgent need for policies that both reduce sodium and increase potassium intake; however, identifying a strategy that fits cultural context will be key to improve population-wide blood pressures.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Potasio , Sodio , Cloruro de Sodio Dietético/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología
5.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 81(1): 48-58.e1, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35870570

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Collaborative approaches to vascular access selection are being increasingly encouraged to elicit patients' preferences and priorities where no unequivocally superior choice exists. We explored how patients, their caregivers, and clinicians integrate principles of shared decision making when engaging in vascular access discussions. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative description. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients, their caregivers, and clinicians from outpatient hemodialysis programs in Alberta, Canada. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: We used a thematic analysis approach to inductively code transcripts and generate themes to capture key concepts related to vascular access shared decision making across participant roles. RESULTS: 42 individuals (19 patients, 2 caregivers, 21 clinicians) participated in this study. Participants identified how access-related decisions follow a series of major decisions about kidney replacement therapy and care goals that influence vascular access preferences and choice. Vascular access shared decision making was strengthened through integration of vascular access selection with dialysis-related decisions and timely, tailored, and balanced exchange of information between patients and their care team. Participants described how opportunities to revisit the vascular access decision before and after dialysis initiation helped prepare patients for their access and encouraged ongoing alignment between patients' care priorities and treatment plans. Where shared decision making was undermined, hemodialysis via a catheter ensued as the most readily available vascular access option. LIMITATIONS: Our study was limited to patients and clinicians from hemodialysis care settings and included few caregiver participants. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that earlier, or upstream, decisions about kidney replacement therapies influence how and when vascular access decisions are made. Repeated vascular access discussions that are integrated with other higher-level decisions are needed to promote vascular access shared decision making and preparedness.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal , Prioridad del Paciente , Alberta , Toma de Decisiones
6.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 38(7): 1682-1690, 2023 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36316015

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The transition from chronic kidney disease (CKD) to kidney failure is a vulnerable time for patients, with suboptimal transitions associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Whether social determinants of health are associated with suboptimal transitions is not well understood. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 1070 patients with advanced CKD who were referred to the Ottawa Hospital Multi-Care Kidney Clinic and developed kidney failure (dialysis or kidney transplantation) between 2010 and 2021. Social determinant information, including education level, employment status and marital status, was collected under routine clinic protocol. Outcomes surrounding suboptimal transition included inpatient (versus outpatient) dialysis starts, pre-emptive (versus delayed) access creation and pre-emptive kidney transplantation. We examined the association between social determinants of health and suboptimal transition outcomes using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The mean age and estimated glomerular filtration rate were 63 years and 18 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Not having a high school degree was associated with higher odds for an inpatient dialysis start compared with having a college degree {odds ratio [OR] 1.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-2.69]}. Unemployment was associated with higher odds for an inpatient dialysis start [OR 1.85 (95% CI 1.18-2.92)], lower odds for pre-emptive access creation [OR 0.53 (95% CI 0.34-0.82)] and lower odds for pre-emptive kidney transplantation [OR 0.48 (95% CI 0.24-0.96)] compared with active employment. Being single was associated with higher odds for an inpatient dialysis start [OR 1.44 (95% CI 1.07-1.93)] and lower odds for pre-emptive access creation [OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.89)] compared with being married. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health, including education, employment and marital status, are associated with suboptimal transitions from CKD to kidney failure.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Humanos , Diálisis Renal , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
7.
Intern Med J ; 53(10): 1739-1751, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37493367

RESUMEN

Resistant hypertension (RHT) is typically defined as blood pressure that remains above guideline-directed targets despite the use of three anti-hypertensives, usually including a diuretic, at optimal or maximally tolerated doses. It is generally estimated to affect 10-30% of those diagnosed with hypertension, though the true incidence might be lower after one factor in the prevalence of non-adherence. Risk factors for its development include diabetes, obesity and other adverse lifestyle factors, and a diagnosis of RHT confers a greater risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as stroke, heart failure and mortality. It is essential to exclude pseudoresistance and secondary hypertension and to ensure non-pharmacologic management is optimised prior to consideration of fourth-line anti-hypertensive agents or advanced interventions, such as device therapies. In this review, we will cover the different definitions of RHT, along with the importance of careful diagnosis and management strategies, and discuss newer agents and research needs.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Diuréticos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 80(4): 462-472.e1, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35588905

