RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to show the intention to treat results of treatment for spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) without anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents and the follow-up results of SISMAD according to the configuration on computed tomography (CT) scans. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational single centre study METHODS: All cases of SISMAD were enrolled consecutively from 2006 onwards. There were 25 symptomatic and four asymptomatic patients in whom SISMAD was found incidentally. The SISMAD patients were treated using a consistent therapeutic strategy without antithrombotics. SISMAD was categorized into four types based on the configuration on CT scans by Yun's classification. Follow-up CT was performed at 3 months, 6 months, and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration was 57 months (13-129 months). Improvement or complete resolution on CT scans, with no symptom recurrence, was seen in 27 patients. The non-invasive approach failed in three cases and two patients underwent further intervention. No patient died during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Weighing the risks versus benefits of antithrombotics and considering the benign nature of SISMAD, conservative treatment without antithrombotics might be sufficient in patients without evidence of bowel ischaemia or infarction on initial CT scan.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/terapia , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/patología , Isquemia Mesentérica/terapia , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Adulto , Disección Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hallazgos Incidentales , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Trombectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to introduce the phenomenon that stenosis or occlusion occurs less frequently in the innominate artery than in the right subclavian and common carotid arteries, which are not first-order branches of the aorta, in Takayasu arteritis (TA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and image findings of all patients who were diagnosed with TA from 2006 to 2014. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists interpreted the images by disease character, location, and extent of occlusion based on computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction arteriography. We have also reviewed the literature on arterial involvement in TA. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were diagnosed with TA. The mean age was 43.9 years, and 83.3% (35/42) of the patients were women. The left subclavian artery was the most common stenosis or occlusion site (17, 40.5%) among the aortic branches. The innominate artery was a less common site (3, 7.1%) than the right subclavian artery (4, 9.5%) and the right common carotid artery (9, 21.4%). All innominate artery cases were found after endovascular procedures of the right subclavian or common carotid arteries. CONCLUSION: The innominate artery might develop stenosis or occlusion less frequently than the right subclavian and common carotid arteries in Korean TA patients.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the roll changes of surgical treatment for peripheral artery disease in endovascular era. METHODS: One hundred and twelve surgically treated cases of peripheral artery disease at a single institution during the period from 2006 to 2011 were studied retrospectively. The cases were divided into two groups of different time periods, one before 2009 (surgical period group) and the other from 2009 onward (endovascular period group). We analyzed the type and location of surgery as well as clinical characteristics of patients and treatment results. RESULTS: Fifty-three cases were for the surgical period group and 59 cases for the endovascular group. No difference in the demographic characteristics and the distribution of major atherosclerosis risk factors was found between the two groups. Additionally, the technical and functional success rate was similar in both groups. However, it is found that there were more acute cases in the endovascular period group than in the surgical period group. The number of cases in need of suprainguinal or below knee exposure was similar in both groups. In hybrid cases, suprainguinal or below knee exposures were more frequently needed during the former period than the latter period. CONCLUSION: The role of surgical treatment is currently in the process of changing. Surgical treatment seems to be a complementary alternative to endovascular treatment for chronic limb ischemia. However, it still seems to play a major role for acute limb ischemia.