RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with comorbid severe mental illness (SMI) may use primary care medical homes differently than other patients with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). OBJECTIVE: To compare medical home use among patients with comorbid SMI to use among those with only chronic physical comorbidities. RESEARCH DESIGN: We examined data on children and adults with MCC for fiscal years 2008-2010, using generalized estimating equations to assess associations between SMI (major depressive disorder or psychosis) and medical home use. SUBJECTS: Medicaid and medical home enrolled children (age, 6-17 y) and adults (age, 18-64 y) in North Carolina with ≥2 of the following chronic health conditions: major depressive disorder, psychosis, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, seizure disorder, asthma, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MEASURES: We examined annual medical home participation (≥1 visit to the medical home) among enrollees and utilization (number of medical home visits) among participants. RESULTS: Compared with patients without depression or psychosis, children and adults with psychosis had lower rates of medical home participation (-12.2 and -8.2 percentage points, respectively, P<0.01) and lower utilization (-0.92 and -1.02 visits, respectively, P<0.01). Children with depression had lower participation than children without depression or psychosis (-5.0 percentage points, P<0.05). Participation and utilization among adults with depression was comparable with use among adults without depression or psychosis (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, medical home use was relatively high for Medicaid enrollees with MCC, though it was somewhat lower among those with SMI. Targeted strategies may be required to increase medical home participation and utilization among SMI patients.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients are being exposed to increasing levels of ionizing radiation, much of it from computed tomography (CT) scans. METHODS: Adults without a cancer diagnosis who received 10 or more CT scans in 2010 were identified from North Carolina Medicaid claims data and were sent a letter in July 2011 informing them of their radiation exposure; those who had undergone 20 or more CT scans in 2010 were also telephoned. The CT scan exposure of these high-exposure patients during the 12 months following these interventions was compared with that of adult Medicaid patients without cancer who had at least 1 CT scan but were not in the intervention population. RESULTS: The average number of CT scans per month for the high-exposure population decreased over time, but most of that reduction occurred 6-9 months before our interventions took place. At about the same time, the number of CT scans per month also decreased in adult Medicaid patients without cancer who had at least 1 CT scan but were not in the intervention population. LIMITATIONS: Our data do not include information about CT scans that may have been performed during times when patients were not covered by Medicaid. Some of our letters may not have been received or understood. Some high-exposure patients were unintentionally excluded from our study because organization of data on Medicaid claims varies by setting of care. CONCLUSION: Our patient education intervention was not temporally associated with significant decreases in subsequent CT exposure. Effecting behavior change to reduce exposure to ionizing radiation requires more than an educational letter or telephone call.
Asunto(s)
Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Medicaid , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Purpose: Weight management is one of the most cited levers for preventing and managing many chronic conditions, particularly those considered to be "lifestyle modifiable." However, it is unclear how much weight is a driver of illness burden among people of color. This article sought to examine whether people of color are more likely to develop "lifestyle-modifiable" conditions, including diabetes, kidney disease, heart disease, lung disease, and hypertension, both individually and in combination (multimorbidity), in the absence of being obese. Methods: Using data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System survey, we examined the risk of having these conditions among Black, Asian, Native American, Latino/a, and White respondents who reported being "normal weight" (n=86,682), while also controlling for age, gender, smoking history, physical activity, and diet. Results: For each individual condition, White respondents almost always had the lowest risk. On the other hand, Latino/a respondents had the highest rates of diabetes and kidney disease. Native American respondents had the highest rates of heart and lung disease. Black respondents had the highest rates of hypertension. Despite an otherwise healthy weight, Native American, Black, and Latino/a people were 2.5, 2.3, and 1.8 times, respectively, more likely to develop multiple chronic conditions that are typically considered "lifestyle modifiable," compared to White people. Conclusion: Disease prevention and management guidelines driven by the clinical experience of White people are insufficient for addressing the considerable illness burden that people of color continue to experience.