Diagnosis and development of screening items for migraine in neurological practice in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to: (1) survey migraine diagnoses among neurological outpatients in Taiwan; (2) compare neurologists' migraine diagnoses with the International Classification of Headache Disorders 2nd Edition (ICHD-2) criteria; and (3) evaluate the diagnostic ability of screening items on a patient migraine questionnaire. METHODS: This prospective study surveyed patients who consulted neurologists for the first time with a chief complaint of headache, excluding those experiencing headaches for > or = 15 days/month. Each neurologist interviewed a maximum of 10 patients. Patients were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire and their physicians completed another questionnaire. The physicians were asked if patients could be diagnosed with migraine. In addition, a diagnosis of ICHD-2 migraine was made by the physician's questionnaire through a computer-generated algorithm. In this study, migraine without aura (code 1.1) or migraine with aura (code 1.2) were designated as "strict migraine", and the combination of strict migraine and ICHD-2 probable migraine (code 1.6) as "any migraine". RESULTS: Among 755 patients who were eligible for analysis, 537 (71%) were diagnosed as having "any migraine", 363 (48%) with "strict migraine", and 451 (60%) with physician-diagnosed migraine. Among the 537 patients diagnosed as having "any migraine", 308 patients (57%) had not been diagnosed by any physician before. A moderate agreement (kappa statistic around 0.5) was found between the physicians' diagnoses and ICHD-2 "strict migraine" or "any migraine". In patients with ICHD-2 probable migraine (n = 174), only 52% were diagnosed with migraine by our physicians. Nausea was the best single item for predicting migraine diagnosis, while any combination of two items among nausea/vomiting, moderate or severe pain and photophobia, provided the optimum screening tool. CONCLUSION: Migraine was the most common headache diagnosis in the neurologists' clinics. Probable migraine was not completely adopted as a migraine spectrum among neurologists. In contrast to ID Migraine(TM), moderate or severe headache intensity replaced headache-related disability as one screening item for migraine in Taiwan.

The cause of slowed forearm median conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome: a Palmar stimulation study.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate the etiopathogenesis of decreased forearm median motor conduction velocity (FMMCV) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), we used segmental stimulation at the palm, wrist and antecubital fossa to determine conduction block at wrist and calculate and compare the segmental median motor conduction velocity (MMCV) to determine the pathogenesis. BACKGROUND: The cause of the decreased FMMCV in CTS remains unclear. Animal models have supported retrograde axonal atrophy as the cause. Some authors believe standard FMMCV, calculated by subtracting the distal latency, may not represent an exact assessment of FMMCV but rather the velocity of small fibers that persist throughout the carpal tunnel. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with clinical symptoms and signs of CTS which had been confirmed with standard electrodiagnosis, were included. The patients were divided into two groups: one with reduced FMMCV <50m/s (Group I, n=20) and the other with normal FMMCV>50m/s (Group II, n=40). Age-matched volunteers served as controls (n=60). We used palm, wrist and antecubital stimulation, and recorded compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitudes at the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle. Based on a ratio of the CMAP amplitudes obtained from wrist and palm stimulation (W/P ratio) and the latency differences, we calculated the W/P ratio and the across wrist MMCV (AWMMCV) and FMMCV and compared and correlated them between two patient groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in median motor and sensory distal latency between Groups I and II. CMAP and sensory nerve action potential amplitudes were reduced in Group I compared with Group II, but the difference was only marginally significant. Four patients had a significant reduction of the W/P ratio in Group I, compared with 7 patients in Group II, which did not reach a significance. Sixteen patients (80%) in Group I demonstrated no conduction block. Furthermore, Group I showed significantly decreased FMMCV when compared with Group II; however, AWMMCV was not significantly reduced in Group I, suggesting that decreased FMMCV does not result from a decrease in AWMMCV. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant motor conduction block and no correlation of the FMMCV and AWMMCV in CTS patients with a decrease of FMMCV, suggesting retrograde axonal atrophy, and not selective conduction block of the large fibers at the wrist, is the direct cause of decreased FMMCV in CTS.

Does direct measurement of forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity reflect actual nerve conduction velocity through the carpal tunnel?