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Race-free estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations incorporating creatinine with and without cystatin C were recently developed and recommended for routine use. However, the performance of these equations among kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study to validate the 2021 race-free Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) eGFR equation based on creatinine alone (eGFRcr) or based on creatinine and cystatin C (eGFRcr-cys) among KTRs. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: KTRs in stable condition (N = 415) from Canada and New Zealand with same-day measurements of creatinine, cystatin C, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. TESTS COMPARED: The 2009 CKD-EPI eGFRcr, 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr, 2012 CKD-EPI eGFRcr-cys, 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr-cys, 2012 CKD-EPI eGFRcys, and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study eGFR equations were compared with measured GFR. OUTCOMES: Bias, precision, accuracy, and correct classification by CKD stage. Bias was defined as the difference between estimated and measured GFR. Precision was represented by the interquartile range. Accuracy was defined as the percentages of participants with eGFRs within 10%/20%/30% (P10/P20/P30) of measured GFR, root mean square error, and mean absolute error. RESULTS: 87% of patients studied were White, 3% Black, and 10% other races. Mean measured GFR was 53 ± 19 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m2. The 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr equations demonstrated similar median bias (-2.3 vs -0.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively), precision (14.5 vs 14.9 mL/min/1.73 m2), and accuracy (P10/P20/P30, 32%/65%/84% vs 33%/63%/84%). The 2012 and 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr-cys equations also demonstrated similar median bias (-3.6 vs 0.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively), precision (13.3 vs 14.3 mL/min/1.73 m2), and accuracy (P10/P20/P30, 32%/63%/80% vs 32%/67%/83%). No clear difference in performance was detected between the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr and eGFRcr-cys equations among KTRs. The proportion of correct classification by CKD stage was similar across all eGFR equations. LIMITATIONS: Moderate sample size, few patients had a GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and the large majority of patients were White. CONCLUSIONS: Among KTRs, the 2021 race-free CKD-EPI eGFR equations perform similarly to the previous CKD-EPI equations that included race correction terms. No significant difference in performance was observed between the 2021 CKD-EPI eGFRcr and eGFRcr-cys equations in the kidney transplant population.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Creatinina , Estudios Transversales , Cistatina C , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/cirugía
9.
Postgrad Med J ; 98(1159): 372-379, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33637639

RESUMEN

AIM: The aim of this study was to systematically appraise the quality of a sample of COVID-19-related systematic reviews (SRs) and discuss internal validity threats affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence. DESIGN: We conducted a scoping review of the literature. SRs with or without meta-analysis (MA) that evaluated clinical data, outcomes or treatments for patients with COVID-19 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We extracted quality characteristics guided by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews-2 to calculate a qualitative score. Complementary evaluation of the most prominent published limitations affecting the COVID-19 body of evidence was performed. RESULTS: A total of 63 SRs were included. The majority were judged as a critically low methodological quality. Most of the studies were not guided by a pre-established protocol (39, 62%). More than half (39, 62%) failed to address risk of bias when interpreting their results. A comprehensive literature search strategy was reported in most SRs (54, 86%). Appropriate use of statistical methods was evident in nearly all SRs with MAs (39, 95%). Only 16 (33%) studies recognised heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19 as a limitation of the study, and 15 (24%) recognised repeated patient populations as a limitation. CONCLUSION: The methodological and reporting quality of current COVID-19 SR is far from optimal. In addition, most of the current SRs fail to address relevant threats to their internal validity, including repeated patients and heterogeneity in the definition of severe COVID-19. Adherence to proper study design and peer-review practices must remain to mitigate current limitations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sesgo , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
10.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 73(3): 499-514, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608223