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed data from a randomized trial to examine the impact on medication adherence of integrated treatment delivered via assertive community treatment (ACT) versus standard clinical case management (SCCM). METHOD: Data from the original study included 198 study participants with co-occurring psychotic and substance use disorders who were randomly assigned to receive integrated treatment via ACT or SCCM and were followed for 3 years. We applied mixed-effects logistic regression to estimate group (ACT vs. SCCM) by time effects on a self-report measure of medication adherence. Adherence was dichotomized as 20% or more missed medication days ("poor adherence") versus less than 20% missed medication days ("adequate adherence"). RESULTS: Participants who were assigned to ACT reported significant improvement in medication adherence compared with those assigned to SCCM. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated treatment delivered via ACT may benefit persons with co-occurring psychotic and substance use disorders who are poorly adherent to medications.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/métodos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Psicóticos/complicaciones , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo de Caso/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of medical home enrollment on acute care use and healthcare spending among Medicaid beneficiaries with mental and physical illness. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of administrative data. METHODS: We used 2007-2010 Medicaid claims and state psychiatric hospital data from a sample of 83,819 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or depression and at least 1 comorbid physical condition. We performed fixed-effects regression analysis at the person-month level to examine the effect of medical home enrollment on the probabilities of emergency department (ED) use, inpatient admission, and outpatient care use and on amount of Medicaid spending. RESULTS: Medical home enrollment had no effect on ED use in either cohort and was associated with a lower probability of inpatient admission in the depression cohort (P <.05). Medical home enrollees in both cohorts experienced an increase in the probability of having any outpatient visits (P <.05). Medical home enrollment was associated with an increase in mean monthly spending among those with schizophrenia ($65.8; P <.05) and a decrease among those with depression (-$66.4; P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicaid beneficiaries with comorbid mental and physical illness, medical home enrollment appears to increase outpatient healthcare use and has mixed effects on acute care use. For individuals in this population who previously had no engagement with the healthcare system, use of the medical home model may represent an investment in providing improved access to needed outpatient services with cost savings potential for beneficiaries with depression.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/economía , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Psiquiátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Care management of high-cost/high-needs patients is an increasingly common strategy to reduce health care costs. A variety of targeting methodologies have emerged to identify patients with high historical or predicted health care utilization, but the more pertinent question for program planners is how to identify those who are most likely to benefit from care management intervention. This paper describes the evolution of complex care management targeting strategies in Community Care of North Carolina's (CCNC) work with the statewide non-dual Medicaid population, culminating in the development of an "Impactability Score" that uses administrative data to predict achievable savings. It describes CCNC's pragmatic approach for estimating intervention effects in a historical cohort of 23,455 individuals, using a control population of 14,839 to determine expected spending at an individual level, against which actual spending could be compared. The actual-to-expected spending difference was then used as the dependent variable in a multivariate model to determine the predictive contribution of a multitude of demographic, clinical, and utilization characteristics. The coefficients from this model yielded the information required to build predictive models for prospective use. Model variables related to medication adherence and historical utilization unexplained by disease burden proved to be more important predictors of impactability than any given diagnosis or event, disease profile, or overall costs of care. Comparison of this approach to alternative targeting strategies (emergency department super-utilizers, inpatient super-utilizers, or patients with highest Hierarchical Condition Category risk scores) suggests a 2- to 3-fold higher return on investment using impactability-based targeting.
