Current Status, Barriers, and Future Directions for Humanized Mouse Models to Evaluate Stem Cell-Based Islet Cell Transplant.

Islet cell transplant (ITx) continues to improve, with recently published long-term outcomes suggesting nearly 80% graft survival, leading to improvements in glycemic control, reductions in insulin doses, and near-complete abrogation of severe hypoglycemia. Unfortunately, access to ITx remains limited by immunosuppression requirements and donor supply. Discovery of stem cell-derived functional islet-like clusters with the capacity to reverse diabetes offers a renewable, potentially immunosuppression-free solution for future widespread ITx. Evaluation and optimization of these therapies is ongoing, but may one day provide a realistic cure for type 1 diabetes. However, stem cell-based ITx has unique immunologic questions that remain unanswered. Here, we briefly synthesize current approaches for stem cell-derived ITx, review humanized mice models, and elaborate on the potential of humanized mice models for bridging the gap between current small rodent models and human clinical trials for allogeneic and autologous inducible pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-based ITx while highlighting limitations and future directions.

Stem Cell-Derived Islet Transplantation in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Can Diabetes Subtypes Guide Implementation?

Historically, only patients with brittle diabetes or severe recurrent hypoglycemia have been considered for islet transplantation (ITx). This population has been selected to optimize the risk-benefit profile, considering risks of long-term immunosuppression and limited organ supply. However, with the advent of stem cell (SC)-derived ITx and the potential for immunosuppression-free ITx, consideration of a broader recipient cohort may soon be justified. Simultaneously, the classical categorization of diabetes is being challenged by growing evidence in support of a clustering of disease subtypes that can be better categorized by the All New Diabetics in Scania (ANDIS) classification system. Using the ANDIS classification, 5 subtypes of diabetes have been described, each with unique causes and consequences. We evaluate consideration for ITx in the context of this broader patient population and the new classification of diabetes subtypes. In this review, we evaluate considerations for ITx based on novel diabetes subtypes, including their limitations, and we elaborate on unique transplant features that should now be considered to enable ITx in these "unconventional" patient cohorts. Based on evidence from those receiving whole pancreas transplant and our more than 20-year experience with ITx, we offer recommendations and potential research avenues to justify implementation of SC-derived ITx in broader populations of patients with all types of diabetes.

Mitochondrial regulation in human pluripotent stem cells during reprogramming and ß cell differentiation.

Mitochondria are the powerhouse of the cell and dynamically control fundamental biological processes including cell reprogramming, pluripotency, and lineage specification. Although remarkable progress in induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived cell therapies has been made, very little is known about the role of mitochondria and the mechanisms involved in somatic cell reprogramming into iPSC and directed reprogramming of iPSCs in terminally differentiated cells. Reprogramming requires changes in cellular characteristics, genomic and epigenetic regulation, as well as major mitochondrial metabolic changes to sustain iPSC self-renewal, pluripotency, and proliferation. Differentiation of autologous iPSC into terminally differentiated ß-like cells requires further metabolic adaptation. Many studies have characterized these alterations in signaling pathways required for the generation and differentiation of iPSC; however, very little is known regarding the metabolic shifts that govern pluripotency transition to tissue-specific lineage differentiation. Understanding such metabolic transitions and how to modulate them is essential for the optimization of differentiation processes to ensure safe iPSC-derived cell therapies. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of mitochondrial metabolism during somatic cell reprogramming to iPSCs and the metabolic shift that occurs during directed differentiation into pancreatic ß-like cells.

Evaluating the Potential for ABO-incompatible Islet Transplantation: Expression of ABH Antigens on Human Pancreata, Isolated Islets, and Embryonic Stem Cell-derived Islets.

BACKGROUND: ABO-incompatible transplantation has improved accessibility of kidney, heart, and liver transplantation. Pancreatic islet transplantation continues to be ABO-matched, yet ABH antigen expression within isolated human islets or novel human embryonic stem cell (hESC)-derived islets remain uncharacterized. METHODS: We evaluated ABH glycans within human pancreata, isolated islets, hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors, and the ensuing in vivo mature islets following kidney subcapsular transplantation in rats. Analyses include fluorescence immunohistochemistry and single-cell analysis using flow cytometry. RESULTS: Within the pancreas, endocrine and ductal cells do not express ABH antigens. Conversely, pancreatic acinar tissues strongly express these antigens. Acinar tissues are present in a substantial portion of cells within islet preparations obtained for clinical transplantation. The hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors and their ensuing in vivo-matured islet-like clusters do not express ABH antigens. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical pancreatic islet transplantation should remain ABO-matched because of contaminant acinar tissue within islet preparations that express ABH glycans. Alternatively, hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors and the resulting in vivo-matured hESC-derived islets do not express ABH antigens. These findings introduce the potential for ABO-incompatible cell replacement treatment and offer evidence to support scalability of hESC-derived cell therapies in type 1 diabetes.