RESUMEN

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after ICM administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. This revised guidance document was developed by a multidisciplinary CAR Working Group of radiologists and nephrologists, and summarizes changes in practice related to contrast administration, screening, and risk stratification since the last guideline. It reviews the scientific evidence for contrast associated AKI and provides consensus-based recommendations for its prevention and management in the Canadian healthcare context. This article is a joint publication in the Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal and Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, intended to inform both communities of practice.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Canadá , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Humanos , Riñón , Radiólogos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 77(2): 178-189.e1, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920153

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVES: Alpha-blockers (ABs) are commonly prescribed for control of resistant or refractory hypertension in patients with and without chronic kidney disease (CKD). The association between AB use and kidney, cardiac, mortality, and safety-related outcomes in CKD remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Population-based retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS: Ontario (Canada) residents 66 years and older treated for hypertension in 2007 to 2015 without a prior prescription for an AB. EXPOSURES: New use of an AB versus new use of a non-AB blood pressure (BP)-lowering medication. OUTCOMES: 30% or greater estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline; dialysis initiation or kidney transplantation (kidney replacement therapy); composite of acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation; safety (hypotension, syncope, falls, and fractures) events; and mortality. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: New users of ABs (doxazosin, terazosin, and prazosin) were matched to new users of non-ABs by a high dimensional propensity score. Cox proportional hazards and Fine and Gray models were used to examine the association of AB use with kidney, cardiac, mortality, and safety outcomes. Interactions by eGFR categories (≥90, 60-89, 30-59, and<30mL/min/1.73m2) were explored. RESULTS: Among 381,120 eligible individuals, 16,088 were dispensed ABs and matched 1:1 to non-AB users. AB use was associated with higher risk for≥30% eGFR decline (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21) and need for kidney replacement therapy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.13-1.44). eGFR level did not modify these associations, P interaction=0.3and 0.3, respectively. Conversely, AB use was associated with lower risk for cardiac events, which was also consistent across eGFR categories (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89-0.95; P interaction=0.1). AB use was also associated with lower mortality risk, but only among those with eGFR<60mL/min/1.73m2 (P interaction<0.001): HRs were 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.93) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.80) for eGFR of 30 to 59 and<30mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, BP measurement data unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: AB use in CKD is associated with higher risk for kidney disease progression but lower risk for cardiac events and mortality compared with alternative BP-lowering medications.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/metabolismo , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidentes por Caídas/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Doxazosina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Mortalidad , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ontario/epidemiología , Prazosina/análogos & derivados , Prazosina/uso terapéutico , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síncope/inducido químicamente
12.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 29(1): 152-160, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31725007

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, doubt has been cast on the existence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The skepticism has stemmed from observational studies from large administrative healthcare databases. Although they correctly call that contrast-induced acute kidney injury is less common than previously thought, they cannot completely exclude selection bias. RECENT FINDINGS: Though less common than previously thought, contrast-induced acute kidney injury still exists. The only prophylactic method that remains valid is that of isotonic volume expansion, which is still deemed beneficial in high-risk patients. N-acetylcysteine and sodium bicarbonate are ineffective and their use should be abandoned. SUMMARY: Contrast-induced kidney injury should be defined based on clinical grounds, not merely on biochemical numbers. More research to validate a clinical definition is necessary in order to accurately re-examine its incidence.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Acetilcisteína/uso terapéutico , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Concentración Osmolar
13.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 35(4): 360-367, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32487944

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular events, and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The kidneys play a causative role in hypertension, but they are also organs vulnerable to hypertensive injury. Thus far, goals for optimal blood pressure in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESKD patients are not fully elucidated. Herein, we critically review the existing evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) continue to be deemed as the best source of evidence to guide optimal blood pressure goals in CKD and ESKD patients. Despite recent advances, the growing body of literature does not permit drawing definitive conclusions. Few adequately powered RCTs have specifically assessed goals for treatment of hypertension in patients with CKD. The most recent large RCT in hypertension, the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, included a subset of patients with CKD and provided some insights. For the ESKD population, trials to evaluate blood pressure goals are even more scarce. The Blood Pressure in Dialysis Trial was a relatively small pilot study that can be deemed as hypothesis generating. SUMMARY: Management of hypertension in CKD is essential for optimization of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and renal outcomes. To date, the existing evidence does not fully clarify ideal targets for blood pressure control in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Cardiología , Hipertensión/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Diálisis Renal
14.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 28(2): 163-170, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30531470