Asunto(s)
Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/normas , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Modelos Estadísticos , North Carolina , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Individuals with diabetes and individuals with serious mental illness are more likely than the general population to die prematurely. The study examined the impact of diabetes on mortality among 197 individuals with co-occurring psychotic and substance use disorders who participated in a randomized controlled study of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment. METHODS: The authors examined Medicaid claims for evidence of diabetes and applied survival analyses to examine whether time from study entry until death was different for individuals with and without evidence of diabetes. RESULTS: Of individuals with co-occurring psychotic and substance use disorders, 21% had evidence of diabetes. In a 12-year period, 41% of those with evidence of diabetes died compared with 10% of those without evidence of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeted for diabetes prevention and diabetes management are critical for persons with serious mental illness, particularly among those who also abuse substances.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus/mortalidad , Trastornos Psicóticos/mortalidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/mortalidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/rehabilitación , Manejo de Caso , Causas de Muerte , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Comorbilidad , Connecticut , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/rehabilitación , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/rehabilitación , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Primary care-based medical homes could improve the coordination of mental health care for individuals with schizophrenia and comorbid chronic conditions. The objective of this paper is to examine whether persons with schizophrenia and comorbid chronic conditions engage in primary care regularly, such that primary care settings have the potential to serve as a mental health home. METHOD: We examined the annual primary care and specialty mental health service utilization of adult North Carolina Medicaid enrollees with schizophrenia and at least one comorbid chronic condition who were in a medical home during 2007-2010. Using a fixed-effects regression approach, we also assessed the effect of medical home enrollment on utilization of primary care and specialty mental health care and medication adherence. RESULTS: A substantial majority (78.5%) of person-years had at least one primary care visit, and 17.9% had at least one primary care visit but no specialty mental health services use. Medical home enrollment was associated with increased use of primary care and specialty mental health care, as well as increased medication adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Medical home enrollees with schizophrenia and comorbid chronic conditions exhibited significant engagement in primary care, suggesting that primary-care-based medical homes could serve a care coordination function for persons with schizophrenia.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina/epidemiología , Esquizofrenia/epidemiología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The authors surveyed a sample of Project Liberty crisis counseling recipients approximately 1.5 years after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, to determine the proportion of respondents who screened positive for complicated grief, a recently identified condition marked by symptoms of continuing separation distress and accompanying bereavement-related traumatic distress. METHODS: A total of 149 service recipients drawn from eight high-volume providers responded to a telephone survey that included questions to screen for complicated grief. RESULTS: Approximately half of the recipients knew someone who had been killed in the attacks. Of those recipients, 44 percent screened positive for complicated grief. Individuals who lost a family member were more likely than those who lost an acquaintance to screen positive for complicated grief. Positive screens were associated with functional impairment independent of the presence of symptoms consistent with full or subthreshold major depression or posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Thirty-two percent of those who screened positive for complicated grief did not meet even subthreshold criteria for major depression or PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: Results affirmed the importance of complicated grief as a unique condition and indicated the need to attend to the psychological consequences of bereavement in disaster-related mental health services.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Libertad , Pesar , Tamizaje Masivo , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aflicción , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Demografía , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Project Liberty provided brief crisis counseling to 753,015 residents of New York City and surrounding counties after the attacks on the World Trade Center. Most regained predisaster functioning after counseling. For those who did not, Project Liberty provided enhanced services by specially trained, licensed mental health professionals. Individuals receiving crisis counseling and enhanced services responded to confidential telephone interviews about 18 and 24 months, respectively, after the attacks. Impairment was compared between groups to determine whether enhanced services recipients reported improved functioning and fewer symptoms of depression, posttraumatic stress, and complicated grief. METHODS: Crisis counseling recipients (N=153) were interviewed once and enhanced services recipients (N=76) were interviewed twice about symptomatology and daily functioning. RESULTS: The samples did not differ in age or gender. Significantly greater proportions of enhanced services recipients reported knowing someone who died as a result of the attacks, having been involved in rescue efforts, or having lost their job because of the attacks. Compared with crisis counseling respondents, enhanced services recipients at their first interview reported significantly more symptoms of depression, grief, and traumatic stress and significantly poorer daily functioning in five life areas. At follow-up, enhanced services respondents reported significant improvement in three of five functioning domains, significantly fewer symptoms of depression and grief, and marginally less traumatic stress. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of enhanced services were more impaired than people who received only crisis counseling. On the basis of reports from service recipients, meaningful improvements in functioning and symptoms may be associated with the receipt of enhanced services.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Cuidados Posteriores/organización & administración , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/organización & administración , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/organización & administración , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Libertad , Pesar , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adulto , Terapia Combinada , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/psicología , Enfermedades Profesionales/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Trabajo de Rescate , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Satisfaction with 11 aspects of service quality and four domains of effectiveness was assessed for counseling services offered through Project Liberty after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center. METHODS: A total of 607 Project Liberty service recipients completed anonymous questionnaires, telephone interviews, or both. The 11 aspects of quality were counselor respect for client, willingness to listen, cultural sensitivity, speaking the same language as the client, amount of counseling time, convenience of meeting time and location, information received, whether the service would be used again, whether the service would be recommended to friends or family, and overall quality of service. The four effectiveness domains were daily responsibilities, relationships, physical health, and community involvement. RESULTS: At least 89 percent of service recipients rated Project Liberty as either good or excellent across 11 service quality dimensions and four effectiveness domains. The counselor's respect for clients and his or her cultural sensitivity were rated particularly favorably. CONCLUSIONS: These ratings suggest that, from the viewpoint of these recipients of counseling services, Project Liberty counselors were largely successful in providing accessible, acceptable, and useful services after the World Trade Center disaster. Such evaluations can be conducted in a cost-effective manner and integrated with evidence-based practice to ultimately ensure that recipients of counseling receive the most efficient and effective interventions.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Libertad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Demografía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine a pattern in the frequency with which individuals who manifested distress reactions resembling diagnostic syndromes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder accessed services provided by Project Liberty. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to 31 reactions to stress (event reactions) shown by 465,428 recipients of Project Liberty counseling, to determine how well event reactions mapped onto traditional diagnostic criteria. Service recipients were tracked when they first sought Project Liberty counseling during the 27 months after the attacks. Those who reported three or more reactions associated with these clusters were characterized as having possible diagnosable conditions. RESULTS: Strong consistent clusters corresponding to traumatic stress and depressive symptoms emerged, with 26 percent, 16 percent, and 8 percent of service recipients rated as having possible PTSD, major depressive disorder, or both, respectively. Taken together, this group constituted over 40 percent of service recipients served by Project Liberty almost every month throughout the 27 months of its existence. CONCLUSIONS: Event reactions, as reported by Project Liberty crisis counselors, many of whom were nonclinicians, mapped coherently onto diagnostic syndromes, suggesting that a checklist of such reactions may be useful to disaster counselors as a cost-effective screening and planning instrument. The steady entry over time into Project Liberty counseling by a substantial number of individuals experiencing high levels of distress underscores the need for providing long-term access to mental health services postdisaster.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría)/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Libertad , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología , Análisis por Conglomerados , Comorbilidad , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciudad de Nueva York , Determinación de la Personalidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/estadística & datos numéricos , Estadística como Asunto , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study determined the likelihood and predictors of Project Liberty counseling recipients' reporting their return to satisfactory life functioning 16 to 26 months after the September 11, 2001, attacks. METHODS: Using anonymous brief paper-and-pencil questionnaires or structured telephone interviews, 452 respondents provided retrospective ratings of their functioning in five life domains during the month before the World Trade Center attacks and the month immediately before the assessment. Information on demographic characteristics and exposure to risk during the World Trade Center attacks also was obtained and used in logistic regression models. The 153 respondents who were interviewed by telephone also rated helpfulness of various coping strategies. RESULTS: In the five domains, 77 to 87 percent of the sample reported good to excellent functioning in the month before the attacks; 55 to 68 percent reported returning to at least the same level of daily functioning after the attacks. African Americans were two to four times more likely than respondents of all other races to report a return to good or excellent functioning after the attack in four domains. Compared with respondents who did not lose their job as a result of the attacks, those who did lose their job were less likely to return to good preattack functioning in two domains. Project Liberty counseling reportedly helped 90 percent of respondents return to predisaster levels of functioning. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to future terrorist attacks should consider demographic characteristics and the impact of the attack because they can affect return to preattack functioning. Counselors should support activities that facilitate positive responses and ameliorate negative psychological responses.
