Comparative evaluation of multiparametric lumbar MRI radiomic models for detecting osteoporosis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a serious global public health issue. Currently, there are few studies that explore the use of multiparametric MRI radiomics for osteoporosis detection. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of radiomics features from multiple MRI sequences (T1WI, T2WI and T1WI combined with T2WI) for detecting osteoporosis in patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 160 patients who had undergone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry(DXA) and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at our hospital. Among them, 86 patients were diagnosed with abnormal bone mass (osteoporosis or low bone mass), and 74 patients were diagnosed with normal bone mass based on the DXA results. Sagittal T1-and T2-weighted images of all patients were imported into the uAI Research Portal (United Imaging Intelligence) for image delineation and radiomics analysis, where a series of radiomic features were obtained. A radiomic model that included T1WI, T2WI, and T1WI+T2WI was established using features selected by LASSO regression. We used ROC curve analysis to evaluate the predictive efficacy of each model for identifying bone abnormalities and conducted decision curve analysis (DCA) to evaluate the net benefit of each model. Finally, we validated the model in a sample of 35 patients from different health care institution. RESULTS: The T1WI + T2WI radiomics model showed better screening performance for patients with abnormal bone mass. In the training group, the sensitivity was 0.758, the specificity was 0.78, and the accuracy was 0.768 (AUC =0.839, 95% CI=0.757-0.901). In the validation group, the sensitivity was 0.792, the specificity was 0.875, and the accuracy was 0.833 (AUC =0.86, 95% CI=0.73-0.943).The DCA also showed that the combined model had better net benefits. In the external validation group, the sensitivity was 0.764, the specificity was 0.833, and the accuracy was 0.8 (AUC =0.824, 95% CI 0.678-0.969). CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics-based multiparametric MRI can be used for the quantitative analysis of lumbar MRI and for accurately screening patients with abnormal bone mass.

Risk stratification by nomogram of deep learning radiomics based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in knee meniscus injury.

PURPOSE: To construct and validate a nomogram model that integrated deep learning radiomic features based on multiparametric MRI and clinical features for risk stratification of meniscus injury. METHODS: A total of 167 knee MR images were collected from two institutions. All patients were classified into two groups based on the MR diagnostic criteria proposed by Stoller et al. The automatic meniscus segmentation model was constructed through V-net. LASSO regression was performed to extract the optimal features correlated to risk stratification. A nomogram model was constructed by combining the Radscore and clinical features. The performance of the models was evaluated by ROC analysis and calibration curve. Subsequently, the model was simulated by junior doctors in order to test its practical application effect. RESULTS: The Dice similarity coefficients of automatic meniscus segmentation models were all over 0.8. Eight optimal features, identified by LASSO regression, were employed to calculate the Radscore. The combined model showed a better performance in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.95) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.93). The calibration curve indicated a better accuracy of the combined model than either the Radscore or clinical model alone. The simulation results showed that the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors increased from 74.9 to 86.2% after using the model. CONCLUSION: Deep learning V-net demonstrated great performance in automatic meniscus segmentation of the knee joint. It was reliable for stratifying the risk of meniscus injury of the knee by nomogram which integrated the Radscores and clinical features.

The value of percentile base on computed tomography histogram in differentiating the invasiveness of adenocarcinoma appearing as pure ground-glass nodules.

To investigate the value of percentile base on computed tomography (CT) histogram analysis for distinguishing invasive adenocarcinoma (IA) from adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) or micro invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) appearing as pure ground-glass nodules.A total of 42 cases of pure ground-glass nodules that were surgically resected and pathologically confirmed as lung adenocarcinoma between January 2015 and May 2019 were included. Cases were divided into IA and AIS/MIA in the study. The percentile on CT histogram was compared between the 2 groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine which factors demonstrated a significant effect on invasiveness. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the predictive ability of individual characteristics and the combined model.The 4 histogram parameters (25th percentile, 55th percentile, 95th percentile, 97.5th percentile) and the combined model all showed a certain diagnostic value. The combined model demonstrated the best diagnostic performance. The AUC values were as follows: 25th percentile = 0.693, 55th percentile = 0.706, 95th percentile = 0.713, 97.5th percentile = 0.710, and combined model = 0.837 (all P < .05).The percentile of histogram parameters help to improve the ability to radiologically determine the invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma appearing as pure ground-glass nodules.