Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
Prev Med ; 185: 108038, 2024 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38857769

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing prevalence of substance use disorders (SUD), few patients are diagnosed and treated in primary care settings. This study evaluated changes in knowledge, confidence, and intention to implement screening and brief intervention (SBI) and SUD treatment after clinicians participated in an asynchronous online education course. METHODS: A self-selected sample of primary care clinicians in Texas participated in online SBI and SUD education March 2021-July 2023. Baseline and post-training surveys evaluated changes in knowledge, confidence, and intent to implement SBI and SUD treatment. Changes were compared using paired t-tests. Multivariable linear regression examined factors potentially associated with confidence and intention to implement changes. Clinician feedback regarding the course was included. RESULTS: Of 613 respondents, 50.9% were practicing family medicine clinicians. Knowledge of adolescent screening tools increased from 21.9% to 75.7% (p < 0.001). Knowledge about the number of drinks that define excessive drinking among non-pregnant women increased from 24.5% at baseline to 64.9% (p < 0.001). Clinicians reported lowest confidence in providing opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy, which improved after program participation. Intent to implement SBI and medication for alcohol, nicotine and opioid use disorders increased (p < 0.001) after training. No factors were associated with change in confidence or intention to implement in multivariable models (p > 0.05). Satisfaction was high and nearly 60% reported intention to change their clinical practice because of the program. CONCLUSION: Knowledge, confidence, and intent to implement SBI and SUD treatment increased after completing the online course. Clinician satisfaction was high and demonstrated improved intention to implement SBI and SUD treatment.

2.
Cult Health Sex ; 26(1): 30-45, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37105132

RESUMEN

This study investigated the association between gender role beliefs and the prevalence and likelihood of experiencing pregnancy among 8525 young women and girls aged 13-19 years in Colombia. The primary outcome of interest was adolescent pregnancy. Retrospective cross-sectional analysis utilised data from the 2015 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) in Colombia, which included an add-on questionnaire on gender relations. Our analysis measured both pregnancy prevalence and pregnancy likelihood in relation to gender role beliefs. With one exception, young women who disagreed with traditionally conforming gender roles had a lower prevalence of pregnancy and were less likely to experience pregnancy than those who agreed with them. The highest likelihood of pregnancy prevalence and likelihood was found among those who agreed with statements suggesting male dominance and those who agreed with women's homemaking responsibilities. The greater the adherence to traditionally conforming gender role beliefs, the higher the likelihood of experiencing pregnancy during adolescence. Girls' and young women's adherence to traditional gender role beliefs appeared to be a risk factor for adolescent pregnancy. Our findings support Colombia's current sex education policies and practices within the framework of gender equity, and evidence the link between gender equity and girls' and young women's reproductive health.


Asunto(s)
Embarazo en Adolescencia , Embarazo , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Rol de Género , Colombia/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Prev Med ; 175: 107686, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37648086

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Geographic patterns of lung cancer mortality rate differ in the region bordering Mexico in contrast to the US. This study compares lung cancer mortality between border and non-border counties by race/ethnicity and gender. METHODS: This study utilized population-level death certificate data from US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Internet Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research dataset between 1999 and 2020. Established algorithms were implemented to examine lung cancer deaths among US residents. We analyzed the age-adjusted data by year, race/ethnicity, gender, and geographic region. Joinpoint regression was used to determine mortality trends across time. RESULTS: Lung cancer mortality rates were lower in border counties compared to non-border counties across time (p < 0.05). Hispanic lung cancer mortality rates were not different in border counties compared to non-border counties during the same period (p > 0.05). Lung cancer mortality among non-Hispanic White living in border counties was lower than non-Hispanic White residing in non-border counties (p < 0.01), and non-Hispanic Black living in border counties had lower lung cancer mortality than non-Hispanic Black in non-border counties in all but three years (p < 0.05). Both female and male mortality rates were lower in border counties compared to non-border counties (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Differences in lung cancer mortality between border counties and non-border counties reflect lower mortality in Hispanics overall and a decline for non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black living in border counties experiencing lower lung cancer mortality rates than non-border counties. Further studies are needed to identify specific causes for lower mortality rates in border counties.

4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(7): 1230-1236, 2022 04 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34218280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have demonstrated differences in oral human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence by sex and race/ethnicity. In this study, we examined the impact of vaccination on these disparities. METHODS: We examined participants aged 18-59 years in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011 to 2016 who reported their HPV vaccination status and submitted an adequate oral sample (N = 9437). Oral prevalence of HPV, grouped by any, low-risk, high-risk, 4 valent (4v) HPV, 9 valent (9v) HPV, and nonvaccine types, was examined by sex, race/ethnicity, and vaccination status. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios by vaccination status. Multivariable logistic regression models controlled for age, sex, and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: The prevalence of any, nonvaccine, low-risk, high-risk, 4vHPV, and 9vHPV types was higher among males than females, even among vaccinated participants. Examination of racial/ethnic differences demonstrated differences in all HPV groups among unvaccinated males and among low-risk types in females. In all but the 2 vaccine-type groups, the prevalence of oral HPV was notably higher among Black males compared with other groups. Significant differences were not observed by race/ethnicity among vaccinated males or females. CONCLUSIONS: Males tested positive for oral HPV more frequently than females, even among those vaccinated. This may have resulted from a lower frequency of males being vaccinated before initiating oral sex than females. Vaccination of males at the recommended age, therefore, may decrease differences in oral HPV by sex. Racial/ethnic differences were observed only in unvaccinated individuals, suggesting these disparities will decrease as more individuals are vaccinated.


Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas Nutricionales , Papillomaviridae , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Prevalencia , Vacunación
5.
J Cancer Educ ; 37(2): 362-369, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32642924

RESUMEN

Knowledge, attitudes, and patient preferences about genetic testing and subsequent risk management for cancer prevention among average risk populations are understudied, especially among Hispanics. This study was to assess these items by conducting an in-person survey in this understudied population. We conducted in-person surveys using a self-administered, structured questionnaire among young women in 2017. Survey questions were adapted from other validated surveys. This study had 677 participants in the final analyses. Data were collected in 2017 and analyzed in 2018 and 2019. Participants had little knowledge about genes or breast cancer risk, but most felt that genetic testing for cancer prevention is "a good idea" (87.0%), "a reassuring idea" (84.0%), and that "everyone should get the test" (87.7%). Most (64.0%) of these women would pay up to $25 for the test, 29.3% would pay $25-$500, and < 10% would pay more than $500 for the test. When asked about a hypothetical scenario of high breast cancer risk, 34.2% Hispanics and 24.5% non-Hispanics would choose chemoprevention. Women would be less likely to choose risk reduction procedures, such as mastectomy (19.6% among Hispanics and 15.1% among non-Hispanics) and salpingo-oophorectomy (11.8% among Hispanics and 10.7% among non-Hispanics). In this low-income, mostly Hispanic population, knowledge about genetic testing and cancer risk is poor, but most have positive opinions about genetic testing for cancer prevention. However, their strong preference for chemoprevention and lesser preference for prophylactic surgeries in a hypothetical scenario underscore the importance of genetic counseling and education.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/prevención & control , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Mastectomía , Prioridad del Paciente , Gestión de Riesgos
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): 1625-1633, 2021 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33983416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Genital and oral cancers are often caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) types that can be prevented through HPV vaccination. Since HPV is sexually transmitted, knowledge of penile prevalence of vaccine-type HPV among US males can help predict potential disparities in these cancers. This study examines penile HPV prevalence by age and race/ethnicity among males. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of publicly available data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Using data from penile swab samples collected from males between 2013 and 2016, the prevalence of 4vHPV and 9vHPV vaccine types was examined across age groups and by race/ethnicity. Logistic regression models adjusting for demographics, sexual behavior, and circumcision were examined to determine whether associations remained after accounting for confounders. RESULTS: Among 2548 males evaluated, HPV infection prevalence differed by race/ethnicity, with Black males exhibiting a higher prevalence of HPV. Examination of 4vHPV type prevalence by age group showed that 18-26-year-old males had a lower prevalence than older age groups. After controlling for confounders, 4vHPV prevalence was only significantly elevated among 27-34-year-old males, those who were single, and males with ≥3 lifetime sex partners. In adjusted models, 9vHPV type prevalence remained elevated among Black males compared with White males. CONCLUSIONS: Variations in 9vHPV type prevalence between Black and White individuals indicate future disparities in HPV-related genital cancers may continue in the United States during the next decade. Revaccinating certain populations with the 9vHPV vaccine may be appropriate to help mitigate this.


Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Etnicidad , Genitales , Humanos , Masculino , Encuestas Nutricionales , Papillomaviridae/genética , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
7.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(5): 504.e1-504.e9, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248134

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A postpartum human papillomavirus vaccination program was locally implemented to address low initiation rates among young adults. Within 20 months, the program achieved high vaccine initiation and series completion rates. Based on the program's success, it was expanded to all 36 counties served by a public hospital. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to conduct a quantitative and qualitative evaluation to examine the success and limitations of the program when expanded from 1 county to 36 counties, many of which are home to rural and medically underserved communities. STUDY DESIGN: Patient navigators reviewed the electronic medical records and immunization registry records of women aged ≤26 years, who delivered an infant at the public hospital, to determine whether they needed to initiate or complete the human papillomavirus vaccine series. Eligible women were counseled and offered the human papillomavirus vaccine during their hospital stay. Patient navigators scheduled follow-up injections in addition to the mother's postpartum or her infant's well-child visits, made reminder phone calls, and rescheduled missed appointments. Descriptive statistics, including frequencies and proportions, were used for patients approached in the initial and expansion programs. Frequencies from the initial and expansion programs were examined separately. Qualitative interviews were conducted with the clinic staff to evaluate the program. The qualitative analyses were conducted using NVivo (QSR International, Melbourne, Australia, version 10). RESULTS: Both initial and expanded programs achieved vaccine completion rates above 70%. Of the 2631 eligible postpartum women enrolled in the initial program, 785 (30%) had already been fully vaccinated. Of the remaining 1846 women, 1265 (69%) women received their first dose, and 196 (11%) women received their second or third dose on the postpartum unit. Of the 1461 women who received at least 1 dose through the initial program, 1124 (77%) completed all 3 doses. Of the 4330 eligible postpartum women enrolled in the expanded program, 886 (21%) had already been fully vaccinated. Of the remaining 3444 women, 2284 (66%) received their first dose, and 343 (10%) received their second or third dose on the postpartum unit. Of the 2627 women receiving at least 1 dose through the expanded program, 1932 (74%) completed all 3 doses. Clinic staff interviewed felt the program benefited the postpartum unit and clinics, because it increased patient knowledge of the vaccine, increased patient volume for vaccination, and gave healthcare providers more time to focus on other tasks. CONCLUSION: Human papillomavirus vaccination on the postpartum unit is an effective way to increase catchup rates and is well accepted by healthcare providers. High completion rates can be achieved if adequate support is provided, even among patients residing in rural or underserved areas who need extensive support to access primary healthcare services. Although this particular program may be considered costly, it is overall effective because the vaccine prevents 5 different types of cancer in women. The inclusion of human papillomavirus vaccination in routine postpartum care is a relatively easy way to reach many adults not vaccinated at a younger age and could help address low vaccination rates among young women in the United States, including hard-to-reach populations.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Públicos , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Atención Posnatal , Periodo Posparto , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Cualitativa , Sistema de Registros , Texas , Adulto Joven
8.
J Behav Med ; 43(3): 460-467, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31625018

RESUMEN

This study examined within group heterogeneity in colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) among foreign-born individuals. Data were from the 2010, 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey data on older adults (N = 5529). In 2018, multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine whether gender and race/ethnicity were associated with CRCS after controlling for sociodemographic, health access, and acculturation related factors. Overall, Asians were significantly less likely to report CRCS compared with Whites (aOR 0.63, CI 0.52-0.76). Hispanic race/ethnicity was negatively associated with CRCS among men (aOR 0.68, CI 0.50-0.91), but not women compared to white men/women, respectively. Additionally, factors associated with CRCS include having fair/poor health, usual source of care, insurance, ≥ 10 years of US residency and citizenship. Screening disparities experienced by these immigrants may be addressed by improving healthcare access, especially for noncitizens and those with limited healthcare access.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Aculturación , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Etnicidad , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos
9.
Cancer ; 124(13): 2815-2823, 2018 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29669162

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Overtreatment is a common concern for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), but this entity is difficult to distinguish from invasive breast cancers in administrative claims data sets because DCIS often is coded as invasive breast cancer. Therefore, the authors developed and validated algorithms to select DCIS cases from administrative claims data to enable outcomes research in this type of data. METHODS: This retrospective cohort using invasive breast cancer and DCIS cases included women aged 66 to 70 years in the 2004 through 2011 Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) data linked to Medicare administrative claims data. TCR records were used as "gold" standards to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 2 algorithms. Women with a biopsy enrolled in Medicare parts A and B at 12 months before and 6 months after their first biopsy without a second incident diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer within 12 months in the TCR were included. Women in 2010 Medicare data were selected to test the algorithms in a general sample. RESULTS: In the TCR data set, a total of 6907 cases met inclusion criteria, with 1244 DCIS cases. The first algorithm had a sensitivity of 79%, a specificity of 89%, and a PPV of 62%. The second algorithm had a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 97%. and a PPV of 77%. Among women in the general sample, the specificity was high and the sensitivity was similar for both algorithms. However, the PPV was approximately 6% to 7% lower. CONCLUSIONS: DCIS frequently is miscoded as invasive breast cancer, and thus the proposed algorithms are useful to examine DCIS outcomes using data sets not linked to cancer registries. Cancer 2018;124:2815-2823. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

10.
Cancer Causes Control ; 29(11): 1105-1113, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353481

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Whereas chronic conditions and foreign-birth have an inverse relationship with cervical cancer screening, the combined effect of these factors on screening is unknown. This study examined the associations between chronic comorbidities and Pap screening recommendations and adherence, and whether these associations vary between foreign- and US-born women. METHODS: In 2017, data from 2013 and 2015 National Health Interview Survey on women aged 21-65 years (N = 20,080) were analyzed. Bivariate associations between chronic comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) and cervical cancer screening recommendation and adherence (screened in the last 3 years) were examined using Chi-square analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to examine the association between foreign-born status and participant Pap test adherence, adjusting for physician Pap test recommendation and chronic comorbidities. RESULTS: Obesity, hypertension, and diabetes were positively associated with Pap screening recommendation. Hypertension and diabetes were negatively associated with screening adherence. Pap screening recommendation (60% vs. 57%, p < 0.05) and adherence (85% vs. 78%, p < 0.001) were higher among foreign-born than US-born women. After adjusting for chronic conditions, foreign-born women had significantly lower odds of receiving Pap tests compared with US-born women (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9). In stratified analysis, only obesity was associated with Pap testing among US-born and foreign-born women. Among foreign-born women, the association between obesity and Pap testing was attenuated after controlling for years lived in the US and citizenship. CONCLUSION: Public health intervention efforts must improve regular access to preventive care and encourage Pap screening among women diagnosed with chronic conditions. Future research should further identify additional factors driving the cervical cancer screening practices of both US- and foreign-born women with and without chronic conditions.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Cooperación del Paciente , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/epidemiología , Embarazo , Adulto Joven
11.
J Community Health ; 42(2): 385-389, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27704304

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to examine correlates of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)'s recommendations among US adolescent girls. We used National Immunization Survey of Teens 2013 data. Based on provider-verified (n = 9403) information, 57.3, 39.1 and 19.0 % of adolescent girls, initiated, completed and completed the HPV vaccine according to ACIP's recommendation (by age 12), respectively. Hispanic race/ethnicity, a physician recommendation for HPV vaccine and ≥1 influenza vaccine in the past 3 years were all associated with a higher likelihood of compliance with ACIP's recommendation. Girls from a larger family and those whose immunization provider was a STD/school/teen clinic were less likely to receive the vaccine at the recommended age compared to a girl raised in a smaller sized family and received immunization from a hospital facility, respectively. Only one-fifth of 13-17 yo girls receive the HPV vaccine by age 12 as recommended by ACIP. Physician visits and influenza vaccination settings are opportunities to improve vaccine series completion at the recommended age.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Comités Consultivos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización/normas , Entrevistas como Asunto , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
12.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 215(3): 318.e1-9, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26899907

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Effective interventions are needed to address the low rate of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in the United States, particularly among girls and women 16-26 years old. Counseling and offering the vaccine to postpartum patients could be an effective strategy to increase uptake among young women who did not complete the 3-dose series at an earlier age. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this evaluation was to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent program designed for postpartum women that used patient navigators (PNs) and reminders for follow-up visits to improve uptake and completion of the HPV vaccine series. STUDY DESIGN: As part of standard care, patients ≤26 years of age from Galveston County, Texas, who delivered an infant from November 2012 through June 2014 at a public hospital were counseled and offered the HPV vaccine postpartum. PNs assisted with scheduling follow-up injections during postpartum or well-child visits. A program evaluation was conducted after 20 months. RESULTS: Of 1038 patients approached, only 161 (15.5%) had previously completed the vaccine series. Of the 877 patients who had not completed the series, 661 (75.4%) received at least 1 dose postpartum, with 575 patients receiving their first dose and 86 receiving their second or third doses. By April 2015, initiation rates had increased as a result of this program from 25.4% before the program was initiated to 80.8% and completion rates from 15.5-65.1%. Missed appointments for injections were less likely among those who received text message reminders and more likely among those with ≥2 prior pregnancies. Those who were Hispanic or had received an influenza vaccination in the last year were more likely to initiate and complete the series through this program. Patients who missed ≥1 follow-up appointments were less likely to complete the vaccine series. CONCLUSION: Offering the HPV vaccine postpartum dramatically increased initiation rates among postpartum patients. PN and text messages ensured that a high percentage completed all 3 doses.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Periodo Posparto , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Pobreza , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Pública , Texas , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Estados Unidos , Salud de la Mujer , Adulto Joven
13.
Prev Med ; 88: 134-9, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27085993

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Little is known about how the number of HPV vaccine doses affect adherence to screening guidelines. This study compared adherence to cervical cancer screening by the number of HPV vaccine doses received by young women and assessed whether the specialty of vaccinating providers affected behavior. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study using administrative insurance claims records included 24,964 19-26year old women who received at least 1 injection of the HPV vaccine between January 2006 and November 2009. Vaccinated young women continuously enrolled in a nationally-representative private insurance plan for 6months prior to and 37months after HPV vaccine administration were included. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing 3years after vaccine initiation by number of vaccine doses and provider type. RESULTS: In this sample, 79.3% had a Pap test 3years following vaccine initiation. Receiving 1 (aOR: 0.60, 95% CI 0.55-0.65) or 2 (aOR: 0.80, 95% CI 0.74-0.87) doses was associated with decreased odds of Pap testing compared to 3 doses. Many young women in our sample (16.5%) were diagnosed with cervical dysplasia prior to HPV vaccination. Patients vaccinated by non-obstetrician/gynecologists were less likely to get a Pap test following vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: Women who received 1 or 2 doses of the HPV vaccine were less likely than those who received 3 doses to be screened for cervical cancer 3years following vaccine initiation. Pediatricians and primary care physicians should convey the importance of initiating and continuing screening to HPV vaccinated patients.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Displasia del Cuello del Útero/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Adulto , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Prueba de Papanicolaou/métodos , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Frotis Vaginal
14.
J Reprod Med ; 61(11-12): 529-33, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30226692

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine if there are any differences in the patient populations that choose subdermal implants versus intrauterine devices (IUDs) for contraceptive purposes. Study Design: Retrospective chart review. Electronic medical records of women who presented to the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston's Regional Maternal Child Health Program Clinics in southeast Texas from March 2011 to March 2013 and received a subdermal implant or IUD were reviewed. Differences in characteristics of women who chose either form of contraception were determined. Results: A total of 356 charts were reviewed. Of those, 188 (53%) women chose the subdermal implant and 168 (47%) chose an IUD. Patients who chose subdermal implants were more likely to have had a long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method previously (p<0.01), previous vaginal deliveries (p<0.001), and an interval from delivery to LARC placement of >1 year (p<0.001). LARC choice was race-specific in that, when compared to Caucasian women, African-American women were significantly more likely to choose an IUD, while Hispanic women were significantly more likely to choose subdermal implants (p=0.002). Conclusion: Different populations choose subdermal implants versus IUDs for contraception. Further research is needed to determine etiologies for these differences.


Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Implantes de Medicamentos/administración & dosificación , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anticoncepción/psicología , Conducta Anticonceptiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Texas
15.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 212(6): 761.e1-8, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25555662

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare complication and continuation rates of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with the subdermal etonogestrel (ENG) implant across the United States among girls and women 15-44 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study of health insurance claims records from 2007 through 2011 identified a cohort of women who had LNG-IUS (n = 79,920) or ENG implants (n = 7374) inserted and had insurance coverage for 12 months postinsertion. Claims for complications were examined 12 months after insertion, or until removal of either device within each of 3 age groups. RESULTS: After its introduction in 2007, the frequency of ENG implants increased each year and almost a third of all insertions were in teenagers. However, among women ≤24 years old who had delivered an infant in the prior 8 weeks, a LNG-IUS was more likely to be inserted than an ENG implant (P < .05). The most frequent complications with both methods were related to abnormal menstruation, which was more likely to occur among ENG implant users. Overall, 83-88% of the entire sample used their chosen method for at least 12 months. The odds of continuation were similar for both methods among teenagers, but ENG implants were more likely to be removed prematurely among women 20-24 years old (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.39) and 25-44 years old (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.64). CONCLUSION: Both of these long-acting contraceptive methods are well tolerated among women of all ages, and demonstrate high continuation rates.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Femeninos , Desogestrel , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levonorgestrel , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Desogestrel/administración & dosificación , Desogestrel/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/efectos adversos , Levonorgestrel/administración & dosificación , Levonorgestrel/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tejido Subcutáneo , Adulto Joven
16.
Prev Med ; 81: 427-32, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26500084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Clinical guidelines recommend that women with a history of adequate screening and not otherwise at high risk may discontinue cervical cancer screening after 65 years of age. However, screening remains common among US women over 65 years old. This study was conducted to examine whether overutilization was attributable to provider's recommendation or patient choice. METHOD: This cross-sectional study used data from 1752 female participants (70+ years) from the 2013 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). We quantitatively assessed the proportions of provider-recommended and patient self-initiated Pap smears. RESULTS: Among female respondents, 40.8% had a Pap smear within the past 3 years, 19.4% had a Pap smear in the last year, and 39.7% reported receiving a recommendation for a Pap smear from their provider in the past year. Among women who received a recommendation to obtain a Pap smear, 39.8% did so within the past 12 months compared to 5.9% of women who did not receive a recommendation (adjusted odds ratio 10.5, 95% confidence interval 7.39-15.0). About 70% of women who visited an obstetrician/gynecologist and reported receiving a recommendation to have a Pap smear did so in the past year, while 32.3% of women who visited an obstetrician/gynecologist but did not receive a recommendation obtained one. CONCLUSION: Pap smears were common among women ≥70 years of age. Health care providers may need additional education on current guidelines regarding indications for Pap smears in this age group to help reduce screening of patients who may not benefit.


Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo , Prueba de Papanicolaou/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos
17.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 210(6): 528.e1-5, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24486227

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence and correlates of complications related to pubic hair removal among a diverse clinical sample of women attending a public clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Women (aged 16-40 years) who received care from April to June 2012 at 2 publicly funded clinics completed an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire (n = 369). After excluding women with missing data, analyses were conducted on 333 women. Additional measures were retrieved through a medical chart review. A χ(2) and a multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze participant characteristics, pubic hair removal behaviors, and complications related to pubic hair removal. RESULTS: Most women (87%) admitted to current removal of at least some pubic hair, whereas the remainder responded that they had removed pubic hair in the past. Under- or normal-weight women were more likely to report total pubic hair removal than overweight or obese women. The majority (60%) had experienced at least 1 health complication because of the removal, of which the most common were epidermal abrasion and ingrown hairs. Black and Hispanic women were less likely than white women to report complications. Overweight or obese women were almost twice as likely to report a complication and almost 3 times as likely if they also had total hair removal. Only 4% had seen a health care provider for a complication related to hair removal and only 4% discussed safe removal practices with their doctor. CONCLUSION: Minor complications commonly occur as a result of pubic hair removal. Gynecological visits could provide a safe environment for women to discuss pubic hair removal practices.


Asunto(s)
Remoción del Cabello/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Enfermedades del Cabello/etiología , Remoción del Cabello/tendencias , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Grupos Raciales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
18.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 192, 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807054

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Substance use disorder (SUD) presents a range of public health challenges and consequences. Despite the prevention potential of screening and brief intervention (SBI) in the primary care setting, implementation is low. The purpose of this study was to assess associations of primary care clinicians' knowledge of SBI and SUD treatment, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control with intention to incorporate SBI and SUD treatment into regular clinical practice. METHODS: This online survey was administered to primary care clinicians who practice in Texas between March 1, 2021, and February 5, 2023. Survey questions were mapped to factors in the Theory of Planned Behavior and included measures of knowledge, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral controls related to SBI and SUD treatment. Intention to engage in SBI and SUD treatment was assessed as the outcome. RESULTS: Of 645 participants included in this study, 59.5% were physicians. Knowledge was low, with less than half correctly reporting what was considered a standard drink (39.6%) and only 20% knew the correct number of alcoholic beverages considered risky drinking in 21-year-old non-pregnant women. Subjective norms, such as having colleagues within their practice support addressing SUDs, and perceived behavioral control such as having SUD screening routinized within clinic workflows, were positively associated with intention to implement SBI and SUD treatment in primary care settings. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying knowledge gaps, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control requires a multipronged interventional approach that blends accessible clinician training with systemic workplace enhancements and a collective shift in professional norms.


Asunto(s)
Intención , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Humanos , Texas , Femenino , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Médicos de Atención Primaria/educación , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud
19.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 209(3): 200.e1-7, 2013 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23727519

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In December 2009, the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommended that women under 21 years old should not receive cervical cancer screening (Papanicolaou tests) or human papillomavirus (HPV) tests. This study examined whether clinicians stopped administering Papanicolaou and HPV tests among women younger than 21 years of age after new ACOG guidelines were issued. STUDY DESIGN: This study was a retrospective secondary data analysis of administrative claims data that included insurance enrollees from across the United States that examined the frequency of Papanicolaou tests and HPV tests among 178,898 nonimmunocompromised females 12-20 years old who had a paid claim for a well-woman visit in 2008, 2009, or 2010. Young women with well-woman examinations in each observed year were examined longitudinally to determine whether past diagnoses of cervical cell abnormalities accounted for Papanicolaou testing in 2010. RESULTS: The proportion of women younger than 21 years old that received a Papanicolaou test as part of her well-woman exam dropped from 77% in 2008 and 2009 to 57% by December of 2010, whereas HPV testing remained stable across time. A diagnosis of cervical cell abnormalities in 2009 was associated with Papanicolaou testing in 2010. However, a previous Papanicolaou test was more strongly associated with a Papanicolaou test in 2010. CONCLUSION: These data show that some physicians are adjusting their practices among young women according to ACOG guidelines, but Papanicolaou and HPV testing among insured women younger than 21 years of age still remains unnecessarily high.


Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Adhesión a Directriz , Prueba de Papanicolaou , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Frotis Vaginal , Adolescente , Adulto , ADN Viral/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
20.
Prim Care ; 50(4): 601-620, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37866834

RESUMEN

To achieve understanding and best care, screening and treating patients should consider the patient's social environment. Social and behavioral factors influence both positive and negative health behaviors that influence mental and physical health. Primary care providers continually navigate barriers faced by patients and seek solutions that take into consideration social and behavioral factors. The role of the PCP begins with an understanding of common barriers and community resources, then by assessing and responding to the patient's own challenges, and finally by advocating in the clinic and public for changes to the underlying social and structural causes of morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
Detalles de la búsqueda