Asunto(s)
Adaptación Psicológica , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Intervención en la Crisis (Psiquiatría) , Libertad , Ataques Terroristas del 11 de Septiembre/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Adulto , Aflicción , Demografía , Etnicidad/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Funciones de Verosimilitud , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Derivación y Consulta , Factores de Riesgo , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/diagnóstico , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etnología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Desempleo/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Clients with co-occurring severe mental and substance use disorders are at high risk of institutionalization and other adverse outcomes. Although integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment is becoming a standard clinical approach for such clients, the optimal method for delivering integrated treatment remains unclear. METHOD: This study compared integrated treatment delivered within two different models of community-based case management (assertive community treatment and standard clinical case management). A total of 198 clients in two urban sites who had co-occurring disorders and were homeless or unstably housed were randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions and were followed for three years. RESULTS: Participants in both treatment conditions improved over time in multiple outcome domains, and few differences were found between the two models. Decreases in substance use were greater than would be expected given time alone. At the site that had higher rates of institutionalization, clients who received standard case management were more likely to be institutionalized. However, in the site that had lower rates of institutionalization, no differences in the rate of institutionalization were found between the two treatment conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated treatment can be successfully delivered either by assertive community treatment or by standard clinical case management.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Humanos , Institucionalización , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Psicoterapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
Schizophrenia is associated with several chronic medical illnesses and a reduced life expectancy. This paper summarizes findings and recommendations from "The Mount Sinai Conference," held at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York on October 17-18, 2002, and discusses the implications for improving medical monitoring of patients with schizophrenia who are managed in outpatient settings from the initiation of treatment. The Mount Sinai Conference involved a diverse panel of experts, including specialists on schizophrenia, obesity, diabetes, cardiology, endocrinology, and ophthalmology. Consensus recommendations included baseline measurement and regular monitoring of body mass index, blood glucose, lipid profiles, signs of prolactin elevation or sexual dysfunction, and movement disorders. Information from such measurements should be considered when selecting or switching antipsychotic agents and should trigger an evaluation of medication when abnormalities are detected.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Arritmias Cardíacas/inducido químicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Ganglios Basales/prevención & control , Catarata/inducido químicamente , Catarata/prevención & control , Contraindicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Humanos , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/prevención & control , Hiperprolactinemia/inducido químicamente , Hiperprolactinemia/complicaciones , Hiperprolactinemia/prevención & control , Miocarditis/inducido químicamente , Miocarditis/prevención & control , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/prevención & control , Esquizofrenia/fisiopatología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/prevención & control , Aumento de Peso/fisiologíaRESUMEN
The 30-day readmission rate is a common performance indicator for hospitals and accountable care entities. There is reason to question whether measuring readmissions as a function of hospital discharges is an appropriate measure of performance for initiatives that aim to improve overall cost and quality outcomes in a population. The objectives of this study were to compare trends in 30-day readmission rates per discharge to population-based measures of hospital admission and readmission frequency in a high-risk statewide Medicaid population over a 5-year period of quality improvement and care management intervention. Further, this study aimed to examine case-mix changes among hospitalized beneficiaries over time. This was a retrospective analysis of North Carolina Medicaid paid claims 2008 through 2012 for beneficiaries with multiple chronic or catastrophic conditions. Thirty-day readmission rates per discharge trended upward from 18.3% in 2008 to 18.7% in 2012. However, the rate of 30-day readmissions per 1000 beneficiaries declined from 123.3 to 110.7. Overall inpatient admissions per 1000 beneficiaries decreased from 579.4 to 518.5. The clinical complexity of hospitalized patients increased over the 5-year period. Although rates of hospital admissions and readmissions fell substantially in this high-risk population over 5 years, the 30-day readmission rate trend appeared unfavorable when measured as a percent of hospital discharges. This may be explained by more complex patients requiring hospitalization over time. The choice of metrics significantly affects the perceived effectiveness of improvement initiatives. Emphasis on readmission rates per discharge may be misguided for entities with a population health management focus.