RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Whether myomectomy increases the risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the following pregnancies remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the following pregnancies. Moreover, different methods of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum were explored. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, including all pregnant patients in Taiwan who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2017. A 1:1 propensity score estimation matching was performed for the analysis of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum. Among pregnant patients who received myomectomy, different methods of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum were compared with the control group. RESULTS: Among the 1,371,458 pregnant patients in this study, 11,255 pregnant patients had a history of myomectomy. The risk of placenta accreta spectrum was higher in pregnant patients with a history of myomectomy than in pregnant patients without a history of myomectomy (incidence: 0.96% vs 0.20%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.81; P<.01). Among pregnant patients with a history of myomectomy, 5045 (46.87%) received laparotomic myomectomy, 3973 (36.93%) received laparoscopic myomectomy, and 1742 (16.20%) received hysteroscopic myomectomy. The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum was higher in the hysteroscopic group than in the laparotomic group or the laparoscopic group (1.89% [hysteroscopic group] vs 0.71% [laparotomic group] and 0.81% [laparoscopic group]; P<.05). Compared with patients without a history of myomectomy, the adjusted odds ratio for placenta accreta spectrum was 3.88 (95% confidence interval, 2.68-5.63; P<.05) in the hysteroscopic group. CONCLUSION: Myomectomy, especially hysteroscopic myomectomy, is associated with an increased risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the subsequent pregnancy.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Novel anticoagulants, such as factor Xa inhibitors, have entered clinical practice as alternatives to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolic event (SEE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). It is not known whether edoxaban, the fourth-to-market factor Xa inhibitor approved for this indication, will be cost-effective in Taiwan, where the cost of warfarin monitoring is prohibitive. METHODS: A Markov model projecting lifetime results of edoxaban 60 mg/30 mg dose-reduced versus warfarin in patients with nonvalvular AF, based on the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 trial, found edoxaban to be of high value relative to warfarin, from the perspective of the US health care system. We applied Taiwan-specific cost inputs to this model structure to assess the relative cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus warfarin from the perspective of the Taiwanese health care system. Event rates and hazard ratios from the ENGAGE AF - TIMI 48 East Asian subpopulation were explored in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: Edoxaban was found to be highly cost-effective compared with warfarin, based on guidelines proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO), with a base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,902 per quality-adjusted life year gained. These results were robust to variation of key model parameters, including assumptions regarding the cost and quality-of-life impact of stroke and bleeding events, and assuming East Asian-specific (as opposed to full-trial-population) rates for combinations of ischemic stroke, SEE, and major bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its higher acquisition cost, edoxaban is an economically attractive alternative to warfarin for the prevention of stroke and SEE in patients with AF in Taiwan.