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Strong epidemiological and pathologic evidence associates NSAIDs with kidney disease, both acute and chronic. Hence, the usage of NSAIDs has decreased in patients with, or at risk for, chronic kidney disease (CKD). Coupled with this has been a rise in use of opioids and other non-NSAID alternatives, which do come with significant, and underrecognized, risk of nonrenal adverse events. We review the literature to understand if this shift is appropriate or deleterious. RECENT FINDINGS: NSAIDs do have a low but tangible risk in causing acute kidney injury, electrolyte imbalances, and increasing blood pressure. However, their role in causing progressive kidney disease is due to long-term usage in high cumulative dosages, and the use of NSAIDs in combination with other agents. Alternatives such as opioids, tramadol, gabapentin and baclofen have weak evidence to support their use and strong evidence to show their harm in patients with CKD. SUMMARY: Tradeoffs are inherent in using active pharmaceuticals, and NSAIDs are no exception. Balancing potential benefits with possible adverse effects around pain management should be a part of every conversation for patients with kidney disease.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/inducido químicamente , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Gabapentina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Pregabalina/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Tramadol/uso terapéutico
16.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 73(4): 467-475, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30642607

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines discourage the use of central venous catheters (CVCs) for vascular access in dialysis. However, some patients have inadequate vessels for arteriovenous fistula creation or choose to use a dialysis catheter. The risks associated with CVC use and their relationship to patient age are poorly characterized. STUDY DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Cohort of 1,041 patients older than 18 years from 5 Canadian dialysis programs who initiated outpatient maintenance hemodialysis therapy with a tunneled CVC between 2004 and 2012 and who had no creation of an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft. EXPOSURES: Age, sex, body size, initiating dialysis therapy in the hospital, and comorbid conditions. OUTCOMES: CVC-related procedures, hospitalization, and death. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Complications were reported as a cumulative risk at 1 and 2 years. Cox proportional hazards regression for recurrent events was used to evaluate risk factors for study outcomes. RESULTS: At 1 year, risks for CVC-related bacteremia, malfunction, and central stenosis were 9%, 15%, and 2%, respectively. Risks for any CVC-related complication at 1 and 2 years were 30% and 38%, respectively. Death related to CVC complications occurred in 6 of 1,041 (0.5%) patients. Compared with patients younger than 60 years, patients aged 70 to 79 and those 80 years or older experienced lower rates of CVC complications: HRs of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.52-0.85; P = 0.001) and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.52-0.92; P = 0.01), respectively. LIMITATIONS: This Canadian dialysis population may not be representative of populations in other countries. CVC use was not compared with other types of hemodialysis vascular access. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-third of hemodialysis patients who used tunneled CVCs during 1 to 2 years experienced complications. Bacteremia occurred in ∼9% of patients at 1 year and were the most common cause of CVC-related hospitalizations. CVC-related death was infrequent. This information could be used to communicate the risk for CVC complications to patients treated with this type of hemodialysis vascular access.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/etiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Canadá/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo
17.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 2019 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31221528

RESUMEN

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the authors and editors because after publication of the Article in Press, the authors discovered that there had been an error in the programming of the statistical analysis. Once the error was corrected, the conclusions of the article were no longer supported. The Publisher and authors apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

18.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 73(1): 62-71, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30122545