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Enfermedad Catastrófica , Enfermedad Crónica , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Humanos , Medicaid , North Carolina , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Claims-based indicators of follow-up within seven and 30 days after psychiatric discharge have face validity as quality measures: early follow-up may improve disease management and guide appropriate service use. Yet these indicators are rarely examined empirically. This study assessed their association with subsequent health care utilization for adults with comorbid conditions. METHODS: Postdischarge follow-up and subsequent utilization were examined among adults enrolled in North Carolina Medicaid who were discharged with claims-based diagnoses of depression or schizophrenia and not readmitted within 30 days. A total of 24,934 discharges (18,341 individuals) in fiscal years 2008-2010 were analyzed. Follow-up was categorized as occurring within 0-7 days, 8-30 days, or none in 30 days. Outcomes in the subsequent six months included psychotropic medication claims, adherence (proportion of days covered), number of hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and outpatient visits. RESULTS: Follow-up within seven days was associated with greater medication adherence and outpatient utilization, compared with no follow-up in 30 days. This was observed for both follow-up with a mental health provider and with any provider. Adults receiving mental health follow-up within seven days had equivalent, or lower, subsequent inpatient and emergency department utilization as those without follow-up within 30 days. However, adults receiving follow-up with any provider within seven days were more likely than those with no follow-up to have an inpatient admission or emergency department visit in the subsequent six months. Few differences in subsequent utilization were observed between mental health follow-up within seven days versus eight to 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: For patients not readmitted within 30 days, follow-up within 30 days appeared to be beneficial on the basis of subsequent service utilization.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Hospitalización , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Dibenzotiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Humanos , Olanzapina , Fumarato de Quetiapina , Risperidona/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This report examines whether the gains associated with changing to clozapine are greater for people who have been intolerant of first generation antipsychotic medications versus those who have been treatment-nonresponsive to previous agents. We examined data from an open-label, randomized trial that compared clozapine to usual care with first generation agents (n = 227). While most patients (n = 173, 76%) entered that study because they were nonresponsive to at least two first generation antipsychotic medications (treatment nonresponsive [TNR]), 24 percent (n = 54) were eligible because they experienced intolerable side effects (treatment intolerant [TI]). Significantly more TI patients discontinued their clozapine trial during the 2-year study compared to TNR patients, and TI patients taking clozapine were more likely to develop agranulocytosis or severe leukopenia. However, TI patients who remained on clozapine showed significant reductions in problematic behaviors and greater movement toward independent living situations than TNR patients. Clinicians should give serious consideration to offering clozapine and other second generation antipsychotic medications to patients who have demonstrated intolerance to first generation antipsychotic medications.
Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/metabolismo , Clozapina/farmacocinética , Clozapina/uso terapéutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve , Clozapina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We characterized prescribing in Connecticut's State public mental health system to assess the feasibility of implementing an evidence-based medication algorithm. Medication records for a random sample of outpatients with diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders showed prescribing patterns similar to the entire United States. The base rate of changing antipsychotic medications was moderate. Over half of patients received decanoate medications, polypharmacy was nontrivial, and there was variability in prescribing patterns across physicians. Caucasian patients were more likely to receive an atypical antipsychotic and less likely to have a decanoate medication, and Latino patients were less likely to change medications. Because the base rate of changing medications was moderate and a considerable proportion of patients were prescribed newer antipsychotic medications, introducing a research-derived medication algorithm with newer atypical antipsychotics as first line agents may fit well with current practice. Further, implementing such an algorithm may reduce racial and ethnic disparities in prescribing patterns.