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether forearm (wrist-elbow) mixed nerve conduction velocity (W-Emix) represents the actual nerve conduction velocity (CV) of nerve fibers passing through the carpal tunnel. BACKGROUND: W-Emix is presumed to reflect the actual forearm CV through the carpal tunnel. However, it has been argued that W-Emix chiefly originates from the nerve fibers passing outside the carpal tunnel. Therefore, the direct measurement of W-Emix cannot be used to assess retrograde axonal atrophy in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with clinical signs and symptoms of CTS were recruited and the diagnosis was confirmed with standard electrodiagnosis. Fifty age-matched volunteers served as control. Recording electrodes were placed over the elbow and index finger for mixed nerve and sensory nerve conduction studies, respectively. Stimulation was applied at the palm and wrist for the measurement of mixed nerve wrist-palm CV (W-Pmix), wrist-elbow CV (W-Emix), and elbow-palm CV (E-Pmix). Stimulation was applied at the elbow, wrist, and palm for the measurement of wrist-elbow sensory CV (W-Esen), wrist-palm CV (W-Psen), and elbow-palm CV (E-Psen). Comparisons were made between W-Pmix and W-Psen, W-Emix and W-Esen, and E-Pmix and E-Psen. RESULTS: Correlations between W-Emix and W-Esen, E-Pmix and E-Psen, and W-Pmix and W-Psen were good in the control. In the patient group, there was a strong positive correlation between W-Pmix and W-Psen, and between E-Pmix and E-Psen. However, W-Esen correlated weakly with W-Emix, suggesting that W-Emix chiefly represents the CV of fibers passing outside the carpal tunnel. Therefore, the direct measurement of W-Emix cannot be used to assess retrograde axonal atrophy. Furthermore, the reduction in W-Psen was more marked than the reduction in W-Esen, implying that a conduction block at the wrist is the least likely cause of proximal slowing in CTS. CONCLUSIONS: W-Emix does not reflect the actual CV of the nerve fibers passing through the carpal tunnel. In addition, retrograde axonal atrophy appears to be the primary cause of decreased forearm CV in CTS.

Forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity: questionable role in the evaluation of retrograde axonal atrophy in carpal tunnel syndrome.

The objective of this study was to determine whether forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity (Fmix) reflects the real conduction velocity of forearm motor nerve (Fmot) and forearm sensory nerve (Fsen) fibers passing through the carpal tunnel. Forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity is presumed to be indicative of the conduction velocity of the median nerve over the forearm. Therefore, Fmix is used widely to assess the causes of slowing forearm conduction velocity in carpal tunnel syndrome. However, some authors claim that Fmix comes chiefly from the undamaged fibers in carpal tunnel syndrome, and thus cannot replace Fmot or Fsen in the evaluation of retrograde axonal atrophy. Patients with clinical symptoms and signs of carpal tunnel syndrome confirmed with standard electrodiagnosis were included. Age-matched volunteers served as control subjects. Conduction velocities across the wrist and over the forearm were measured, including those of the wrist sensory (Wsen), wrist motor (Wmot), and wrist mixed nerves (Wmix); and forearm mixed (Fmix), forearm motor (Fmot), and forearm sensory nerves (Fsen). The authors compared and correlated Wsen, Wmot, and Wmix; and Fmix, Fmot, and Fsen respectively. The mean values of Wsen, Wmot, Wmix, Fmix, Fmot, and Fsen of the control subjects less those of corresponding conduction velocity of carpal tunnel syndrome patients were designated Wsen N, Wmot N, Wmix N, Fmix N, Fmot N, and Fsen N respectively and were compared and correlated again. Wrist motor nerve conduction velocity, Wsen, and Wmix were significantly lower in carpal tunnel syndrome patients, and Fmot and Fsen but not Fmix were reduced significantly when compared with control subjects. Mean wrist sensory nerve conduction velocity, Wmot N, and Wmix N; and Fsen N and Fmot N showed good correlation except for Fmix N, suggesting that Fmix reflects the conduction velocity of undamaged fibers in carpal tunnel syndrome. Forearm mixed nerve conduction velocity cannot replace Fmot or Fsen in the assessment of retrograde axonal atrophy in carpal tunnel syndrome. In the disease state, Fmix possibly represents the conduction velocity of the palmar cutaneous branch.