Suspension culture improves iPSC expansion and pluripotency phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) offer potential to revolutionize regenerative medicine as a renewable source for islets, dopaminergic neurons, retinal cells, and cardiomyocytes. However, translation of these regenerative cell therapies requires cost-efficient mass manufacturing of high-quality human iPSCs. This study presents an improved three-dimensional Vertical-Wheel® bioreactor (3D suspension) cell expansion protocol with comparison to a two-dimensional (2D planar) protocol. METHODS: Sendai virus transfection of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells was used to establish mycoplasma and virus free iPSC lines without common genetic duplications or deletions. iPSCs were then expanded under 2D planar and 3D suspension culture conditions. We comparatively evaluated cell expansion capacity, genetic integrity, pluripotency phenotype, and in vitro and in vivo pluripotency potential of iPSCs. RESULTS: Expansion of iPSCs using Vertical-Wheel® bioreactors achieved 93.8-fold (IQR 30.2) growth compared to 19.1 (IQR 4.0) in 2D (p < 0.0022), the largest expansion potential reported to date over 5 days. 0.5 L Vertical-Wheel® bioreactors achieved similar expansion and further reduced iPSC production cost. 3D suspension expanded cells had increased proliferation, measured as Ki67+ expression using flow cytometry (3D: 69.4% [IQR 5.5%] vs. 2D: 57.4% [IQR 10.9%], p = 0.0022), and had a higher frequency of pluripotency marker (Oct4+Nanog+Sox2+) expression (3D: 94.3 [IQR 1.4] vs. 2D: 52.5% [IQR 5.6], p = 0.0079). q-PCR genetic analysis demonstrated a lack of duplications or deletions at the 8 most commonly mutated regions within iPSC lines after long-term passaging (> 25). 2D-cultured cells displayed a primed pluripotency phenotype, which transitioned to naïve after 3D-culture. Both 2D and 3D cells were capable of trilineage differentiation and following teratoma, 2D-expanded cells generated predominantly solid teratomas, while 3D-expanded cells produced more mature and predominantly cystic teratomas with lower Ki67+ expression within teratomas (3D: 16.7% [IQR 3.2%] vs.. 2D: 45.3% [IQR 3.0%], p = 0.002) in keeping with a naïve phenotype. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates nearly 100-fold iPSC expansion over 5-days using our 3D suspension culture protocol in Vertical-Wheel® bioreactors, the largest cell growth reported to date. 3D expanded cells showed enhanced in vitro and in vivo pluripotency phenotype that may support more efficient scale-up strategies and safer clinical implementation.

Optimizing Generation of Stem Cell-Derived Islet Cells.

Islet transplantation is a highly effective treatment for select patients with type 1 diabetes. Unfortunately, current use is limited to those with brittle disease due to donor limitations and immunosuppression requirements. Discovery of factors for induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult somatic cells into a malleable state has reinvigorated the possibility of autologous-based regenerative cell therapies. Similarly, recent progress in allogeneic human embryonic stem cell islet products is showing early success in clinical trials. Describing safe and standardized differentiation protocols with clear pathways to optimize yield and minimize off-target growth is needed to efficiently move the field forward. This review discusses current islet differentiation protocols with a detailed break-down of differentiation stages to guide step-wise controlled generation of functional islet products.

Characterization of stem-cell-derived islets during differentiation and after implantation.

Recapitulation of embryonic pancreatic development has enabled development of methods for in vitro islet cell differentiation using human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), which have the potential to cure diabetes. Advanced methods for optimal generation of stem-cell-derived islets (SC-islets) has enabled successful diabetes reversal in rodents and shown promising early clinical trial outcomes. The main impediment for use of SC-islets is concern about safety because of off-target growth resulting from contaminated residual cells. In this review, we summarize the different endocrine and non-endocrine cell populations that have been described to emerge throughout ß cell differentiation and after transplantation. We discuss the most recent approaches to enrich endocrine populations and remove off-target cells. Finally, we discuss the critical quality control and release criteria testing that we anticipate will be required prior to transplantation to ensure product safety.