RESUMEN

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Fistulas are the preferred form of hemodialysis access; however, many fistulas fail to mature into usable accesses after creation. Data for outcomes after placement of a second fistula are limited. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: People who initiated hemodialysis therapy in any of 5 Canadian dialysis programs (2004-2012) and had at least 1 hemodialysis fistula placed. PREDICTOR: Second versus initial fistula; receipt of 2 versus 1 fistula; second versus first fistula in recipients of 2 fistulas. OUTCOMES: Catheter-free fistula use during 1 year following initiation of hemodialysis therapy or following fistula creation, if created after hemodialysis therapy start; proportion of time with catheter-free use; time to catheter free use; time of functional patency. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Logistic regression; fractional regression. RESULTS: Among the 1,091 study participants (mean age, 64±15 [SD] years; 63% men; 59% with diabetes), 901 received 1 and 190 received 2 fistulas. 38% of second fistulas versus 46% of first fistulas were used catheter free at least once. Average percentages of time that second and initial fistulas were used catheter free were 34% and 42%, respectively (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54-0.94). Compared with people who received 1 fistula, those who received 2 fistulas were less likely to achieve catheter-free use (26% vs 56%) and remain catheter free (23% vs 49% of time; OR, 0.30, 95% CI, 0.24-0.39). Among people who received 2 fistulas, the proportion of time that the second fistula was used catheter free was 11% higher with each 10% greater proportion of time that the first fistula was used catheter free (95% CI, 1%-22%). Model discrimination was modest (C index, 0.69). LIMITATIONS: Unknown criteria for patient selection for 1 or 2 fistulas; unknown reasons for prolonged catheter use. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of a second fistula may be inferior to outcomes of the initial fistula. First and second fistula outcomes are weakly correlated and difficult to predict based on clinical characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Derivación Arteriovenosa Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
BMC Nephrol ; 20(1): 390, 2019 10 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31660884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuropsychiatric conditions such as depression, delirium and cognitive impairment are common in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and individuals suffering from ESKD are more likely to commit suicide than members of the general population. Self-harm gestures are not infrequent for ESKD patients suffering from depression, but not well described in other conditions. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of self-harm in a patient with ESKD suffering from acute delirium. A man in his mid-seventies was admitted with fungal peritoneal dialysis (PD) associated peritonitis. On the first day post operatively, he was found with absent vital signs due to exsanguination from newly inserted central catheter which he which had self-severed. He died a few days later as a result of the self-harm gesture. CONCLUSION: This case highlights that delirium may lead to self-harm events in ESKD and identifies a few strategies to help reduce the risk of self-harm events.


Asunto(s)
Delirio/psicología , Exsanguinación/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Diálisis Renal , Anciano , Catéteres Venosos Centrales , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Conducta Autodestructiva
20.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 70(3): 226-232, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31255393

RESUMEN

In 2017, the Canadian Association of Radiologists issued a clinical practice guideline (CPG) regarding the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), or on dialysis due to mounting evidence indicating that nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) occurs with extreme rarity or not at all when using Group II GBCAs or the Group III GBCA gadoxetic acid (compared to first generation Group I linear GBCAs). One of the goals of the work group was to re-evaluate the CPG after 24 months to determine the effect of more liberal use of GBCA on reported cases of NSF in patients with AKI, CKD Stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or those that are dialysis-dependent. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted by a subcommittee of the initial CPG panel between the dates of January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018 to identify new unconfounded cases of NSF linked to Group II or Group III GBCAs and an updated CPG developed. To our knowledge, when using a Group II or Group III GBCA between 2017-2018, only a single unconfounded case report of a fibrosing dermopathy has been reported in a patient who received gadobenate dimeglumine with Stage 2 CKD. No other unconfounded cases of NSF have been reported with Group II or III agents in during this timeframe. The subcommittee concluded that the main recommendations from the 2017 CPG should remain unaltered, but agreed that screening for renal disease in the outpatient setting is no longer justifiable, cost-effective or recommended. Patients on hemodialysis (HD) should, however, be identified prior to GBCA administration to arrange timely HD to optimize gadolinium clearance, although there remains no evidence that HD reduces the risk of NSF. When administering Group II or III GBCAs to patients with AKI, on dialysis or with severe CKD, informed consent relating to NSF is also no longer explicitly recommended.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Gadolinio , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Canadá , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiólogos , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda