Liver Regeneration and Recanalization Time Course following Repeated Reversible Portal Vein Embolization in Swine.

INTRODUCTION: Portal vein embolization (PVE) is an accepted technique to preoperatively increase the volume of the future remnant liver before major hepatectomy. A permanent material is usually preferred since its superiority to induce liver hypertrophy over absorbable material has been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the use of an absorbable material generates a reversible PVE (RPVE) capable of inducing significant liver hypertrophy. In small animal models, the possibility to proceed to a repeated RPVE (RRPVE) has shown to boost liver hypertrophy further. The aim of this preliminary study was to assess the feasibility and the tolerance of RRPVE in a large animal model, in comparison with permanent PVE (PPVE) and single RPVE. METHODS: Six swine (2 per group) were assigned either to single RPVE group (using powdered gelatin sponge), RRPVE group (2 RPVEs separated by 14 days) or PPVE group (using N-butyl-cyanoacrylate). The feasibility and tolerance of the procedures were evaluated using portography, liver function tests and histological analysis. Evolution of liver volumes was assessed with volumetric imaging by computed tomography. RESULTS: Embolization of portal branches corresponding to 75% of total liver volume was performed successfully in all animals. Procedures were well tolerated, inducing moderate changes in portal pressure and transient aminotransferase increase. None of the animals developed portal vein thrombosis. After RPVE, complete recanalization occurred at day 11. RRPVE showed a trend for higher hypertrophy, the non-embolized liver to total liver ratio reaching 5.2 ± 1.0% in the RPVE group, 6.8 ± 0.1% in the RRPVE group and 5.0 ± 0.3% in the PPVE group. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In this preliminary comparative study, RRPVE was as feasible and as well tolerated as the other procedures, and resulted in higher liver hypertrophy.

Humanitarian obstetric care for refugees of the Syrian war. The first 6 months of experience of Gynécologie Sans Frontières in Zaatari Refugee Camp (Jordan).

OBJECTIVE: To report the first 6 months of experience of a nongovernmental-organization-managed obstetric care unit in a war refugee camp, with problems encountered and solutions implemented. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of the maternity activity of Gynécologie Sans Frontières (GSF). SETTING: GSF's maternity unit, in Zaatari camp (Jordan). POPULATION: All pregnant women among Syrian refugees who came to the unit for delivery. METHODS: The GSF's maternity unit is a light structure built with three tents, permitting low-risk pregnancy care and childbirth. Emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in the Moroccan army field hospital. High-risk pregnancies were transferred to Al Mafraq or Amman Hospital (Jordan) after assessment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Delivery characteristics, indications for referral. RESULTS: From September 2012 to February 2013, 371 women attended the unit and 299 delivered in it. Delivery rates increased from 5/month to 112/month over the period. Mean gestational age at birth was 39(+3) gestational weeks (SD = 1.9). Median birthweight was 3100 g (25-75% interquartile range 2840-3430 g). Spontaneous vaginal deliveries were dominant and the major maternal complication was postpartum hemorrhage (n = 13). Eighty-two women were referred to Al Mafraq or Amman hospitals, mainly for preterm labor (32%) and congenital malformations (11%). We managed one case of stillbirth. Maternal mortality did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the difficulties of war, high-risk pregnant women were properly identified, permitting referrals when required. Cooperation with other nongovernmental organizations, including the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, was essential for the management of situations at risk of complications and to contain perinatal and maternal mortality.

Concomitant Vascular War Trauma Saturating a French Forward Surgical Team Deployed to Support the Victims of the Syrian War (2013). Interest of the Vascular Damage Control.

Vascular injuries from war require an emergency treatment whose objective is to quickly obtain hemostasis and the restoration of arterial flow. In this context of heavy trauma and limited means, damage control surgery is recommended and is based on the use of temporary vascular shunts (TVSs). We report the management of the simultaneous arrival of 2 vascular injuries of war in a field hospital. Patient 1 presented a ballistic trauma of the elbow with a section of the humeral artery (Gustillo IIIC). A TVS was set up during the external fixation of the elbow. Final revascularization was carried out and aponevrotomies of the forearm were performed. Patient 2 had a riddled knee with an open fracture of the femur, an avulsion of the popliteal artery, and a hemorrhagic shock. A strategy of damage control surgery was carried out with placing an arterial and venous shunt. Aponevrotomies of the leg were carried out before casting. For the traumatisms of the arteries of the members, the use of shunts is reserved for the lesions of the proximal vessels. Many vascular shunts available have the same performances to restore the arterial flow and prevent secondary thrombosis. The time before the final revascularization depends on the clinical condition of the patient. The value of anticoagulation in these cases was not shown.

Ultra-forward surgical support for special operations forces. Conception, development and certification of the French Special Operations Surgical Team (SOST) airborne capability.

When special operations forces (SOF) are in action, a surgical team (SOST) is usually ground deployed as close as possible to the combat area, to try and provide surgical support within the golden hour. The French SOST is composed of 6 people: 2 surgeons, 1 scrub nurse, 1 anaesthetist, 1 anesthetic nurse and 1 SOF paramedic. It can be deployed in 45 min under a tent or in a building. However, some tactical situations prevent the ground deployment. A solution is to deploy the SOST in a tactical unprepared aircraft hold, to make it possible to offer DCS, to treat non-compressible exsanguinating trauma, without any ground logistical footprint. This article describes the stages of the design, development and certification process of the airborne SOST capability. The authors report the modifications and adaptations of the equipment and the surgical paradigms which make it possible to solve the constraints linked to the aeronautical and combat environment. Study type/level of evidence Care management Level of Evidence IV.

Effectiveness of a specific trauma training on war-related truncal injury management: A pre-post study.

BACKGROUND: Non-Compressible Torso Hemorrhage (NCTH) is the leading cause of preventable death in combat casualty care. To enhance the French military surgeons' preparedness, the French Military Health Service designed the Advanced Course for Deployment Surgery (ACDS) in 2008. This study evaluates behavioral changes in war surgery practice since its implementation. METHODS: Data were extracted from the OPEX® registry, which recorded all surgical activity during deployment from 2003 to 2021. All patients treated in French Role 2 or 3 Medical Treatment Facilities (MTFs) deployed in Afghanistan, Mali, or Chad requiring emergency surgery for NCTH were included. The mechanism of injury, severity, and surgical procedures were noted. Surgical care produced before (Control group) and after the implementation of the ACDS course (ACDS group) were compared. RESULTS: We included 189 trauma patients; 99 in the ACDS group and 90 in the Control group. Most injuries were combat-related (88 % of the ACDS and 82 % of the Control group). The ACDS group had more polytrauma (42% vs. 27 %; p= 0.034) and more e-FAST detailed patients (35% vs. 21 %; p= 0.044). Basics in surgical trauma care were similar between both groups, with a tendency in the ACDS group toward less digestive diversion (n= 6 [6 %] vs. n= 12 [13 %]; p= 0.128), more temporary closure with abdominal packing (n= 17 [17 %] vs. n= 10 [11 %]; p= 0.327), and less re-operation for bleeding (n= 0 [0 %] vs. n= 5 [6 %]; p= 0.046). CONCLUSION: The French model of war trauma course succeeded in keeping specialized surgeons aware of the basics of damage control surgery. The main improvements were better use of preoperative imaging and better management of seriously injured patients.

Diagnostic Splenectomy: Characteristics, Pre-Operative Investigations, and Identified Pathologies for 20 Patients.

Splenectomy is indicated in cases of trauma to the spleen or hematological and immunological diseases (hereditary spherocytosis, autoimmune cytopenia). Less frequently, splenectomy is performed for diagnostic purposes to complement unsuccessful prior etiological investigations. The splenectomy remains a surgery at risk of complications and should be considered as a last-resort procedure to make the diagnosis and to be able to treat patients. We studied the medical files of 142 patients who underwent a splenectomy for any reason over a 10-year period and identified 20 diagnostic splenectomies. Diagnostic splenectomies were mainly performed to explore unexplained splenomegaly for 13 patients and fever of unknown origin for 10. The other patients had surgery for other causes (cytopenia, abdominal symptoms, suspicion of relapsing malignant hemopathies). Splenectomy contributed to the final diagnosis in 19 of 20 cases, corresponding mostly to lymphoid hemopathies (14/20). The most frequent disease was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (8/20). Splenectomy did not reveal any infectious disease. The most relevant pre-operative procedures to aid the diagnosis were 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) and immuno-hematological examinations. Diagnostic splenectomy is useful and necessary in certain difficult diagnostic situations. Highlights: Diagnostic splenectomy is still useful in 2020 to diagnose unexplained splenomegaly or fever of unknown origin. Lymphoma was the most common final diagnosis. FDG PET/CT was the most useful tool to aid in the diagnosis.

Traum'cast: an online, open-access educational video podcast series for teaching military trauma care to all healthcare providers.

The aim of this paper was to describe the development of 'Traum'cast', an ambitious project to create a high-quality, open-access, 12-week video podcast programme providing evidence-based continuing medical education for civilian and military healthcare practitioners dedicated to the management of trauma caused by weapons of war. The management of such patients became a particular public health issue in France following the 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, which highlighted the need for all healthcare professionals to have appropriate knowledge and training in such situations. In 2016, the French Health General Direction asked the French Military Medical Service (FMMS) to create a task force and to use its unique and considerable experience to produce high-quality educational material on key themes including war injuries, combat casualty care, triage, damage control surgery, transfusion strategies, psychological injury and rehabilitation. The material was produced by FMMS and first broadcast in French and for free, on the official FMMS YouTube channel in September 2020. Traum'cast provides evidence-based continuing medical education for civilian and military healthcare practitioners. Traum'cast is an educational innovation that meets a public health requirement.

A decade in the battlefield (2004-2014): A French military perspective on the high mortality associated with non-exclusively orthopedic or brain combat injuries.

BACKGROUND: During the last few decades, French armed forces have regularly deployed in asymmetric conflicts. Surgical support for casualties of these conflicts occurs in NATO role 2 and 3 medical treatment facilities (MTF); definitive surgical care occurs in France following a strategic medical evacuation. The aim of this study was to describe the combat injury profile of these soldiers who presented with either non-exclusively orthopedic and/or brain injuries. METHODS: This descriptive study is a retrospective analysis of the surgical management of French casualties performed in role 2 or 3 MTF in Afghanistan, Mali, Niger, Djibouti and the Central African Republic between January 2004 and December 2014. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included. Forty had fragment wounds. The most severe lesions were of the head, neck or thorax. The average injury severity score (ISS) was 34.9 (IC 95% 29.8-40). 17 damage control procedures were performed. Thirty patients died with a mean ISS of 61 (IC 95% 56-67); 5 deaths were considered as preventable. The most frequent surgical procedures in the MTF were digestive (n=31) and thoracic surgery (n=19). Thirty patients needed second-look surgery in France; eleven had severe complications. No patient died following medical evacuation to France. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicated that the mortality following non-exclusively brain or orthopedic injuries remains high in modern asymmetric conflicts. Level of Evidence IV.

French civilian surgical expertise still inadequately prepared for mass casualties 3 years after major terror attacks in Paris (2015) and Nice (2016).

BACKGROUND: Three years after the terror attacks in Paris and Nice, this study aims to determine the level of interest, the technical skills and level of surgical activity in exsanguinating trauma care for a nonselected population of practicing French surgeons. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent between July and December 2017 to French students and practicing surgeons, using the French Surgical Colleges' mailing lists. Items analyzed included education, training, interest and clinical activity in trauma care and damage-control surgery (DCS). RESULTS: 622 questionnaires were analyzed and was composed of 318 (51%) certificated surgeons, of whom 56% worked in university teaching hospitals and 47% in Level I trauma centers (TC1); 44% were digestive surgeons and 7% were military surgeons. The mean score of 'interest in trauma care' was 8/10. Factors associated with a higher score were being a resident doctor (p = 0.01), a digestive surgeon (p = 0.0013), in the military (p = 1,71 × 10) and working in TC1 (p = 0.034). The mean "DCS techniques knowledge" score was 6.2/10 and factors significantly associated with a higher score were being a digestive surgeon (respectively, p = 0.0007 and p = 0.001) and in the military (respectively p = 1.74 × 10 and p = 3.94 × 10). Reported clinical activity in trauma and DCS were low. Additional continuing surgical education courses in trauma were completed by 23% of surgeons. CONCLUSION: French surgeons surveyed showed considerable interest in trauma care and treatment. Despite this, and regardless of surgical speciality, their theoretical and practical knowledge of necessary DCS skills remain inadequate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Study Type Survey.

Is there still a benefit to operate appendiceal abscess on board French nuclear submarines?

Appendicular abscess occurred in 14.2% of patients presenting acute appendicitis. Management of these patients remains controversial, ranging from an emergency appendectomy to a nonoperative treatment. On board French nuclear submarines, the usual treatment for all cases of appendiceal masses, including both appendicitis and appendiceal abscess, is an appendectomy. In the past 5 years, the introduction of ultrasonography (US) on board has enabled the diagnosis of appendiceal abscess with a high rate of accuracy, and the latest studies show that nonoperative treatment is an alternative approach. This nonsurgical treatment, based on intravenous administration of antibiotics, is successful in about 93% of the patients. Failure of nonsurgical treatment is a reliable indication of percutaneous drainage. The proportion of adult patients who need percutaneous drainage of abscesses is about 27%. A successful primary nonoperative treatment may or may not be followed by interval appendectomy at the conclusion of the patrol. Nonsurgical treatment is associated with a significantly lower morbidity than surgery. Considering that the on-board surgical facility is limited, nonsurgical treatment appears to be the best approach for treating a sailor with an appendiceal abscess during a submarine patrol mission.

Pre-hospital management of pediatric polytrauma during modern conflict: experience and limits of the French military health service.

BACKGROUND: French military physicians serving in deployment are confronted with pediatric polytrauma patients (PPP) during the provision of medical aid to civilian populations. The objectives of this study were to describe the current care of PPPs during these missions, to report difficulties encountered and to evaluate the training of doctors for management of PPPs in the field. METHODS: A descriptive epidemiological study based on a questionnaire sent to physicians who had been deployed overseas. RESULTS: 91 doctors participated. Their mean age was 35 years. 86% of the doctors managed children whilst serving overseas, of which 54% were PPPs. The incidence of pediatric polytrauma varied according to the country, but overall from 1129 emergencies reported during overseas missions, 11% were PPPs. Penetrating traumas represented 37% of cases; 24% were circulatory distress and 19% were massive bleeding. 80% of the doctors reported a lack of pediatric trauma experience, less than 5% had received appropriate in-service training and only 9% had worked in pediatric emergency facilities in France. The equipment available for PPPs in the field was often poorly understood and frequently considered to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of PPPs of war is rare and complex, but care of older children it is similar to that required for adults. Preparation for PPP management, it could be optimized by identifying risks which alter depending on the country of deployment, such as the logistical organization of the battlefield chain of care. Improvements in doctors' pediatric trauma training should be individualized, based on their mission needs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Deployment of the Surgical Life-saving Module (SLM) in 2017: Lessons learned in setting up and training operational surgical units.

INTRODUCTION: The military operations carried out by the French armed forces, occasionally require the use of the Surgical Life-saving Module (SLM), to ensure the surgical support of its soldiers. Due to its extreme mobility and capacity of fast deployment, SLM is particularly useful in small-scale military operations, such as Special Forces missions. In 2017, the French SLM was for the first time used to ensure surgical support of allied forces, which were lacking forward surgical capabilities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the SLM is a mobile, heliborne, airborne, surgical structure with parachuting capability onto land or sea, therefore essentially focused on life-saving procedures, also known as "damage control" surgery. Due to the need for mobility and rapid implementation, the SLM is limited to a maximum of 5 interventions or, in terms of injuries, to 1 or 2 seriously injured patients. RESULTS: Over a period of 2 months, 5 medical teams were successively deployed with the SLM. A total of 157 casualties were treated. The most common injuries were caused by shrapnel 561%), followed by firearms (36%), and blunt trauma (2.5%). Injuries included the limbs (56%), thorax (18%), abdomen (13%), head (11%), and neck (2%). The average ISS was 8.5 (1-25) with 26 patients presenting with an ISS greater than or equal to 15. The average NISS was 10.8 (1-75) with 34 casualties having an NISS equal to or greater than 15. The surgical procedures were broken down as follows: 126 dressings, 16 laparotomies, 7 thoracotomies, 12 isolated thoracic drains (without thoracotomy), 1 cervicotomy, 12 amputations, 7 limb splints, 2 limb fasciotomies, 2 external fixators and 1 femoral fracture traction. CONCLUSIONS: The numerous SLM deployments in larger operations highlighted its ability to adapt both in terms of equipment and personnel. Continuous management of equipment logistics, robust personnel training, and appropriate organization of the evacuation procedures, were the key elements for optimizing combat casualty care. As a consequence, the SLM appears to be an operational surgical unit of choice during deployments.

Maintenance therapy with a monthly injection of alemtuzumab prolongs response duration in patients with refractory B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (B-CLL/SLL).

Alemtuzumab, the monoclonal anti-CD52 antibody, has clinical activity in B-cell and T-cell malignancies at the dose of 30 mg three times weekly for 9-12 weeks. This standard regimen induced responses usually shorter than 6 months. To prolong time to progression, we initialized a phase II study with an identical initial scheme until partial response, followed by a maintenance therapy lasting at least 4 months. Eleven heavily pretreated patients (8 with B-chronic lymhocytic leukemia (B-CLL) and 3 with small lymphoctyic lymphoma (SLL)) have been treated with this maintenance regimen (MR patients) and were retrospectively compared to 5 patients (3 B-CLL and 2 SLL) treated with the standard regimen (SR patients). Patients characteristics before treatment were identical in both groups. Objective response was reached by 9 (82%) MR patients and 3 (60%) SR patients (p NS). After the treatment, 8 (73%) MR patients and all SR patients progressed with a median time at 12.2 months and 3 months respectively. Survival time from alemtuzumab was significatively different (P < 0.005). None of the patients died in the MR group with a median follow-up at 16 months. In the SR group, the median survival from alemtuzumab was 5.9 months. We did not observe any differences in terms of hematological toxicites and infections between the two groups. In conclusion, maintenance alemtuzumab therapy seems to increase the time to progression and the survival, without adding hematological toxicities and infectious complications. More patients are needed to confirm this observation.

French pre-hospital trauma triage criteria: Does the "pre-hospital resuscitation" criterion provide additional benefit in triage?

AIM: To evaluate the performance of the specific French Vittel "Pre-Hospital (PH) resuscitation" criteria in selecting polytrauma patients during the pre-hospital stage and its potential to increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of pre-hospital trauma triage. METHODS: This was a monocentric prospective cohort study of injured adults transported by emergency medical service to a trauma center. Patients who met any of the field trauma triage criteria were considered "triage positive". Hospital data was statistically linked to pre-hospital records. The primary outcome of defining a "major trauma patient" was Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 16. RESULTS: There were a total of 200 injured patients evaluated over a 2 years period who met at least 1 triage criterion. The number of false positives was 64 patients (ISS < 16). The PPV was 68%. The sensitivity and the negative predictive value could not be evaluated in this study since it only included patients with positive Vittel criteria. The criterion of "PH resuscitation" was present for 64 patients (32%), but 10 of them had an ISS < 16. This was statistically significant in correlation with the severity of the trauma in univariate analysis (OR = 7.2; P = 0.005; 95%CI: 1.6-31.6). However, despite this correlation the overall PPV was not significantly increased by the use of the criterion "PH resuscitation" (68% vs 67.8%). CONCLUSION: The criterion of "pre-hospital resuscitation" was statistically significant with the severity of the trauma, but did not increase the PPV. The use of "pre-hospital resuscitation" criterion could be re-considered if these results are confirmed by larger studies.

How to reconstruct an upper full-thickness abdomen wall defect in austere environment? Interests of the pedicled myofascial latissimis dorsi flap.

Upper abdominal wall defects secondary to trauma are not amenable to immediate closure in most cases. After a primary coverage, the definitive reconstruction can be done at a later date, using prosthetic mesh or flap. The majority of these complex procedures is, however, not available in the austere environment. The authors report a clinical case of upper full-thickness defects of the abdominal wall secondary to an explosion in Afghanistan. The patient was managed by a French Forward Surgical Team. The defect was immediately reconstructed in a one-stage surgery using a pedicled myofascial latissimus dorsi flap with good functional results. The pedicled latissimus dorsi flap is commonly used for coverage of both extrathoracic and intrathoracic defects. It is, therefore, possible to extend the harvesting of the muscle to the thoracolumbar fascia and the posterior third of the iliac crest. It provides a very large flap to cover an upper full-thickness abdomen wall defect. The harvest technique is simple, short, and largely accessible to a general surgeon. It provides immediate and definitive closure with a short hospital stay, what is clearly adapted in austere environment.

Surgical proctologic emergency in isolated sea-based environment: how it is performed in the French navy.

Proctologic emergency are very common and are a true challenge for a general practitioner (GP) in a sea-based environment. Performing simple surgical procedures could be essential for the management of these patients. Thrombosed external hemorrhoids are very painful and necessitate the extraction of the blood clot under local anesthesia. The perianal abscess and the pilonidal abscess are also painful entities and represent a significant septic risk. The surgical management of the latter two is simple but requires general anesthesia. Using ketamine and midazolam with these procedures offers a very high level of anesthetic safety. This short article describes the mentioned procedures that are richly illustrated.

Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): arguments for conservative surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the duodenum are rare. We sought to evaluate the postoperative courses and long-term outcomes of conservative surgery (CS) versus pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with non-metastatic duodenal GISTs. METHODS: Seventeen patients underwent surgery for duodenal GISTs between January 2000 and January 2012; 11 patients underwent CS (CS group), and six patients underwent a PD (PD group). RESULTS: Mortality was similar between the two groups. Patients in the PD group had longer operative times, more tumors located on the pancreatic side of the duodenum, higher rates of post-operative complications including postoperative pancreatic fistulas, and a longer hospital stay, when compared with patients of CS group. All tumors were resected with clear surgical margins (R0 resection). The median disease-free survival times were not different. CONCLUSION: CS was safe and provided similar oncologic outcomes as PD. CS should be the procedure of choice in patients with GIST that does not involve the pancreatic side of the duodenum.